Tensile deformation and morphology changes in segmented elastomer films and fibers including mechanical property modeling

Segmented polyether soft segment (SS) elastomers with different hard segments (HS) in film and fiber form were studied by birefringence, DSC, and tensile tests. To understand the morphological contributions to property differences, high resolution tapping AFM resolved ribbon‐like highly anisotropic...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied polymer science 2020-11, Vol.137 (43), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Sauer, Bryan B., Kampert, William G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 43
container_start_page
container_title Journal of applied polymer science
container_volume 137
creator Sauer, Bryan B.
Kampert, William G.
description Segmented polyether soft segment (SS) elastomers with different hard segments (HS) in film and fiber form were studied by birefringence, DSC, and tensile tests. To understand the morphological contributions to property differences, high resolution tapping AFM resolved ribbon‐like highly anisotropic hard domain (HD) lamellae in low modulus Pebax (polyamide 12 HS) and polyetherester (PEE), films, while lower HS content high melting poly(urethane urea) (PUU) had much smaller less anisotropic but higher melting HDs, explaining its enhanced thermal and mechanical hysteresis properties. Stress–strain tensile data demonstrate the excellent strength and toughness of PUUs and some spun PEE fibers, and film and fiber birefringence data applied during strain cycling up to very high stresses provided the molecular basis for the varying properties. The parameters from non‐Gaussian fits of tensile data provide insight into network properties for these systems exhibiting very high strengths and a large degree of strain hardening. Modeling of PEE and Pebax films also shows the effects of substantial plastic yielding of the HD networks. Tensile data were obtained as a function of strain rate and temperature to help understand the contributions of network restructuring and other factors. For fibers, strain rate data spanning seven decades show and unusual drop in strengths at very high strain rates. Temperature‐dependent tensile data also show large differences between PUU materials versus lower melting PEEs. Tapping‐mode AFM data for film surfaces of three solvent cast segmented elastomers with polyether soft segments, and one hard biaxially melt‐oriented PET film. The pebax and polyetherester (PEE‐B) samples have hard segments consisting of PA12 and PBT, respectively. PUU‐A is a low hard segment polyureaurethane with aromatic MDI based hard segments. Scan boxes are 500 × 500 nm for each plot, and the phase angle range is 0–20°.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/app.49315
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2433110022</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2433110022</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-b8930d3369ef64b369e4abdc424a388e46d05f2524fefe16bc2f432a1cbd6c8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDtrwzAUhUVpoelj6D8QdOrgRC-79hhCXxBohnQ2snTlKNiWKzkU__vKcddOZzjfOfdyEHqgZEkJYSvZ90tRcJpeoAUlxXMiMpZfokX0aJIXRXqNbkI4EkJpSrIFGvfQBdsA1mCcb-VgXYdlp3HrfH9wjatHrA6yqyFg2-EAdQvdABpDI8PgWvDY2KYN54yxFfiJU81J267GLUxZq2SDe-968MMYizU00bxDV0Y2Ae7_9BZ9vb7sN-_J9vPtY7PeJopzkSZVXnCiOc8KMJmoJhWy0kowIXmeg8g0SQ1LmTBggGaVYkZwJqmqdKZy4Lfoce6NH3yfIAzl0Z18F0-WTHBOp9lYpJ5mSnkXggdT9t620o8lJeWElHHZ8rxsZFcz-xOHG_8Hy_VuNyd-ActAfVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2433110022</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tensile deformation and morphology changes in segmented elastomer films and fibers including mechanical property modeling</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Sauer, Bryan B. ; Kampert, William G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Bryan B. ; Kampert, William G.</creatorcontrib><description>Segmented polyether soft segment (SS) elastomers with different hard segments (HS) in film and fiber form were studied by birefringence, DSC, and tensile tests. To understand the morphological contributions to property differences, high resolution tapping AFM resolved ribbon‐like highly anisotropic hard domain (HD) lamellae in low modulus Pebax (polyamide 12 HS) and polyetherester (PEE), films, while lower HS content high melting poly(urethane urea) (PUU) had much smaller less anisotropic but higher melting HDs, explaining its enhanced thermal and mechanical hysteresis properties. Stress–strain tensile data demonstrate the excellent strength and toughness of PUUs and some spun PEE fibers, and film and fiber birefringence data applied during strain cycling up to very high stresses provided the molecular basis for the varying properties. The parameters from non‐Gaussian fits of tensile data provide insight into network properties for these systems exhibiting very high strengths and a large degree of strain hardening. Modeling of PEE and Pebax films also shows the effects of substantial plastic yielding of the HD networks. Tensile data were obtained as a function of strain rate and temperature to help understand the contributions of network restructuring and other factors. For fibers, strain rate data spanning seven decades show and unusual drop in strengths at very high strain rates. Temperature‐dependent tensile data also show large differences between PUU materials versus lower melting PEEs. Tapping‐mode AFM data for film surfaces of three solvent cast segmented elastomers with polyether soft segments, and one hard biaxially melt‐oriented PET film. The pebax and polyetherester (PEE‐B) samples have hard segments consisting of PA12 and PBT, respectively. PUU‐A is a low hard segment polyureaurethane with aromatic MDI based hard segments. Scan boxes are 500 × 500 nm for each plot, and the phase angle range is 0–20°.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8995</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-4628</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/app.49315</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Birefringence ; crystallization ; Elastomers ; Fibers ; Materials science ; Mechanical hysteresis ; Melting ; Modelling ; Morphology ; Polyamide resins ; Polymers ; Properties (attributes) ; Strain hardening ; Strain rate ; structure‐property relationships ; Temperature dependence ; Tensile deformation ; Tensile tests ; theory and modeling ; thermal properties</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied polymer science, 2020-11, Vol.137 (43), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-b8930d3369ef64b369e4abdc424a388e46d05f2524fefe16bc2f432a1cbd6c8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-b8930d3369ef64b369e4abdc424a388e46d05f2524fefe16bc2f432a1cbd6c8e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7220-274X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fapp.49315$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fapp.49315$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Bryan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kampert, William G.</creatorcontrib><title>Tensile deformation and morphology changes in segmented elastomer films and fibers including mechanical property modeling</title><title>Journal of applied polymer science</title><description>Segmented polyether soft segment (SS) elastomers with different hard segments (HS) in film and fiber form were studied by birefringence, DSC, and tensile tests. To understand the morphological contributions to property differences, high resolution tapping AFM resolved ribbon‐like highly anisotropic hard domain (HD) lamellae in low modulus Pebax (polyamide 12 HS) and polyetherester (PEE), films, while lower HS content high melting poly(urethane urea) (PUU) had much smaller less anisotropic but higher melting HDs, explaining its enhanced thermal and mechanical hysteresis properties. Stress–strain tensile data demonstrate the excellent strength and toughness of PUUs and some spun PEE fibers, and film and fiber birefringence data applied during strain cycling up to very high stresses provided the molecular basis for the varying properties. The parameters from non‐Gaussian fits of tensile data provide insight into network properties for these systems exhibiting very high strengths and a large degree of strain hardening. Modeling of PEE and Pebax films also shows the effects of substantial plastic yielding of the HD networks. Tensile data were obtained as a function of strain rate and temperature to help understand the contributions of network restructuring and other factors. For fibers, strain rate data spanning seven decades show and unusual drop in strengths at very high strain rates. Temperature‐dependent tensile data also show large differences between PUU materials versus lower melting PEEs. Tapping‐mode AFM data for film surfaces of three solvent cast segmented elastomers with polyether soft segments, and one hard biaxially melt‐oriented PET film. The pebax and polyetherester (PEE‐B) samples have hard segments consisting of PA12 and PBT, respectively. PUU‐A is a low hard segment polyureaurethane with aromatic MDI based hard segments. Scan boxes are 500 × 500 nm for each plot, and the phase angle range is 0–20°.</description><subject>Birefringence</subject><subject>crystallization</subject><subject>Elastomers</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Mechanical hysteresis</subject><subject>Melting</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Polyamide resins</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Properties (attributes)</subject><subject>Strain hardening</subject><subject>Strain rate</subject><subject>structure‐property relationships</subject><subject>Temperature dependence</subject><subject>Tensile deformation</subject><subject>Tensile tests</subject><subject>theory and modeling</subject><subject>thermal properties</subject><issn>0021-8995</issn><issn>1097-4628</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDtrwzAUhUVpoelj6D8QdOrgRC-79hhCXxBohnQ2snTlKNiWKzkU__vKcddOZzjfOfdyEHqgZEkJYSvZ90tRcJpeoAUlxXMiMpZfokX0aJIXRXqNbkI4EkJpSrIFGvfQBdsA1mCcb-VgXYdlp3HrfH9wjatHrA6yqyFg2-EAdQvdABpDI8PgWvDY2KYN54yxFfiJU81J267GLUxZq2SDe-968MMYizU00bxDV0Y2Ae7_9BZ9vb7sN-_J9vPtY7PeJopzkSZVXnCiOc8KMJmoJhWy0kowIXmeg8g0SQ1LmTBggGaVYkZwJqmqdKZy4Lfoce6NH3yfIAzl0Z18F0-WTHBOp9lYpJ5mSnkXggdT9t620o8lJeWElHHZ8rxsZFcz-xOHG_8Hy_VuNyd-ActAfVA</recordid><startdate>20201115</startdate><enddate>20201115</enddate><creator>Sauer, Bryan B.</creator><creator>Kampert, William G.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7220-274X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20201115</creationdate><title>Tensile deformation and morphology changes in segmented elastomer films and fibers including mechanical property modeling</title><author>Sauer, Bryan B. ; Kampert, William G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3345-b8930d3369ef64b369e4abdc424a388e46d05f2524fefe16bc2f432a1cbd6c8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Birefringence</topic><topic>crystallization</topic><topic>Elastomers</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Mechanical hysteresis</topic><topic>Melting</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Polyamide resins</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Properties (attributes)</topic><topic>Strain hardening</topic><topic>Strain rate</topic><topic>structure‐property relationships</topic><topic>Temperature dependence</topic><topic>Tensile deformation</topic><topic>Tensile tests</topic><topic>theory and modeling</topic><topic>thermal properties</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauer, Bryan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kampert, William G.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauer, Bryan B.</au><au>Kampert, William G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tensile deformation and morphology changes in segmented elastomer films and fibers including mechanical property modeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied polymer science</jtitle><date>2020-11-15</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>43</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0021-8995</issn><eissn>1097-4628</eissn><abstract>Segmented polyether soft segment (SS) elastomers with different hard segments (HS) in film and fiber form were studied by birefringence, DSC, and tensile tests. To understand the morphological contributions to property differences, high resolution tapping AFM resolved ribbon‐like highly anisotropic hard domain (HD) lamellae in low modulus Pebax (polyamide 12 HS) and polyetherester (PEE), films, while lower HS content high melting poly(urethane urea) (PUU) had much smaller less anisotropic but higher melting HDs, explaining its enhanced thermal and mechanical hysteresis properties. Stress–strain tensile data demonstrate the excellent strength and toughness of PUUs and some spun PEE fibers, and film and fiber birefringence data applied during strain cycling up to very high stresses provided the molecular basis for the varying properties. The parameters from non‐Gaussian fits of tensile data provide insight into network properties for these systems exhibiting very high strengths and a large degree of strain hardening. Modeling of PEE and Pebax films also shows the effects of substantial plastic yielding of the HD networks. Tensile data were obtained as a function of strain rate and temperature to help understand the contributions of network restructuring and other factors. For fibers, strain rate data spanning seven decades show and unusual drop in strengths at very high strain rates. Temperature‐dependent tensile data also show large differences between PUU materials versus lower melting PEEs. Tapping‐mode AFM data for film surfaces of three solvent cast segmented elastomers with polyether soft segments, and one hard biaxially melt‐oriented PET film. The pebax and polyetherester (PEE‐B) samples have hard segments consisting of PA12 and PBT, respectively. PUU‐A is a low hard segment polyureaurethane with aromatic MDI based hard segments. Scan boxes are 500 × 500 nm for each plot, and the phase angle range is 0–20°.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/app.49315</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7220-274X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8995
ispartof Journal of applied polymer science, 2020-11, Vol.137 (43), p.n/a
issn 0021-8995
1097-4628
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2433110022
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Birefringence
crystallization
Elastomers
Fibers
Materials science
Mechanical hysteresis
Melting
Modelling
Morphology
Polyamide resins
Polymers
Properties (attributes)
Strain hardening
Strain rate
structure‐property relationships
Temperature dependence
Tensile deformation
Tensile tests
theory and modeling
thermal properties
title Tensile deformation and morphology changes in segmented elastomer films and fibers including mechanical property modeling
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T03%3A25%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tensile%20deformation%20and%20morphology%20changes%20in%20segmented%20elastomer%20films%20and%20fibers%20including%20mechanical%20property%20modeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20polymer%20science&rft.au=Sauer,%20Bryan%20B.&rft.date=2020-11-15&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=43&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0021-8995&rft.eissn=1097-4628&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/app.49315&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2433110022%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2433110022&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true