Does Participatory Budgeting Alter Public Spending? Evidence From New York City
Participatory budgeting is described as a direct-democracy approach to resource allocation decision making. Theories assume it changes how public resources are spent by moving decisions from elected officials to citizens. The literature does not consider how earmarking—in which legislators direct pa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Administration & society 2020-10, Vol.52 (9), p.1382-1409 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1409 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1382 |
container_title | Administration & society |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Calabrese, Thad Williams, Dan Gupta, Anubhav |
description | Participatory budgeting is described as a direct-democracy approach to resource allocation decision making. Theories assume it changes how public resources are spent by moving decisions from elected officials to citizens. The literature does not consider how earmarking—in which legislators direct parts of public budgets directly—might affect the impact of such policy devices. New York City’s participatory budgeting process which uses earmarks is analyzed to determine spending changes. Officials involved fund more projects at lower average amounts than those not involved but do not change the areas of funding, all of which is expected in systems of budgetary earmarks controlled by legislators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0095399720912548 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430950237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0095399720912548</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2430950237</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-915fc2fb679cc63099a2f0bb0775945c190e87af8613094a7ce9f88461555c4a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UM9LwzAUDqLgnN49BjxXX9KmaU4y56aCuIF68FTSLBmZW1OTVNl_b8YEQfBdHny_Hu9D6JzAJSGcXwEIlgvBKQhCWVEdoAFhjGY55OIQDXZ0tuOP0UkIK0iTmAGa3Tod8Fz6aJXtZHR-i2_6xVJH2y7xaB21x_O-WVuFnzvdLhJ6jSefdqFbpfHUuw1-0l_4zfl3PLZxe4qOjFwHffazh-h1OnkZ32ePs7uH8egxUzmImAnCjKKmKblQqkyQkNRA0wDnTBRMEQG64tJUJUlkIbnSwlRVUaafmCpkPkQX-9zOu49eh1ivXO_bdLKmRbIwoDlPKtirlHcheG3qztuN9NuaQL2rrf5bW7Jke0uQS_0b-q_-G8cJapg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430950237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does Participatory Budgeting Alter Public Spending? Evidence From New York City</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Calabrese, Thad ; Williams, Dan ; Gupta, Anubhav</creator><creatorcontrib>Calabrese, Thad ; Williams, Dan ; Gupta, Anubhav</creatorcontrib><description>Participatory budgeting is described as a direct-democracy approach to resource allocation decision making. Theories assume it changes how public resources are spent by moving decisions from elected officials to citizens. The literature does not consider how earmarking—in which legislators direct parts of public budgets directly—might affect the impact of such policy devices. New York City’s participatory budgeting process which uses earmarks is analyzed to determine spending changes. Officials involved fund more projects at lower average amounts than those not involved but do not change the areas of funding, all of which is expected in systems of budgetary earmarks controlled by legislators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0095-3997</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-3039</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0095399720912548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Appropriations ; Budgets ; Citizen participation ; Decision making ; Deliberative democracy ; Democracy ; Direct democracy ; Government spending ; Legislators ; Policy making ; Public officials ; Resource allocation</subject><ispartof>Administration & society, 2020-10, Vol.52 (9), p.1382-1409</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-915fc2fb679cc63099a2f0bb0775945c190e87af8613094a7ce9f88461555c4a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-915fc2fb679cc63099a2f0bb0775945c190e87af8613094a7ce9f88461555c4a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9398-8817</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0095399720912548$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0095399720912548$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21800,27845,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calabrese, Thad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Anubhav</creatorcontrib><title>Does Participatory Budgeting Alter Public Spending? Evidence From New York City</title><title>Administration & society</title><description>Participatory budgeting is described as a direct-democracy approach to resource allocation decision making. Theories assume it changes how public resources are spent by moving decisions from elected officials to citizens. The literature does not consider how earmarking—in which legislators direct parts of public budgets directly—might affect the impact of such policy devices. New York City’s participatory budgeting process which uses earmarks is analyzed to determine spending changes. Officials involved fund more projects at lower average amounts than those not involved but do not change the areas of funding, all of which is expected in systems of budgetary earmarks controlled by legislators.</description><subject>Appropriations</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Citizen participation</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deliberative democracy</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Direct democracy</subject><subject>Government spending</subject><subject>Legislators</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Public officials</subject><subject>Resource allocation</subject><issn>0095-3997</issn><issn>1552-3039</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UM9LwzAUDqLgnN49BjxXX9KmaU4y56aCuIF68FTSLBmZW1OTVNl_b8YEQfBdHny_Hu9D6JzAJSGcXwEIlgvBKQhCWVEdoAFhjGY55OIQDXZ0tuOP0UkIK0iTmAGa3Tod8Fz6aJXtZHR-i2_6xVJH2y7xaB21x_O-WVuFnzvdLhJ6jSefdqFbpfHUuw1-0l_4zfl3PLZxe4qOjFwHffazh-h1OnkZ32ePs7uH8egxUzmImAnCjKKmKblQqkyQkNRA0wDnTBRMEQG64tJUJUlkIbnSwlRVUaafmCpkPkQX-9zOu49eh1ivXO_bdLKmRbIwoDlPKtirlHcheG3qztuN9NuaQL2rrf5bW7Jke0uQS_0b-q_-G8cJapg</recordid><startdate>202010</startdate><enddate>202010</enddate><creator>Calabrese, Thad</creator><creator>Williams, Dan</creator><creator>Gupta, Anubhav</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9398-8817</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202010</creationdate><title>Does Participatory Budgeting Alter Public Spending? Evidence From New York City</title><author>Calabrese, Thad ; Williams, Dan ; Gupta, Anubhav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-915fc2fb679cc63099a2f0bb0775945c190e87af8613094a7ce9f88461555c4a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Appropriations</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Citizen participation</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deliberative democracy</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Direct democracy</topic><topic>Government spending</topic><topic>Legislators</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Public officials</topic><topic>Resource allocation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calabrese, Thad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Dan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gupta, Anubhav</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Administration & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calabrese, Thad</au><au>Williams, Dan</au><au>Gupta, Anubhav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does Participatory Budgeting Alter Public Spending? Evidence From New York City</atitle><jtitle>Administration & society</jtitle><date>2020-10</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1382</spage><epage>1409</epage><pages>1382-1409</pages><issn>0095-3997</issn><eissn>1552-3039</eissn><abstract>Participatory budgeting is described as a direct-democracy approach to resource allocation decision making. Theories assume it changes how public resources are spent by moving decisions from elected officials to citizens. The literature does not consider how earmarking—in which legislators direct parts of public budgets directly—might affect the impact of such policy devices. New York City’s participatory budgeting process which uses earmarks is analyzed to determine spending changes. Officials involved fund more projects at lower average amounts than those not involved but do not change the areas of funding, all of which is expected in systems of budgetary earmarks controlled by legislators.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0095399720912548</doi><tpages>28</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9398-8817</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0095-3997 |
ispartof | Administration & society, 2020-10, Vol.52 (9), p.1382-1409 |
issn | 0095-3997 1552-3039 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2430950237 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Journals Online; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Appropriations Budgets Citizen participation Decision making Deliberative democracy Democracy Direct democracy Government spending Legislators Policy making Public officials Resource allocation |
title | Does Participatory Budgeting Alter Public Spending? Evidence From New York City |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A00%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20Participatory%20Budgeting%20Alter%20Public%20Spending?%20Evidence%20From%20New%20York%20City&rft.jtitle=Administration%20&%20society&rft.au=Calabrese,%20Thad&rft.date=2020-10&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1382&rft.epage=1409&rft.pages=1382-1409&rft.issn=0095-3997&rft.eissn=1552-3039&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0095399720912548&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430950237%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430950237&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0095399720912548&rfr_iscdi=true |