Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions

•Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance sh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Linguistics and education 2020-04, Vol.56, p.100808-15, Article 100808
Hauptverfasser: Duran, Derya, Jacknick, Christine M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 15
container_issue
container_start_page 100808
container_title Linguistics and education
container_volume 56
creator Duran, Derya
Jacknick, Christine M.
description •Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance shifts have differential effects on student participation. This paper explores teacher elicitation practices following a perceived absence of a response to an initial inquiry. Specifically, we focus on whole class post-task discussions where a teacher pursues responses in post-first position following students’ non-uptake, and thus makes her orientation toward the expectation of a response publicly available. The data for this study come from 30 h of video-recorded classroom interactions in an English as a medium of instruction university in Turkey. Using Conversation Analysis, this study demonstrates that when confronted with a non-response to her initial elicitation in whole class interaction, in addition to drawing on interactional resources (e.g., designedly incomplete utterances, increments) that have been described in earlier research on response pursuits, the teacher uses two additional strategies to secure an answer: (1) modeling a response by personalizing the task, and (2) drawing on a range of multimodal resources (i.e., pedagogical artifact, embodied behavior, vocalization) to elicit engagement. The study particularly focuses on how the teacher employs multimodal tools to promote engagement and to further the progress of the ongoing pedagogical activity (i.e., reflective discussions) when a response is due but not provided. The findings have implications for understanding the design and delivery of teacher response pursuits, and thus contribute to our understanding of turn allocation practices during the whole class sharing phase in content classrooms.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2434082198</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0898589820300450</els_id><sourcerecordid>2434082198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-aa5a4295cc0b9427e664457cdd0f20265b493eaee59566c3d24c9d3bd3932b883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8Fz13z1Ta5LMjiFyx4Wc8hTaZuam1rplX897bUs5cZGN73nZmHkGtGN4yy_LbeNKF9A7_hlM8jqqg6ISumCpEylctTsqJKqzSbyjm5QKwpZQWjakW2B7DuCDGJgH3XIiT9GHEMAyahTb6PXQOJayxi0nc4pIPF98QHdCNimOSX5KyyDcLVX1-T14f7w-4p3b88Pu_u9qkTig6ptZmVXGfO0VJLXkCeS5kVzntaTTfnWSm1AAuQ6SzPnfBcOu1F6YUWvFRKrMnNktvH7nMEHEzdjbGdVhouhaSKMz2r5KJysUOMUJk-hg8bfwyjZiZlarOQMjMps5CabNvFBtMHXwGiQRegdeBDBDcY34X_A34BAypzDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434082198</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Duran, Derya ; Jacknick, Christine M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Duran, Derya ; Jacknick, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><description>•Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance shifts have differential effects on student participation. This paper explores teacher elicitation practices following a perceived absence of a response to an initial inquiry. Specifically, we focus on whole class post-task discussions where a teacher pursues responses in post-first position following students’ non-uptake, and thus makes her orientation toward the expectation of a response publicly available. The data for this study come from 30 h of video-recorded classroom interactions in an English as a medium of instruction university in Turkey. Using Conversation Analysis, this study demonstrates that when confronted with a non-response to her initial elicitation in whole class interaction, in addition to drawing on interactional resources (e.g., designedly incomplete utterances, increments) that have been described in earlier research on response pursuits, the teacher uses two additional strategies to secure an answer: (1) modeling a response by personalizing the task, and (2) drawing on a range of multimodal resources (i.e., pedagogical artifact, embodied behavior, vocalization) to elicit engagement. The study particularly focuses on how the teacher employs multimodal tools to promote engagement and to further the progress of the ongoing pedagogical activity (i.e., reflective discussions) when a response is due but not provided. The findings have implications for understanding the design and delivery of teacher response pursuits, and thus contribute to our understanding of turn allocation practices during the whole class sharing phase in content classrooms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-5898</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1864</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Classroom communication ; Conversation analysis ; Educational activities ; English as a medium of instruction ; Higher education ; Language of instruction ; Pedagogy ; Questions ; Response pursuits ; Teachers ; Vocalization ; Whole class discussions</subject><ispartof>Linguistics and education, 2020-04, Vol.56, p.100808-15, Article 100808</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-aa5a4295cc0b9427e664457cdd0f20265b493eaee59566c3d24c9d3bd3932b883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-aa5a4295cc0b9427e664457cdd0f20265b493eaee59566c3d24c9d3bd3932b883</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0898589820300450$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duran, Derya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacknick, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><title>Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions</title><title>Linguistics and education</title><description>•Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance shifts have differential effects on student participation. This paper explores teacher elicitation practices following a perceived absence of a response to an initial inquiry. Specifically, we focus on whole class post-task discussions where a teacher pursues responses in post-first position following students’ non-uptake, and thus makes her orientation toward the expectation of a response publicly available. The data for this study come from 30 h of video-recorded classroom interactions in an English as a medium of instruction university in Turkey. Using Conversation Analysis, this study demonstrates that when confronted with a non-response to her initial elicitation in whole class interaction, in addition to drawing on interactional resources (e.g., designedly incomplete utterances, increments) that have been described in earlier research on response pursuits, the teacher uses two additional strategies to secure an answer: (1) modeling a response by personalizing the task, and (2) drawing on a range of multimodal resources (i.e., pedagogical artifact, embodied behavior, vocalization) to elicit engagement. The study particularly focuses on how the teacher employs multimodal tools to promote engagement and to further the progress of the ongoing pedagogical activity (i.e., reflective discussions) when a response is due but not provided. The findings have implications for understanding the design and delivery of teacher response pursuits, and thus contribute to our understanding of turn allocation practices during the whole class sharing phase in content classrooms.</description><subject>Classroom communication</subject><subject>Conversation analysis</subject><subject>Educational activities</subject><subject>English as a medium of instruction</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Language of instruction</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Response pursuits</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Vocalization</subject><subject>Whole class discussions</subject><issn>0898-5898</issn><issn>1873-1864</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-Aw8Fz13z1Ta5LMjiFyx4Wc8hTaZuam1rplX897bUs5cZGN73nZmHkGtGN4yy_LbeNKF9A7_hlM8jqqg6ISumCpEylctTsqJKqzSbyjm5QKwpZQWjakW2B7DuCDGJgH3XIiT9GHEMAyahTb6PXQOJayxi0nc4pIPF98QHdCNimOSX5KyyDcLVX1-T14f7w-4p3b88Pu_u9qkTig6ptZmVXGfO0VJLXkCeS5kVzntaTTfnWSm1AAuQ6SzPnfBcOu1F6YUWvFRKrMnNktvH7nMEHEzdjbGdVhouhaSKMz2r5KJysUOMUJk-hg8bfwyjZiZlarOQMjMps5CabNvFBtMHXwGiQRegdeBDBDcY34X_A34BAypzDw</recordid><startdate>202004</startdate><enddate>202004</enddate><creator>Duran, Derya</creator><creator>Jacknick, Christine M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>8BM</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202004</creationdate><title>Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions</title><author>Duran, Derya ; Jacknick, Christine M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-aa5a4295cc0b9427e664457cdd0f20265b493eaee59566c3d24c9d3bd3932b883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Classroom communication</topic><topic>Conversation analysis</topic><topic>Educational activities</topic><topic>English as a medium of instruction</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Language of instruction</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Response pursuits</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Vocalization</topic><topic>Whole class discussions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duran, Derya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jacknick, Christine M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ComDisDome</collection><jtitle>Linguistics and education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duran, Derya</au><au>Jacknick, Christine M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions</atitle><jtitle>Linguistics and education</jtitle><date>2020-04</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>56</volume><spage>100808</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>100808-15</pages><artnum>100808</artnum><issn>0898-5898</issn><eissn>1873-1864</eissn><abstract>•Multimodal resources are critical in the delivery of teachers’ response pursuits.•Response-mobilizing features have regulatory functions that adjust the initial inquiry.•Students’ willingness to participate is affected by lack of a next designated speaker and delicacy.•Teachers’ epistemic stance shifts have differential effects on student participation. This paper explores teacher elicitation practices following a perceived absence of a response to an initial inquiry. Specifically, we focus on whole class post-task discussions where a teacher pursues responses in post-first position following students’ non-uptake, and thus makes her orientation toward the expectation of a response publicly available. The data for this study come from 30 h of video-recorded classroom interactions in an English as a medium of instruction university in Turkey. Using Conversation Analysis, this study demonstrates that when confronted with a non-response to her initial elicitation in whole class interaction, in addition to drawing on interactional resources (e.g., designedly incomplete utterances, increments) that have been described in earlier research on response pursuits, the teacher uses two additional strategies to secure an answer: (1) modeling a response by personalizing the task, and (2) drawing on a range of multimodal resources (i.e., pedagogical artifact, embodied behavior, vocalization) to elicit engagement. The study particularly focuses on how the teacher employs multimodal tools to promote engagement and to further the progress of the ongoing pedagogical activity (i.e., reflective discussions) when a response is due but not provided. The findings have implications for understanding the design and delivery of teacher response pursuits, and thus contribute to our understanding of turn allocation practices during the whole class sharing phase in content classrooms.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-5898
ispartof Linguistics and education, 2020-04, Vol.56, p.100808-15, Article 100808
issn 0898-5898
1873-1864
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2434082198
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Classroom communication
Conversation analysis
Educational activities
English as a medium of instruction
Higher education
Language of instruction
Pedagogy
Questions
Response pursuits
Teachers
Vocalization
Whole class discussions
title Teacher response pursuits in whole class post-task discussions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T06%3A24%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teacher%20response%20pursuits%20in%20whole%20class%20post-task%20discussions&rft.jtitle=Linguistics%20and%20education&rft.au=Duran,%20Derya&rft.date=2020-04&rft.volume=56&rft.spage=100808&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=100808-15&rft.artnum=100808&rft.issn=0898-5898&rft.eissn=1873-1864&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.linged.2020.100808&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2434082198%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434082198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0898589820300450&rfr_iscdi=true