Cross-regional comparative study on energy efficiency evaluation in the Yangtze River Basin of China
This paper selects energy consumption data of 11 provinces in YRB and 19 provinces and cities in non-YRB from 2014 to 2016 and constructs a shared border Metafrontier non-radial directional short model, adding CO 2 and AQI indicators as undesirable factors, in order to evaluate the total efficiency...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental science and pollution research international 2020-09, Vol.27 (27), p.34037-34051 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 34051 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 27 |
| container_start_page | 34037 |
| container_title | Environmental science and pollution research international |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Ren, Fang-rong Tian, Ze Pan, Jing-jing Chiu, Yung-ho |
| description | This paper selects energy consumption data of 11 provinces in YRB and 19 provinces and cities in non-YRB from 2014 to 2016 and constructs a shared border Metafrontier non-radial directional short model, adding CO
2
and AQI indicators as undesirable factors, in order to evaluate the total efficiency and the input and output efficiencies of these two regions. The results are as follows. (1) From the changes in the score and ranking of the two regions’ total environmental efficiency, only two provinces in YRB show a slight decrease, while most of them show a stable or rising trend; seven provinces in non-YRB have a low rising rate. This means during the study period that YRB made more progress at energy conservation, emission reduction, and pollution control than other provinces and cities in non-YRB. (2) The efficiency scores of energy consumption, GDP, CO
2
, and AQI emissions are different in each province. Overall, the situation of YRB is better than that of non-YRB. Not only is the efficiency score of each index higher, but the efficiency difference between provinces and cities within the region is small, which is conducive to the linkage effect of the region and the realization of green coordinated development. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11356-020-09439-z |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2433036315</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2574373346</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2cfd82385b1a31e7998266578f4eb61bfbab6ad7481da7f57e850ab84d61bf1d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8BL16iSZMm7VGLX7AgiB48hbSddLt00zVphd1fb9YKggdPM8z7vHN4EDpn9IpRqq4DYzyVhCaU0FzwnOwO0IxJJogSeX6IZvEqCONCHKOTEFY0knmiZqgufB8C8dC0vTMdrvr1xngztJ-AwzDWW9w7DA58s8VgbVu14Kq4fppujFQMW4eHJeB345phB_glNj2-NSHee4uLZevMKTqypgtw9jPn6O3-7rV4JIvnh6fiZkEqIfhAksrWWcKztGSGM1B5niVSpiqzAkrJSluaUppaiYzVRtlUQZZSU2ai3oes5nN0Of3d-P5jhDDodRsq6DrjoB-DTlIluOJcyIhe_EFX_eijgUgJzimXnKWRSiaq2lvyYPXGt2vjt5pRvRevJ_E66tTf4vUulvhUChF2Dfjf1_-0vgDp7IdZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2433036315</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cross-regional comparative study on energy efficiency evaluation in the Yangtze River Basin of China</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Ren, Fang-rong ; Tian, Ze ; Pan, Jing-jing ; Chiu, Yung-ho</creator><creatorcontrib>Ren, Fang-rong ; Tian, Ze ; Pan, Jing-jing ; Chiu, Yung-ho</creatorcontrib><description>This paper selects energy consumption data of 11 provinces in YRB and 19 provinces and cities in non-YRB from 2014 to 2016 and constructs a shared border Metafrontier non-radial directional short model, adding CO
2
and AQI indicators as undesirable factors, in order to evaluate the total efficiency and the input and output efficiencies of these two regions. The results are as follows. (1) From the changes in the score and ranking of the two regions’ total environmental efficiency, only two provinces in YRB show a slight decrease, while most of them show a stable or rising trend; seven provinces in non-YRB have a low rising rate. This means during the study period that YRB made more progress at energy conservation, emission reduction, and pollution control than other provinces and cities in non-YRB. (2) The efficiency scores of energy consumption, GDP, CO
2
, and AQI emissions are different in each province. Overall, the situation of YRB is better than that of non-YRB. Not only is the efficiency score of each index higher, but the efficiency difference between provinces and cities within the region is small, which is conducive to the linkage effect of the region and the realization of green coordinated development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0944-1344</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1614-7499</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-09439-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Carbon dioxide ; China ; Cities ; Comparative studies ; comparative study ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecotoxicology ; Efficiency ; Emission analysis ; Emissions control ; Energy conservation ; Energy consumption ; Energy efficiency ; Environment ; Environmental assessment ; Environmental Chemistry ; Environmental Health ; Environmental science ; Pollution control ; Provinces ; Research Article ; River basins ; Sustainable development ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control ; watersheds ; Yangtze River</subject><ispartof>Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020-09, Vol.27 (27), p.34037-34051</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2cfd82385b1a31e7998266578f4eb61bfbab6ad7481da7f57e850ab84d61bf1d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2cfd82385b1a31e7998266578f4eb61bfbab6ad7481da7f57e850ab84d61bf1d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11356-020-09439-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11356-020-09439-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ren, Fang-rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Ze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Jing-jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Yung-ho</creatorcontrib><title>Cross-regional comparative study on energy efficiency evaluation in the Yangtze River Basin of China</title><title>Environmental science and pollution research international</title><addtitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</addtitle><description>This paper selects energy consumption data of 11 provinces in YRB and 19 provinces and cities in non-YRB from 2014 to 2016 and constructs a shared border Metafrontier non-radial directional short model, adding CO
2
and AQI indicators as undesirable factors, in order to evaluate the total efficiency and the input and output efficiencies of these two regions. The results are as follows. (1) From the changes in the score and ranking of the two regions’ total environmental efficiency, only two provinces in YRB show a slight decrease, while most of them show a stable or rising trend; seven provinces in non-YRB have a low rising rate. This means during the study period that YRB made more progress at energy conservation, emission reduction, and pollution control than other provinces and cities in non-YRB. (2) The efficiency scores of energy consumption, GDP, CO
2
, and AQI emissions are different in each province. Overall, the situation of YRB is better than that of non-YRB. Not only is the efficiency score of each index higher, but the efficiency difference between provinces and cities within the region is small, which is conducive to the linkage effect of the region and the realization of green coordinated development.</description><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>comparative study</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Emissions control</subject><subject>Energy conservation</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Energy efficiency</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental Chemistry</subject><subject>Environmental Health</subject><subject>Environmental science</subject><subject>Pollution control</subject><subject>Provinces</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><subject>watersheds</subject><subject>Yangtze River</subject><issn>0944-1344</issn><issn>1614-7499</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8BL16iSZMm7VGLX7AgiB48hbSddLt00zVphd1fb9YKggdPM8z7vHN4EDpn9IpRqq4DYzyVhCaU0FzwnOwO0IxJJogSeX6IZvEqCONCHKOTEFY0knmiZqgufB8C8dC0vTMdrvr1xngztJ-AwzDWW9w7DA58s8VgbVu14Kq4fppujFQMW4eHJeB345phB_glNj2-NSHee4uLZevMKTqypgtw9jPn6O3-7rV4JIvnh6fiZkEqIfhAksrWWcKztGSGM1B5niVSpiqzAkrJSluaUppaiYzVRtlUQZZSU2ai3oes5nN0Of3d-P5jhDDodRsq6DrjoB-DTlIluOJcyIhe_EFX_eijgUgJzimXnKWRSiaq2lvyYPXGt2vjt5pRvRevJ_E66tTf4vUulvhUChF2Dfjf1_-0vgDp7IdZ</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Ren, Fang-rong</creator><creator>Tian, Ze</creator><creator>Pan, Jing-jing</creator><creator>Chiu, Yung-ho</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Cross-regional comparative study on energy efficiency evaluation in the Yangtze River Basin of China</title><author>Ren, Fang-rong ; Tian, Ze ; Pan, Jing-jing ; Chiu, Yung-ho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c443t-2cfd82385b1a31e7998266578f4eb61bfbab6ad7481da7f57e850ab84d61bf1d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>comparative study</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Emissions control</topic><topic>Energy conservation</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Energy efficiency</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental Chemistry</topic><topic>Environmental Health</topic><topic>Environmental science</topic><topic>Pollution control</topic><topic>Provinces</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><topic>watersheds</topic><topic>Yangtze River</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ren, Fang-rong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tian, Ze</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Jing-jing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiu, Yung-ho</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ren, Fang-rong</au><au>Tian, Ze</au><au>Pan, Jing-jing</au><au>Chiu, Yung-ho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cross-regional comparative study on energy efficiency evaluation in the Yangtze River Basin of China</atitle><jtitle>Environmental science and pollution research international</jtitle><stitle>Environ Sci Pollut Res</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>27</issue><spage>34037</spage><epage>34051</epage><pages>34037-34051</pages><issn>0944-1344</issn><eissn>1614-7499</eissn><abstract>This paper selects energy consumption data of 11 provinces in YRB and 19 provinces and cities in non-YRB from 2014 to 2016 and constructs a shared border Metafrontier non-radial directional short model, adding CO
2
and AQI indicators as undesirable factors, in order to evaluate the total efficiency and the input and output efficiencies of these two regions. The results are as follows. (1) From the changes in the score and ranking of the two regions’ total environmental efficiency, only two provinces in YRB show a slight decrease, while most of them show a stable or rising trend; seven provinces in non-YRB have a low rising rate. This means during the study period that YRB made more progress at energy conservation, emission reduction, and pollution control than other provinces and cities in non-YRB. (2) The efficiency scores of energy consumption, GDP, CO
2
, and AQI emissions are different in each province. Overall, the situation of YRB is better than that of non-YRB. Not only is the efficiency score of each index higher, but the efficiency difference between provinces and cities within the region is small, which is conducive to the linkage effect of the region and the realization of green coordinated development.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11356-020-09439-z</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0944-1344 |
| ispartof | Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020-09, Vol.27 (27), p.34037-34051 |
| issn | 0944-1344 1614-7499 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2433036315 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Carbon dioxide China Cities Comparative studies comparative study Earth and Environmental Science Ecotoxicology Efficiency Emission analysis Emissions control Energy conservation Energy consumption Energy efficiency Environment Environmental assessment Environmental Chemistry Environmental Health Environmental science Pollution control Provinces Research Article River basins Sustainable development Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control watersheds Yangtze River |
| title | Cross-regional comparative study on energy efficiency evaluation in the Yangtze River Basin of China |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T17%3A42%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cross-regional%20comparative%20study%20on%20energy%20efficiency%20evaluation%20in%20the%20Yangtze%20River%20Basin%20of%20China&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20science%20and%20pollution%20research%20international&rft.au=Ren,%20Fang-rong&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=27&rft.spage=34037&rft.epage=34051&rft.pages=34037-34051&rft.issn=0944-1344&rft.eissn=1614-7499&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11356-020-09439-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2574373346%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2433036315&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |