Assessing economic instruments to steer urban residential sprawl, using a hedonic pricing simulation modelling approach
•Flat property taxes and public transport subsidies are efficient instruments to control urban residential sprawl.•Land taxes are not sufficient to discourage urban residential sprawl, failing to compete with low land prices and high development profits.•Assessed economic incentive instruments lead...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Land use policy 2020-03, Vol.92, p.104458, Article 104458 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 104458 |
container_title | Land use policy |
container_volume | 92 |
creator | Mendonça, Rita Roebeling, Peter Martins, Filomena Fidélis, Teresa Teotónio, Carla Alves, Henrique Rocha, João |
description | •Flat property taxes and public transport subsidies are efficient instruments to control urban residential sprawl.•Land taxes are not sufficient to discourage urban residential sprawl, failing to compete with low land prices and high development profits.•Assessed economic incentive instruments lead to a decrease in urban residential area and living space, and an increase in real estate values.
Over the past centuries, cities have undergone major transformations that led to global urbanization. One of the phenomena emerging from urbanization is urban sprawl, defined as the uncontrolled spread of cities into undeveloped areas. The decrease in housing prices and commuting costs as well as the failure to internalize the real costs associated with natural land, led to households moving-out into the urban fringe – resulting in fragmented, low-density residential development patterns that has multiple negative impacts. Awareness for this problem has fed the need for the implementation of effective policies against urban residential sprawl – a subject that has received considerable attention in literature, albeit little attention has been given to economic incentive instruments. Hence, the objective of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of different economic instruments in steering urban residential sprawl – assessing property taxes, land taxes and public transport subsidies. To this end, the Sustainable Urbanizing Landscape Development (SULD) model is used and adapted, and a case study is provided for the medium-sized City of Aveiro in central Portugal. Results show that a flat property tax and a public transport subsidy for low and middle-income households are the most efficient instruments, leading to a decrease in urban residential area, living space and housing quantity as well as an increase in real estate values. On the other hand, a land tax results in insignificant changes in urban residential development patterns. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104458 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430407990</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0264837719305241</els_id><sourcerecordid>2430407990</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d02ae27ce65b26eff50b664af8bf6edf5ef120c55235c1691c61bfca50dcbffb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUE1r3DAUFKGBbJP8B0Gu9VaSLdk-bkObFhZyac9Clp6yWmzJ0bMb-u-r3S30mNODefPBDCGUsy1nXH0-bkcT3Yowp3ErGO8L3DSyuyIb3rV1JVvZfCAbJlRTdXXb3pCPiEfGmOq52JC3HSIghvhCwaaYpmBpiLjkdYK4IF0SxQUg0zUPJtIMGFx5BDNSnLN5Gz_R9aw29AAuxSKfc7AnBMO0jmYJKdIpORjHM22eczL2cEeuvRkR7v_dW_Lr29efj9-r_fPTj8fdvrJ1r5bKMWFAtBaUHIQC7yUblGqM7wavwHkJngtmpRS1tLxUsooP3hrJnB28H-pb8nDxLbGvK-Cij2nNsURq0dSsYW3fs8LqLiybE2IGr0uJyeQ_mjN9mlkf9f-Z9WlmfZm5SL9cpFBa_A6QNdoA0YILGeyiXQrvm_wFRRGP7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430407990</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing economic instruments to steer urban residential sprawl, using a hedonic pricing simulation modelling approach</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mendonça, Rita ; Roebeling, Peter ; Martins, Filomena ; Fidélis, Teresa ; Teotónio, Carla ; Alves, Henrique ; Rocha, João</creator><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Rita ; Roebeling, Peter ; Martins, Filomena ; Fidélis, Teresa ; Teotónio, Carla ; Alves, Henrique ; Rocha, João</creatorcontrib><description>•Flat property taxes and public transport subsidies are efficient instruments to control urban residential sprawl.•Land taxes are not sufficient to discourage urban residential sprawl, failing to compete with low land prices and high development profits.•Assessed economic incentive instruments lead to a decrease in urban residential area and living space, and an increase in real estate values.
Over the past centuries, cities have undergone major transformations that led to global urbanization. One of the phenomena emerging from urbanization is urban sprawl, defined as the uncontrolled spread of cities into undeveloped areas. The decrease in housing prices and commuting costs as well as the failure to internalize the real costs associated with natural land, led to households moving-out into the urban fringe – resulting in fragmented, low-density residential development patterns that has multiple negative impacts. Awareness for this problem has fed the need for the implementation of effective policies against urban residential sprawl – a subject that has received considerable attention in literature, albeit little attention has been given to economic incentive instruments. Hence, the objective of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of different economic instruments in steering urban residential sprawl – assessing property taxes, land taxes and public transport subsidies. To this end, the Sustainable Urbanizing Landscape Development (SULD) model is used and adapted, and a case study is provided for the medium-sized City of Aveiro in central Portugal. Results show that a flat property tax and a public transport subsidy for low and middle-income households are the most efficient instruments, leading to a decrease in urban residential area, living space and housing quantity as well as an increase in real estate values. On the other hand, a land tax results in insignificant changes in urban residential development patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-8377</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5754</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104458</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Cities ; Commuting ; Computer simulation ; Costs ; Economic incentive instruments ; Economic incentives ; Economics ; Hedonic pricing simulation ; Households ; Housing ; Housing developments ; Land use ; Peri-urban areas ; Property taxes ; Public lands ; Public transportation ; Real estate ; Residential areas ; Residential density ; Residential development ; Simulation ; Steering ; Subsidies ; Sustainable development ; Taxation ; Taxes ; Urban areas ; Urban planning ; Urban sprawl ; Urbanization</subject><ispartof>Land use policy, 2020-03, Vol.92, p.104458, Article 104458</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d02ae27ce65b26eff50b664af8bf6edf5ef120c55235c1691c61bfca50dcbffb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d02ae27ce65b26eff50b664af8bf6edf5ef120c55235c1691c61bfca50dcbffb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264837719305241$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27843,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roebeling, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Filomena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidélis, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teotónio, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, João</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing economic instruments to steer urban residential sprawl, using a hedonic pricing simulation modelling approach</title><title>Land use policy</title><description>•Flat property taxes and public transport subsidies are efficient instruments to control urban residential sprawl.•Land taxes are not sufficient to discourage urban residential sprawl, failing to compete with low land prices and high development profits.•Assessed economic incentive instruments lead to a decrease in urban residential area and living space, and an increase in real estate values.
Over the past centuries, cities have undergone major transformations that led to global urbanization. One of the phenomena emerging from urbanization is urban sprawl, defined as the uncontrolled spread of cities into undeveloped areas. The decrease in housing prices and commuting costs as well as the failure to internalize the real costs associated with natural land, led to households moving-out into the urban fringe – resulting in fragmented, low-density residential development patterns that has multiple negative impacts. Awareness for this problem has fed the need for the implementation of effective policies against urban residential sprawl – a subject that has received considerable attention in literature, albeit little attention has been given to economic incentive instruments. Hence, the objective of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of different economic instruments in steering urban residential sprawl – assessing property taxes, land taxes and public transport subsidies. To this end, the Sustainable Urbanizing Landscape Development (SULD) model is used and adapted, and a case study is provided for the medium-sized City of Aveiro in central Portugal. Results show that a flat property tax and a public transport subsidy for low and middle-income households are the most efficient instruments, leading to a decrease in urban residential area, living space and housing quantity as well as an increase in real estate values. On the other hand, a land tax results in insignificant changes in urban residential development patterns.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Commuting</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Economic incentive instruments</subject><subject>Economic incentives</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Hedonic pricing simulation</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Housing developments</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Peri-urban areas</subject><subject>Property taxes</subject><subject>Public lands</subject><subject>Public transportation</subject><subject>Real estate</subject><subject>Residential areas</subject><subject>Residential density</subject><subject>Residential development</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Steering</subject><subject>Subsidies</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Taxes</subject><subject>Urban areas</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><subject>Urban sprawl</subject><subject>Urbanization</subject><issn>0264-8377</issn><issn>1873-5754</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUE1r3DAUFKGBbJP8B0Gu9VaSLdk-bkObFhZyac9Clp6yWmzJ0bMb-u-r3S30mNODefPBDCGUsy1nXH0-bkcT3Yowp3ErGO8L3DSyuyIb3rV1JVvZfCAbJlRTdXXb3pCPiEfGmOq52JC3HSIghvhCwaaYpmBpiLjkdYK4IF0SxQUg0zUPJtIMGFx5BDNSnLN5Gz_R9aw29AAuxSKfc7AnBMO0jmYJKdIpORjHM22eczL2cEeuvRkR7v_dW_Lr29efj9-r_fPTj8fdvrJ1r5bKMWFAtBaUHIQC7yUblGqM7wavwHkJngtmpRS1tLxUsooP3hrJnB28H-pb8nDxLbGvK-Cij2nNsURq0dSsYW3fs8LqLiybE2IGr0uJyeQ_mjN9mlkf9f-Z9WlmfZm5SL9cpFBa_A6QNdoA0YILGeyiXQrvm_wFRRGP7g</recordid><startdate>202003</startdate><enddate>202003</enddate><creator>Mendonça, Rita</creator><creator>Roebeling, Peter</creator><creator>Martins, Filomena</creator><creator>Fidélis, Teresa</creator><creator>Teotónio, Carla</creator><creator>Alves, Henrique</creator><creator>Rocha, João</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202003</creationdate><title>Assessing economic instruments to steer urban residential sprawl, using a hedonic pricing simulation modelling approach</title><author>Mendonça, Rita ; Roebeling, Peter ; Martins, Filomena ; Fidélis, Teresa ; Teotónio, Carla ; Alves, Henrique ; Rocha, João</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-d02ae27ce65b26eff50b664af8bf6edf5ef120c55235c1691c61bfca50dcbffb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Commuting</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Economic incentive instruments</topic><topic>Economic incentives</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Hedonic pricing simulation</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Housing developments</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Peri-urban areas</topic><topic>Property taxes</topic><topic>Public lands</topic><topic>Public transportation</topic><topic>Real estate</topic><topic>Residential areas</topic><topic>Residential density</topic><topic>Residential development</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Steering</topic><topic>Subsidies</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Taxes</topic><topic>Urban areas</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><topic>Urban sprawl</topic><topic>Urbanization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mendonça, Rita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roebeling, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martins, Filomena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fidélis, Teresa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teotónio, Carla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alves, Henrique</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rocha, João</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mendonça, Rita</au><au>Roebeling, Peter</au><au>Martins, Filomena</au><au>Fidélis, Teresa</au><au>Teotónio, Carla</au><au>Alves, Henrique</au><au>Rocha, João</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing economic instruments to steer urban residential sprawl, using a hedonic pricing simulation modelling approach</atitle><jtitle>Land use policy</jtitle><date>2020-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>92</volume><spage>104458</spage><pages>104458-</pages><artnum>104458</artnum><issn>0264-8377</issn><eissn>1873-5754</eissn><abstract>•Flat property taxes and public transport subsidies are efficient instruments to control urban residential sprawl.•Land taxes are not sufficient to discourage urban residential sprawl, failing to compete with low land prices and high development profits.•Assessed economic incentive instruments lead to a decrease in urban residential area and living space, and an increase in real estate values.
Over the past centuries, cities have undergone major transformations that led to global urbanization. One of the phenomena emerging from urbanization is urban sprawl, defined as the uncontrolled spread of cities into undeveloped areas. The decrease in housing prices and commuting costs as well as the failure to internalize the real costs associated with natural land, led to households moving-out into the urban fringe – resulting in fragmented, low-density residential development patterns that has multiple negative impacts. Awareness for this problem has fed the need for the implementation of effective policies against urban residential sprawl – a subject that has received considerable attention in literature, albeit little attention has been given to economic incentive instruments. Hence, the objective of this paper is to assess the effectiveness of different economic instruments in steering urban residential sprawl – assessing property taxes, land taxes and public transport subsidies. To this end, the Sustainable Urbanizing Landscape Development (SULD) model is used and adapted, and a case study is provided for the medium-sized City of Aveiro in central Portugal. Results show that a flat property tax and a public transport subsidy for low and middle-income households are the most efficient instruments, leading to a decrease in urban residential area, living space and housing quantity as well as an increase in real estate values. On the other hand, a land tax results in insignificant changes in urban residential development patterns.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104458</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-8377 |
ispartof | Land use policy, 2020-03, Vol.92, p.104458, Article 104458 |
issn | 0264-8377 1873-5754 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2430407990 |
source | PAIS Index; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Case studies Cities Commuting Computer simulation Costs Economic incentive instruments Economic incentives Economics Hedonic pricing simulation Households Housing Housing developments Land use Peri-urban areas Property taxes Public lands Public transportation Real estate Residential areas Residential density Residential development Simulation Steering Subsidies Sustainable development Taxation Taxes Urban areas Urban planning Urban sprawl Urbanization |
title | Assessing economic instruments to steer urban residential sprawl, using a hedonic pricing simulation modelling approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T23%3A48%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20economic%20instruments%20to%20steer%20urban%20residential%20sprawl,%20using%20a%20hedonic%20pricing%20simulation%20modelling%20approach&rft.jtitle=Land%20use%20policy&rft.au=Mendon%C3%A7a,%20Rita&rft.date=2020-03&rft.volume=92&rft.spage=104458&rft.pages=104458-&rft.artnum=104458&rft.issn=0264-8377&rft.eissn=1873-5754&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104458&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430407990%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430407990&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0264837719305241&rfr_iscdi=true |