Correlation of displacement vector fields calculated by different deformable image registration algorithms with motion parameters in helical, axial and cone beam CT imaging

Aim:The purpose of this study is to investigate quantitatively the correlation of displacement vector fields (DVFs) from different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms to register images from helical computed tomography (HCT), axial computed tomography (ACT) and cone beam computed tomograp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radiotherapy in practice 2020-09, Vol.19 (3), p.219-225
Hauptverfasser: Alsbou, Nesreen, Ahmad, Salahuddin, Ali, Imad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 225
container_issue 3
container_start_page 219
container_title Journal of radiotherapy in practice
container_volume 19
creator Alsbou, Nesreen
Ahmad, Salahuddin
Ali, Imad
description Aim:The purpose of this study is to investigate quantitatively the correlation of displacement vector fields (DVFs) from different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms to register images from helical computed tomography (HCT), axial computed tomography (ACT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with motion parameters.Materials and methods:CT images obtained from scanning of the mobile phantom were registered with the stationary CT images using four DIR algorithms from the DIRART software: Demons, Fast-Demons, Horn–Schunck and Lucas–Kanade. HCT, ACT and CBCT imaging techniques were used to image a mobile phantom, which included three targets with different sizes (small, medium and large) that were manufactured from a water-equivalent material and embedded in low-density foam to simulate lung lesions. The phantom was moved with controlled cyclic motion patterns where a range of motion amplitudes (0–20 mm) and frequencies (0·125–0·5 Hz) were used.Results:The DVF obtained from different algorithms correlated well with motion amplitudes applied on the mobile phantom for CBCT and HCT, where the maximal DVF increased linearly with the motion amplitudes of the mobile phantom. In ACT, the DVF correlated less with motion amplitudes where motion-induced strong image artefacts and the DIR algorithms were not able to deform the ACT image of the mobile targets to the stationary targets. Three DIR algorithms produce comparable values and patterns of the DVF for certain CT imaging modality. However, DVF from Fast-Demons deviated strongly from other algorithms at large motion amplitudes.Conclusions:The local DVFs provide direct quantitative values for the actual internal tumour shifts that can be used to determine margins for the internal target volume that consider tumour motion during treatment planning. Furthermore, the DVF distributions can be used to extract motion parameters such as motion amplitude that can be extracted from the maximal or minimal DVF calculated by the different DIR algorithms and used in the management of the patient motion.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1460396919000657
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2433792564</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1460396919000657</cupid><sourcerecordid>2433792564</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-bf98c7fae49923ac90c70051a53f2a4bce1ec280fce88c0cade2e652dff3a8943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctO7DAMhisEEtcHYGeJLYWk6S3LoxE3CYkFsK7c1ClBaTPH6cDhnXhIOjNIZ4FY2bK__0skJ8mpFBdSyOryUealULrUUgshyqLaSQ7mUZVKqeTuphfper-fHMb4KkSe56I6SD4XgZk8Ti6MECx0Li49GhponOCNzBQYrCPfRTDozWomqYP2YwatJV5THdnAA7aewA3YEzD1Lk68daLvA7vpZYjwPhcYwma8RMaBJuIIboQX8m7WnwP-c-gBxw5MGAlawgEWTxuvG_vjZM-ij3TyXY-S5-urp8Vtev9wc7f4c5-arNRT2lpdm8oi5VpnCo0WphKikFgom2HeGpJkslpYQ3VthMGOMiqLrLNWYa1zdZScbb1LDn9XFKfmNax4nJ9sslypSmdFuabkljIcYmSyzZLnj_JHI0WzPkrz4yhzRn1ncGjZdT39V_-e-gKcMZNV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2433792564</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Correlation of displacement vector fields calculated by different deformable image registration algorithms with motion parameters in helical, axial and cone beam CT imaging</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Alsbou, Nesreen ; Ahmad, Salahuddin ; Ali, Imad</creator><creatorcontrib>Alsbou, Nesreen ; Ahmad, Salahuddin ; Ali, Imad</creatorcontrib><description>Aim:The purpose of this study is to investigate quantitatively the correlation of displacement vector fields (DVFs) from different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms to register images from helical computed tomography (HCT), axial computed tomography (ACT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with motion parameters.Materials and methods:CT images obtained from scanning of the mobile phantom were registered with the stationary CT images using four DIR algorithms from the DIRART software: Demons, Fast-Demons, Horn–Schunck and Lucas–Kanade. HCT, ACT and CBCT imaging techniques were used to image a mobile phantom, which included three targets with different sizes (small, medium and large) that were manufactured from a water-equivalent material and embedded in low-density foam to simulate lung lesions. The phantom was moved with controlled cyclic motion patterns where a range of motion amplitudes (0–20 mm) and frequencies (0·125–0·5 Hz) were used.Results:The DVF obtained from different algorithms correlated well with motion amplitudes applied on the mobile phantom for CBCT and HCT, where the maximal DVF increased linearly with the motion amplitudes of the mobile phantom. In ACT, the DVF correlated less with motion amplitudes where motion-induced strong image artefacts and the DIR algorithms were not able to deform the ACT image of the mobile targets to the stationary targets. Three DIR algorithms produce comparable values and patterns of the DVF for certain CT imaging modality. However, DVF from Fast-Demons deviated strongly from other algorithms at large motion amplitudes.Conclusions:The local DVFs provide direct quantitative values for the actual internal tumour shifts that can be used to determine margins for the internal target volume that consider tumour motion during treatment planning. Furthermore, the DVF distributions can be used to extract motion parameters such as motion amplitude that can be extracted from the maximal or minimal DVF calculated by the different DIR algorithms and used in the management of the patient motion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1460-3969</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-1131</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1460396919000657</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Amplitudes ; Computed tomography ; Computer simulation ; Correlation analysis ; Deformation ; Fields (mathematics) ; Formability ; Image registration ; Imaging techniques ; Mathematical analysis ; Medical imaging ; Original Article ; Parameters ; Radiation therapy ; Registration ; Thorax ; Tomography ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2020-09, Vol.19 (3), p.219-225</ispartof><rights>Cambridge University Press 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-bf98c7fae49923ac90c70051a53f2a4bce1ec280fce88c0cade2e652dff3a8943</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8433-7150</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1460396919000657/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27903,27904,55607</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alsbou, Nesreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Salahuddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Imad</creatorcontrib><title>Correlation of displacement vector fields calculated by different deformable image registration algorithms with motion parameters in helical, axial and cone beam CT imaging</title><title>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</title><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><description>Aim:The purpose of this study is to investigate quantitatively the correlation of displacement vector fields (DVFs) from different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms to register images from helical computed tomography (HCT), axial computed tomography (ACT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with motion parameters.Materials and methods:CT images obtained from scanning of the mobile phantom were registered with the stationary CT images using four DIR algorithms from the DIRART software: Demons, Fast-Demons, Horn–Schunck and Lucas–Kanade. HCT, ACT and CBCT imaging techniques were used to image a mobile phantom, which included three targets with different sizes (small, medium and large) that were manufactured from a water-equivalent material and embedded in low-density foam to simulate lung lesions. The phantom was moved with controlled cyclic motion patterns where a range of motion amplitudes (0–20 mm) and frequencies (0·125–0·5 Hz) were used.Results:The DVF obtained from different algorithms correlated well with motion amplitudes applied on the mobile phantom for CBCT and HCT, where the maximal DVF increased linearly with the motion amplitudes of the mobile phantom. In ACT, the DVF correlated less with motion amplitudes where motion-induced strong image artefacts and the DIR algorithms were not able to deform the ACT image of the mobile targets to the stationary targets. Three DIR algorithms produce comparable values and patterns of the DVF for certain CT imaging modality. However, DVF from Fast-Demons deviated strongly from other algorithms at large motion amplitudes.Conclusions:The local DVFs provide direct quantitative values for the actual internal tumour shifts that can be used to determine margins for the internal target volume that consider tumour motion during treatment planning. Furthermore, the DVF distributions can be used to extract motion parameters such as motion amplitude that can be extracted from the maximal or minimal DVF calculated by the different DIR algorithms and used in the management of the patient motion.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Amplitudes</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Fields (mathematics)</subject><subject>Formability</subject><subject>Image registration</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>Registration</subject><subject>Thorax</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>1460-3969</issn><issn>1467-1131</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctO7DAMhisEEtcHYGeJLYWk6S3LoxE3CYkFsK7c1ClBaTPH6cDhnXhIOjNIZ4FY2bK__0skJ8mpFBdSyOryUealULrUUgshyqLaSQ7mUZVKqeTuphfper-fHMb4KkSe56I6SD4XgZk8Ti6MECx0Li49GhponOCNzBQYrCPfRTDozWomqYP2YwatJV5THdnAA7aewA3YEzD1Lk68daLvA7vpZYjwPhcYwma8RMaBJuIIboQX8m7WnwP-c-gBxw5MGAlawgEWTxuvG_vjZM-ij3TyXY-S5-urp8Vtev9wc7f4c5-arNRT2lpdm8oi5VpnCo0WphKikFgom2HeGpJkslpYQ3VthMGOMiqLrLNWYa1zdZScbb1LDn9XFKfmNax4nJ9sslypSmdFuabkljIcYmSyzZLnj_JHI0WzPkrz4yhzRn1ncGjZdT39V_-e-gKcMZNV</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Alsbou, Nesreen</creator><creator>Ahmad, Salahuddin</creator><creator>Ali, Imad</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-7150</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>Correlation of displacement vector fields calculated by different deformable image registration algorithms with motion parameters in helical, axial and cone beam CT imaging</title><author>Alsbou, Nesreen ; Ahmad, Salahuddin ; Ali, Imad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c269t-bf98c7fae49923ac90c70051a53f2a4bce1ec280fce88c0cade2e652dff3a8943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Amplitudes</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Fields (mathematics)</topic><topic>Formability</topic><topic>Image registration</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>Registration</topic><topic>Thorax</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alsbou, Nesreen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmad, Salahuddin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ali, Imad</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alsbou, Nesreen</au><au>Ahmad, Salahuddin</au><au>Ali, Imad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Correlation of displacement vector fields calculated by different deformable image registration algorithms with motion parameters in helical, axial and cone beam CT imaging</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radiotherapy in practice</jtitle><addtitle>J Radiother Pract</addtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>219</spage><epage>225</epage><pages>219-225</pages><issn>1460-3969</issn><eissn>1467-1131</eissn><abstract>Aim:The purpose of this study is to investigate quantitatively the correlation of displacement vector fields (DVFs) from different deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms to register images from helical computed tomography (HCT), axial computed tomography (ACT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with motion parameters.Materials and methods:CT images obtained from scanning of the mobile phantom were registered with the stationary CT images using four DIR algorithms from the DIRART software: Demons, Fast-Demons, Horn–Schunck and Lucas–Kanade. HCT, ACT and CBCT imaging techniques were used to image a mobile phantom, which included three targets with different sizes (small, medium and large) that were manufactured from a water-equivalent material and embedded in low-density foam to simulate lung lesions. The phantom was moved with controlled cyclic motion patterns where a range of motion amplitudes (0–20 mm) and frequencies (0·125–0·5 Hz) were used.Results:The DVF obtained from different algorithms correlated well with motion amplitudes applied on the mobile phantom for CBCT and HCT, where the maximal DVF increased linearly with the motion amplitudes of the mobile phantom. In ACT, the DVF correlated less with motion amplitudes where motion-induced strong image artefacts and the DIR algorithms were not able to deform the ACT image of the mobile targets to the stationary targets. Three DIR algorithms produce comparable values and patterns of the DVF for certain CT imaging modality. However, DVF from Fast-Demons deviated strongly from other algorithms at large motion amplitudes.Conclusions:The local DVFs provide direct quantitative values for the actual internal tumour shifts that can be used to determine margins for the internal target volume that consider tumour motion during treatment planning. Furthermore, the DVF distributions can be used to extract motion parameters such as motion amplitude that can be extracted from the maximal or minimal DVF calculated by the different DIR algorithms and used in the management of the patient motion.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1460396919000657</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8433-7150</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1460-3969
ispartof Journal of radiotherapy in practice, 2020-09, Vol.19 (3), p.219-225
issn 1460-3969
1467-1131
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2433792564
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Amplitudes
Computed tomography
Computer simulation
Correlation analysis
Deformation
Fields (mathematics)
Formability
Image registration
Imaging techniques
Mathematical analysis
Medical imaging
Original Article
Parameters
Radiation therapy
Registration
Thorax
Tomography
Tumors
title Correlation of displacement vector fields calculated by different deformable image registration algorithms with motion parameters in helical, axial and cone beam CT imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T08%3A12%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Correlation%20of%20displacement%20vector%20fields%20calculated%20by%20different%20deformable%20image%20registration%20algorithms%20with%20motion%20parameters%20in%20helical,%20axial%20and%20cone%20beam%20CT%20imaging&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radiotherapy%20in%20practice&rft.au=Alsbou,%20Nesreen&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=219&rft.epage=225&rft.pages=219-225&rft.issn=1460-3969&rft.eissn=1467-1131&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1460396919000657&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2433792564%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2433792564&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1460396919000657&rfr_iscdi=true