Read in or check out: A four-year analysis of circulation and in-house use of print books

As libraries offer more multi-dimensional study areas and online resources, it is important to understand how print books are being used. The reported decline in print book circulation has largely been based on books checked out of the library without recording in-house use (books used in the librar...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of academic librarianship 2020-07, Vol.46 (4), p.102157, Article 102157
Hauptverfasser: Rose-Wiles, Lisa M., Shea, Gerard, Kehnemuyi, Kaitlin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 102157
container_title The Journal of academic librarianship
container_volume 46
creator Rose-Wiles, Lisa M.
Shea, Gerard
Kehnemuyi, Kaitlin
description As libraries offer more multi-dimensional study areas and online resources, it is important to understand how print books are being used. The reported decline in print book circulation has largely been based on books checked out of the library without recording in-house use (books used in the library but not checked out). Including in-house use gives a more accurate representation of book circulation, helping to demonstrate the value of the physical library and print collections, and informing collection development. To better understand how our print collections are being used, we analyze holdings, checkout data, and in-house use data by subject, as well as circulation in regard to patron group, library gate count and student enrollment. Our findings show declining use of all print collections with the steepest decline in reference books. The majority of books used in house were not checked out, affirming the need to include in-house use data to provide an accurate picture of print book use and inform collection development. We use our findings to inform the redesign of our reference collection and suggest ways to integrate print and digital formats and promote the value of books and reading.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102157
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2434071478</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0099133320300604</els_id><sourcerecordid>2434071478</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bc3c316e9785b646ceede50c97d10bd7695ae207a7440c9cf7e3047181fe31023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE9LwzAYh4MoOKffwEPAo3QmTZq0HoQx_AcDQfTgKaTpW5ZuNjNplX17Uzs8ioXQ8Ob3hF8ehM4pmVFCxVUz00ZvbDlLSTqMUprJAzShuSwSWhTFIZoQUsQ9Y-wYnYTQkPjRNJugt2fQFbYtdh6bFZg1dn13jee4dr1PdqA91q3e7IIN2NXYWG_6je6sa-N8AJOV6wPgYcXzrbdth0vn1uEUHdV6E-Bs_5-i17vbl8VDsny6f1zMl4lhjHdJaZhhVEAh86wUXBiACjJiCllRUlZSFJmGlEgtOY9TU0tghEua0xpYfCqboovx3q13Hz2ETjWxeuwcVMoZJ5JymccUH1PGuxA81CpWfdd-pyhRg0TVqFGiGiSqUWLE8hH7gtLVwVhoDfyiUWLGiciEGHyKhe1-zCxc33YRvfw_GtM3Yxqiqk8LXu2Jynownaqc_bvpN0H1m3o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434071478</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Read in or check out: A four-year analysis of circulation and in-house use of print books</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Rose-Wiles, Lisa M. ; Shea, Gerard ; Kehnemuyi, Kaitlin</creator><creatorcontrib>Rose-Wiles, Lisa M. ; Shea, Gerard ; Kehnemuyi, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><description>As libraries offer more multi-dimensional study areas and online resources, it is important to understand how print books are being used. The reported decline in print book circulation has largely been based on books checked out of the library without recording in-house use (books used in the library but not checked out). Including in-house use gives a more accurate representation of book circulation, helping to demonstrate the value of the physical library and print collections, and informing collection development. To better understand how our print collections are being used, we analyze holdings, checkout data, and in-house use data by subject, as well as circulation in regard to patron group, library gate count and student enrollment. Our findings show declining use of all print collections with the steepest decline in reference books. The majority of books used in house were not checked out, affirming the need to include in-house use data to provide an accurate picture of print book use and inform collection development. We use our findings to inform the redesign of our reference collection and suggest ways to integrate print and digital formats and promote the value of books and reading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-1333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1999</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102157</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Academic libraries ; Circulation ; Collection analysis ; Collection assessment ; Collection development ; E-books ; Enrollment ; In-house use ; Information Science &amp; Library Science ; Internet resources ; Libraries ; Library Services ; Printed materials ; Reference Materials ; Science &amp; Technology ; Technology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of academic librarianship, 2020-07, Vol.46 (4), p.102157, Article 102157</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>5</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000540656600006</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bc3c316e9785b646ceede50c97d10bd7695ae207a7440c9cf7e3047181fe31023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bc3c316e9785b646ceede50c97d10bd7695ae207a7440c9cf7e3047181fe31023</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6757-7160</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102157$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rose-Wiles, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehnemuyi, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><title>Read in or check out: A four-year analysis of circulation and in-house use of print books</title><title>The Journal of academic librarianship</title><addtitle>J ACAD LIBR</addtitle><description>As libraries offer more multi-dimensional study areas and online resources, it is important to understand how print books are being used. The reported decline in print book circulation has largely been based on books checked out of the library without recording in-house use (books used in the library but not checked out). Including in-house use gives a more accurate representation of book circulation, helping to demonstrate the value of the physical library and print collections, and informing collection development. To better understand how our print collections are being used, we analyze holdings, checkout data, and in-house use data by subject, as well as circulation in regard to patron group, library gate count and student enrollment. Our findings show declining use of all print collections with the steepest decline in reference books. The majority of books used in house were not checked out, affirming the need to include in-house use data to provide an accurate picture of print book use and inform collection development. We use our findings to inform the redesign of our reference collection and suggest ways to integrate print and digital formats and promote the value of books and reading.</description><subject>Academic libraries</subject><subject>Circulation</subject><subject>Collection analysis</subject><subject>Collection assessment</subject><subject>Collection development</subject><subject>E-books</subject><subject>Enrollment</subject><subject>In-house use</subject><subject>Information Science &amp; Library Science</subject><subject>Internet resources</subject><subject>Libraries</subject><subject>Library Services</subject><subject>Printed materials</subject><subject>Reference Materials</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Technology</subject><issn>0099-1333</issn><issn>1879-1999</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkE9LwzAYh4MoOKffwEPAo3QmTZq0HoQx_AcDQfTgKaTpW5ZuNjNplX17Uzs8ioXQ8Ob3hF8ehM4pmVFCxVUz00ZvbDlLSTqMUprJAzShuSwSWhTFIZoQUsQ9Y-wYnYTQkPjRNJugt2fQFbYtdh6bFZg1dn13jee4dr1PdqA91q3e7IIN2NXYWG_6je6sa-N8AJOV6wPgYcXzrbdth0vn1uEUHdV6E-Bs_5-i17vbl8VDsny6f1zMl4lhjHdJaZhhVEAh86wUXBiACjJiCllRUlZSFJmGlEgtOY9TU0tghEua0xpYfCqboovx3q13Hz2ETjWxeuwcVMoZJ5JymccUH1PGuxA81CpWfdd-pyhRg0TVqFGiGiSqUWLE8hH7gtLVwVhoDfyiUWLGiciEGHyKhe1-zCxc33YRvfw_GtM3Yxqiqk8LXu2Jynownaqc_bvpN0H1m3o</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Rose-Wiles, Lisa M.</creator><creator>Shea, Gerard</creator><creator>Kehnemuyi, Kaitlin</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-7160</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Read in or check out: A four-year analysis of circulation and in-house use of print books</title><author>Rose-Wiles, Lisa M. ; Shea, Gerard ; Kehnemuyi, Kaitlin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-bc3c316e9785b646ceede50c97d10bd7695ae207a7440c9cf7e3047181fe31023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Academic libraries</topic><topic>Circulation</topic><topic>Collection analysis</topic><topic>Collection assessment</topic><topic>Collection development</topic><topic>E-books</topic><topic>Enrollment</topic><topic>In-house use</topic><topic>Information Science &amp; Library Science</topic><topic>Internet resources</topic><topic>Libraries</topic><topic>Library Services</topic><topic>Printed materials</topic><topic>Reference Materials</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rose-Wiles, Lisa M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shea, Gerard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kehnemuyi, Kaitlin</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI &amp; AHCI)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of academic librarianship</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rose-Wiles, Lisa M.</au><au>Shea, Gerard</au><au>Kehnemuyi, Kaitlin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Read in or check out: A four-year analysis of circulation and in-house use of print books</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of academic librarianship</jtitle><stitle>J ACAD LIBR</stitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>102157</spage><pages>102157-</pages><artnum>102157</artnum><issn>0099-1333</issn><eissn>1879-1999</eissn><abstract>As libraries offer more multi-dimensional study areas and online resources, it is important to understand how print books are being used. The reported decline in print book circulation has largely been based on books checked out of the library without recording in-house use (books used in the library but not checked out). Including in-house use gives a more accurate representation of book circulation, helping to demonstrate the value of the physical library and print collections, and informing collection development. To better understand how our print collections are being used, we analyze holdings, checkout data, and in-house use data by subject, as well as circulation in regard to patron group, library gate count and student enrollment. Our findings show declining use of all print collections with the steepest decline in reference books. The majority of books used in house were not checked out, affirming the need to include in-house use data to provide an accurate picture of print book use and inform collection development. We use our findings to inform the redesign of our reference collection and suggest ways to integrate print and digital formats and promote the value of books and reading.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102157</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6757-7160</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0099-1333
ispartof The Journal of academic librarianship, 2020-07, Vol.46 (4), p.102157, Article 102157
issn 0099-1333
1879-1999
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2434071478
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Academic libraries
Circulation
Collection analysis
Collection assessment
Collection development
E-books
Enrollment
In-house use
Information Science & Library Science
Internet resources
Libraries
Library Services
Printed materials
Reference Materials
Science & Technology
Technology
title Read in or check out: A four-year analysis of circulation and in-house use of print books
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T07%3A11%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Read%20in%20or%20check%20out:%20A%20four-year%20analysis%20of%20circulation%20and%20in-house%20use%20of%20print%20books&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20academic%20librarianship&rft.au=Rose-Wiles,%20Lisa%20M.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=102157&rft.pages=102157-&rft.artnum=102157&rft.issn=0099-1333&rft.eissn=1879-1999&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102157&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2434071478%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434071478&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0099133320300604&rfr_iscdi=true