Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?
In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income fam...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Renewable agriculture and food systems 2020-02, Vol.35 (1), p.90-101 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 101 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 90 |
container_title | Renewable agriculture and food systems |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Becot, Florence A. Sitaker, Marilyn Kolodinsky, Jane M. Morgan, Emily H. Wang, Weiwei Garner, Jennifer Ammerman, Alice Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie Seguin, Rebecca A. |
description | In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income families and sales of locally-grown foods for farmers. Proponents of these interventions assert that these programs have a positive impact on local economies yet there is limited evidence to validate this argument. This research project used a customized input-output model to simulate potential economic impacts of programs and policies that enable Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to shift purchases from traditional food retailers to DTC venues in four states. Two different scenarios were explored: (1) increased outreach to low-income consumers and (2) financial support for using SNAP benefits at DTC market channels. We found a positive, though modest, economic impact at the state level under both scenarios when accounting for (a) business losses in the food retail and wholesale sectors, (b) a shift in acreage from commodity to specialty crops and (c) the cost to taxpayers. Since most of the increased economic activity would be in the produce farming sector, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for this sector along with potential policy implications. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1742170518000327 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430597016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2430597016</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-9b8731c3b4a8b03395a9af9992556bcc467c805dcb451b7e82fbea369367988d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplkE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_wNsLXvSwmmw2m-QkpfgFpRaq5yVJszalu1mT7KFn_7hbK148zTA8zMAgdEnwLcGE3y0JL3LCMSMCY0xzfoRG-ygjnNDjP4_ZKTqLcYNxLiSnI_Q1VS0oiGtXJ3AtpLWFrg9mraIFX8PWG7WF2vtVBL2DZd91W9vYNg3pvE_BJedbmMToYlKtsbAI_iOoBq6X88niBoI1rnMDH8E1nTLpZ-HQao1vfbO7P0cntdpGe_GrY_T--PA2fc5mr08v08ksM5SUKZNacEoM1YUSGlMqmZKqllLmjJXamKLkRmC2MrpgRHMr8lpbRUtJSy6FWNExujr0dsF_9jamauP70A6TVV5QzCTHpBwocqBM8DEGW1ddcI0Ku4rgav919e9r-g1bjnF_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430597016</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Becot, Florence A. ; Sitaker, Marilyn ; Kolodinsky, Jane M. ; Morgan, Emily H. ; Wang, Weiwei ; Garner, Jennifer ; Ammerman, Alice ; Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie ; Seguin, Rebecca A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Becot, Florence A. ; Sitaker, Marilyn ; Kolodinsky, Jane M. ; Morgan, Emily H. ; Wang, Weiwei ; Garner, Jennifer ; Ammerman, Alice ; Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie ; Seguin, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income families and sales of locally-grown foods for farmers. Proponents of these interventions assert that these programs have a positive impact on local economies yet there is limited evidence to validate this argument. This research project used a customized input-output model to simulate potential economic impacts of programs and policies that enable Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to shift purchases from traditional food retailers to DTC venues in four states. Two different scenarios were explored: (1) increased outreach to low-income consumers and (2) financial support for using SNAP benefits at DTC market channels. We found a positive, though modest, economic impact at the state level under both scenarios when accounting for (a) business losses in the food retail and wholesale sectors, (b) a shift in acreage from commodity to specialty crops and (c) the cost to taxpayers. Since most of the increased economic activity would be in the produce farming sector, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for this sector along with potential policy implications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-1705</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-1713</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1742170518000327</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Agricultural economics ; Agriculture ; Community ; Community supported agriculture ; Computer simulation ; Consumers ; Economic conditions ; Economic development ; Economic impact ; Economic models ; Economics ; Farmers ; Farmers markets ; Food ; Food stamps ; Impact analysis ; Income ; Local economy ; Low income groups ; Nutrition ; Purchasing ; Research projects ; Researchers ; Retail stores ; Sales ; Shopping ; Specialty crops ; Traditional foods</subject><ispartof>Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2020-02, Vol.35 (1), p.90-101</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-9b8731c3b4a8b03395a9af9992556bcc467c805dcb451b7e82fbea369367988d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-9b8731c3b4a8b03395a9af9992556bcc467c805dcb451b7e82fbea369367988d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0085-5661</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Becot, Florence A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitaker, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodinsky, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Emily H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammerman, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seguin, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><title>Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?</title><title>Renewable agriculture and food systems</title><description>In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income families and sales of locally-grown foods for farmers. Proponents of these interventions assert that these programs have a positive impact on local economies yet there is limited evidence to validate this argument. This research project used a customized input-output model to simulate potential economic impacts of programs and policies that enable Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to shift purchases from traditional food retailers to DTC venues in four states. Two different scenarios were explored: (1) increased outreach to low-income consumers and (2) financial support for using SNAP benefits at DTC market channels. We found a positive, though modest, economic impact at the state level under both scenarios when accounting for (a) business losses in the food retail and wholesale sectors, (b) a shift in acreage from commodity to specialty crops and (c) the cost to taxpayers. Since most of the increased economic activity would be in the produce farming sector, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for this sector along with potential policy implications.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Agricultural economics</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Community supported agriculture</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Farmers</subject><subject>Farmers markets</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food stamps</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Local economy</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Nutrition</subject><subject>Purchasing</subject><subject>Research projects</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Retail stores</subject><subject>Sales</subject><subject>Shopping</subject><subject>Specialty crops</subject><subject>Traditional foods</subject><issn>1742-1705</issn><issn>1742-1713</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNplkE1LAzEYhIMoWKs_wNsLXvSwmmw2m-QkpfgFpRaq5yVJszalu1mT7KFn_7hbK148zTA8zMAgdEnwLcGE3y0JL3LCMSMCY0xzfoRG-ygjnNDjP4_ZKTqLcYNxLiSnI_Q1VS0oiGtXJ3AtpLWFrg9mraIFX8PWG7WF2vtVBL2DZd91W9vYNg3pvE_BJedbmMToYlKtsbAI_iOoBq6X88niBoI1rnMDH8E1nTLpZ-HQao1vfbO7P0cntdpGe_GrY_T--PA2fc5mr08v08ksM5SUKZNacEoM1YUSGlMqmZKqllLmjJXamKLkRmC2MrpgRHMr8lpbRUtJSy6FWNExujr0dsF_9jamauP70A6TVV5QzCTHpBwocqBM8DEGW1ddcI0Ku4rgav919e9r-g1bjnF_</recordid><startdate>202002</startdate><enddate>202002</enddate><creator>Becot, Florence A.</creator><creator>Sitaker, Marilyn</creator><creator>Kolodinsky, Jane M.</creator><creator>Morgan, Emily H.</creator><creator>Wang, Weiwei</creator><creator>Garner, Jennifer</creator><creator>Ammerman, Alice</creator><creator>Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie</creator><creator>Seguin, Rebecca A.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>R05</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0085-5661</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202002</creationdate><title>Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?</title><author>Becot, Florence A. ; Sitaker, Marilyn ; Kolodinsky, Jane M. ; Morgan, Emily H. ; Wang, Weiwei ; Garner, Jennifer ; Ammerman, Alice ; Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie ; Seguin, Rebecca A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-9b8731c3b4a8b03395a9af9992556bcc467c805dcb451b7e82fbea369367988d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Agricultural economics</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Community supported agriculture</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Farmers</topic><topic>Farmers markets</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food stamps</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Local economy</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Nutrition</topic><topic>Purchasing</topic><topic>Research projects</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Retail stores</topic><topic>Sales</topic><topic>Shopping</topic><topic>Specialty crops</topic><topic>Traditional foods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Becot, Florence A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sitaker, Marilyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolodinsky, Jane M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morgan, Emily H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Weiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garner, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ammerman, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seguin, Rebecca A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>University of Michigan</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Becot, Florence A.</au><au>Sitaker, Marilyn</au><au>Kolodinsky, Jane M.</au><au>Morgan, Emily H.</au><au>Wang, Weiwei</au><au>Garner, Jennifer</au><au>Ammerman, Alice</au><au>Jilcott Pitts, Stephanie</au><au>Seguin, Rebecca A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy?</atitle><jtitle>Renewable agriculture and food systems</jtitle><date>2020-02</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>90</spage><epage>101</epage><pages>90-101</pages><issn>1742-1705</issn><eissn>1742-1713</eissn><abstract>In recent years, several initiatives have sought to encourage redemption of food assistance benefits at direct-to-consumer (DTC) market venues such as community supported agriculture programs and farmers’ markets in the USA, with the dual goal of increasing access to healthy foods for low-income families and sales of locally-grown foods for farmers. Proponents of these interventions assert that these programs have a positive impact on local economies yet there is limited evidence to validate this argument. This research project used a customized input-output model to simulate potential economic impacts of programs and policies that enable Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients to shift purchases from traditional food retailers to DTC venues in four states. Two different scenarios were explored: (1) increased outreach to low-income consumers and (2) financial support for using SNAP benefits at DTC market channels. We found a positive, though modest, economic impact at the state level under both scenarios when accounting for (a) business losses in the food retail and wholesale sectors, (b) a shift in acreage from commodity to specialty crops and (c) the cost to taxpayers. Since most of the increased economic activity would be in the produce farming sector, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for this sector along with potential policy implications.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1742170518000327</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0085-5661</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-1705 |
ispartof | Renewable agriculture and food systems, 2020-02, Vol.35 (1), p.90-101 |
issn | 1742-1705 1742-1713 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2430597016 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Accounting Agricultural economics Agriculture Community Community supported agriculture Computer simulation Consumers Economic conditions Economic development Economic impact Economic models Economics Farmers Farmers markets Food Food stamps Impact analysis Income Local economy Low income groups Nutrition Purchasing Research projects Researchers Retail stores Sales Shopping Specialty crops Traditional foods |
title | Can a shift in the purchase of local foods by Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) recipients impact the local economy? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T07%3A18%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20a%20shift%20in%20the%20purchase%20of%20local%20foods%20by%20Supplemental%20Nutrition%20Assistance%20Program%20(SNAP)%20recipients%20impact%20the%20local%20economy?&rft.jtitle=Renewable%20agriculture%20and%20food%20systems&rft.au=Becot,%20Florence%20A.&rft.date=2020-02&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=90&rft.epage=101&rft.pages=90-101&rft.issn=1742-1705&rft.eissn=1742-1713&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1742170518000327&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430597016%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430597016&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |