Reliability and Validity of Disability Literacy Scale for Medical School Students

Abstract Background Disability literacy is the ability to perceive definition of disabled person, their characteristics, difficulties in daily life and solution suggestions, their rights and false thoughts and orientations about them. The aim of the study was to develop the Disability Literacy Scale...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of public health 2019-11, Vol.29 (Supplement_4)
Hauptverfasser: Aydoğan, S, Atay, E, Metintaş, S, Demirtaş, Z, Öcal, E E, Pala, S Çalışkan, Oktar, D, Mutlu, A, Önsüz, M F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_4
container_start_page
container_title European journal of public health
container_volume 29
creator Aydoğan, S
Atay, E
Metintaş, S
Demirtaş, Z
Öcal, E E
Pala, S Çalışkan
Oktar, D
Mutlu, A
Önsüz, M F
description Abstract Background Disability literacy is the ability to perceive definition of disabled person, their characteristics, difficulties in daily life and solution suggestions, their rights and false thoughts and orientations about them. The aim of the study was to develop the Disability Literacy Scale (DLS) to determine the disability literacy of medical school students with a high probability of encountering disabled people. Methods This study was conducted in 1110 medical school students in 2018-2019 academic year. By using literature 97 questions were collected. DLS was created with 22 questions by taking expert opinions. Correct answer was scored as 1, while wrong or ’do not know’ answer as 0. In order to evaluate the reliability of the scale, item total score correlation and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) analyzes and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used for construct validity. Results Of the 51.1% students were female and their age ranged from 17-40, the mean was 21.1±2.2. After the scale development study, the scale consisted of 14 items and 3 sub-dimensions. Scale items explain 43.21% of total variance and factor loadings ranged from 0.37-0.80. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.61, 0.64, 0.51 for communication, health problems and social life sub-dimensions, and 0.68 for the whole scale. The fit of scale and the fit index were found to be acceptable after confirmatory factor analysis. In the last form of the scale, the score that can be taken from scale range 0-14. It was accepted that by increasing of the score, disability literacy level was increased. The mean score of students was 9.79±2.57 and the median was 10.0. The scores obtained from DLS were found to be lower in the first 3 grades (p < 0.001), low level mother and father education (p < 0.001/p=0.012) and who have not yet taken lesson about disability (p = 0.021). Conclusions DLS is a valid-reliable tool for assessing disability literacy levels of medical school students. Key messages It is essential to place disability related lessons from the earliest grades of medical school curriculum. In the literature, DLS seems the first scale about disability literacy and needs to be tested in large communities.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430179391</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.004</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2430179391</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1504-85311e90c75d7adb44608cf0722979cd41bc70e4e975a61d18f46afb6838ef953</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkElPwzAQhS0EEqXwA7hF4kramcSJ4yNil4oQq7hZjhfhEupiJ4fy63EVuHN6s7w3I32EHCPMEHg5N0NYD-1cfXxjw2YAdIdMkNY0L2t42001AuZY1MU-OYhxCQAVa4oJeXg0nZOt61y_yeRKZ6-yc3rbeJtduPi3WrjeBKk22ZOSncmsD9md0S41afLufZJ-0GbVx0OyZ2UXzdGvTsnL1eXz-U2-uL--PT9b5AoroHlTlYiGg2KVZlK3lNbQKAusKDjjSlNsFQNDDWeVrFFjY2ktbVs3ZWMsr8opORnvroP_GkzsxdIPYZVeioKWgIyXHJMLR5cKPsZgrFgH9ynDRiCILTkxkhMjOZHIpczpmPHD-h_2HxhecnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430179391</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reliability and Validity of Disability Literacy Scale for Medical School Students</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Aydoğan, S ; Atay, E ; Metintaş, S ; Demirtaş, Z ; Öcal, E E ; Pala, S Çalışkan ; Oktar, D ; Mutlu, A ; Önsüz, M F</creator><creatorcontrib>Aydoğan, S ; Atay, E ; Metintaş, S ; Demirtaş, Z ; Öcal, E E ; Pala, S Çalışkan ; Oktar, D ; Mutlu, A ; Önsüz, M F</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background Disability literacy is the ability to perceive definition of disabled person, their characteristics, difficulties in daily life and solution suggestions, their rights and false thoughts and orientations about them. The aim of the study was to develop the Disability Literacy Scale (DLS) to determine the disability literacy of medical school students with a high probability of encountering disabled people. Methods This study was conducted in 1110 medical school students in 2018-2019 academic year. By using literature 97 questions were collected. DLS was created with 22 questions by taking expert opinions. Correct answer was scored as 1, while wrong or ’do not know’ answer as 0. In order to evaluate the reliability of the scale, item total score correlation and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) analyzes and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used for construct validity. Results Of the 51.1% students were female and their age ranged from 17-40, the mean was 21.1±2.2. After the scale development study, the scale consisted of 14 items and 3 sub-dimensions. Scale items explain 43.21% of total variance and factor loadings ranged from 0.37-0.80. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.61, 0.64, 0.51 for communication, health problems and social life sub-dimensions, and 0.68 for the whole scale. The fit of scale and the fit index were found to be acceptable after confirmatory factor analysis. In the last form of the scale, the score that can be taken from scale range 0-14. It was accepted that by increasing of the score, disability literacy level was increased. The mean score of students was 9.79±2.57 and the median was 10.0. The scores obtained from DLS were found to be lower in the first 3 grades (p &lt; 0.001), low level mother and father education (p &lt; 0.001/p=0.012) and who have not yet taken lesson about disability (p = 0.021). Conclusions DLS is a valid-reliable tool for assessing disability literacy levels of medical school students. Key messages It is essential to place disability related lessons from the earliest grades of medical school curriculum. In the literature, DLS seems the first scale about disability literacy and needs to be tested in large communities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Ability ; Communication ; Confirmatory factor analysis ; Correlation analysis ; Curricula ; Disability ; Disability studies ; Everyday life ; Factor analysis ; Health problems ; Literacy ; Low level ; Medical schools ; People with disabilities ; Public health ; Questions ; Reliability ; Reliability analysis ; Students</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2019-11, Vol.29 (Supplement_4)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. 2019</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1603,27865,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.004$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aydoğan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atay, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metintaş, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirtaş, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öcal, E E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pala, S Çalışkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oktar, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutlu, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Önsüz, M F</creatorcontrib><title>Reliability and Validity of Disability Literacy Scale for Medical School Students</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Abstract Background Disability literacy is the ability to perceive definition of disabled person, their characteristics, difficulties in daily life and solution suggestions, their rights and false thoughts and orientations about them. The aim of the study was to develop the Disability Literacy Scale (DLS) to determine the disability literacy of medical school students with a high probability of encountering disabled people. Methods This study was conducted in 1110 medical school students in 2018-2019 academic year. By using literature 97 questions were collected. DLS was created with 22 questions by taking expert opinions. Correct answer was scored as 1, while wrong or ’do not know’ answer as 0. In order to evaluate the reliability of the scale, item total score correlation and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) analyzes and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used for construct validity. Results Of the 51.1% students were female and their age ranged from 17-40, the mean was 21.1±2.2. After the scale development study, the scale consisted of 14 items and 3 sub-dimensions. Scale items explain 43.21% of total variance and factor loadings ranged from 0.37-0.80. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.61, 0.64, 0.51 for communication, health problems and social life sub-dimensions, and 0.68 for the whole scale. The fit of scale and the fit index were found to be acceptable after confirmatory factor analysis. In the last form of the scale, the score that can be taken from scale range 0-14. It was accepted that by increasing of the score, disability literacy level was increased. The mean score of students was 9.79±2.57 and the median was 10.0. The scores obtained from DLS were found to be lower in the first 3 grades (p &lt; 0.001), low level mother and father education (p &lt; 0.001/p=0.012) and who have not yet taken lesson about disability (p = 0.021). Conclusions DLS is a valid-reliable tool for assessing disability literacy levels of medical school students. Key messages It is essential to place disability related lessons from the earliest grades of medical school curriculum. In the literature, DLS seems the first scale about disability literacy and needs to be tested in large communities.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Confirmatory factor analysis</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Disability</subject><subject>Disability studies</subject><subject>Everyday life</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Health problems</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Low level</subject><subject>Medical schools</subject><subject>People with disabilities</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reliability analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkElPwzAQhS0EEqXwA7hF4kramcSJ4yNil4oQq7hZjhfhEupiJ4fy63EVuHN6s7w3I32EHCPMEHg5N0NYD-1cfXxjw2YAdIdMkNY0L2t42001AuZY1MU-OYhxCQAVa4oJeXg0nZOt61y_yeRKZ6-yc3rbeJtduPi3WrjeBKk22ZOSncmsD9md0S41afLufZJ-0GbVx0OyZ2UXzdGvTsnL1eXz-U2-uL--PT9b5AoroHlTlYiGg2KVZlK3lNbQKAusKDjjSlNsFQNDDWeVrFFjY2ktbVs3ZWMsr8opORnvroP_GkzsxdIPYZVeioKWgIyXHJMLR5cKPsZgrFgH9ynDRiCILTkxkhMjOZHIpczpmPHD-h_2HxhecnA</recordid><startdate>20191101</startdate><enddate>20191101</enddate><creator>Aydoğan, S</creator><creator>Atay, E</creator><creator>Metintaş, S</creator><creator>Demirtaş, Z</creator><creator>Öcal, E E</creator><creator>Pala, S Çalışkan</creator><creator>Oktar, D</creator><creator>Mutlu, A</creator><creator>Önsüz, M F</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20191101</creationdate><title>Reliability and Validity of Disability Literacy Scale for Medical School Students</title><author>Aydoğan, S ; Atay, E ; Metintaş, S ; Demirtaş, Z ; Öcal, E E ; Pala, S Çalışkan ; Oktar, D ; Mutlu, A ; Önsüz, M F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1504-85311e90c75d7adb44608cf0722979cd41bc70e4e975a61d18f46afb6838ef953</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Confirmatory factor analysis</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Disability</topic><topic>Disability studies</topic><topic>Everyday life</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Health problems</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Low level</topic><topic>Medical schools</topic><topic>People with disabilities</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reliability analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aydoğan, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atay, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metintaş, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demirtaş, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Öcal, E E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pala, S Çalışkan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oktar, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mutlu, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Önsüz, M F</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aydoğan, S</au><au>Atay, E</au><au>Metintaş, S</au><au>Demirtaş, Z</au><au>Öcal, E E</au><au>Pala, S Çalışkan</au><au>Oktar, D</au><au>Mutlu, A</au><au>Önsüz, M F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reliability and Validity of Disability Literacy Scale for Medical School Students</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2019-11-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>Supplement_4</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background Disability literacy is the ability to perceive definition of disabled person, their characteristics, difficulties in daily life and solution suggestions, their rights and false thoughts and orientations about them. The aim of the study was to develop the Disability Literacy Scale (DLS) to determine the disability literacy of medical school students with a high probability of encountering disabled people. Methods This study was conducted in 1110 medical school students in 2018-2019 academic year. By using literature 97 questions were collected. DLS was created with 22 questions by taking expert opinions. Correct answer was scored as 1, while wrong or ’do not know’ answer as 0. In order to evaluate the reliability of the scale, item total score correlation and internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha) analyzes and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were used for construct validity. Results Of the 51.1% students were female and their age ranged from 17-40, the mean was 21.1±2.2. After the scale development study, the scale consisted of 14 items and 3 sub-dimensions. Scale items explain 43.21% of total variance and factor loadings ranged from 0.37-0.80. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.61, 0.64, 0.51 for communication, health problems and social life sub-dimensions, and 0.68 for the whole scale. The fit of scale and the fit index were found to be acceptable after confirmatory factor analysis. In the last form of the scale, the score that can be taken from scale range 0-14. It was accepted that by increasing of the score, disability literacy level was increased. The mean score of students was 9.79±2.57 and the median was 10.0. The scores obtained from DLS were found to be lower in the first 3 grades (p &lt; 0.001), low level mother and father education (p &lt; 0.001/p=0.012) and who have not yet taken lesson about disability (p = 0.021). Conclusions DLS is a valid-reliable tool for assessing disability literacy levels of medical school students. Key messages It is essential to place disability related lessons from the earliest grades of medical school curriculum. In the literature, DLS seems the first scale about disability literacy and needs to be tested in large communities.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.004</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1101-1262
ispartof European journal of public health, 2019-11, Vol.29 (Supplement_4)
issn 1101-1262
1464-360X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2430179391
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
subjects Ability
Communication
Confirmatory factor analysis
Correlation analysis
Curricula
Disability
Disability studies
Everyday life
Factor analysis
Health problems
Literacy
Low level
Medical schools
People with disabilities
Public health
Questions
Reliability
Reliability analysis
Students
title Reliability and Validity of Disability Literacy Scale for Medical School Students
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T16%3A27%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reliability%20and%20Validity%20of%20Disability%20Literacy%20Scale%20for%20Medical%20School%20Students&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Aydo%C4%9Fan,%20S&rft.date=2019-11-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=Supplement_4&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2430179391%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430179391&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckz187.004&rfr_iscdi=true