COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ACETYLATION AND PARAFFIN EMULSION IMPREGNATION IN PINUS CARIBEAE

The use of wood as building material has some disadvantages, especially in relation to water and dimensional stability. Wood modification methods have been studied in the past decades, including active methods such as acetylation and passive methods such as paraffin impregnation. Acetylation is very...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of tropical forest science 2020-07, Vol.32 (3), p.237-245
Hauptverfasser: Schardosin, FZ, Nisgoski, S, Cademartori, PHG, Morrone, SR, Muniz, GIB
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 245
container_issue 3
container_start_page 237
container_title Journal of tropical forest science
container_volume 32
creator Schardosin, FZ
Nisgoski, S
Cademartori, PHG
Morrone, SR
Muniz, GIB
description The use of wood as building material has some disadvantages, especially in relation to water and dimensional stability. Wood modification methods have been studied in the past decades, including active methods such as acetylation and passive methods such as paraffin impregnation. Acetylation is very effective in avoiding water exchange in wood, but its large scale application is costly and capital demanding. Impregnation with paraffin emulsion could be a simpler and cheaper substitute method. In this context, this study had the objective to compare wood modification results of these two different methods. Pinus caribeae lamellas were acetylated and impregnated with wax emulsion in two different particle sizes. The modified slats were tested for water absorption in submersion, where the apparent contact angle was measured for distillate water, the thermal stability was tested by thermogravimetric analysis, color parameter was evaluated and near infrared (NIR) and visible light spectra were collected and segregated by principal component analysis (PCA). The particle size influenced the penetration of wax into the wood. For particle size 9 μm, the water absorption was similar to untreated wood, and similar to acetylated wood, particle size 3.9 μm. The external wax cover on the slats retained contact angles similar to acetylated wood, and higher than in untreated wood. The wax content in the slat influenced the thermogravimetric behavior of the modified wood, similar to lower equilibrium moisture content in acetylated wood. All treatments resulted in color changes of the wood surface. The principal component analysis was effective in segregating the acetylated wood from other treatments, and the different wax content in treated slats resulted in segregation of both paraffin wax-impregnated woods. Paraffin emulsion impregnation could be a substitute for acetylation when reduction in water absorption was required.
doi_str_mv 10.26525/JTFS2020.32.3.237
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2434840917</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26921871</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26921871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-858f8ddee65f9f4c415588e0c9b0bd19629f1f160b4970e0ad52a9101bbdde4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AUEoeG5NJkmbHGtNdyvddtl2Dx4k9C9Y1K5t9-C3N2vFwzDMzPu9gYfQLcEOuBz4w3MeZoABOxQc6gD1ztACOBBbCuadowUmIGxT9BJdjWOHMeXAvAV6DdLN1t9FWZpYaWjla2WpMFRBnp1GP1D5S-znkbn6yZNllH4YRomlNvs4O22jzXanVsksMYdtlOwzKzCOj8pX1-iiLd7H5uavL9E-VHmwtuN0FQV-bFeUkckWXLSirpvG5a1sWcUI50I0uJIlLmsiXZAtaYmLSyY93OCi5lBIgklZGoqVdInuZ9_D0H8dm3HSXX8cPs1LDYwywbAknlHBrKqGfhyHptWH4e2jGL41wfo3Rt1N7XiKUVPQVJsYDXQ3Q9049cM_Aa4EIjxCfwBscGcK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434840917</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ACETYLATION AND PARAFFIN EMULSION IMPREGNATION IN PINUS CARIBEAE</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Schardosin, FZ ; Nisgoski, S ; Cademartori, PHG ; Morrone, SR ; Muniz, GIB</creator><creatorcontrib>Schardosin, FZ ; Nisgoski, S ; Cademartori, PHG ; Morrone, SR ; Muniz, GIB</creatorcontrib><description>The use of wood as building material has some disadvantages, especially in relation to water and dimensional stability. Wood modification methods have been studied in the past decades, including active methods such as acetylation and passive methods such as paraffin impregnation. Acetylation is very effective in avoiding water exchange in wood, but its large scale application is costly and capital demanding. Impregnation with paraffin emulsion could be a simpler and cheaper substitute method. In this context, this study had the objective to compare wood modification results of these two different methods. Pinus caribeae lamellas were acetylated and impregnated with wax emulsion in two different particle sizes. The modified slats were tested for water absorption in submersion, where the apparent contact angle was measured for distillate water, the thermal stability was tested by thermogravimetric analysis, color parameter was evaluated and near infrared (NIR) and visible light spectra were collected and segregated by principal component analysis (PCA). The particle size influenced the penetration of wax into the wood. For particle size 9 μm, the water absorption was similar to untreated wood, and similar to acetylated wood, particle size 3.9 μm. The external wax cover on the slats retained contact angles similar to acetylated wood, and higher than in untreated wood. The wax content in the slat influenced the thermogravimetric behavior of the modified wood, similar to lower equilibrium moisture content in acetylated wood. All treatments resulted in color changes of the wood surface. The principal component analysis was effective in segregating the acetylated wood from other treatments, and the different wax content in treated slats resulted in segregation of both paraffin wax-impregnated woods. Paraffin emulsion impregnation could be a substitute for acetylation when reduction in water absorption was required.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0128-1283</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2521-9847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26525/JTFS2020.32.3.237</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kuala Lumpur: Forest Research Institute Malaysia</publisher><subject>Absorption ; Acetylation ; Color ; Construction materials ; Contact angle ; Dimensional stability ; Impregnation ; Infrared analysis ; Laboratories ; Moisture content ; Paraffin ; Paraffin wax ; Particle size ; Polyethylene ; Pressure vessels ; Principal components analysis ; Slats ; Spectrum analysis ; Stability analysis ; Substitutes ; Thermal stability ; Thermogravimetric analysis ; Water absorption ; Water content ; Water exchange</subject><ispartof>Journal of tropical forest science, 2020-07, Vol.32 (3), p.237-245</ispartof><rights>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</rights><rights>Copyright Forest Research Institute Malaysia Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-858f8ddee65f9f4c415588e0c9b0bd19629f1f160b4970e0ad52a9101bbdde4b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26921871$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26921871$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schardosin, FZ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisgoski, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cademartori, PHG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrone, SR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muniz, GIB</creatorcontrib><title>COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ACETYLATION AND PARAFFIN EMULSION IMPREGNATION IN PINUS CARIBEAE</title><title>Journal of tropical forest science</title><description>The use of wood as building material has some disadvantages, especially in relation to water and dimensional stability. Wood modification methods have been studied in the past decades, including active methods such as acetylation and passive methods such as paraffin impregnation. Acetylation is very effective in avoiding water exchange in wood, but its large scale application is costly and capital demanding. Impregnation with paraffin emulsion could be a simpler and cheaper substitute method. In this context, this study had the objective to compare wood modification results of these two different methods. Pinus caribeae lamellas were acetylated and impregnated with wax emulsion in two different particle sizes. The modified slats were tested for water absorption in submersion, where the apparent contact angle was measured for distillate water, the thermal stability was tested by thermogravimetric analysis, color parameter was evaluated and near infrared (NIR) and visible light spectra were collected and segregated by principal component analysis (PCA). The particle size influenced the penetration of wax into the wood. For particle size 9 μm, the water absorption was similar to untreated wood, and similar to acetylated wood, particle size 3.9 μm. The external wax cover on the slats retained contact angles similar to acetylated wood, and higher than in untreated wood. The wax content in the slat influenced the thermogravimetric behavior of the modified wood, similar to lower equilibrium moisture content in acetylated wood. All treatments resulted in color changes of the wood surface. The principal component analysis was effective in segregating the acetylated wood from other treatments, and the different wax content in treated slats resulted in segregation of both paraffin wax-impregnated woods. Paraffin emulsion impregnation could be a substitute for acetylation when reduction in water absorption was required.</description><subject>Absorption</subject><subject>Acetylation</subject><subject>Color</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Contact angle</subject><subject>Dimensional stability</subject><subject>Impregnation</subject><subject>Infrared analysis</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Paraffin</subject><subject>Paraffin wax</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Polyethylene</subject><subject>Pressure vessels</subject><subject>Principal components analysis</subject><subject>Slats</subject><subject>Spectrum analysis</subject><subject>Stability analysis</subject><subject>Substitutes</subject><subject>Thermal stability</subject><subject>Thermogravimetric analysis</subject><subject>Water absorption</subject><subject>Water content</subject><subject>Water exchange</subject><issn>0128-1283</issn><issn>2521-9847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9LxDAQxYMouK5-AUEoeG5NJkmbHGtNdyvddtl2Dx4k9C9Y1K5t9-C3N2vFwzDMzPu9gYfQLcEOuBz4w3MeZoABOxQc6gD1ztACOBBbCuadowUmIGxT9BJdjWOHMeXAvAV6DdLN1t9FWZpYaWjla2WpMFRBnp1GP1D5S-znkbn6yZNllH4YRomlNvs4O22jzXanVsksMYdtlOwzKzCOj8pX1-iiLd7H5uavL9E-VHmwtuN0FQV-bFeUkckWXLSirpvG5a1sWcUI50I0uJIlLmsiXZAtaYmLSyY93OCi5lBIgklZGoqVdInuZ9_D0H8dm3HSXX8cPs1LDYwywbAknlHBrKqGfhyHptWH4e2jGL41wfo3Rt1N7XiKUVPQVJsYDXQ3Q9049cM_Aa4EIjxCfwBscGcK</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Schardosin, FZ</creator><creator>Nisgoski, S</creator><creator>Cademartori, PHG</creator><creator>Morrone, SR</creator><creator>Muniz, GIB</creator><general>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>BVBZV</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ACETYLATION AND PARAFFIN EMULSION IMPREGNATION IN PINUS CARIBEAE</title><author>Schardosin, FZ ; Nisgoski, S ; Cademartori, PHG ; Morrone, SR ; Muniz, GIB</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-858f8ddee65f9f4c415588e0c9b0bd19629f1f160b4970e0ad52a9101bbdde4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Absorption</topic><topic>Acetylation</topic><topic>Color</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Contact angle</topic><topic>Dimensional stability</topic><topic>Impregnation</topic><topic>Infrared analysis</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Paraffin</topic><topic>Paraffin wax</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Polyethylene</topic><topic>Pressure vessels</topic><topic>Principal components analysis</topic><topic>Slats</topic><topic>Spectrum analysis</topic><topic>Stability analysis</topic><topic>Substitutes</topic><topic>Thermal stability</topic><topic>Thermogravimetric analysis</topic><topic>Water absorption</topic><topic>Water content</topic><topic>Water exchange</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schardosin, FZ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nisgoski, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cademartori, PHG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morrone, SR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muniz, GIB</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>East &amp; South Asia Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of tropical forest science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schardosin, FZ</au><au>Nisgoski, S</au><au>Cademartori, PHG</au><au>Morrone, SR</au><au>Muniz, GIB</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ACETYLATION AND PARAFFIN EMULSION IMPREGNATION IN PINUS CARIBEAE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of tropical forest science</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>237</spage><epage>245</epage><pages>237-245</pages><issn>0128-1283</issn><eissn>2521-9847</eissn><abstract>The use of wood as building material has some disadvantages, especially in relation to water and dimensional stability. Wood modification methods have been studied in the past decades, including active methods such as acetylation and passive methods such as paraffin impregnation. Acetylation is very effective in avoiding water exchange in wood, but its large scale application is costly and capital demanding. Impregnation with paraffin emulsion could be a simpler and cheaper substitute method. In this context, this study had the objective to compare wood modification results of these two different methods. Pinus caribeae lamellas were acetylated and impregnated with wax emulsion in two different particle sizes. The modified slats were tested for water absorption in submersion, where the apparent contact angle was measured for distillate water, the thermal stability was tested by thermogravimetric analysis, color parameter was evaluated and near infrared (NIR) and visible light spectra were collected and segregated by principal component analysis (PCA). The particle size influenced the penetration of wax into the wood. For particle size 9 μm, the water absorption was similar to untreated wood, and similar to acetylated wood, particle size 3.9 μm. The external wax cover on the slats retained contact angles similar to acetylated wood, and higher than in untreated wood. The wax content in the slat influenced the thermogravimetric behavior of the modified wood, similar to lower equilibrium moisture content in acetylated wood. All treatments resulted in color changes of the wood surface. The principal component analysis was effective in segregating the acetylated wood from other treatments, and the different wax content in treated slats resulted in segregation of both paraffin wax-impregnated woods. Paraffin emulsion impregnation could be a substitute for acetylation when reduction in water absorption was required.</abstract><cop>Kuala Lumpur</cop><pub>Forest Research Institute Malaysia</pub><doi>10.26525/JTFS2020.32.3.237</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0128-1283
ispartof Journal of tropical forest science, 2020-07, Vol.32 (3), p.237-245
issn 0128-1283
2521-9847
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2434840917
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Absorption
Acetylation
Color
Construction materials
Contact angle
Dimensional stability
Impregnation
Infrared analysis
Laboratories
Moisture content
Paraffin
Paraffin wax
Particle size
Polyethylene
Pressure vessels
Principal components analysis
Slats
Spectrum analysis
Stability analysis
Substitutes
Thermal stability
Thermogravimetric analysis
Water absorption
Water content
Water exchange
title COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF ACETYLATION AND PARAFFIN EMULSION IMPREGNATION IN PINUS CARIBEAE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T01%3A33%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=COMPARISON%20OF%20THE%20EFFECTS%20OF%20ACETYLATION%20AND%20PARAFFIN%20EMULSION%20IMPREGNATION%20IN%20PINUS%20CARIBEAE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20tropical%20forest%20science&rft.au=Schardosin,%20FZ&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=237&rft.epage=245&rft.pages=237-245&rft.issn=0128-1283&rft.eissn=2521-9847&rft_id=info:doi/10.26525/JTFS2020.32.3.237&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26921871%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434840917&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26921871&rfr_iscdi=true