Healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to frequent users of emergency departments
Abstract Background Frequent users of emergency department (FUEDs; ≥ 5 ED visits/ year) are often vulnerable individuals cumulating medical, social and substance use problems. FUEDs often require complex and sustained care coordination generally unavailable in ED and are commonly considered contribu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of public health 2019-11, Vol.29 (Supplement_4) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_4 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | European journal of public health |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Grazioli, V Kasztura, M Chastonay, O Graells, M Schmutz, E von Allmen, M Lemoine, M Daeppen, J-B Hugli, O Bodenmann, P |
description | Abstract
Background
Frequent users of emergency department (FUEDs; ≥ 5 ED visits/ year) are often vulnerable individuals cumulating medical, social and substance use problems. FUEDs often require complex and sustained care coordination generally unavailable in ED and are commonly considered contributing to ED crowding. In view of supporting ED health-care providers through specific training and interventions tailored to FUEDs, this study aimed to explore ED healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to FUEDs.
Methods
Participants (N = 208) were ED healthcare providers (i.e., nurses, physicians) from 75 university and community hospitals in Switzerland (71% of all EDs) who answered a questionnaire on FUEDs. They were asked to indicate the extent to which FUEDs represent a problem in their ED. Perceived difficulties related to FUEDs were elicited by an open-ended question. Conventional content analysis was used to extract common categories and themes.
Results
Among the 208 participants, 134 (64%) reported that FUEDs represent a problem. Of those, 132 provided 1 to 5 answers to the open-ended question. Twenty-eight categories were identified and organized in 4 themes. First, participants reported difficulties related to FUEDs’ characteristics themselves (e.g., problem’s chronicity; behavioural difficulties) leading to healthcare complexity. Second, participants perceived negative consequences related to the presence of FUEDs in the ED (e.g., work overload, staff helplessness and fatigue). Third, ED healthcare offer was considered inappropriate and inefficient to respond to FUEDs needs and fourth collaborating with FUEDs’ existing healthcare network was perceived as difficult.
Conclusions
ED healthcare providers experience a wide range of difficulties related to the management of FUEDs. Providing training and implementing a case management intervention tailored to FUEDs might support ED health-care providers and contribute to address FUEDs’ complex needs.
Key messages
ED healthcare providers perceive FUEDs to represent a problem.
Perceived difficulties might decrease through training and case management support might contribute to better address FUEDs complex needs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.344 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430179644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.344</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2430179644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1074-ddb9be5cdade3564e753fd0a1a045f5aadffc6736aaef9ce93eccb48179332b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHaW2JLWjh2nWaIKKFIlNiCxsxx7DClpHGwHqay4BtfjJLiEA7Cakeb9mT8foXNKZpRUbA6D74d6rl8_6ELMGOcHaEK54BkT5Okw9ZTQjOYiP0YnIWwIIUW5yCfIrkC18UUrD7j37r0x4MP35xfuwWvoY-O6gJ3FprG20UMbGwjYQ6siGBwdth7eBugiHkIS7knYgn-GTu-wgV75uE3TcIqOrGoDnP3VKXq8uX5YrrL1_e3d8mqdaUpKnhlTVzUU2igDrBAcyoJZQxRVhBe2UMpYq0XJhFJgKw0VA61rvqBlxVheczZFF-Pe9EvyFaLcuMF36aTMOSOJE3xP0ZHS3oXgwcreN1vld5ISuY9TjnHKMU7JfjWXo8YN_T_wH-mbft0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430179644</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to frequent users of emergency departments</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Grazioli, V ; Kasztura, M ; Chastonay, O ; Graells, M ; Schmutz, E ; von Allmen, M ; Lemoine, M ; Daeppen, J-B ; Hugli, O ; Bodenmann, P</creator><creatorcontrib>Grazioli, V ; Kasztura, M ; Chastonay, O ; Graells, M ; Schmutz, E ; von Allmen, M ; Lemoine, M ; Daeppen, J-B ; Hugli, O ; Bodenmann, P</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Background
Frequent users of emergency department (FUEDs; ≥ 5 ED visits/ year) are often vulnerable individuals cumulating medical, social and substance use problems. FUEDs often require complex and sustained care coordination generally unavailable in ED and are commonly considered contributing to ED crowding. In view of supporting ED health-care providers through specific training and interventions tailored to FUEDs, this study aimed to explore ED healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to FUEDs.
Methods
Participants (N = 208) were ED healthcare providers (i.e., nurses, physicians) from 75 university and community hospitals in Switzerland (71% of all EDs) who answered a questionnaire on FUEDs. They were asked to indicate the extent to which FUEDs represent a problem in their ED. Perceived difficulties related to FUEDs were elicited by an open-ended question. Conventional content analysis was used to extract common categories and themes.
Results
Among the 208 participants, 134 (64%) reported that FUEDs represent a problem. Of those, 132 provided 1 to 5 answers to the open-ended question. Twenty-eight categories were identified and organized in 4 themes. First, participants reported difficulties related to FUEDs’ characteristics themselves (e.g., problem’s chronicity; behavioural difficulties) leading to healthcare complexity. Second, participants perceived negative consequences related to the presence of FUEDs in the ED (e.g., work overload, staff helplessness and fatigue). Third, ED healthcare offer was considered inappropriate and inefficient to respond to FUEDs needs and fourth collaborating with FUEDs’ existing healthcare network was perceived as difficult.
Conclusions
ED healthcare providers experience a wide range of difficulties related to the management of FUEDs. Providing training and implementing a case management intervention tailored to FUEDs might support ED health-care providers and contribute to address FUEDs’ complex needs.
Key messages
ED healthcare providers perceive FUEDs to represent a problem.
Perceived difficulties might decrease through training and case management support might contribute to better address FUEDs complex needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.344</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Case management ; Complexity ; Content analysis ; Coordination ; Coordination compounds ; Emergency medical care ; Emergency medical services ; Health care ; Health care industry ; Health services ; Hospitals ; Intervention ; Management ; Medical personnel ; Nurses ; Perceptions ; Physicians ; Public health ; Questions ; Substance use ; Training</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2019-11, Vol.29 (Supplement_4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1599,27847,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.344$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grazioli, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasztura, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chastonay, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graells, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmutz, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Allmen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemoine, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daeppen, J-B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hugli, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodenmann, P</creatorcontrib><title>Healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to frequent users of emergency departments</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Abstract
Background
Frequent users of emergency department (FUEDs; ≥ 5 ED visits/ year) are often vulnerable individuals cumulating medical, social and substance use problems. FUEDs often require complex and sustained care coordination generally unavailable in ED and are commonly considered contributing to ED crowding. In view of supporting ED health-care providers through specific training and interventions tailored to FUEDs, this study aimed to explore ED healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to FUEDs.
Methods
Participants (N = 208) were ED healthcare providers (i.e., nurses, physicians) from 75 university and community hospitals in Switzerland (71% of all EDs) who answered a questionnaire on FUEDs. They were asked to indicate the extent to which FUEDs represent a problem in their ED. Perceived difficulties related to FUEDs were elicited by an open-ended question. Conventional content analysis was used to extract common categories and themes.
Results
Among the 208 participants, 134 (64%) reported that FUEDs represent a problem. Of those, 132 provided 1 to 5 answers to the open-ended question. Twenty-eight categories were identified and organized in 4 themes. First, participants reported difficulties related to FUEDs’ characteristics themselves (e.g., problem’s chronicity; behavioural difficulties) leading to healthcare complexity. Second, participants perceived negative consequences related to the presence of FUEDs in the ED (e.g., work overload, staff helplessness and fatigue). Third, ED healthcare offer was considered inappropriate and inefficient to respond to FUEDs needs and fourth collaborating with FUEDs’ existing healthcare network was perceived as difficult.
Conclusions
ED healthcare providers experience a wide range of difficulties related to the management of FUEDs. Providing training and implementing a case management intervention tailored to FUEDs might support ED health-care providers and contribute to address FUEDs’ complex needs.
Key messages
ED healthcare providers perceive FUEDs to represent a problem.
Perceived difficulties might decrease through training and case management support might contribute to better address FUEDs complex needs.</description><subject>Case management</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Coordination compounds</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health care industry</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Substance use</subject><subject>Training</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHaW2JLWjh2nWaIKKFIlNiCxsxx7DClpHGwHqay4BtfjJLiEA7Cakeb9mT8foXNKZpRUbA6D74d6rl8_6ELMGOcHaEK54BkT5Okw9ZTQjOYiP0YnIWwIIUW5yCfIrkC18UUrD7j37r0x4MP35xfuwWvoY-O6gJ3FprG20UMbGwjYQ6siGBwdth7eBugiHkIS7knYgn-GTu-wgV75uE3TcIqOrGoDnP3VKXq8uX5YrrL1_e3d8mqdaUpKnhlTVzUU2igDrBAcyoJZQxRVhBe2UMpYq0XJhFJgKw0VA61rvqBlxVheczZFF-Pe9EvyFaLcuMF36aTMOSOJE3xP0ZHS3oXgwcreN1vld5ISuY9TjnHKMU7JfjWXo8YN_T_wH-mbft0</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Grazioli, V</creator><creator>Kasztura, M</creator><creator>Chastonay, O</creator><creator>Graells, M</creator><creator>Schmutz, E</creator><creator>von Allmen, M</creator><creator>Lemoine, M</creator><creator>Daeppen, J-B</creator><creator>Hugli, O</creator><creator>Bodenmann, P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to frequent users of emergency departments</title><author>Grazioli, V ; Kasztura, M ; Chastonay, O ; Graells, M ; Schmutz, E ; von Allmen, M ; Lemoine, M ; Daeppen, J-B ; Hugli, O ; Bodenmann, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1074-ddb9be5cdade3564e753fd0a1a045f5aadffc6736aaef9ce93eccb48179332b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Case management</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Coordination compounds</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health care industry</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Substance use</topic><topic>Training</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grazioli, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kasztura, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chastonay, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graells, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmutz, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>von Allmen, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemoine, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daeppen, J-B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hugli, O</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bodenmann, P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grazioli, V</au><au>Kasztura, M</au><au>Chastonay, O</au><au>Graells, M</au><au>Schmutz, E</au><au>von Allmen, M</au><au>Lemoine, M</au><au>Daeppen, J-B</au><au>Hugli, O</au><au>Bodenmann, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to frequent users of emergency departments</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>Supplement_4</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Background
Frequent users of emergency department (FUEDs; ≥ 5 ED visits/ year) are often vulnerable individuals cumulating medical, social and substance use problems. FUEDs often require complex and sustained care coordination generally unavailable in ED and are commonly considered contributing to ED crowding. In view of supporting ED health-care providers through specific training and interventions tailored to FUEDs, this study aimed to explore ED healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to FUEDs.
Methods
Participants (N = 208) were ED healthcare providers (i.e., nurses, physicians) from 75 university and community hospitals in Switzerland (71% of all EDs) who answered a questionnaire on FUEDs. They were asked to indicate the extent to which FUEDs represent a problem in their ED. Perceived difficulties related to FUEDs were elicited by an open-ended question. Conventional content analysis was used to extract common categories and themes.
Results
Among the 208 participants, 134 (64%) reported that FUEDs represent a problem. Of those, 132 provided 1 to 5 answers to the open-ended question. Twenty-eight categories were identified and organized in 4 themes. First, participants reported difficulties related to FUEDs’ characteristics themselves (e.g., problem’s chronicity; behavioural difficulties) leading to healthcare complexity. Second, participants perceived negative consequences related to the presence of FUEDs in the ED (e.g., work overload, staff helplessness and fatigue). Third, ED healthcare offer was considered inappropriate and inefficient to respond to FUEDs needs and fourth collaborating with FUEDs’ existing healthcare network was perceived as difficult.
Conclusions
ED healthcare providers experience a wide range of difficulties related to the management of FUEDs. Providing training and implementing a case management intervention tailored to FUEDs might support ED health-care providers and contribute to address FUEDs’ complex needs.
Key messages
ED healthcare providers perceive FUEDs to represent a problem.
Perceived difficulties might decrease through training and case management support might contribute to better address FUEDs complex needs.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.344</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1101-1262 |
ispartof | European journal of public health, 2019-11, Vol.29 (Supplement_4) |
issn | 1101-1262 1464-360X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2430179644 |
source | Oxford Journals Open Access Collection |
subjects | Case management Complexity Content analysis Coordination Coordination compounds Emergency medical care Emergency medical services Health care Health care industry Health services Hospitals Intervention Management Medical personnel Nurses Perceptions Physicians Public health Questions Substance use Training |
title | Healthcare providers’ perceptions of difficulties related to frequent users of emergency departments |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T08%3A04%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Healthcare%20providers%E2%80%99%20perceptions%20of%20difficulties%20related%20to%20frequent%20users%20of%20emergency%20departments&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Grazioli,%20V&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=Supplement_4&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.344&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2430179644%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430179644&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckz186.344&rfr_iscdi=true |