Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions
•Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance sh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Linguistics and education 2020-04, Vol.56, p.100808-15, Article 100808 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 100808 |
container_title | Linguistics and education |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Duran, Derya Jacknick, Christine M. |
description | •Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance shifts have differential effects on student participation.
This paper explores teacher elicitation practices following a perceived absence of a response to an initial inquiry. Specifically, we focus on whole class post-task discussions where a teacher pursues responses in post-first position following students’ non-uptake, and thus makes her orientation toward the expectation of a response publicly available. The data for this study come from 30 h of video-recorded classroom interactions in an English as a medium of instruction university in Turkey. Using Conversation Analysis, this study demonstrates that when confronted with a non-response to her initial elicitation in whole class interaction, in addition to drawing on interactional resources (e.g., designedly incomplete utterances, increments) that have been described in earlier research on response pursuits, the teacher uses two additional strategies to secure an answer: (1) modeling a response by personalizing the task, and (2) drawing on a range of multimodal resources (i.e., pedagogical artifact, embodied behavior, vocalization) to elicit engagement. The study particularly focuses on how the teacher employs multimodal tools to promote engagement and to further the progress of the ongoing pedagogical activity (i.e., reflective discussions) when a response is due but not provided. The findings have implications for understanding the design and delivery of teacher response pursuits, and thus contribute to our understanding of turn allocation practices during the whole class sharing phase in content classrooms. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2434082198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0898589820300450</els_id><sourcerecordid>2434082198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-aa5a4295cc0b9427e664457cdd0f20265b493eaee59566c3d24c9d3bd3932b883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8Fz13z1Ta5LMjiFyx4Wc8hTaZuam1rplX897bUs5cZGN73nZmHkGtGN4yy_LbeNKF9A7_hlM8jqqg6ISumCpEylctTsqJKqzSbyjm5QKwpZQWjakW2B7DuCDGJgH3XIiT9GHEMAyahTb6PXQOJayxi0nc4pIPF98QHdCNimOSX5KyyDcLVX1-T14f7w-4p3b88Pu_u9qkTig6ptZmVXGfO0VJLXkCeS5kVzntaTTfnWSm1AAuQ6SzPnfBcOu1F6YUWvFRKrMnNktvH7nMEHEzdjbGdVhouhaSKMz2r5KJysUOMUJk-hg8bfwyjZiZlarOQMjMps5CabNvFBtMHXwGiQRegdeBDBDcY34X_A34BAypzDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434082198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Duran, Derya ; Jacknick, Christine M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Duran, Derya ; Jacknick, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><description>•Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance shifts have differential effects on student participation.
This paper explores teacher elicitation practices following a perceived absence of a response to an initial inquiry. Specifically, we focus on whole class post-task discussions where a teacher pursues responses in post-first position following students’ non-uptake, and thus makes her orientation toward the expectation of a response publicly available. The data for this study come from 30 h of video-recorded classroom interactions in an English as a medium of instruction university in Turkey. Using Conversation Analysis, this study demonstrates that when confronted with a non-response to her initial elicitation in whole class interaction, in addition to drawing on interactional resources (e.g., designedly incomplete utterances, increments) that have been described in earlier research on response pursuits, the teacher uses two additional strategies to secure an answer: (1) modeling a response by personalizing the task, and (2) drawing on a range of multimodal resources (i.e., pedagogical artifact, embodied behavior, vocalization) to elicit engagement. The study particularly focuses on how the teacher employs multimodal tools to promote engagement and to further the progress of the ongoing pedagogical activity (i.e., reflective discussions) when a response is due but not provided. The findings have implications for understanding the design and delivery of teacher response pursuits, and thus contribute to our understanding of turn allocation practices during the whole class sharing phase in content classrooms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-5898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1864</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Classroom communication ; Conversation analysis ; Educational activities ; English as a medium of instruction ; Higher education ; Language of instruction ; Pedagogy ; Questions ; Response pursuits ; Teachers ; Vocalization ; Whole class discussions</subject><ispartof>Linguistics and education, 2020-04, Vol.56, p.100808-15, Article 100808</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-aa5a4295cc0b9427e664457cdd0f20265b493eaee59566c3d24c9d3bd3932b883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-aa5a4295cc0b9427e664457cdd0f20265b493eaee59566c3d24c9d3bd3932b883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589820300450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duran, Derya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacknick, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><title>Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions</title><title>Linguistics and education</title><description>•Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance shifts have differential effects on student participation.
This paper explores teacher elicitation practices following a perceived absence of a response to an initial inquiry. Specifically, we focus on whole class post-task discussions where a teacher pursues responses in post-first position following students’ non-uptake, and thus makes her orientation toward the expectation of a response publicly available. The data for this study come from 30 h of video-recorded classroom interactions in an English as a medium of instruction university in Turkey. Using Conversation Analysis, this study demonstrates that when confronted with a non-response to her initial elicitation in whole class interaction, in addition to drawing on interactional resources (e.g., designedly incomplete utterances, increments) that have been described in earlier research on response pursuits, the teacher uses two additional strategies to secure an answer: (1) modeling a response by personalizing the task, and (2) drawing on a range of multimodal resources (i.e., pedagogical artifact, embodied behavior, vocalization) to elicit engagement. The study particularly focuses on how the teacher employs multimodal tools to promote engagement and to further the progress of the ongoing pedagogical activity (i.e., reflective discussions) when a response is due but not provided. The findings have implications for understanding the design and delivery of teacher response pursuits, and thus contribute to our understanding of turn allocation practices during the whole class sharing phase in content classrooms.</description><subject>Classroom communication</subject><subject>Conversation analysis</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>English as a medium of instruction</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Language of instruction</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Response pursuits</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Vocalization</subject><subject>Whole class discussions</subject><issn>0898-5898</issn><issn>1873-1864</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8Fz13z1Ta5LMjiFyx4Wc8hTaZuam1rplX897bUs5cZGN73nZmHkGtGN4yy_LbeNKF9A7_hlM8jqqg6ISumCpEylctTsqJKqzSbyjm5QKwpZQWjakW2B7DuCDGJgH3XIiT9GHEMAyahTb6PXQOJayxi0nc4pIPF98QHdCNimOSX5KyyDcLVX1-T14f7w-4p3b88Pu_u9qkTig6ptZmVXGfO0VJLXkCeS5kVzntaTTfnWSm1AAuQ6SzPnfBcOu1F6YUWvFRKrMnNktvH7nMEHEzdjbGdVhouhaSKMz2r5KJysUOMUJk-hg8bfwyjZiZlarOQMjMps5CabNvFBtMHXwGiQRegdeBDBDcY34X_A34BAypzDw</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Duran, Derya</creator><creator>Jacknick, Christine M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions</title><author>Duran, Derya ; Jacknick, Christine M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-aa5a4295cc0b9427e664457cdd0f20265b493eaee59566c3d24c9d3bd3932b883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Classroom communication</topic><topic>Conversation analysis</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>English as a medium of instruction</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Language of instruction</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Response pursuits</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Vocalization</topic><topic>Whole class discussions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duran, Derya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacknick, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Linguistics and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duran, Derya</au><au>Jacknick, Christine M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics and education</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><spage>100808</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>100808-15</pages><artnum>100808</artnum><issn>0898-5898</issn><eissn>1873-1864</eissn><abstract>•Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance shifts have differential effects on student participation.
This paper explores teacher elicitation practices following a perceived absence of a response to an initial inquiry. Specifically, we focus on whole class post-task discussions where a teacher pursues responses in post-first position following students’ non-uptake, and thus makes her orientation toward the expectation of a response publicly available. The data for this study come from 30 h of video-recorded classroom interactions in an English as a medium of instruction university in Turkey. Using Conversation Analysis, this study demonstrates that when confronted with a non-response to her initial elicitation in whole class interaction, in addition to drawing on interactional resources (e.g., designedly incomplete utterances, increments) that have been described in earlier research on response pursuits, the teacher uses two additional strategies to secure an answer: (1) modeling a response by personalizing the task, and (2) drawing on a range of multimodal resources (i.e., pedagogical artifact, embodied behavior, vocalization) to elicit engagement. The study particularly focuses on how the teacher employs multimodal tools to promote engagement and to further the progress of the ongoing pedagogical activity (i.e., reflective discussions) when a response is due but not provided. The findings have implications for understanding the design and delivery of teacher response pursuits, and thus contribute to our understanding of turn allocation practices during the whole class sharing phase in content classrooms.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0898-5898 |
ispartof | Linguistics and education, 2020-04, Vol.56, p.100808-15, Article 100808 |
issn | 0898-5898 1873-1864 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2434082198 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Classroom communication Conversation analysis Educational activities English as a medium of instruction Higher education Language of instruction Pedagogy Questions Response pursuits Teachers Vocalization Whole class discussions |
title | Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A24%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teacher%20response%20pursuits%20in%20whole%20class%20post-task%20discussions&rft.jtitle=Linguistics%20and%20education&rft.au=Duran,%20Derya&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=56&rft.spage=100808&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=100808-15&rft.artnum=100808&rft.issn=0898-5898&rft.eissn=1873-1864&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2434082198%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434082198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0898589820300450&rfr_iscdi=true |