Improving access to post-exposure prophylaxis for Lyme disease: a role for community pharmacists

Abstract Issue Virtually non-existent in Eastern Townships (ET) before 2010, Lyme disease incidence rate reached 52 confirmed cases per 100 000 in some districts in 2018, leading to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) recommendation by public health. To improve access to PEP, community pharmacists can n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of public health 2019-11, Vol.29 (Supplement_4)
Hauptverfasser: Baron, G, Pinsonneault, L, Binet, A, Philie, C-A, Bonapace-Potvin, M, Lio, S
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_4
container_start_page
container_title European journal of public health
container_volume 29
creator Baron, G
Pinsonneault, L
Binet, A
Philie, C-A
Bonapace-Potvin, M
Lio, S
description Abstract Issue Virtually non-existent in Eastern Townships (ET) before 2010, Lyme disease incidence rate reached 52 confirmed cases per 100 000 in some districts in 2018, leading to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) recommendation by public health. To improve access to PEP, community pharmacists can now screen and initiate PEP under a collaborative practice agreement (CPA) with the regional Medical Officer of Health. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of pharmacists regarding Lyme disease PEP were surveyed after implementation of this measure. Description of the problem 312 community pharmacists practicing in ET were invited, in October 2018, to complete an online survey, based on Godin’s integrative model (2012), with questions on professional characteristics, knowledge of CPA, attitudes about PEP, and facilitators and barriers to the use of CPA. Pharmacist’s practices were evaluated using 8 clinical vignettes. Vignette-specific and a global score were calculated. Bivariate analyses were done to test the association between global score and knowledge, attitudes, facilitators and barriers. Results Response rate was 13.8%. Most pharmacists knew (97.4%) and were in favor (93.1%) of the CPA, and believed it was effective to prevent Lyme disease (96.4%). The main barriers reported to using the CPA were related to the assessment of PEP criteria. With regards to practice, pharmacists answered correctly for clients presenting all criteria for PEP (80.6%), aged < 8 y.o. (51.6%), who had their tick removed for >72 hrs (67.7%), already presenting with symptoms (32.3%) or who had exposure in a non-endemic area (38.7%). Finally, none of the variables studied were associated with the global score. Lessons This measure has now been expanded in other endemic regions in Quebec and a provincial CPA is under development. These results will help guide the development of the provincial CPA, specifically to better consider and to provide guidance regarding PEP contraindications. Key messages Pharmacist-initiated PEP is an innovative approach to increase timely population access to an essential preventive measure in the fight against Lyme disease in endemic districts. Additional guidance is required for pharmacists with regards to assessment of PEP criteria in future CPAs.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.161
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430181213</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.161</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2430181213</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1501-de602cc338738d62390c3ed378be04af24a44625d4982d5999cd71af2e0498723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPElRSv7SQ2N1TxqFSJC0jcjGs7NKWpg52ghq_HED6A06x2ZnZHg9A5kBkQya5cH9p-dWXev0CUMyjgAE2AFzxjBXk5TDMQyIAW9BidxLghhOSloBP0umja4D_r3RvWxrgYcedx62OXuX2CPjic-HY9bPW-jrjyAS-HxmFbR6eju8YaB791v4TxTdPv6m7A7VqHRps6dvEUHVV6G93ZH07R893t0_whWz7eL-Y3y8xAnqJZVxBqDGOiZMIWlElimLOsFCtHuK4o15wXNLdcCmpzKaWxJaR9YqUoKZuii_FuivvRu9ipje_DLr1UlDMCAiiwpIJRZYKPMbhKtaFudBgUEPVTpBqLVGORKhWZPJejx_ftP-TfKY54tQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430181213</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improving access to post-exposure prophylaxis for Lyme disease: a role for community pharmacists</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Baron, G ; Pinsonneault, L ; Binet, A ; Philie, C-A ; Bonapace-Potvin, M ; Lio, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Baron, G ; Pinsonneault, L ; Binet, A ; Philie, C-A ; Bonapace-Potvin, M ; Lio, S</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Issue Virtually non-existent in Eastern Townships (ET) before 2010, Lyme disease incidence rate reached 52 confirmed cases per 100 000 in some districts in 2018, leading to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) recommendation by public health. To improve access to PEP, community pharmacists can now screen and initiate PEP under a collaborative practice agreement (CPA) with the regional Medical Officer of Health. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of pharmacists regarding Lyme disease PEP were surveyed after implementation of this measure. Description of the problem 312 community pharmacists practicing in ET were invited, in October 2018, to complete an online survey, based on Godin’s integrative model (2012), with questions on professional characteristics, knowledge of CPA, attitudes about PEP, and facilitators and barriers to the use of CPA. Pharmacist’s practices were evaluated using 8 clinical vignettes. Vignette-specific and a global score were calculated. Bivariate analyses were done to test the association between global score and knowledge, attitudes, facilitators and barriers. Results Response rate was 13.8%. Most pharmacists knew (97.4%) and were in favor (93.1%) of the CPA, and believed it was effective to prevent Lyme disease (96.4%). The main barriers reported to using the CPA were related to the assessment of PEP criteria. With regards to practice, pharmacists answered correctly for clients presenting all criteria for PEP (80.6%), aged &lt; 8 y.o. (51.6%), who had their tick removed for &gt;72 hrs (67.7%), already presenting with symptoms (32.3%) or who had exposure in a non-endemic area (38.7%). Finally, none of the variables studied were associated with the global score. Lessons This measure has now been expanded in other endemic regions in Quebec and a provincial CPA is under development. These results will help guide the development of the provincial CPA, specifically to better consider and to provide guidance regarding PEP contraindications. Key messages Pharmacist-initiated PEP is an innovative approach to increase timely population access to an essential preventive measure in the fight against Lyme disease in endemic districts. Additional guidance is required for pharmacists with regards to assessment of PEP criteria in future CPAs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.161</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Access ; Attitudes ; Barriers ; Bivariate analysis ; Clients ; Community ; Criteria ; Disease ; Disease prevention ; Districts ; Exposure ; Internet ; Lyme disease ; Pharmacists ; Prophylaxis ; Public health ; Signs and symptoms ; Vector-borne diseases</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2019-11, Vol.29 (Supplement_4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1598,27845,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.161$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baron, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinsonneault, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binet, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philie, C-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonapace-Potvin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lio, S</creatorcontrib><title>Improving access to post-exposure prophylaxis for Lyme disease: a role for community pharmacists</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Abstract Issue Virtually non-existent in Eastern Townships (ET) before 2010, Lyme disease incidence rate reached 52 confirmed cases per 100 000 in some districts in 2018, leading to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) recommendation by public health. To improve access to PEP, community pharmacists can now screen and initiate PEP under a collaborative practice agreement (CPA) with the regional Medical Officer of Health. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of pharmacists regarding Lyme disease PEP were surveyed after implementation of this measure. Description of the problem 312 community pharmacists practicing in ET were invited, in October 2018, to complete an online survey, based on Godin’s integrative model (2012), with questions on professional characteristics, knowledge of CPA, attitudes about PEP, and facilitators and barriers to the use of CPA. Pharmacist’s practices were evaluated using 8 clinical vignettes. Vignette-specific and a global score were calculated. Bivariate analyses were done to test the association between global score and knowledge, attitudes, facilitators and barriers. Results Response rate was 13.8%. Most pharmacists knew (97.4%) and were in favor (93.1%) of the CPA, and believed it was effective to prevent Lyme disease (96.4%). The main barriers reported to using the CPA were related to the assessment of PEP criteria. With regards to practice, pharmacists answered correctly for clients presenting all criteria for PEP (80.6%), aged &lt; 8 y.o. (51.6%), who had their tick removed for &gt;72 hrs (67.7%), already presenting with symptoms (32.3%) or who had exposure in a non-endemic area (38.7%). Finally, none of the variables studied were associated with the global score. Lessons This measure has now been expanded in other endemic regions in Quebec and a provincial CPA is under development. These results will help guide the development of the provincial CPA, specifically to better consider and to provide guidance regarding PEP contraindications. Key messages Pharmacist-initiated PEP is an innovative approach to increase timely population access to an essential preventive measure in the fight against Lyme disease in endemic districts. Additional guidance is required for pharmacists with regards to assessment of PEP criteria in future CPAs.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Bivariate analysis</subject><subject>Clients</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Disease prevention</subject><subject>Districts</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Internet</subject><subject>Lyme disease</subject><subject>Pharmacists</subject><subject>Prophylaxis</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Signs and symptoms</subject><subject>Vector-borne diseases</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPElRSv7SQ2N1TxqFSJC0jcjGs7NKWpg52ghq_HED6A06x2ZnZHg9A5kBkQya5cH9p-dWXev0CUMyjgAE2AFzxjBXk5TDMQyIAW9BidxLghhOSloBP0umja4D_r3RvWxrgYcedx62OXuX2CPjic-HY9bPW-jrjyAS-HxmFbR6eju8YaB791v4TxTdPv6m7A7VqHRps6dvEUHVV6G93ZH07R893t0_whWz7eL-Y3y8xAnqJZVxBqDGOiZMIWlElimLOsFCtHuK4o15wXNLdcCmpzKaWxJaR9YqUoKZuii_FuivvRu9ipje_DLr1UlDMCAiiwpIJRZYKPMbhKtaFudBgUEPVTpBqLVGORKhWZPJejx_ftP-TfKY54tQ</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Baron, G</creator><creator>Pinsonneault, L</creator><creator>Binet, A</creator><creator>Philie, C-A</creator><creator>Bonapace-Potvin, M</creator><creator>Lio, S</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Improving access to post-exposure prophylaxis for Lyme disease: a role for community pharmacists</title><author>Baron, G ; Pinsonneault, L ; Binet, A ; Philie, C-A ; Bonapace-Potvin, M ; Lio, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1501-de602cc338738d62390c3ed378be04af24a44625d4982d5999cd71af2e0498723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Bivariate analysis</topic><topic>Clients</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Disease prevention</topic><topic>Districts</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Internet</topic><topic>Lyme disease</topic><topic>Pharmacists</topic><topic>Prophylaxis</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Signs and symptoms</topic><topic>Vector-borne diseases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baron, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pinsonneault, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Binet, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philie, C-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonapace-Potvin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lio, S</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baron, G</au><au>Pinsonneault, L</au><au>Binet, A</au><au>Philie, C-A</au><au>Bonapace-Potvin, M</au><au>Lio, S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improving access to post-exposure prophylaxis for Lyme disease: a role for community pharmacists</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>Supplement_4</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Issue Virtually non-existent in Eastern Townships (ET) before 2010, Lyme disease incidence rate reached 52 confirmed cases per 100 000 in some districts in 2018, leading to post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) recommendation by public health. To improve access to PEP, community pharmacists can now screen and initiate PEP under a collaborative practice agreement (CPA) with the regional Medical Officer of Health. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of pharmacists regarding Lyme disease PEP were surveyed after implementation of this measure. Description of the problem 312 community pharmacists practicing in ET were invited, in October 2018, to complete an online survey, based on Godin’s integrative model (2012), with questions on professional characteristics, knowledge of CPA, attitudes about PEP, and facilitators and barriers to the use of CPA. Pharmacist’s practices were evaluated using 8 clinical vignettes. Vignette-specific and a global score were calculated. Bivariate analyses were done to test the association between global score and knowledge, attitudes, facilitators and barriers. Results Response rate was 13.8%. Most pharmacists knew (97.4%) and were in favor (93.1%) of the CPA, and believed it was effective to prevent Lyme disease (96.4%). The main barriers reported to using the CPA were related to the assessment of PEP criteria. With regards to practice, pharmacists answered correctly for clients presenting all criteria for PEP (80.6%), aged &lt; 8 y.o. (51.6%), who had their tick removed for &gt;72 hrs (67.7%), already presenting with symptoms (32.3%) or who had exposure in a non-endemic area (38.7%). Finally, none of the variables studied were associated with the global score. Lessons This measure has now been expanded in other endemic regions in Quebec and a provincial CPA is under development. These results will help guide the development of the provincial CPA, specifically to better consider and to provide guidance regarding PEP contraindications. Key messages Pharmacist-initiated PEP is an innovative approach to increase timely population access to an essential preventive measure in the fight against Lyme disease in endemic districts. Additional guidance is required for pharmacists with regards to assessment of PEP criteria in future CPAs.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.161</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1101-1262
ispartof European journal of public health, 2019-11, Vol.29 (Supplement_4)
issn 1101-1262
1464-360X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2430181213
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Access
Attitudes
Barriers
Bivariate analysis
Clients
Community
Criteria
Disease
Disease prevention
Districts
Exposure
Internet
Lyme disease
Pharmacists
Prophylaxis
Public health
Signs and symptoms
Vector-borne diseases
title Improving access to post-exposure prophylaxis for Lyme disease: a role for community pharmacists
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T07%3A34%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improving%20access%20to%20post-exposure%20prophylaxis%20for%20Lyme%20disease:%20a%20role%20for%20community%20pharmacists&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Baron,%20G&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=Supplement_4&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.161&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2430181213%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430181213&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.161&rfr_iscdi=true