The U.S.-China Trade War: Is Food China’s Most Powerful Weapon?
This article examines the concept of “food power,” analyzes China’s use of food as a foreign policy instrument against the U.S. in the context of their trade war, and considers the potential implications. MAIN ARGUMENT The food power balance between the U.S. and China is affected by four key factors...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Asia policy 2020-07, Vol.15 (3), p.59-86 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 86 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | Asia policy |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Hongzhou, Zhang |
description | This article examines the concept of “food power,” analyzes China’s use of food as a foreign policy instrument against the U.S. in the context of their trade war, and considers the potential implications.
MAIN ARGUMENT
The food power balance between the U.S. and China is affected by four key factors: scarcity, the concentration of supply, the degree of demand dispersion, and action independence. Since emerging as the leading food importer, China has successfully tipped the food power balance in its favor through overseas agricultural investment, import diversification, and cultivation of its own global agribusiness. In addition, the global food glut and the critical importance of rural support for Donald Trump’s re-election campaign further increase China’s leverage in bilateral food trade. With this newly gained food power, the Chinese government, which used to be a victim of U.S. food embargoes, has started using food as a foreign policy instrument to influence U.S. policy amid the ongoing trade war. While China appears to have achieved limited success against the Trump administration through food power, the potential costs to both China and the world of weaponizing food trade could be huge.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
• While it is understandable that China seeks to leverage its newly gained food power against the U.S., serious caution must be exercised. There are severe liabilities for the global economy and adverse effects for both countries when food is weaponized.
• So long as the food relationship is relatively symmetrical, the political leverage that food provides China against the U.S. is ephemeral because the balance of food power could easily be tipped in either direction.
• Given China’s increasing dependence on the global market for its food supply, a stable and flourishing food trade system will be critical to the country’s overall food security. This means that attempts by China to use food as a foreign policy instrument are ultimately counterproductive. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1353/asp.2020.0044 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2434044095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27023923</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27023923</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-68954347b85f494fd336d9c6804c54e98507759f04b5f3bbf00ff32217e47e8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFaPgheh4DlxMrObzRylWBUKHpricUnSXdpgm7qbHvz3bmipp5nD-8HzCnGfQZqRoucq7FMEhBRAygsxypTiBDmHy9MPnBfX4iaEFkApDTQSD-XaTpbpIk2m682umpS-WtnJV-VvxZWrvoO9O92xWM5ey-l7Mv98-5i-zJOGCPskL1hJkroulJMs3YooX3GTFyAbJS0XCrRW7EDWylFdOwDnCDHTVmpbWBqLp2Pu3nc_Bxt603YHv4uVBmNwJAFWUZUcVY3vQvDWmb3fbCv_azIwA7yJ8GaANwN81MtzamubfnsI9j9Y54iszGIYZdgHgQCAOdoej7Y29J0_d6AGJEaiPyukYe4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2434044095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The U.S.-China Trade War: Is Food China’s Most Powerful Weapon?</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hongzhou, Zhang</creator><creatorcontrib>Hongzhou, Zhang</creatorcontrib><description>This article examines the concept of “food power,” analyzes China’s use of food as a foreign policy instrument against the U.S. in the context of their trade war, and considers the potential implications.
MAIN ARGUMENT
The food power balance between the U.S. and China is affected by four key factors: scarcity, the concentration of supply, the degree of demand dispersion, and action independence. Since emerging as the leading food importer, China has successfully tipped the food power balance in its favor through overseas agricultural investment, import diversification, and cultivation of its own global agribusiness. In addition, the global food glut and the critical importance of rural support for Donald Trump’s re-election campaign further increase China’s leverage in bilateral food trade. With this newly gained food power, the Chinese government, which used to be a victim of U.S. food embargoes, has started using food as a foreign policy instrument to influence U.S. policy amid the ongoing trade war. While China appears to have achieved limited success against the Trump administration through food power, the potential costs to both China and the world of weaponizing food trade could be huge.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
• While it is understandable that China seeks to leverage its newly gained food power against the U.S., serious caution must be exercised. There are severe liabilities for the global economy and adverse effects for both countries when food is weaponized.
• So long as the food relationship is relatively symmetrical, the political leverage that food provides China against the U.S. is ephemeral because the balance of food power could easily be tipped in either direction.
• Given China’s increasing dependence on the global market for its food supply, a stable and flourishing food trade system will be critical to the country’s overall food security. This means that attempts by China to use food as a foreign policy instrument are ultimately counterproductive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1559-0968</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-2960</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1353/asp.2020.0044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Seattle: National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR)</publisher><subject>Agribusiness ; Agricultural investment ; ARTICLES AND ESSAYS ; Balance of power ; Cold War ; Embargoes & blockades ; Exports ; Food security ; Food supply ; Foreign policy ; Global economy ; International trade ; National security ; Political campaigns ; Politics ; Power ; Rural areas ; Scarcity ; Tariffs ; Trade disputes ; Trade policy ; Trump, Donald J ; War ; World War II</subject><ispartof>Asia policy, 2020-07, Vol.15 (3), p.59-86</ispartof><rights>The National Bureau of Asian Research</rights><rights>Copyright © The National Bureau of Asian Research, Seattle, Washington</rights><rights>Copyright The National Bureau of Asian Research Jul 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-68954347b85f494fd336d9c6804c54e98507759f04b5f3bbf00ff32217e47e8e3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27023923$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27023923$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27864,27922,27923,58015,58248</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hongzhou, Zhang</creatorcontrib><title>The U.S.-China Trade War: Is Food China’s Most Powerful Weapon?</title><title>Asia policy</title><description>This article examines the concept of “food power,” analyzes China’s use of food as a foreign policy instrument against the U.S. in the context of their trade war, and considers the potential implications.
MAIN ARGUMENT
The food power balance between the U.S. and China is affected by four key factors: scarcity, the concentration of supply, the degree of demand dispersion, and action independence. Since emerging as the leading food importer, China has successfully tipped the food power balance in its favor through overseas agricultural investment, import diversification, and cultivation of its own global agribusiness. In addition, the global food glut and the critical importance of rural support for Donald Trump’s re-election campaign further increase China’s leverage in bilateral food trade. With this newly gained food power, the Chinese government, which used to be a victim of U.S. food embargoes, has started using food as a foreign policy instrument to influence U.S. policy amid the ongoing trade war. While China appears to have achieved limited success against the Trump administration through food power, the potential costs to both China and the world of weaponizing food trade could be huge.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
• While it is understandable that China seeks to leverage its newly gained food power against the U.S., serious caution must be exercised. There are severe liabilities for the global economy and adverse effects for both countries when food is weaponized.
• So long as the food relationship is relatively symmetrical, the political leverage that food provides China against the U.S. is ephemeral because the balance of food power could easily be tipped in either direction.
• Given China’s increasing dependence on the global market for its food supply, a stable and flourishing food trade system will be critical to the country’s overall food security. This means that attempts by China to use food as a foreign policy instrument are ultimately counterproductive.</description><subject>Agribusiness</subject><subject>Agricultural investment</subject><subject>ARTICLES AND ESSAYS</subject><subject>Balance of power</subject><subject>Cold War</subject><subject>Embargoes & blockades</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>National security</subject><subject>Political campaigns</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Scarcity</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Trade disputes</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Trump, Donald J</subject><subject>War</subject><subject>World War II</subject><issn>1559-0968</issn><issn>1559-2960</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkE1Lw0AQhhdRsFaPgheh4DlxMrObzRylWBUKHpricUnSXdpgm7qbHvz3bmipp5nD-8HzCnGfQZqRoucq7FMEhBRAygsxypTiBDmHy9MPnBfX4iaEFkApDTQSD-XaTpbpIk2m682umpS-WtnJV-VvxZWrvoO9O92xWM5ey-l7Mv98-5i-zJOGCPskL1hJkroulJMs3YooX3GTFyAbJS0XCrRW7EDWylFdOwDnCDHTVmpbWBqLp2Pu3nc_Bxt603YHv4uVBmNwJAFWUZUcVY3vQvDWmb3fbCv_azIwA7yJ8GaANwN81MtzamubfnsI9j9Y54iszGIYZdgHgQCAOdoej7Y29J0_d6AGJEaiPyukYe4</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Hongzhou, Zhang</creator><general>National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR)</general><general>National Bureau of Asian Research</general><general>The National Bureau of Asian Research</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>The U.S.-China Trade War</title><author>Hongzhou, Zhang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c332t-68954347b85f494fd336d9c6804c54e98507759f04b5f3bbf00ff32217e47e8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agribusiness</topic><topic>Agricultural investment</topic><topic>ARTICLES AND ESSAYS</topic><topic>Balance of power</topic><topic>Cold War</topic><topic>Embargoes & blockades</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>National security</topic><topic>Political campaigns</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Scarcity</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Trade disputes</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Trump, Donald J</topic><topic>War</topic><topic>World War II</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hongzhou, Zhang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Asia policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hongzhou, Zhang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The U.S.-China Trade War: Is Food China’s Most Powerful Weapon?</atitle><jtitle>Asia policy</jtitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>59</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>59-86</pages><issn>1559-0968</issn><eissn>1559-2960</eissn><abstract>This article examines the concept of “food power,” analyzes China’s use of food as a foreign policy instrument against the U.S. in the context of their trade war, and considers the potential implications.
MAIN ARGUMENT
The food power balance between the U.S. and China is affected by four key factors: scarcity, the concentration of supply, the degree of demand dispersion, and action independence. Since emerging as the leading food importer, China has successfully tipped the food power balance in its favor through overseas agricultural investment, import diversification, and cultivation of its own global agribusiness. In addition, the global food glut and the critical importance of rural support for Donald Trump’s re-election campaign further increase China’s leverage in bilateral food trade. With this newly gained food power, the Chinese government, which used to be a victim of U.S. food embargoes, has started using food as a foreign policy instrument to influence U.S. policy amid the ongoing trade war. While China appears to have achieved limited success against the Trump administration through food power, the potential costs to both China and the world of weaponizing food trade could be huge.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
• While it is understandable that China seeks to leverage its newly gained food power against the U.S., serious caution must be exercised. There are severe liabilities for the global economy and adverse effects for both countries when food is weaponized.
• So long as the food relationship is relatively symmetrical, the political leverage that food provides China against the U.S. is ephemeral because the balance of food power could easily be tipped in either direction.
• Given China’s increasing dependence on the global market for its food supply, a stable and flourishing food trade system will be critical to the country’s overall food security. This means that attempts by China to use food as a foreign policy instrument are ultimately counterproductive.</abstract><cop>Seattle</cop><pub>National Bureau of Asian Research (NBR)</pub><doi>10.1353/asp.2020.0044</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1559-0968 |
ispartof | Asia policy, 2020-07, Vol.15 (3), p.59-86 |
issn | 1559-0968 1559-2960 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2434044095 |
source | PAIS Index; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agribusiness Agricultural investment ARTICLES AND ESSAYS Balance of power Cold War Embargoes & blockades Exports Food security Food supply Foreign policy Global economy International trade National security Political campaigns Politics Power Rural areas Scarcity Tariffs Trade disputes Trade policy Trump, Donald J War World War II |
title | The U.S.-China Trade War: Is Food China’s Most Powerful Weapon? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T05%3A50%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20U.S.-China%20Trade%20War:%20Is%20Food%20China%E2%80%99s%20Most%20Powerful%20Weapon?&rft.jtitle=Asia%20policy&rft.au=Hongzhou,%20Zhang&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=59&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=59-86&rft.issn=1559-0968&rft.eissn=1559-2960&rft_id=info:doi/10.1353/asp.2020.0044&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27023923%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2434044095&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27023923&rfr_iscdi=true |