Comparison of identifying land cover tempo-spatial changes using GlobCover and MCD12Q1 global land cover products

Global land cover (GLC) products have been widely used in land use and land cover change (LUCC). It is an urgent need to investigate the harmonization and comparative methods for different products derived from various satellite imagery and classification schemes. MCD12Q1 and GlobCover were comparat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Arabian journal of geosciences 2020-08, Vol.13 (16), Article 792
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, Jingling, Dong, Yingying, Zhang, Mingmei, Huang, Linsheng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 16
container_start_page
container_title Arabian journal of geosciences
container_volume 13
creator Zhao, Jingling
Dong, Yingying
Zhang, Mingmei
Huang, Linsheng
description Global land cover (GLC) products have been widely used in land use and land cover change (LUCC). It is an urgent need to investigate the harmonization and comparative methods for different products derived from various satellite imagery and classification schemes. MCD12Q1 and GlobCover were comparatively used to identify the changes of land cover at a provincial scale in China. The European Space Agency (ESA) GlobCover and the Terra and Aqua combined Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Land Cover Type (MCD12Q1) datasets of 2005 and 2009 were used and compared comprehensively. The two products were harmonized and reclassified into six types at 500-m resolution, namely, forestland, grassland, cropland, wetland, artificial area, and others. Four aspects of land cover changing rate ( K ), land use integrated index ( L d ), land use dynamic degree ( LUDD ), and transfer analysis were respectively identified and analyzed. The analysis results show that the two datasets have similar mapping capabilities in monitoring the LUCC, but there are also obvious differences due to the classification schemes, especially for the forestland and grassland. The K of forestland and grassland for GlobCover is respectively − 4.94 and 2.90%, while they are 7.63 and − 47.73% for MCD12Q1. The L d difference is, respectively, 10 and 1 for MCD12Q1 and GlobCover. The LUDD in Anhui Province from 2005 to 2009 is 3.06% for MCD12Q1 and 0.90% for GlobCover. Additionally, the transfer matrix is also constructed to explore the land cover changes. The significant differences between the two datasets are attributed to forestland and grassland. We conclude that the differences are primarily ascribed to the classification systems. The study provides an important reference for identifying provincial LUCC by jointly using different GLC products.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12517-020-05780-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2432895589</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2432895589</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-49971c3710c0a0916c1a6b5ba267c378e0bdc7715abefb76d3f6b4b5c4d1d4d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuA19EkbT56KVWnMBFBr0OSprOja7qkFfbvzVZRr7w6h8PzvgceAC4JviYYi5tIKCMCYYoRZkJiRI_AjEjOkWCZPP7ZCTkFZzGuMeYSCzkD29Jveh2a6Dvoa9hUrhuaetd0K9jqroLWf7oAB7fpPYq9HhrdQvuhu5WLcIx7bNF6Ux6oPf9c3hH6SuAqXRP6p6MPvhrtEM_BSa3b6C6-5xy8P9y_lY9o-bJ4Km-XyGZcDigvCkFsJgi2WOOCcEs0N8xoykU6S4dNZYUgTBtXG8GrrOYmN8zmFanySmZzcDX1psfb0cVBrf0YuvRS0TyjsmBMFomiE2WDjzG4WvWh2eiwUwSrvVo1qVVJrTqoVTSFsikUE5xUhN_qf1JfwMJ82A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2432895589</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of identifying land cover tempo-spatial changes using GlobCover and MCD12Q1 global land cover products</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Zhao, Jingling ; Dong, Yingying ; Zhang, Mingmei ; Huang, Linsheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jingling ; Dong, Yingying ; Zhang, Mingmei ; Huang, Linsheng</creatorcontrib><description>Global land cover (GLC) products have been widely used in land use and land cover change (LUCC). It is an urgent need to investigate the harmonization and comparative methods for different products derived from various satellite imagery and classification schemes. MCD12Q1 and GlobCover were comparatively used to identify the changes of land cover at a provincial scale in China. The European Space Agency (ESA) GlobCover and the Terra and Aqua combined Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Land Cover Type (MCD12Q1) datasets of 2005 and 2009 were used and compared comprehensively. The two products were harmonized and reclassified into six types at 500-m resolution, namely, forestland, grassland, cropland, wetland, artificial area, and others. Four aspects of land cover changing rate ( K ), land use integrated index ( L d ), land use dynamic degree ( LUDD ), and transfer analysis were respectively identified and analyzed. The analysis results show that the two datasets have similar mapping capabilities in monitoring the LUCC, but there are also obvious differences due to the classification schemes, especially for the forestland and grassland. The K of forestland and grassland for GlobCover is respectively − 4.94 and 2.90%, while they are 7.63 and − 47.73% for MCD12Q1. The L d difference is, respectively, 10 and 1 for MCD12Q1 and GlobCover. The LUDD in Anhui Province from 2005 to 2009 is 3.06% for MCD12Q1 and 0.90% for GlobCover. Additionally, the transfer matrix is also constructed to explore the land cover changes. The significant differences between the two datasets are attributed to forestland and grassland. We conclude that the differences are primarily ascribed to the classification systems. The study provides an important reference for identifying provincial LUCC by jointly using different GLC products.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1866-7511</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1866-7538</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12517-020-05780-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Classification ; Classification schemes ; Classification systems ; Datasets ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth science ; Earth Sciences ; Forests ; Grasslands ; Image classification ; Imagery ; Land cover ; Land use ; Mapping ; Original Paper ; Resolution ; Satellite imagery ; Satellites ; Spaceborne remote sensing ; Spectroradiometers ; Transfer matrices</subject><ispartof>Arabian journal of geosciences, 2020-08, Vol.13 (16), Article 792</ispartof><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020</rights><rights>Saudi Society for Geosciences 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-49971c3710c0a0916c1a6b5ba267c378e0bdc7715abefb76d3f6b4b5c4d1d4d83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-49971c3710c0a0916c1a6b5ba267c378e0bdc7715abefb76d3f6b4b5c4d1d4d83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12517-020-05780-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12517-020-05780-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jingling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mingmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Linsheng</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of identifying land cover tempo-spatial changes using GlobCover and MCD12Q1 global land cover products</title><title>Arabian journal of geosciences</title><addtitle>Arab J Geosci</addtitle><description>Global land cover (GLC) products have been widely used in land use and land cover change (LUCC). It is an urgent need to investigate the harmonization and comparative methods for different products derived from various satellite imagery and classification schemes. MCD12Q1 and GlobCover were comparatively used to identify the changes of land cover at a provincial scale in China. The European Space Agency (ESA) GlobCover and the Terra and Aqua combined Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Land Cover Type (MCD12Q1) datasets of 2005 and 2009 were used and compared comprehensively. The two products were harmonized and reclassified into six types at 500-m resolution, namely, forestland, grassland, cropland, wetland, artificial area, and others. Four aspects of land cover changing rate ( K ), land use integrated index ( L d ), land use dynamic degree ( LUDD ), and transfer analysis were respectively identified and analyzed. The analysis results show that the two datasets have similar mapping capabilities in monitoring the LUCC, but there are also obvious differences due to the classification schemes, especially for the forestland and grassland. The K of forestland and grassland for GlobCover is respectively − 4.94 and 2.90%, while they are 7.63 and − 47.73% for MCD12Q1. The L d difference is, respectively, 10 and 1 for MCD12Q1 and GlobCover. The LUDD in Anhui Province from 2005 to 2009 is 3.06% for MCD12Q1 and 0.90% for GlobCover. Additionally, the transfer matrix is also constructed to explore the land cover changes. The significant differences between the two datasets are attributed to forestland and grassland. We conclude that the differences are primarily ascribed to the classification systems. The study provides an important reference for identifying provincial LUCC by jointly using different GLC products.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Classification</subject><subject>Classification schemes</subject><subject>Classification systems</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Image classification</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Resolution</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Satellites</subject><subject>Spaceborne remote sensing</subject><subject>Spectroradiometers</subject><subject>Transfer matrices</subject><issn>1866-7511</issn><issn>1866-7538</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuA19EkbT56KVWnMBFBr0OSprOja7qkFfbvzVZRr7w6h8PzvgceAC4JviYYi5tIKCMCYYoRZkJiRI_AjEjOkWCZPP7ZCTkFZzGuMeYSCzkD29Jveh2a6Dvoa9hUrhuaetd0K9jqroLWf7oAB7fpPYq9HhrdQvuhu5WLcIx7bNF6Ux6oPf9c3hH6SuAqXRP6p6MPvhrtEM_BSa3b6C6-5xy8P9y_lY9o-bJ4Km-XyGZcDigvCkFsJgi2WOOCcEs0N8xoykU6S4dNZYUgTBtXG8GrrOYmN8zmFanySmZzcDX1psfb0cVBrf0YuvRS0TyjsmBMFomiE2WDjzG4WvWh2eiwUwSrvVo1qVVJrTqoVTSFsikUE5xUhN_qf1JfwMJ82A</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Zhao, Jingling</creator><creator>Dong, Yingying</creator><creator>Zhang, Mingmei</creator><creator>Huang, Linsheng</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Comparison of identifying land cover tempo-spatial changes using GlobCover and MCD12Q1 global land cover products</title><author>Zhao, Jingling ; Dong, Yingying ; Zhang, Mingmei ; Huang, Linsheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-49971c3710c0a0916c1a6b5ba267c378e0bdc7715abefb76d3f6b4b5c4d1d4d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Classification</topic><topic>Classification schemes</topic><topic>Classification systems</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Image classification</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Resolution</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Satellites</topic><topic>Spaceborne remote sensing</topic><topic>Spectroradiometers</topic><topic>Transfer matrices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jingling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dong, Yingying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Mingmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Linsheng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Jingling</au><au>Dong, Yingying</au><au>Zhang, Mingmei</au><au>Huang, Linsheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of identifying land cover tempo-spatial changes using GlobCover and MCD12Q1 global land cover products</atitle><jtitle>Arabian journal of geosciences</jtitle><stitle>Arab J Geosci</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>16</issue><artnum>792</artnum><issn>1866-7511</issn><eissn>1866-7538</eissn><abstract>Global land cover (GLC) products have been widely used in land use and land cover change (LUCC). It is an urgent need to investigate the harmonization and comparative methods for different products derived from various satellite imagery and classification schemes. MCD12Q1 and GlobCover were comparatively used to identify the changes of land cover at a provincial scale in China. The European Space Agency (ESA) GlobCover and the Terra and Aqua combined Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Land Cover Type (MCD12Q1) datasets of 2005 and 2009 were used and compared comprehensively. The two products were harmonized and reclassified into six types at 500-m resolution, namely, forestland, grassland, cropland, wetland, artificial area, and others. Four aspects of land cover changing rate ( K ), land use integrated index ( L d ), land use dynamic degree ( LUDD ), and transfer analysis were respectively identified and analyzed. The analysis results show that the two datasets have similar mapping capabilities in monitoring the LUCC, but there are also obvious differences due to the classification schemes, especially for the forestland and grassland. The K of forestland and grassland for GlobCover is respectively − 4.94 and 2.90%, while they are 7.63 and − 47.73% for MCD12Q1. The L d difference is, respectively, 10 and 1 for MCD12Q1 and GlobCover. The LUDD in Anhui Province from 2005 to 2009 is 3.06% for MCD12Q1 and 0.90% for GlobCover. Additionally, the transfer matrix is also constructed to explore the land cover changes. The significant differences between the two datasets are attributed to forestland and grassland. We conclude that the differences are primarily ascribed to the classification systems. The study provides an important reference for identifying provincial LUCC by jointly using different GLC products.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s12517-020-05780-2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1866-7511
ispartof Arabian journal of geosciences, 2020-08, Vol.13 (16), Article 792
issn 1866-7511
1866-7538
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2432895589
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Agricultural land
Classification
Classification schemes
Classification systems
Datasets
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth science
Earth Sciences
Forests
Grasslands
Image classification
Imagery
Land cover
Land use
Mapping
Original Paper
Resolution
Satellite imagery
Satellites
Spaceborne remote sensing
Spectroradiometers
Transfer matrices
title Comparison of identifying land cover tempo-spatial changes using GlobCover and MCD12Q1 global land cover products
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A11%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20identifying%20land%20cover%20tempo-spatial%20changes%20using%20GlobCover%20and%20MCD12Q1%20global%20land%20cover%20products&rft.jtitle=Arabian%20journal%20of%20geosciences&rft.au=Zhao,%20Jingling&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=16&rft.artnum=792&rft.issn=1866-7511&rft.eissn=1866-7538&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12517-020-05780-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432895589%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2432895589&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true