Ranking the occupational incident contributory factors: A Bayesian network model for the petroleum industry

•Contributory factors of the occupational incident were ranked.•Procedure violation, poor risk perception, and poor management commitment were three top-ranking contributory factors.•Method of the study would be helpful for quantitative risk analysis of occupational safety. A vast amount of research...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Process safety and environmental protection 2020-05, Vol.137, p.352-357
Hauptverfasser: Naghavi-Konjin, Zahra, Mortazavi, Seyed-Bagher, Asilian-Mahabadi, Hassan, Hajizadeh, Ebrahim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 357
container_issue
container_start_page 352
container_title Process safety and environmental protection
container_volume 137
creator Naghavi-Konjin, Zahra
Mortazavi, Seyed-Bagher
Asilian-Mahabadi, Hassan
Hajizadeh, Ebrahim
description •Contributory factors of the occupational incident were ranked.•Procedure violation, poor risk perception, and poor management commitment were three top-ranking contributory factors.•Method of the study would be helpful for quantitative risk analysis of occupational safety. A vast amount of research has been conducted to identify human and organizational factors that contribute to the occurrence of occupational incidents. Considering the identified factors, the question is how much the occupational incident probability will decrease in the absence of one or more recognized contributory factors. Twenty-one fatal accident reports were selected for Root Cause Analysis (RCA). The contributory factors were identified by content analysis of the accident scenarios. A 5-point Likert questionnaire was developed to measure the probability of identified factors. Using the identified contributory factors and their corresponding probabilities, a Bayesian network model was constructed for estimating the probability of the occupational incident in the absence of each contributory factor. Procedure violation, poor risk perception, and poor management commitment were three top-ranking contributory factors. The Bayesian network estimated that preventing procedures violation could cause a reduction of 44 % in the occupational incident probability. Using Bayesian network’s advantages is an effective technique for quantifying occupational safety risks. Ranking the contributory factors enables us to choose the most effective prevention strategies. Procedure violation (a type of unsafe act) was the most influencing factor in occupational incident probability.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.psep.2020.01.038
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2432558480</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0957582019308687</els_id><sourcerecordid>2432558480</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-d58082d6132ca75ca6812b7e07039431b667063f1851c923b985f4f5dff780a23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1r3DAURUVJoJNJ_0BXgqztPkmWLYduJiFtAgOB0K6FRn5qNR-SK8kp8-_r6WSd1d3ce3jvEPKZQc2AtV-29ZhxrDlwqIHVINQHsmBd01RC9uqCLKCXXSUVh4_kKuctADDesQXZvZiw8-EXLb-RRmun0RQfg9lTH6wfMBRqYyjJb6YS05E6Y-fMt3RF78wRszeBBix_Y9rRQxxwT11M_2EjlhT3OB1m0jDlko7X5NKZfcZPb7kkP789_Lh_rNbP35_uV-vKCq5KNUgFig8tE9yaTlrTKsY3HUIHom8E27RtB61wTElmey42vZKucXJwrlNguFiSmzN3TPHPhLnobZzS_FPWvBFcStUomFv83LIp5pzQ6TH5g0lHzUCfpOqtPknVJ6kamJ6lzqOv5xHO9796TDpbj8Hi4BPaoofo35v_A1J6gRU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2432558480</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Ranking the occupational incident contributory factors: A Bayesian network model for the petroleum industry</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Naghavi-Konjin, Zahra ; Mortazavi, Seyed-Bagher ; Asilian-Mahabadi, Hassan ; Hajizadeh, Ebrahim</creator><creatorcontrib>Naghavi-Konjin, Zahra ; Mortazavi, Seyed-Bagher ; Asilian-Mahabadi, Hassan ; Hajizadeh, Ebrahim</creatorcontrib><description>•Contributory factors of the occupational incident were ranked.•Procedure violation, poor risk perception, and poor management commitment were three top-ranking contributory factors.•Method of the study would be helpful for quantitative risk analysis of occupational safety. A vast amount of research has been conducted to identify human and organizational factors that contribute to the occurrence of occupational incidents. Considering the identified factors, the question is how much the occupational incident probability will decrease in the absence of one or more recognized contributory factors. Twenty-one fatal accident reports were selected for Root Cause Analysis (RCA). The contributory factors were identified by content analysis of the accident scenarios. A 5-point Likert questionnaire was developed to measure the probability of identified factors. Using the identified contributory factors and their corresponding probabilities, a Bayesian network model was constructed for estimating the probability of the occupational incident in the absence of each contributory factor. Procedure violation, poor risk perception, and poor management commitment were three top-ranking contributory factors. The Bayesian network estimated that preventing procedures violation could cause a reduction of 44 % in the occupational incident probability. Using Bayesian network’s advantages is an effective technique for quantifying occupational safety risks. Ranking the contributory factors enables us to choose the most effective prevention strategies. Procedure violation (a type of unsafe act) was the most influencing factor in occupational incident probability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-5820</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1744-3598</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2020.01.038</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Rugby: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Accidents ; Bayesian analysis ; Bayesian network ; Content analysis ; Contributory factor ; Occupational incident ; Occupational safety ; Organizational aspects ; Petroleum industry ; Probability ; Ranking ; Risk management ; Risk perception ; Root cause analysis</subject><ispartof>Process safety and environmental protection, 2020-05, Vol.137, p.352-357</ispartof><rights>2020 Institution of Chemical Engineers</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. May 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-d58082d6132ca75ca6812b7e07039431b667063f1851c923b985f4f5dff780a23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-d58082d6132ca75ca6812b7e07039431b667063f1851c923b985f4f5dff780a23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2020.01.038$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Naghavi-Konjin, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortazavi, Seyed-Bagher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asilian-Mahabadi, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajizadeh, Ebrahim</creatorcontrib><title>Ranking the occupational incident contributory factors: A Bayesian network model for the petroleum industry</title><title>Process safety and environmental protection</title><description>•Contributory factors of the occupational incident were ranked.•Procedure violation, poor risk perception, and poor management commitment were three top-ranking contributory factors.•Method of the study would be helpful for quantitative risk analysis of occupational safety. A vast amount of research has been conducted to identify human and organizational factors that contribute to the occurrence of occupational incidents. Considering the identified factors, the question is how much the occupational incident probability will decrease in the absence of one or more recognized contributory factors. Twenty-one fatal accident reports were selected for Root Cause Analysis (RCA). The contributory factors were identified by content analysis of the accident scenarios. A 5-point Likert questionnaire was developed to measure the probability of identified factors. Using the identified contributory factors and their corresponding probabilities, a Bayesian network model was constructed for estimating the probability of the occupational incident in the absence of each contributory factor. Procedure violation, poor risk perception, and poor management commitment were three top-ranking contributory factors. The Bayesian network estimated that preventing procedures violation could cause a reduction of 44 % in the occupational incident probability. Using Bayesian network’s advantages is an effective technique for quantifying occupational safety risks. Ranking the contributory factors enables us to choose the most effective prevention strategies. Procedure violation (a type of unsafe act) was the most influencing factor in occupational incident probability.</description><subject>Accidents</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Bayesian network</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Contributory factor</subject><subject>Occupational incident</subject><subject>Occupational safety</subject><subject>Organizational aspects</subject><subject>Petroleum industry</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Ranking</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Risk perception</subject><subject>Root cause analysis</subject><issn>0957-5820</issn><issn>1744-3598</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1r3DAURUVJoJNJ_0BXgqztPkmWLYduJiFtAgOB0K6FRn5qNR-SK8kp8-_r6WSd1d3ce3jvEPKZQc2AtV-29ZhxrDlwqIHVINQHsmBd01RC9uqCLKCXXSUVh4_kKuctADDesQXZvZiw8-EXLb-RRmun0RQfg9lTH6wfMBRqYyjJb6YS05E6Y-fMt3RF78wRszeBBix_Y9rRQxxwT11M_2EjlhT3OB1m0jDlko7X5NKZfcZPb7kkP789_Lh_rNbP35_uV-vKCq5KNUgFig8tE9yaTlrTKsY3HUIHom8E27RtB61wTElmey42vZKucXJwrlNguFiSmzN3TPHPhLnobZzS_FPWvBFcStUomFv83LIp5pzQ6TH5g0lHzUCfpOqtPknVJ6kamJ6lzqOv5xHO9796TDpbj8Hi4BPaoofo35v_A1J6gRU</recordid><startdate>202005</startdate><enddate>202005</enddate><creator>Naghavi-Konjin, Zahra</creator><creator>Mortazavi, Seyed-Bagher</creator><creator>Asilian-Mahabadi, Hassan</creator><creator>Hajizadeh, Ebrahim</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202005</creationdate><title>Ranking the occupational incident contributory factors: A Bayesian network model for the petroleum industry</title><author>Naghavi-Konjin, Zahra ; Mortazavi, Seyed-Bagher ; Asilian-Mahabadi, Hassan ; Hajizadeh, Ebrahim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c328t-d58082d6132ca75ca6812b7e07039431b667063f1851c923b985f4f5dff780a23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accidents</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Bayesian network</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Contributory factor</topic><topic>Occupational incident</topic><topic>Occupational safety</topic><topic>Organizational aspects</topic><topic>Petroleum industry</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Ranking</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Risk perception</topic><topic>Root cause analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Naghavi-Konjin, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mortazavi, Seyed-Bagher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Asilian-Mahabadi, Hassan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hajizadeh, Ebrahim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Naghavi-Konjin, Zahra</au><au>Mortazavi, Seyed-Bagher</au><au>Asilian-Mahabadi, Hassan</au><au>Hajizadeh, Ebrahim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Ranking the occupational incident contributory factors: A Bayesian network model for the petroleum industry</atitle><jtitle>Process safety and environmental protection</jtitle><date>2020-05</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>137</volume><spage>352</spage><epage>357</epage><pages>352-357</pages><issn>0957-5820</issn><eissn>1744-3598</eissn><abstract>•Contributory factors of the occupational incident were ranked.•Procedure violation, poor risk perception, and poor management commitment were three top-ranking contributory factors.•Method of the study would be helpful for quantitative risk analysis of occupational safety. A vast amount of research has been conducted to identify human and organizational factors that contribute to the occurrence of occupational incidents. Considering the identified factors, the question is how much the occupational incident probability will decrease in the absence of one or more recognized contributory factors. Twenty-one fatal accident reports were selected for Root Cause Analysis (RCA). The contributory factors were identified by content analysis of the accident scenarios. A 5-point Likert questionnaire was developed to measure the probability of identified factors. Using the identified contributory factors and their corresponding probabilities, a Bayesian network model was constructed for estimating the probability of the occupational incident in the absence of each contributory factor. Procedure violation, poor risk perception, and poor management commitment were three top-ranking contributory factors. The Bayesian network estimated that preventing procedures violation could cause a reduction of 44 % in the occupational incident probability. Using Bayesian network’s advantages is an effective technique for quantifying occupational safety risks. Ranking the contributory factors enables us to choose the most effective prevention strategies. Procedure violation (a type of unsafe act) was the most influencing factor in occupational incident probability.</abstract><cop>Rugby</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.psep.2020.01.038</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-5820
ispartof Process safety and environmental protection, 2020-05, Vol.137, p.352-357
issn 0957-5820
1744-3598
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2432558480
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects Accidents
Bayesian analysis
Bayesian network
Content analysis
Contributory factor
Occupational incident
Occupational safety
Organizational aspects
Petroleum industry
Probability
Ranking
Risk management
Risk perception
Root cause analysis
title Ranking the occupational incident contributory factors: A Bayesian network model for the petroleum industry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A55%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Ranking%20the%20occupational%20incident%20contributory%20factors:%20A%20Bayesian%20network%20model%20for%20the%20petroleum%20industry&rft.jtitle=Process%20safety%20and%20environmental%20protection&rft.au=Naghavi-Konjin,%20Zahra&rft.date=2020-05&rft.volume=137&rft.spage=352&rft.epage=357&rft.pages=352-357&rft.issn=0957-5820&rft.eissn=1744-3598&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.psep.2020.01.038&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2432558480%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2432558480&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0957582019308687&rfr_iscdi=true