How Economic Sanctions Discourage the Prospect of Reunification of the Korean Peninsula (and What Might Help)
Purpose-This paper examines how economic sanctions imposed on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) by the United Nations and the United States, which has taken additional measures to ban DPRK's economic activities in order to pressure the regime into denuclearization, may have...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | North Korean review 2020-04, Vol.16 (1), p.121-130 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 130 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | North Korean review |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Sriyai, Surachanee |
description | Purpose-This paper examines how economic sanctions imposed on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) by the United Nations and the United States, which has taken additional measures to ban DPRK's economic activities in order to pressure the regime into denuclearization, may have an adverse effect on the prospect of reunification in the Korean Peninsula. Design/Methodology/Approach-A critical evaluation of the current situation in the Peninsula through rational choice perspective. This paper proposes a solution that may promote the future of reunification in accordance with the modernization theory of democratization. Findings-This paper finds that economic sanctions can discourage the prospect of reunification for two main reasons: (1) sanctions put strains on the DPRK's economy, but not enough for the regime to surrender its nuclear weapons; and (2) UN sanctions have intrinsic monitoring and implementation issues. Practical Implications-The findings from this paper might be useful for policymakers as an alternative outlook on the issue of reunification; and thus, might reshape the approach to negotiation. Originality/Value-This paper offers an alternative perspective about economic sanctions, which are one of the most used instruments of coercion/manipulation in the realm of international relations. Moreover, it also offers a more good-natured approach to reunification. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430112656</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26912709</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26912709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j120t-ab4b52feabe9184604fbb916b42405b31ed82dbc01a94459ae5efc83de281ba23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj11LwzAYhYsoOKc_QQh4oxeFJE275FLmdKLi8AMvy5v07ZayJTVJEf-9HfPqHA4P53COsglTguVcyup49GU5-plUp9lZjB2lQnIqJ9lu6X_Iwnjnd9aQd3AmWe8iubPR-CHAGknaIFkFH3s0ifiWvOHgbGsN7Ml9sAeefEBwZIXOujhsgVyDa8jXBhJ5setNIkvc9jfn2UkL24gX_zrNPu8XH_Nl_vz68Di_fc47xmnKQQtd8hZBo2JSVFS0WitWacEFLXXBsJG80YYyUEKUCrDE1siiQS6ZBl5Ms6tDbx_894Ax1d14xo2TNRcFZYxXZTVSlweqi8mHug92B-G35pVifEZV8QcEk1_s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430112656</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Economic Sanctions Discourage the Prospect of Reunification of the Korean Peninsula (and What Might Help)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Political Science Complete (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Sriyai, Surachanee</creator><creatorcontrib>Sriyai, Surachanee</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose-This paper examines how economic sanctions imposed on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) by the United Nations and the United States, which has taken additional measures to ban DPRK's economic activities in order to pressure the regime into denuclearization, may have an adverse effect on the prospect of reunification in the Korean Peninsula. Design/Methodology/Approach-A critical evaluation of the current situation in the Peninsula through rational choice perspective. This paper proposes a solution that may promote the future of reunification in accordance with the modernization theory of democratization. Findings-This paper finds that economic sanctions can discourage the prospect of reunification for two main reasons: (1) sanctions put strains on the DPRK's economy, but not enough for the regime to surrender its nuclear weapons; and (2) UN sanctions have intrinsic monitoring and implementation issues. Practical Implications-The findings from this paper might be useful for policymakers as an alternative outlook on the issue of reunification; and thus, might reshape the approach to negotiation. Originality/Value-This paper offers an alternative perspective about economic sanctions, which are one of the most used instruments of coercion/manipulation in the realm of international relations. Moreover, it also offers a more good-natured approach to reunification.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1551-2789</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1941-2886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Jefferson: McFarland & Company</publisher><subject>Central banks ; Coercion ; Commentary Essays ; Cooperation ; Democracy ; Democratization ; Economic activity ; Economic development ; Economic statistics ; International relations ; Kim Jong Il ; Kim Jong Un ; Manipulation ; Modernization ; Negotiation ; Nuclear weapons ; Policy making ; Rational choice ; Sanctions ; Value</subject><ispartof>North Korean review, 2020-04, Vol.16 (1), p.121-130</ispartof><rights>2020 McFarland & Company, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright McFarland & Company, Inc. Spring 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26912709$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26912709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,12824,27843,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sriyai, Surachanee</creatorcontrib><title>How Economic Sanctions Discourage the Prospect of Reunification of the Korean Peninsula (and What Might Help)</title><title>North Korean review</title><description>Purpose-This paper examines how economic sanctions imposed on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) by the United Nations and the United States, which has taken additional measures to ban DPRK's economic activities in order to pressure the regime into denuclearization, may have an adverse effect on the prospect of reunification in the Korean Peninsula. Design/Methodology/Approach-A critical evaluation of the current situation in the Peninsula through rational choice perspective. This paper proposes a solution that may promote the future of reunification in accordance with the modernization theory of democratization. Findings-This paper finds that economic sanctions can discourage the prospect of reunification for two main reasons: (1) sanctions put strains on the DPRK's economy, but not enough for the regime to surrender its nuclear weapons; and (2) UN sanctions have intrinsic monitoring and implementation issues. Practical Implications-The findings from this paper might be useful for policymakers as an alternative outlook on the issue of reunification; and thus, might reshape the approach to negotiation. Originality/Value-This paper offers an alternative perspective about economic sanctions, which are one of the most used instruments of coercion/manipulation in the realm of international relations. Moreover, it also offers a more good-natured approach to reunification.</description><subject>Central banks</subject><subject>Coercion</subject><subject>Commentary Essays</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Democratization</subject><subject>Economic activity</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>International relations</subject><subject>Kim Jong Il</subject><subject>Kim Jong Un</subject><subject>Manipulation</subject><subject>Modernization</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Nuclear weapons</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Rational choice</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Value</subject><issn>1551-2789</issn><issn>1941-2886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotj11LwzAYhYsoOKc_QQh4oxeFJE275FLmdKLi8AMvy5v07ZayJTVJEf-9HfPqHA4P53COsglTguVcyup49GU5-plUp9lZjB2lQnIqJ9lu6X_Iwnjnd9aQd3AmWe8iubPR-CHAGknaIFkFH3s0ifiWvOHgbGsN7Ml9sAeefEBwZIXOujhsgVyDa8jXBhJ5setNIkvc9jfn2UkL24gX_zrNPu8XH_Nl_vz68Di_fc47xmnKQQtd8hZBo2JSVFS0WitWacEFLXXBsJG80YYyUEKUCrDE1siiQS6ZBl5Ms6tDbx_894Ax1d14xo2TNRcFZYxXZTVSlweqi8mHug92B-G35pVifEZV8QcEk1_s</recordid><startdate>20200401</startdate><enddate>20200401</enddate><creator>Sriyai, Surachanee</creator><general>McFarland & Company</general><general>McFarland & Company, Inc</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200401</creationdate><title>How Economic Sanctions Discourage the Prospect of Reunification of the Korean Peninsula (and What Might Help)</title><author>Sriyai, Surachanee</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j120t-ab4b52feabe9184604fbb916b42405b31ed82dbc01a94459ae5efc83de281ba23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Central banks</topic><topic>Coercion</topic><topic>Commentary Essays</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Democratization</topic><topic>Economic activity</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>International relations</topic><topic>Kim Jong Il</topic><topic>Kim Jong Un</topic><topic>Manipulation</topic><topic>Modernization</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Nuclear weapons</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Rational choice</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Value</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sriyai, Surachanee</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>North Korean review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sriyai, Surachanee</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Economic Sanctions Discourage the Prospect of Reunification of the Korean Peninsula (and What Might Help)</atitle><jtitle>North Korean review</jtitle><date>2020-04-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>130</epage><pages>121-130</pages><issn>1551-2789</issn><eissn>1941-2886</eissn><abstract>Purpose-This paper examines how economic sanctions imposed on the Democratic People's Republic of Korea (DPRK) by the United Nations and the United States, which has taken additional measures to ban DPRK's economic activities in order to pressure the regime into denuclearization, may have an adverse effect on the prospect of reunification in the Korean Peninsula. Design/Methodology/Approach-A critical evaluation of the current situation in the Peninsula through rational choice perspective. This paper proposes a solution that may promote the future of reunification in accordance with the modernization theory of democratization. Findings-This paper finds that economic sanctions can discourage the prospect of reunification for two main reasons: (1) sanctions put strains on the DPRK's economy, but not enough for the regime to surrender its nuclear weapons; and (2) UN sanctions have intrinsic monitoring and implementation issues. Practical Implications-The findings from this paper might be useful for policymakers as an alternative outlook on the issue of reunification; and thus, might reshape the approach to negotiation. Originality/Value-This paper offers an alternative perspective about economic sanctions, which are one of the most used instruments of coercion/manipulation in the realm of international relations. Moreover, it also offers a more good-natured approach to reunification.</abstract><cop>Jefferson</cop><pub>McFarland & Company</pub><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1551-2789 |
ispartof | North Korean review, 2020-04, Vol.16 (1), p.121-130 |
issn | 1551-2789 1941-2886 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2430112656 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Political Science Complete (EBSCOhost) |
subjects | Central banks Coercion Commentary Essays Cooperation Democracy Democratization Economic activity Economic development Economic statistics International relations Kim Jong Il Kim Jong Un Manipulation Modernization Negotiation Nuclear weapons Policy making Rational choice Sanctions Value |
title | How Economic Sanctions Discourage the Prospect of Reunification of the Korean Peninsula (and What Might Help) |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T23%3A51%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Economic%20Sanctions%20Discourage%20the%20Prospect%20of%20Reunification%20of%20the%20Korean%20Peninsula%20(and%20What%20Might%20Help)&rft.jtitle=North%20Korean%20review&rft.au=Sriyai,%20Surachanee&rft.date=2020-04-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=130&rft.pages=121-130&rft.issn=1551-2789&rft.eissn=1941-2886&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26912709%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430112656&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26912709&rfr_iscdi=true |