Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?

In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income fam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Renewable agriculture and food systems 2020-02, Vol.35 (1), p.90-101
Hauptverfasser: Becot, Florence A., Sitaker, Marilyn, Kolodinsky, Jane M., Morgan, Emily H., Wang, Weiwei, Garner, Jennifer, Ammerman, Alice, Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie, Seguin, Rebecca A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 101
container_issue 1
container_start_page 90
container_title Renewable agriculture and food systems
container_volume 35
creator Becot, Florence A.
Sitaker, Marilyn
Kolodinsky, Jane M.
Morgan, Emily H.
Wang, Weiwei
Garner, Jennifer
Ammerman, Alice
Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie
Seguin, Rebecca A.
description In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income families and sales of locally-grown foods for farmers. Proponents of these interventions assert that these programs have a positive impact on local economies yet there is limited evidence to validate this argument. This research project used a customized input-output model to simulate potential economic impacts of programs and policies that enable Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to shift purchases from traditional food retailers to DTC venues in four states. Two different scenarios were explored: (1) increased outreach to low-income consumers and (2) financial support for using SNAP benefits at DTC market channels. We found a positive, though modest, economic impact at the state level under both scenarios when accounting for (a) business losses in the food retail and wholesale sectors, (b) a shift in acreage from commodity to specialty crops and (c) the cost to taxpayers. Since most of the increased economic activity would be in the produce farming sector, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for this sector along with potential policy implications.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1742170518000327
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430597016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2430597016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-9b8731c3b4a8b03395a9af9992556bcc467c805dcb451b7e82fbea369367988d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_wNsLXvSwmmw2m-QkpfgFpRaq5yVJszalu1mT7KFn_7hbK148zTA8zMAgdEnwLcGE3y0JL3LCMSMCY0xzfoRG-ygjnNDjP4_ZKTqLcYNxLiSnI_Q1VS0oiGtXJ3AtpLWFrg9mraIFX8PWG7WF2vtVBL2DZd91W9vYNg3pvE_BJedbmMToYlKtsbAI_iOoBq6X88niBoI1rnMDH8E1nTLpZ-HQao1vfbO7P0cntdpGe_GrY_T--PA2fc5mr08v08ksM5SUKZNacEoM1YUSGlMqmZKqllLmjJXamKLkRmC2MrpgRHMr8lpbRUtJSy6FWNExujr0dsF_9jamauP70A6TVV5QzCTHpBwocqBM8DEGW1ddcI0Ku4rgav919e9r-g1bjnF_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430597016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Becot, Florence A. ; Sitaker, Marilyn ; Kolodinsky, Jane M. ; Morgan, Emily H. ; Wang, Weiwei ; Garner, Jennifer ; Ammerman, Alice ; Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie ; Seguin, Rebecca A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Becot, Florence A. ; Sitaker, Marilyn ; Kolodinsky, Jane M. ; Morgan, Emily H. ; Wang, Weiwei ; Garner, Jennifer ; Ammerman, Alice ; Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie ; Seguin, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income families and sales of locally-grown foods for farmers. Proponents of these interventions assert that these programs have a positive impact on local economies yet there is limited evidence to validate this argument. This research project used a customized input-output model to simulate potential economic impacts of programs and policies that enable Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to shift purchases from traditional food retailers to DTC venues in four states. Two different scenarios were explored: (1) increased outreach to low-income consumers and (2) financial support for using SNAP benefits at DTC market channels. We found a positive, though modest, economic impact at the state level under both scenarios when accounting for (a) business losses in the food retail and wholesale sectors, (b) a shift in acreage from commodity to specialty crops and (c) the cost to taxpayers. Since most of the increased economic activity would be in the produce farming sector, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for this sector along with potential policy implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-1705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1742170518000327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Agricultural economics ; Agriculture ; Community ; Community supported agriculture ; Computer simulation ; Consumers ; Economic conditions ; Economic development ; Economic impact ; Economic models ; Economics ; Farmers ; Farmers markets ; Food ; Food stamps ; Impact analysis ; Income ; Local economy ; Low income groups ; Nutrition ; Purchasing ; Research projects ; Researchers ; Retail stores ; Sales ; Shopping ; Specialty crops ; Traditional foods</subject><ispartof>Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2020-02, Vol.35 (1), p.90-101</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-9b8731c3b4a8b03395a9af9992556bcc467c805dcb451b7e82fbea369367988d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-9b8731c3b4a8b03395a9af9992556bcc467c805dcb451b7e82fbea369367988d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0085-5661</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becot, Florence A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitaker, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodinsky, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Emily H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammerman, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seguin, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><title>Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?</title><title>Renewable agriculture and food systems</title><description>In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income families and sales of locally-grown foods for farmers. Proponents of these interventions assert that these programs have a positive impact on local economies yet there is limited evidence to validate this argument. This research project used a customized input-output model to simulate potential economic impacts of programs and policies that enable Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to shift purchases from traditional food retailers to DTC venues in four states. Two different scenarios were explored: (1) increased outreach to low-income consumers and (2) financial support for using SNAP benefits at DTC market channels. We found a positive, though modest, economic impact at the state level under both scenarios when accounting for (a) business losses in the food retail and wholesale sectors, (b) a shift in acreage from commodity to specialty crops and (c) the cost to taxpayers. Since most of the increased economic activity would be in the produce farming sector, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for this sector along with potential policy implications.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community supported agriculture</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farmers markets</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food stamps</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Local economy</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Shopping</subject><subject>Specialty crops</subject><subject>Traditional foods</subject><issn>1742-1705</issn><issn>1742-1713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_wNsLXvSwmmw2m-QkpfgFpRaq5yVJszalu1mT7KFn_7hbK148zTA8zMAgdEnwLcGE3y0JL3LCMSMCY0xzfoRG-ygjnNDjP4_ZKTqLcYNxLiSnI_Q1VS0oiGtXJ3AtpLWFrg9mraIFX8PWG7WF2vtVBL2DZd91W9vYNg3pvE_BJedbmMToYlKtsbAI_iOoBq6X88niBoI1rnMDH8E1nTLpZ-HQao1vfbO7P0cntdpGe_GrY_T--PA2fc5mr08v08ksM5SUKZNacEoM1YUSGlMqmZKqllLmjJXamKLkRmC2MrpgRHMr8lpbRUtJSy6FWNExujr0dsF_9jamauP70A6TVV5QzCTHpBwocqBM8DEGW1ddcI0Ku4rgav919e9r-g1bjnF_</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Becot, Florence A.</creator><creator>Sitaker, Marilyn</creator><creator>Kolodinsky, Jane M.</creator><creator>Morgan, Emily H.</creator><creator>Wang, Weiwei</creator><creator>Garner, Jennifer</creator><creator>Ammerman, Alice</creator><creator>Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie</creator><creator>Seguin, Rebecca A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0085-5661</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?</title><author>Becot, Florence A. ; Sitaker, Marilyn ; Kolodinsky, Jane M. ; Morgan, Emily H. ; Wang, Weiwei ; Garner, Jennifer ; Ammerman, Alice ; Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie ; Seguin, Rebecca A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-9b8731c3b4a8b03395a9af9992556bcc467c805dcb451b7e82fbea369367988d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community supported agriculture</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farmers markets</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food stamps</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Local economy</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Shopping</topic><topic>Specialty crops</topic><topic>Traditional foods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becot, Florence A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitaker, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodinsky, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Emily H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammerman, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seguin, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becot, Florence A.</au><au>Sitaker, Marilyn</au><au>Kolodinsky, Jane M.</au><au>Morgan, Emily H.</au><au>Wang, Weiwei</au><au>Garner, Jennifer</au><au>Ammerman, Alice</au><au>Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie</au><au>Seguin, Rebecca A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?</atitle><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>90-101</pages><issn>1742-1705</issn><eissn>1742-1713</eissn><abstract>In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income families and sales of locally-grown foods for farmers. Proponents of these interventions assert that these programs have a positive impact on local economies yet there is limited evidence to validate this argument. This research project used a customized input-output model to simulate potential economic impacts of programs and policies that enable Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to shift purchases from traditional food retailers to DTC venues in four states. Two different scenarios were explored: (1) increased outreach to low-income consumers and (2) financial support for using SNAP benefits at DTC market channels. We found a positive, though modest, economic impact at the state level under both scenarios when accounting for (a) business losses in the food retail and wholesale sectors, (b) a shift in acreage from commodity to specialty crops and (c) the cost to taxpayers. Since most of the increased economic activity would be in the produce farming sector, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for this sector along with potential policy implications.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1742170518000327</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0085-5661</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-1705
ispartof Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2020-02, Vol.35 (1), p.90-101
issn 1742-1705
1742-1713
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2430597016
source Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Accounting
Agricultural economics
Agriculture
Community
Community supported agriculture
Computer simulation
Consumers
Economic conditions
Economic development
Economic impact
Economic models
Economics
Farmers
Farmers markets
Food
Food stamps
Impact analysis
Income
Local economy
Low income groups
Nutrition
Purchasing
Research projects
Researchers
Retail stores
Sales
Shopping
Specialty crops
Traditional foods
title Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A18%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20shift%20in%20the%20purchase%20of%20local%20foods%20by%20Supplemental%20Nutrition%20Assistance%20Program%20(SNAP)%20recipients%20impact%20the%20local%20economy?&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20agriculture%20and%20food%20systems&rft.au=Becot,%20Florence%20A.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=90-101&rft.issn=1742-1705&rft.eissn=1742-1713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1742170518000327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430597016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430597016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true