Estimated exposure to glyphosate in humans via environmental, occupational, and dietary pathways: an updated review of the scientific literature

Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world, but it has also been the focus of discussion and restrictions in several countries since it was declared ‘probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)’ by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2015. Since that time, severa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Pest management science 2020-09, Vol.76 (9), p.2878-2885
1. Verfasser: Solomon, Keith R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2885
container_issue 9
container_start_page 2878
container_title Pest management science
container_volume 76
creator Solomon, Keith R
description Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world, but it has also been the focus of discussion and restrictions in several countries since it was declared ‘probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)’ by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2015. Since that time, several regulatory agencies have reviewed the public literature and guideline studies submitted for regulatory purposes and have concluded that it is not a carcinogen, and revised acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) and the reference dose (RfD) have been published. Also, restrictions on use have been lifted in many locations. Risk assessment for any pesticide requires knowledge of exposure in humans and the environment, and this paper is an update on a previous review in 2016 and includes papers published after 2016. These exposure data for air, water, bystanders, the general public, domesticated animals, pets, and applicators were combined and compared to the revised exposure criteria published by regulatory agencies. In all cases, measured and estimated systemic exposures to glyphosate in humans and animals were less than the ADIs and the RfD. Based on this large dataset, these exposures represent a de minimis risk. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry An updated review of exposures to glyphosate in humans indicates de minimis risks when systemic doses and exposures via diet are compared to revised regulatory acceptable daily intakes and reference doses.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ps.5717
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2434257278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2434257278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-104a4fca6979c9925012aadee382e039e86d32bfad9064b15f78a887da1e839a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoXkbxDSTgwoXOmKTtNHEn4g0EBRXclTPNqRPpNDVJZ-xb-MhmHHXnKic_H9_h_ITsczbijInT1o-ynOdrZJtnYjxMlZLrf7N82SI73r8xxpRSYpNsJVymLJFsm3xe-mBmEFBT_Git7xzSYOlr3bdT62NOTUOn3QwaT-cGKDZz42wzwyZAfUJtWXYtBGOb5Q8aTbXBAK6nMZ0uoPdnMaVdq79XOJwbXFBb0TBF6ksTNaYyJa1NQAchbt8lGxXUHvd-3gF5vrp8urgZ3t1f316c3w3LlPN8yFkKaVXCWOWqjEdljAsAjZhIgSxRKMc6EZMKtGLjdMKzKpcgZa6Bo0wUJANyuPK2zr536EPxZjsXz_CFSJNUZLnIZaSOVlTprPcOq6J1sS7XF5wVy-aL1hfL5iN58OPrJjPUf9xv1RE4XgELU2P_n6d4ePzWfQHKQo7O</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434257278</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimated exposure to glyphosate in humans via environmental, occupational, and dietary pathways: an updated review of the scientific literature</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Solomon, Keith R</creator><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Keith R</creatorcontrib><description>Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world, but it has also been the focus of discussion and restrictions in several countries since it was declared ‘probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)’ by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2015. Since that time, several regulatory agencies have reviewed the public literature and guideline studies submitted for regulatory purposes and have concluded that it is not a carcinogen, and revised acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) and the reference dose (RfD) have been published. Also, restrictions on use have been lifted in many locations. Risk assessment for any pesticide requires knowledge of exposure in humans and the environment, and this paper is an update on a previous review in 2016 and includes papers published after 2016. These exposure data for air, water, bystanders, the general public, domesticated animals, pets, and applicators were combined and compared to the revised exposure criteria published by regulatory agencies. In all cases, measured and estimated systemic exposures to glyphosate in humans and animals were less than the ADIs and the RfD. Based on this large dataset, these exposures represent a de minimis risk. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry An updated review of exposures to glyphosate in humans indicates de minimis risks when systemic doses and exposures via diet are compared to revised regulatory acceptable daily intakes and reference doses.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ps.5717</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31840380</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>agriculture ; air ; Animals ; applicators ; Carcinogens ; Diet ; Domestic animals ; Environmental Exposure ; Exposure ; food residues ; forestry ; Glycine - analogs &amp; derivatives ; Glycine - toxicity ; Glyphosate ; Herbicides ; Humans ; landscape ; Literature reviews ; Occupational Exposure ; Pesticides ; Pets ; POEA ; Regulatory agencies ; Risk Assessment ; water</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2020-09, Vol.76 (9), p.2878-2885</ispartof><rights>2019 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2019 Society of Chemical Industry.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-104a4fca6979c9925012aadee382e039e86d32bfad9064b15f78a887da1e839a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-104a4fca6979c9925012aadee382e039e86d32bfad9064b15f78a887da1e839a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8496-6413</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fps.5717$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fps.5717$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31840380$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Keith R</creatorcontrib><title>Estimated exposure to glyphosate in humans via environmental, occupational, and dietary pathways: an updated review of the scientific literature</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><description>Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world, but it has also been the focus of discussion and restrictions in several countries since it was declared ‘probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)’ by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2015. Since that time, several regulatory agencies have reviewed the public literature and guideline studies submitted for regulatory purposes and have concluded that it is not a carcinogen, and revised acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) and the reference dose (RfD) have been published. Also, restrictions on use have been lifted in many locations. Risk assessment for any pesticide requires knowledge of exposure in humans and the environment, and this paper is an update on a previous review in 2016 and includes papers published after 2016. These exposure data for air, water, bystanders, the general public, domesticated animals, pets, and applicators were combined and compared to the revised exposure criteria published by regulatory agencies. In all cases, measured and estimated systemic exposures to glyphosate in humans and animals were less than the ADIs and the RfD. Based on this large dataset, these exposures represent a de minimis risk. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry An updated review of exposures to glyphosate in humans indicates de minimis risks when systemic doses and exposures via diet are compared to revised regulatory acceptable daily intakes and reference doses.</description><subject>agriculture</subject><subject>air</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>applicators</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Environmental Exposure</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>food residues</subject><subject>forestry</subject><subject>Glycine - analogs &amp; derivatives</subject><subject>Glycine - toxicity</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>landscape</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Pets</subject><subject>POEA</subject><subject>Regulatory agencies</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>water</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoXkbxDSTgwoXOmKTtNHEn4g0EBRXclTPNqRPpNDVJZ-xb-MhmHHXnKic_H9_h_ITsczbijInT1o-ynOdrZJtnYjxMlZLrf7N82SI73r8xxpRSYpNsJVymLJFsm3xe-mBmEFBT_Git7xzSYOlr3bdT62NOTUOn3QwaT-cGKDZz42wzwyZAfUJtWXYtBGOb5Q8aTbXBAK6nMZ0uoPdnMaVdq79XOJwbXFBb0TBF6ksTNaYyJa1NQAchbt8lGxXUHvd-3gF5vrp8urgZ3t1f316c3w3LlPN8yFkKaVXCWOWqjEdljAsAjZhIgSxRKMc6EZMKtGLjdMKzKpcgZa6Bo0wUJANyuPK2zr536EPxZjsXz_CFSJNUZLnIZaSOVlTprPcOq6J1sS7XF5wVy-aL1hfL5iN58OPrJjPUf9xv1RE4XgELU2P_n6d4ePzWfQHKQo7O</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Solomon, Keith R</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-6413</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Estimated exposure to glyphosate in humans via environmental, occupational, and dietary pathways: an updated review of the scientific literature</title><author>Solomon, Keith R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4117-104a4fca6979c9925012aadee382e039e86d32bfad9064b15f78a887da1e839a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>agriculture</topic><topic>air</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>applicators</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Environmental Exposure</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>food residues</topic><topic>forestry</topic><topic>Glycine - analogs &amp; derivatives</topic><topic>Glycine - toxicity</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>landscape</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Pets</topic><topic>POEA</topic><topic>Regulatory agencies</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Solomon, Keith R</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Solomon, Keith R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimated exposure to glyphosate in humans via environmental, occupational, and dietary pathways: an updated review of the scientific literature</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest Manag Sci</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2878</spage><epage>2885</epage><pages>2878-2885</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><abstract>Glyphosate is one of the most widely used herbicides in the world, but it has also been the focus of discussion and restrictions in several countries since it was declared ‘probably carcinogenic to humans (Group 2A)’ by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2015. Since that time, several regulatory agencies have reviewed the public literature and guideline studies submitted for regulatory purposes and have concluded that it is not a carcinogen, and revised acceptable daily intakes (ADIs) and the reference dose (RfD) have been published. Also, restrictions on use have been lifted in many locations. Risk assessment for any pesticide requires knowledge of exposure in humans and the environment, and this paper is an update on a previous review in 2016 and includes papers published after 2016. These exposure data for air, water, bystanders, the general public, domesticated animals, pets, and applicators were combined and compared to the revised exposure criteria published by regulatory agencies. In all cases, measured and estimated systemic exposures to glyphosate in humans and animals were less than the ADIs and the RfD. Based on this large dataset, these exposures represent a de minimis risk. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry An updated review of exposures to glyphosate in humans indicates de minimis risks when systemic doses and exposures via diet are compared to revised regulatory acceptable daily intakes and reference doses.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><pmid>31840380</pmid><doi>10.1002/ps.5717</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8496-6413</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-498X
ispartof Pest management science, 2020-09, Vol.76 (9), p.2878-2885
issn 1526-498X
1526-4998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2434257278
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects agriculture
air
Animals
applicators
Carcinogens
Diet
Domestic animals
Environmental Exposure
Exposure
food residues
forestry
Glycine - analogs & derivatives
Glycine - toxicity
Glyphosate
Herbicides
Humans
landscape
Literature reviews
Occupational Exposure
Pesticides
Pets
POEA
Regulatory agencies
Risk Assessment
water
title Estimated exposure to glyphosate in humans via environmental, occupational, and dietary pathways: an updated review of the scientific literature
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T11%3A20%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimated%20exposure%20to%20glyphosate%20in%20humans%20via%20environmental,%20occupational,%20and%20dietary%20pathways:%20an%20updated%20review%20of%20the%20scientific%20literature&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Solomon,%20Keith%20R&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2878&rft.epage=2885&rft.pages=2878-2885&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ps.5717&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2434257278%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434257278&rft_id=info:pmid/31840380&rfr_iscdi=true