Explaining a new foreign aid recipient: the European Union’s provision of aid to regional trade agreements, 1995–2013

Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) are increasingly recipients in the foreign aid budgets of donors. What explains the emergence of IGOs as recipients of foreign aid? While conventional wisdom suggests that foreign aid is primarily a foreign policy tool used by donor countries, I argue that aid...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of international relations and development 2020-09, Vol.23 (3), p.701-727
1. Verfasser: Jolliff Scott, Brandy
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 727
container_issue 3
container_start_page 701
container_title Journal of international relations and development
container_volume 23
creator Jolliff Scott, Brandy
description Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) are increasingly recipients in the foreign aid budgets of donors. What explains the emergence of IGOs as recipients of foreign aid? While conventional wisdom suggests that foreign aid is primarily a foreign policy tool used by donor countries, I argue that aid allocated to IGOs is not explained through the lens of donor interests. Rather, it is the independent institutional design of the IGO aid recipient that makes them attractive recipients of aid which is intended to promote economic development, not donor state interests. Thus, aid to IGO recipients is explained on the basis of recipient development need and the independent institutional design of the IGO. Using original data on European Union aid allocations to a specific type of IGO, the regional trade agreement (RTA), this paper demonstrates that RTAs with more independent institutional designs and greater economic and/or trade need indeed receive more aid than their less independent, less needy peers. Further, these results hold even when controlling for donor interests and across multiple models/techniques. These results shed light on this emerging, new type of foreign aid recipient and argue for a need to re-evaluate the state-recipient focus of the aid allocation literature.
doi_str_mv 10.1057/s41268-018-0163-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2433061160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2433061160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-330cbe2a2fc0dbaece6bae2f819601203545a70eedf38518b84e9dfcff2c3e903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhSMEEqVwAHaW2BLw2EnqsENV-ZEqsaFry03GwVXrBDsF2lXvwIrr9SQ4BIkVC49nRu97Gr0oOgd6BTQdXfsEWCZiCt3LeLw9iAaQCoghF_Qw9AkVcRb64-jE-wWlMOJUDKLN5KNZKmONrYgiFt-Jrh2ayhJlSuKwMI1B296Q9gXJZO3qBpUlM2tqu999edK4-s34MJFa_yBtHagqLNSStE6VSFTlEFfBxF8SyPN0v_tkFPhpdKTV0uPZ7z-MZneT5_FDPH26fxzfTuOCQ9bGnNNijkwxXdByrrDALFSmBeQZBUZ5mqRqRBFLzUUKYi4SzEtdaM0Kjjnlw-ii9w2nvq7Rt3JRr104z0uWBPcMIOtU0KsKV3vvUMvGmZVyGwlUdgnLPmEZEpZdwnIbGNYzPmhthe7P-X_oG81fgUU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2433061160</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Explaining a new foreign aid recipient: the European Union’s provision of aid to regional trade agreements, 1995–2013</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Jolliff Scott, Brandy</creator><creatorcontrib>Jolliff Scott, Brandy</creatorcontrib><description>Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) are increasingly recipients in the foreign aid budgets of donors. What explains the emergence of IGOs as recipients of foreign aid? While conventional wisdom suggests that foreign aid is primarily a foreign policy tool used by donor countries, I argue that aid allocated to IGOs is not explained through the lens of donor interests. Rather, it is the independent institutional design of the IGO aid recipient that makes them attractive recipients of aid which is intended to promote economic development, not donor state interests. Thus, aid to IGO recipients is explained on the basis of recipient development need and the independent institutional design of the IGO. Using original data on European Union aid allocations to a specific type of IGO, the regional trade agreement (RTA), this paper demonstrates that RTAs with more independent institutional designs and greater economic and/or trade need indeed receive more aid than their less independent, less needy peers. Further, these results hold even when controlling for donor interests and across multiple models/techniques. These results shed light on this emerging, new type of foreign aid recipient and argue for a need to re-evaluate the state-recipient focus of the aid allocation literature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1408-6980</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1581-1980</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1057/s41268-018-0163-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Palgrave Macmillan UK</publisher><subject>Area Studies ; Budgets ; Development Studies ; Donors ; Economic development ; Economics ; Foreign aid ; Foreign policy ; International organizations ; International Relations ; Original Article ; Peers ; Political Science and International Relations ; Political Science and International Studies ; Regionalism ; Trade agreements ; Wisdom</subject><ispartof>Journal of international relations and development, 2020-09, Vol.23 (3), p.701-727</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2018</rights><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2018.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-330cbe2a2fc0dbaece6bae2f819601203545a70eedf38518b84e9dfcff2c3e903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-330cbe2a2fc0dbaece6bae2f819601203545a70eedf38518b84e9dfcff2c3e903</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1057/s41268-018-0163-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1057/s41268-018-0163-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,12828,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jolliff Scott, Brandy</creatorcontrib><title>Explaining a new foreign aid recipient: the European Union’s provision of aid to regional trade agreements, 1995–2013</title><title>Journal of international relations and development</title><addtitle>J Int Relat Dev</addtitle><description>Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) are increasingly recipients in the foreign aid budgets of donors. What explains the emergence of IGOs as recipients of foreign aid? While conventional wisdom suggests that foreign aid is primarily a foreign policy tool used by donor countries, I argue that aid allocated to IGOs is not explained through the lens of donor interests. Rather, it is the independent institutional design of the IGO aid recipient that makes them attractive recipients of aid which is intended to promote economic development, not donor state interests. Thus, aid to IGO recipients is explained on the basis of recipient development need and the independent institutional design of the IGO. Using original data on European Union aid allocations to a specific type of IGO, the regional trade agreement (RTA), this paper demonstrates that RTAs with more independent institutional designs and greater economic and/or trade need indeed receive more aid than their less independent, less needy peers. Further, these results hold even when controlling for donor interests and across multiple models/techniques. These results shed light on this emerging, new type of foreign aid recipient and argue for a need to re-evaluate the state-recipient focus of the aid allocation literature.</description><subject>Area Studies</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Development Studies</subject><subject>Donors</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Foreign aid</subject><subject>Foreign policy</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>International Relations</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Political Science and International Relations</subject><subject>Political Science and International Studies</subject><subject>Regionalism</subject><subject>Trade agreements</subject><subject>Wisdom</subject><issn>1408-6980</issn><issn>1581-1980</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1OwzAQhSMEEqVwAHaW2BLw2EnqsENV-ZEqsaFry03GwVXrBDsF2lXvwIrr9SQ4BIkVC49nRu97Gr0oOgd6BTQdXfsEWCZiCt3LeLw9iAaQCoghF_Qw9AkVcRb64-jE-wWlMOJUDKLN5KNZKmONrYgiFt-Jrh2ayhJlSuKwMI1B296Q9gXJZO3qBpUlM2tqu999edK4-s34MJFa_yBtHagqLNSStE6VSFTlEFfBxF8SyPN0v_tkFPhpdKTV0uPZ7z-MZneT5_FDPH26fxzfTuOCQ9bGnNNijkwxXdByrrDALFSmBeQZBUZ5mqRqRBFLzUUKYi4SzEtdaM0Kjjnlw-ii9w2nvq7Rt3JRr104z0uWBPcMIOtU0KsKV3vvUMvGmZVyGwlUdgnLPmEZEpZdwnIbGNYzPmhthe7P-X_oG81fgUU</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Jolliff Scott, Brandy</creator><general>Palgrave Macmillan UK</general><general>Palgrave Macmillan</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Explaining a new foreign aid recipient: the European Union’s provision of aid to regional trade agreements, 1995–2013</title><author>Jolliff Scott, Brandy</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-330cbe2a2fc0dbaece6bae2f819601203545a70eedf38518b84e9dfcff2c3e903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Area Studies</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Development Studies</topic><topic>Donors</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Foreign aid</topic><topic>Foreign policy</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>International Relations</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Political Science and International Relations</topic><topic>Political Science and International Studies</topic><topic>Regionalism</topic><topic>Trade agreements</topic><topic>Wisdom</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jolliff Scott, Brandy</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of international relations and development</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jolliff Scott, Brandy</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Explaining a new foreign aid recipient: the European Union’s provision of aid to regional trade agreements, 1995–2013</atitle><jtitle>Journal of international relations and development</jtitle><stitle>J Int Relat Dev</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>701</spage><epage>727</epage><pages>701-727</pages><issn>1408-6980</issn><eissn>1581-1980</eissn><abstract>Intergovernmental organizations (IGOs) are increasingly recipients in the foreign aid budgets of donors. What explains the emergence of IGOs as recipients of foreign aid? While conventional wisdom suggests that foreign aid is primarily a foreign policy tool used by donor countries, I argue that aid allocated to IGOs is not explained through the lens of donor interests. Rather, it is the independent institutional design of the IGO aid recipient that makes them attractive recipients of aid which is intended to promote economic development, not donor state interests. Thus, aid to IGO recipients is explained on the basis of recipient development need and the independent institutional design of the IGO. Using original data on European Union aid allocations to a specific type of IGO, the regional trade agreement (RTA), this paper demonstrates that RTAs with more independent institutional designs and greater economic and/or trade need indeed receive more aid than their less independent, less needy peers. Further, these results hold even when controlling for donor interests and across multiple models/techniques. These results shed light on this emerging, new type of foreign aid recipient and argue for a need to re-evaluate the state-recipient focus of the aid allocation literature.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Palgrave Macmillan UK</pub><doi>10.1057/s41268-018-0163-z</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1408-6980
ispartof Journal of international relations and development, 2020-09, Vol.23 (3), p.701-727
issn 1408-6980
1581-1980
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2433061160
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Area Studies
Budgets
Development Studies
Donors
Economic development
Economics
Foreign aid
Foreign policy
International organizations
International Relations
Original Article
Peers
Political Science and International Relations
Political Science and International Studies
Regionalism
Trade agreements
Wisdom
title Explaining a new foreign aid recipient: the European Union’s provision of aid to regional trade agreements, 1995–2013
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T12%3A48%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Explaining%20a%20new%20foreign%20aid%20recipient:%20the%20European%20Union%E2%80%99s%20provision%20of%20aid%20to%20regional%20trade%20agreements,%201995%E2%80%932013&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20international%20relations%20and%20development&rft.au=Jolliff%20Scott,%20Brandy&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=701&rft.epage=727&rft.pages=701-727&rft.issn=1408-6980&rft.eissn=1581-1980&rft_id=info:doi/10.1057/s41268-018-0163-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2433061160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2433061160&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true