Quantitatively Tracking the Elevation of the Tibetan Plateau Since the Cretaceous: Insights From Whole‐Rock Sr/Y and La/Yb Ratios

Crustal thickness, elevation, and Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N of magmatic rocks are strongly correlated for subduction‐related and collision‐related mountain belts. We quantitatively constrain the paleo‐elevation of the Tibetan Plateau since the Cretaceous using empirically derived equations. The results are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Geophysical research letters 2020-08, Vol.47 (15), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Hu, Fangyang, Wu, Fuyuan, Chapman, James B., Ducea, Mihai N., Ji, Weiqiang, Liu, Shuwen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 15
container_start_page
container_title Geophysical research letters
container_volume 47
creator Hu, Fangyang
Wu, Fuyuan
Chapman, James B.
Ducea, Mihai N.
Ji, Weiqiang
Liu, Shuwen
description Crustal thickness, elevation, and Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N of magmatic rocks are strongly correlated for subduction‐related and collision‐related mountain belts. We quantitatively constrain the paleo‐elevation of the Tibetan Plateau since the Cretaceous using empirically derived equations. The results are broadly consistent with previous estimates based on stable isotope and structural analyses, supporting a complex uplift history. Our data suggest that a protoplateau formed in central Tibet during the Late Cretaceous and was higher than the contemporaneous Gangdese arc. This protoplateau collapsed before the India‐Asia collision, during the same time period that elevation in southern Tibet was increasing. During the India‐Asia collision, northern and southern Tibet were uplifted first followed by renewed uplift in central Tibet, which suggests a more complicated uplift history than commonly believed. We contend that a broad paleovalley formed during the Paleogene in central Tibet and that the whole Tibetan Plateau reached present‐day elevations during the Miocene. Plain Language Summary Paleo‐elevation is an important factor in understanding the mountain building processes. Strong correlations are observed between crustal thickness, elevation, and Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N of magmatic rocks for both subduction‐related and collision‐related mountain belts. We established empirical equations derived from modern examples and applied them to constrain the paleo‐elevation evolution of the Tibetan Plateau since the Cretaceous. Our calculated results are broadly consistent with previous estimates based on stable isotope and structural analyses and document a complex uplift history. In central Tibet, a proto‐plateau with an elevation >3,000 m was formed during the Late Cretaceous and was higher than the Gangdese continental arc in the south. This protoplateau collapsed at the same time as the southern Tibet plateau (Lhasaplano) was uplifted prior to the India‐Asia collision formed before the India‐Asia collision. During the India‐Asia collision in the Cenozoic, northern and southern Tibet were uplift first, followed by uplift of central Tibet. A paleovalley was formed in central Tibet during the Paleogene and elevations of the whole Tibetan Plateau similar to the present‐day were achieved during the Miocene. Key Points Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N ratios of magmatic rocks can be used for estimating paleo‐elevation of orogenic belts Two protoplateaus were formed successively during the Lat
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2020GL089202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2432939249</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432939249</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3721-3947a97fa2724384a39e3980b74a6955ada90c853dabc378520719546a360afa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwkAURSdGExHd-QGTuLXyOtN2Ou4MESRpogLGsGpeyxQKpYMzLYadiT_gN_olFnDhytW7effk3uQScunCjQtMdhgw6EcQykYckZYrPc8JAcQxaQHIRjMRnJIzaxcAwIG7LfL5XGNZ5RVW-UYVWzo2mC7zckaruaL3hdo0hi6pzvaPcZ6oCkv6VGClsKajvEzV3umaxkiVru0tHZQ2n80rS3tGr-jrXBfq--NrqNMlHZnOhGI5pRF2Jgkd7tLtOTnJsLDq4ve2yUvvftx9cKLH_qB7FznIBXMdLj2BUmTIBPN46CGXissQEuFhIH0fpyghDX0-xSTlIvQZCFf6XoA8AMyQt8nVIXdt9FutbBUvdG3KpjJuApnkknmyoa4PVGq0tUZl8drkKzTb2IV4N3P8d-YGZwf8PS_U9l827g-jAGTg8h-hsn3i</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2432939249</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitatively Tracking the Elevation of the Tibetan Plateau Since the Cretaceous: Insights From Whole‐Rock Sr/Y and La/Yb Ratios</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Hu, Fangyang ; Wu, Fuyuan ; Chapman, James B. ; Ducea, Mihai N. ; Ji, Weiqiang ; Liu, Shuwen</creator><creatorcontrib>Hu, Fangyang ; Wu, Fuyuan ; Chapman, James B. ; Ducea, Mihai N. ; Ji, Weiqiang ; Liu, Shuwen</creatorcontrib><description>Crustal thickness, elevation, and Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N of magmatic rocks are strongly correlated for subduction‐related and collision‐related mountain belts. We quantitatively constrain the paleo‐elevation of the Tibetan Plateau since the Cretaceous using empirically derived equations. The results are broadly consistent with previous estimates based on stable isotope and structural analyses, supporting a complex uplift history. Our data suggest that a protoplateau formed in central Tibet during the Late Cretaceous and was higher than the contemporaneous Gangdese arc. This protoplateau collapsed before the India‐Asia collision, during the same time period that elevation in southern Tibet was increasing. During the India‐Asia collision, northern and southern Tibet were uplifted first followed by renewed uplift in central Tibet, which suggests a more complicated uplift history than commonly believed. We contend that a broad paleovalley formed during the Paleogene in central Tibet and that the whole Tibetan Plateau reached present‐day elevations during the Miocene. Plain Language Summary Paleo‐elevation is an important factor in understanding the mountain building processes. Strong correlations are observed between crustal thickness, elevation, and Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N of magmatic rocks for both subduction‐related and collision‐related mountain belts. We established empirical equations derived from modern examples and applied them to constrain the paleo‐elevation evolution of the Tibetan Plateau since the Cretaceous. Our calculated results are broadly consistent with previous estimates based on stable isotope and structural analyses and document a complex uplift history. In central Tibet, a proto‐plateau with an elevation &gt;3,000 m was formed during the Late Cretaceous and was higher than the Gangdese continental arc in the south. This protoplateau collapsed at the same time as the southern Tibet plateau (Lhasaplano) was uplifted prior to the India‐Asia collision formed before the India‐Asia collision. During the India‐Asia collision in the Cenozoic, northern and southern Tibet were uplift first, followed by uplift of central Tibet. A paleovalley was formed in central Tibet during the Paleogene and elevations of the whole Tibetan Plateau similar to the present‐day were achieved during the Miocene. Key Points Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N ratios of magmatic rocks can be used for estimating paleo‐elevation of orogenic belts Two protoplateaus were formed successively during the Late Cretaceous in the central and southern Tibet before India‐Asia collision A paleovalley formed during the Paleogene in central Tibet and the Tibetan Plateau reached present‐day elevations during the Miocene</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-8276</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8007</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020GL089202</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Belts ; Cenozoic ; Cretaceous ; Crustal thickness ; Elevation ; Empirical equations ; Isotopes ; magmatic rocks ; Mathematical analysis ; Miocene ; Mountains ; Orogeny ; Paleogene ; paleo‐elevation ; Plateaus ; Ratios ; Rock ; Rocks ; Stable isotopes ; Subduction ; Thickness ; Tibetan Plateau ; Uplift</subject><ispartof>Geophysical research letters, 2020-08, Vol.47 (15), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3721-3947a97fa2724384a39e3980b74a6955ada90c853dabc378520719546a360afa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3721-3947a97fa2724384a39e3980b74a6955ada90c853dabc378520719546a360afa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1145-4687 ; 0000-0002-6942-9214 ; 0000-0002-3487-7498 ; 0000-0002-1299-9742</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2020GL089202$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2020GL089202$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,1428,11495,27905,27906,45555,45556,46390,46449,46814,46873</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hu, Fangyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Fuyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducea, Mihai N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Weiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuwen</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitatively Tracking the Elevation of the Tibetan Plateau Since the Cretaceous: Insights From Whole‐Rock Sr/Y and La/Yb Ratios</title><title>Geophysical research letters</title><description>Crustal thickness, elevation, and Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N of magmatic rocks are strongly correlated for subduction‐related and collision‐related mountain belts. We quantitatively constrain the paleo‐elevation of the Tibetan Plateau since the Cretaceous using empirically derived equations. The results are broadly consistent with previous estimates based on stable isotope and structural analyses, supporting a complex uplift history. Our data suggest that a protoplateau formed in central Tibet during the Late Cretaceous and was higher than the contemporaneous Gangdese arc. This protoplateau collapsed before the India‐Asia collision, during the same time period that elevation in southern Tibet was increasing. During the India‐Asia collision, northern and southern Tibet were uplifted first followed by renewed uplift in central Tibet, which suggests a more complicated uplift history than commonly believed. We contend that a broad paleovalley formed during the Paleogene in central Tibet and that the whole Tibetan Plateau reached present‐day elevations during the Miocene. Plain Language Summary Paleo‐elevation is an important factor in understanding the mountain building processes. Strong correlations are observed between crustal thickness, elevation, and Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N of magmatic rocks for both subduction‐related and collision‐related mountain belts. We established empirical equations derived from modern examples and applied them to constrain the paleo‐elevation evolution of the Tibetan Plateau since the Cretaceous. Our calculated results are broadly consistent with previous estimates based on stable isotope and structural analyses and document a complex uplift history. In central Tibet, a proto‐plateau with an elevation &gt;3,000 m was formed during the Late Cretaceous and was higher than the Gangdese continental arc in the south. This protoplateau collapsed at the same time as the southern Tibet plateau (Lhasaplano) was uplifted prior to the India‐Asia collision formed before the India‐Asia collision. During the India‐Asia collision in the Cenozoic, northern and southern Tibet were uplift first, followed by uplift of central Tibet. A paleovalley was formed in central Tibet during the Paleogene and elevations of the whole Tibetan Plateau similar to the present‐day were achieved during the Miocene. Key Points Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N ratios of magmatic rocks can be used for estimating paleo‐elevation of orogenic belts Two protoplateaus were formed successively during the Late Cretaceous in the central and southern Tibet before India‐Asia collision A paleovalley formed during the Paleogene in central Tibet and the Tibetan Plateau reached present‐day elevations during the Miocene</description><subject>Belts</subject><subject>Cenozoic</subject><subject>Cretaceous</subject><subject>Crustal thickness</subject><subject>Elevation</subject><subject>Empirical equations</subject><subject>Isotopes</subject><subject>magmatic rocks</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Miocene</subject><subject>Mountains</subject><subject>Orogeny</subject><subject>Paleogene</subject><subject>paleo‐elevation</subject><subject>Plateaus</subject><subject>Ratios</subject><subject>Rock</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Stable isotopes</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Tibetan Plateau</subject><subject>Uplift</subject><issn>0094-8276</issn><issn>1944-8007</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFOwkAURSdGExHd-QGTuLXyOtN2Ou4MESRpogLGsGpeyxQKpYMzLYadiT_gN_olFnDhytW7effk3uQScunCjQtMdhgw6EcQykYckZYrPc8JAcQxaQHIRjMRnJIzaxcAwIG7LfL5XGNZ5RVW-UYVWzo2mC7zckaruaL3hdo0hi6pzvaPcZ6oCkv6VGClsKajvEzV3umaxkiVru0tHZQ2n80rS3tGr-jrXBfq--NrqNMlHZnOhGI5pRF2Jgkd7tLtOTnJsLDq4ve2yUvvftx9cKLH_qB7FznIBXMdLj2BUmTIBPN46CGXissQEuFhIH0fpyghDX0-xSTlIvQZCFf6XoA8AMyQt8nVIXdt9FutbBUvdG3KpjJuApnkknmyoa4PVGq0tUZl8drkKzTb2IV4N3P8d-YGZwf8PS_U9l827g-jAGTg8h-hsn3i</recordid><startdate>20200816</startdate><enddate>20200816</enddate><creator>Hu, Fangyang</creator><creator>Wu, Fuyuan</creator><creator>Chapman, James B.</creator><creator>Ducea, Mihai N.</creator><creator>Ji, Weiqiang</creator><creator>Liu, Shuwen</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1145-4687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-9214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3487-7498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-9742</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200816</creationdate><title>Quantitatively Tracking the Elevation of the Tibetan Plateau Since the Cretaceous: Insights From Whole‐Rock Sr/Y and La/Yb Ratios</title><author>Hu, Fangyang ; Wu, Fuyuan ; Chapman, James B. ; Ducea, Mihai N. ; Ji, Weiqiang ; Liu, Shuwen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3721-3947a97fa2724384a39e3980b74a6955ada90c853dabc378520719546a360afa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Belts</topic><topic>Cenozoic</topic><topic>Cretaceous</topic><topic>Crustal thickness</topic><topic>Elevation</topic><topic>Empirical equations</topic><topic>Isotopes</topic><topic>magmatic rocks</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Miocene</topic><topic>Mountains</topic><topic>Orogeny</topic><topic>Paleogene</topic><topic>paleo‐elevation</topic><topic>Plateaus</topic><topic>Ratios</topic><topic>Rock</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Stable isotopes</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Tibetan Plateau</topic><topic>Uplift</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hu, Fangyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Fuyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapman, James B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ducea, Mihai N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Weiqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shuwen</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hu, Fangyang</au><au>Wu, Fuyuan</au><au>Chapman, James B.</au><au>Ducea, Mihai N.</au><au>Ji, Weiqiang</au><au>Liu, Shuwen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitatively Tracking the Elevation of the Tibetan Plateau Since the Cretaceous: Insights From Whole‐Rock Sr/Y and La/Yb Ratios</atitle><jtitle>Geophysical research letters</jtitle><date>2020-08-16</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>15</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0094-8276</issn><eissn>1944-8007</eissn><abstract>Crustal thickness, elevation, and Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N of magmatic rocks are strongly correlated for subduction‐related and collision‐related mountain belts. We quantitatively constrain the paleo‐elevation of the Tibetan Plateau since the Cretaceous using empirically derived equations. The results are broadly consistent with previous estimates based on stable isotope and structural analyses, supporting a complex uplift history. Our data suggest that a protoplateau formed in central Tibet during the Late Cretaceous and was higher than the contemporaneous Gangdese arc. This protoplateau collapsed before the India‐Asia collision, during the same time period that elevation in southern Tibet was increasing. During the India‐Asia collision, northern and southern Tibet were uplifted first followed by renewed uplift in central Tibet, which suggests a more complicated uplift history than commonly believed. We contend that a broad paleovalley formed during the Paleogene in central Tibet and that the whole Tibetan Plateau reached present‐day elevations during the Miocene. Plain Language Summary Paleo‐elevation is an important factor in understanding the mountain building processes. Strong correlations are observed between crustal thickness, elevation, and Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N of magmatic rocks for both subduction‐related and collision‐related mountain belts. We established empirical equations derived from modern examples and applied them to constrain the paleo‐elevation evolution of the Tibetan Plateau since the Cretaceous. Our calculated results are broadly consistent with previous estimates based on stable isotope and structural analyses and document a complex uplift history. In central Tibet, a proto‐plateau with an elevation &gt;3,000 m was formed during the Late Cretaceous and was higher than the Gangdese continental arc in the south. This protoplateau collapsed at the same time as the southern Tibet plateau (Lhasaplano) was uplifted prior to the India‐Asia collision formed before the India‐Asia collision. During the India‐Asia collision in the Cenozoic, northern and southern Tibet were uplift first, followed by uplift of central Tibet. A paleovalley was formed in central Tibet during the Paleogene and elevations of the whole Tibetan Plateau similar to the present‐day were achieved during the Miocene. Key Points Sr/Y and (La/Yb)N ratios of magmatic rocks can be used for estimating paleo‐elevation of orogenic belts Two protoplateaus were formed successively during the Late Cretaceous in the central and southern Tibet before India‐Asia collision A paleovalley formed during the Paleogene in central Tibet and the Tibetan Plateau reached present‐day elevations during the Miocene</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2020GL089202</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1145-4687</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-9214</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3487-7498</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1299-9742</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-8276
ispartof Geophysical research letters, 2020-08, Vol.47 (15), p.n/a
issn 0094-8276
1944-8007
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2432939249
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Belts
Cenozoic
Cretaceous
Crustal thickness
Elevation
Empirical equations
Isotopes
magmatic rocks
Mathematical analysis
Miocene
Mountains
Orogeny
Paleogene
paleo‐elevation
Plateaus
Ratios
Rock
Rocks
Stable isotopes
Subduction
Thickness
Tibetan Plateau
Uplift
title Quantitatively Tracking the Elevation of the Tibetan Plateau Since the Cretaceous: Insights From Whole‐Rock Sr/Y and La/Yb Ratios
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T00%3A18%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitatively%20Tracking%20the%20Elevation%20of%20the%20Tibetan%20Plateau%20Since%20the%20Cretaceous:%20Insights%20From%20Whole%E2%80%90Rock%20Sr/Y%20and%20La/Yb%20Ratios&rft.jtitle=Geophysical%20research%20letters&rft.au=Hu,%20Fangyang&rft.date=2020-08-16&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=15&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0094-8276&rft.eissn=1944-8007&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020GL089202&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432939249%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2432939249&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true