Knowledge and beliefs on vaccines among a sample of Italian pregnant women: results from the NAVIDAD study
Abstract Background Vaccine hesitancy is an emerging phenomenon in European countries and leads to decreasing trends in infant vaccine coverage. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of confidence and correct awareness about immunizations, which are crucial for the success of vaccination pr...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of public health 2020-04, Vol.30 (2), p.286-292 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 292 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 286 |
container_title | European journal of public health |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Bert, Fabrizio Olivero, Elena Rossello, Paola Gualano, Maria R Castaldi, Silvana Damiani, Gianfranco D’Errico, Marcello M Di Giovanni, Pamela Fantini, Maria P Fabiani, Leila Gabutti, Giovanni Loperto, Ilaria Marranzano, Marina Masanotti, Giuseppe Nante, Nicola Rosso, Annalisa Squeri, Raffaele Signorelli, Carlo Siliquini, Roberta |
description | Abstract
Background
Vaccine hesitancy is an emerging phenomenon in European countries and leads to decreasing trends in infant vaccine coverage. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of confidence and correct awareness about immunizations, which are crucial for the success of vaccination programmes.
Methods
As part of the NAVIDAD multicentre study, we examined vaccination confidence and complacency among a sample of 1820 pregnant women from 14 Italian cities. The questionnaire assessed the interviewee's knowledge, beliefs and misconceptions, as well as their socioeconomic status, information sources about vaccines and confidence in the Italian National Healthcare Service.
Results
Only 9% of women completely believed to the efficacy, necessity and safety of vaccinations. Almost 20% of them had misconceptions on most of the themes. There was a significant difference in the level of knowledge considering educational level: women with a high educational level have less probability of obtaining a low knowledge score (odds ratio (OR) 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.54]). The level of knowledge was also influenced by the sources of information: women who received information from their general practitioner (GP) and from institutional websites had a significantly lower chance of having misconceptions (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.58–0.96]; OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.46–0.74]). Finally, the results underlined the influence of trust in healthcare professional information on the likelihood of having misconceptions (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.27–0.89]).
Conclusions
The data suggest the efficacy of GPs and institutional websites as a source of information to contrast misconceptions and underline the importance of confidence in the healthcare system to increase complacency and confidence in vaccines. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurpub/ckz209 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430184295</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckz209</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2430184295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7396e73224d331a8f6b4a3ffedb6aa2c5ed81f79989a6c5a3a8316b394e369f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0E4lEYWZElFpaAH6kTs1Utj4oKFkBs0U1yXVoSO9gJCH49rVJYme4djs4nHUKOOTvnTMsL7HzT5RfF27dgeovs81jFkVTsZXv1c8YjLpTYIwchLBljwyQVu2RP8iRWWut9sryz7rPCco4UbElzrBZoAnWWfkBRLCwGCrWzcwo0QN1USJ2h0xaqBVjaeJxbsC39dDXaS-oxdFUbqPGupu0r0vvR83QymtDQduXXIdkxUAU82twBebq-ehzfRrOHm-l4NIsKqWUbJVIrTKQQcSklh9SoPAZpDJa5AhDFEMuUm0TrVIMqhiAhlVzlUscolTZDOSCnvbfx7r3D0GZL13m7msxELBlPY6HXVNRThXcheDRZ4xc1-K-Ms2xdNuvLZn3ZFX-ysXZ5jeUf_ZtyBZz1gOuaf1w_ei-EdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430184295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge and beliefs on vaccines among a sample of Italian pregnant women: results from the NAVIDAD study</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Bert, Fabrizio ; Olivero, Elena ; Rossello, Paola ; Gualano, Maria R ; Castaldi, Silvana ; Damiani, Gianfranco ; D’Errico, Marcello M ; Di Giovanni, Pamela ; Fantini, Maria P ; Fabiani, Leila ; Gabutti, Giovanni ; Loperto, Ilaria ; Marranzano, Marina ; Masanotti, Giuseppe ; Nante, Nicola ; Rosso, Annalisa ; Squeri, Raffaele ; Signorelli, Carlo ; Siliquini, Roberta</creator><creatorcontrib>Bert, Fabrizio ; Olivero, Elena ; Rossello, Paola ; Gualano, Maria R ; Castaldi, Silvana ; Damiani, Gianfranco ; D’Errico, Marcello M ; Di Giovanni, Pamela ; Fantini, Maria P ; Fabiani, Leila ; Gabutti, Giovanni ; Loperto, Ilaria ; Marranzano, Marina ; Masanotti, Giuseppe ; Nante, Nicola ; Rosso, Annalisa ; Squeri, Raffaele ; Signorelli, Carlo ; Siliquini, Roberta ; Collaborating Group ; Collaborating Group</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Vaccine hesitancy is an emerging phenomenon in European countries and leads to decreasing trends in infant vaccine coverage. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of confidence and correct awareness about immunizations, which are crucial for the success of vaccination programmes.
Methods
As part of the NAVIDAD multicentre study, we examined vaccination confidence and complacency among a sample of 1820 pregnant women from 14 Italian cities. The questionnaire assessed the interviewee's knowledge, beliefs and misconceptions, as well as their socioeconomic status, information sources about vaccines and confidence in the Italian National Healthcare Service.
Results
Only 9% of women completely believed to the efficacy, necessity and safety of vaccinations. Almost 20% of them had misconceptions on most of the themes. There was a significant difference in the level of knowledge considering educational level: women with a high educational level have less probability of obtaining a low knowledge score (odds ratio (OR) 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.54]). The level of knowledge was also influenced by the sources of information: women who received information from their general practitioner (GP) and from institutional websites had a significantly lower chance of having misconceptions (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.58–0.96]; OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.46–0.74]). Finally, the results underlined the influence of trust in healthcare professional information on the likelihood of having misconceptions (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.27–0.89]).
Conclusions
The data suggest the efficacy of GPs and institutional websites as a source of information to contrast misconceptions and underline the importance of confidence in the healthcare system to increase complacency and confidence in vaccines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz209</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31746999</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Confidence ; Confidence intervals ; Education ; Health care ; Health services ; Immunization ; Information sources ; Pregnancy ; Public health ; Safety ; Socioeconomic status ; Socioeconomics ; Statistical analysis ; Vaccines ; Websites ; Women</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2020-04, Vol.30 (2), p.286-292</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7396e73224d331a8f6b4a3ffedb6aa2c5ed81f79989a6c5a3a8316b394e369f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7396e73224d331a8f6b4a3ffedb6aa2c5ed81f79989a6c5a3a8316b394e369f53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7259-4923 ; 0000-0002-0866-7200</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz209$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31746999$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bert, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivero, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossello, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gualano, Maria R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaldi, Silvana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damiani, Gianfranco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Errico, Marcello M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Giovanni, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantini, Maria P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiani, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabutti, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loperto, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marranzano, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masanotti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nante, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosso, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Squeri, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siliquini, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collaborating Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collaborating Group</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge and beliefs on vaccines among a sample of Italian pregnant women: results from the NAVIDAD study</title><title>European journal of public health</title><addtitle>Eur J Public Health</addtitle><description>Abstract
Background
Vaccine hesitancy is an emerging phenomenon in European countries and leads to decreasing trends in infant vaccine coverage. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of confidence and correct awareness about immunizations, which are crucial for the success of vaccination programmes.
Methods
As part of the NAVIDAD multicentre study, we examined vaccination confidence and complacency among a sample of 1820 pregnant women from 14 Italian cities. The questionnaire assessed the interviewee's knowledge, beliefs and misconceptions, as well as their socioeconomic status, information sources about vaccines and confidence in the Italian National Healthcare Service.
Results
Only 9% of women completely believed to the efficacy, necessity and safety of vaccinations. Almost 20% of them had misconceptions on most of the themes. There was a significant difference in the level of knowledge considering educational level: women with a high educational level have less probability of obtaining a low knowledge score (odds ratio (OR) 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.54]). The level of knowledge was also influenced by the sources of information: women who received information from their general practitioner (GP) and from institutional websites had a significantly lower chance of having misconceptions (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.58–0.96]; OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.46–0.74]). Finally, the results underlined the influence of trust in healthcare professional information on the likelihood of having misconceptions (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.27–0.89]).
Conclusions
The data suggest the efficacy of GPs and institutional websites as a source of information to contrast misconceptions and underline the importance of confidence in the healthcare system to increase complacency and confidence in vaccines.</description><subject>Confidence</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Immunization</subject><subject>Information sources</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Socioeconomic status</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Websites</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkDtPwzAURi0E4lEYWZElFpaAH6kTs1Utj4oKFkBs0U1yXVoSO9gJCH49rVJYme4djs4nHUKOOTvnTMsL7HzT5RfF27dgeovs81jFkVTsZXv1c8YjLpTYIwchLBljwyQVu2RP8iRWWut9sryz7rPCco4UbElzrBZoAnWWfkBRLCwGCrWzcwo0QN1USJ2h0xaqBVjaeJxbsC39dDXaS-oxdFUbqPGupu0r0vvR83QymtDQduXXIdkxUAU82twBebq-ehzfRrOHm-l4NIsKqWUbJVIrTKQQcSklh9SoPAZpDJa5AhDFEMuUm0TrVIMqhiAhlVzlUscolTZDOSCnvbfx7r3D0GZL13m7msxELBlPY6HXVNRThXcheDRZ4xc1-K-Ms2xdNuvLZn3ZFX-ysXZ5jeUf_ZtyBZz1gOuaf1w_ei-EdA</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Bert, Fabrizio</creator><creator>Olivero, Elena</creator><creator>Rossello, Paola</creator><creator>Gualano, Maria R</creator><creator>Castaldi, Silvana</creator><creator>Damiani, Gianfranco</creator><creator>D’Errico, Marcello M</creator><creator>Di Giovanni, Pamela</creator><creator>Fantini, Maria P</creator><creator>Fabiani, Leila</creator><creator>Gabutti, Giovanni</creator><creator>Loperto, Ilaria</creator><creator>Marranzano, Marina</creator><creator>Masanotti, Giuseppe</creator><creator>Nante, Nicola</creator><creator>Rosso, Annalisa</creator><creator>Squeri, Raffaele</creator><creator>Signorelli, Carlo</creator><creator>Siliquini, Roberta</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7259-4923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-7200</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>Knowledge and beliefs on vaccines among a sample of Italian pregnant women: results from the NAVIDAD study</title><author>Bert, Fabrizio ; Olivero, Elena ; Rossello, Paola ; Gualano, Maria R ; Castaldi, Silvana ; Damiani, Gianfranco ; D’Errico, Marcello M ; Di Giovanni, Pamela ; Fantini, Maria P ; Fabiani, Leila ; Gabutti, Giovanni ; Loperto, Ilaria ; Marranzano, Marina ; Masanotti, Giuseppe ; Nante, Nicola ; Rosso, Annalisa ; Squeri, Raffaele ; Signorelli, Carlo ; Siliquini, Roberta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-7396e73224d331a8f6b4a3ffedb6aa2c5ed81f79989a6c5a3a8316b394e369f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Confidence</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Immunization</topic><topic>Information sources</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Socioeconomic status</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Websites</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bert, Fabrizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olivero, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rossello, Paola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gualano, Maria R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castaldi, Silvana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damiani, Gianfranco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Errico, Marcello M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di Giovanni, Pamela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fantini, Maria P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiani, Leila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gabutti, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loperto, Ilaria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marranzano, Marina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masanotti, Giuseppe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nante, Nicola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosso, Annalisa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Squeri, Raffaele</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Signorelli, Carlo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siliquini, Roberta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collaborating Group</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collaborating Group</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bert, Fabrizio</au><au>Olivero, Elena</au><au>Rossello, Paola</au><au>Gualano, Maria R</au><au>Castaldi, Silvana</au><au>Damiani, Gianfranco</au><au>D’Errico, Marcello M</au><au>Di Giovanni, Pamela</au><au>Fantini, Maria P</au><au>Fabiani, Leila</au><au>Gabutti, Giovanni</au><au>Loperto, Ilaria</au><au>Marranzano, Marina</au><au>Masanotti, Giuseppe</au><au>Nante, Nicola</au><au>Rosso, Annalisa</au><au>Squeri, Raffaele</au><au>Signorelli, Carlo</au><au>Siliquini, Roberta</au><aucorp>Collaborating Group</aucorp><aucorp>Collaborating Group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge and beliefs on vaccines among a sample of Italian pregnant women: results from the NAVIDAD study</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><addtitle>Eur J Public Health</addtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>286</spage><epage>292</epage><pages>286-292</pages><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Vaccine hesitancy is an emerging phenomenon in European countries and leads to decreasing trends in infant vaccine coverage. The aim of this study was to analyze the level of confidence and correct awareness about immunizations, which are crucial for the success of vaccination programmes.
Methods
As part of the NAVIDAD multicentre study, we examined vaccination confidence and complacency among a sample of 1820 pregnant women from 14 Italian cities. The questionnaire assessed the interviewee's knowledge, beliefs and misconceptions, as well as their socioeconomic status, information sources about vaccines and confidence in the Italian National Healthcare Service.
Results
Only 9% of women completely believed to the efficacy, necessity and safety of vaccinations. Almost 20% of them had misconceptions on most of the themes. There was a significant difference in the level of knowledge considering educational level: women with a high educational level have less probability of obtaining a low knowledge score (odds ratio (OR) 0.43 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.54]). The level of knowledge was also influenced by the sources of information: women who received information from their general practitioner (GP) and from institutional websites had a significantly lower chance of having misconceptions (OR 0.74 [95% CI 0.58–0.96]; OR 0.59 [95% CI 0.46–0.74]). Finally, the results underlined the influence of trust in healthcare professional information on the likelihood of having misconceptions (OR 0.49 [95% CI 0.27–0.89]).
Conclusions
The data suggest the efficacy of GPs and institutional websites as a source of information to contrast misconceptions and underline the importance of confidence in the healthcare system to increase complacency and confidence in vaccines.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>31746999</pmid><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckz209</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7259-4923</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0866-7200</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1101-1262 |
ispartof | European journal of public health, 2020-04, Vol.30 (2), p.286-292 |
issn | 1101-1262 1464-360X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2430184295 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection |
subjects | Confidence Confidence intervals Education Health care Health services Immunization Information sources Pregnancy Public health Safety Socioeconomic status Socioeconomics Statistical analysis Vaccines Websites Women |
title | Knowledge and beliefs on vaccines among a sample of Italian pregnant women: results from the NAVIDAD study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T04%3A40%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20and%20beliefs%20on%20vaccines%20among%20a%20sample%20of%20Italian%20pregnant%20women:%20results%20from%20the%20NAVIDAD%20study&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Bert,%20Fabrizio&rft.aucorp=Collaborating%20Group&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=286&rft.epage=292&rft.pages=286-292&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckz209&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2430184295%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430184295&rft_id=info:pmid/31746999&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckz209&rfr_iscdi=true |