Studies of the TNT equivalence of propane, propane/oxygen, and ANFO
The TNT equivalences of equal masses of propane, a stoichiometric mixture of propane and oxygen, and ammonium-nitrate–fuel-oil (ANFO) were calculated based on the peak hydrostatic and dynamic pressures, the hydrostatic and dynamic pressure positive-phase impulses, and the positive-phase integrated w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Shock waves 2020-07, Vol.30 (5), p.483-489 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 489 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 483 |
container_title | Shock waves |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Dewey, J. M. |
description | The TNT equivalences of equal masses of propane, a stoichiometric mixture of propane and oxygen, and ammonium-nitrate–fuel-oil (ANFO) were calculated based on the peak hydrostatic and dynamic pressures, the hydrostatic and dynamic pressure positive-phase impulses, and the positive-phase integrated work flux. It was assumed that the propane had been dispersed as a vapour/droplet cloud to form a stoichiometric mixture with atmospheric oxygen before detonation. This is the objective for fuel–air weapons and the worst-case scenario for accidental propane explosions such as boiling liquid expanding vapour explosions. The TNT equivalences of propane/oxygen and ANFO, which have energy yields less than TNT, show little variation when calculated using the different blast wave physical properties. In contrast, the equivalences for propane, which has a significantly higher energy yield than TNT, show a broad range of values, with those based on the impulses being significantly larger than those based on the peak values. The equivalence based on the positive-phase integrated work flux is intermediate between the peak and impulse values. The reasons for these differences are illustrated and discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00193-020-00949-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2430112611</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2430112611</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-469831eef0b0a975f7df4f6be86a9431aa78306bebce6f37a993a11a5b25eec43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9PwkAQxTdGExH9Ap6aeGVlZrftdo-EiJoQOIjnzbbMIgRb6LYi397Farx5mj95783kx9gtwj0CqKEHQC05COAAOtb8cMZ6GEvBBSbynPVAy4yjyNQlu_J-E-QqVarHxi9Nu1yTjyoXNW8ULWaLiPbt-sNuqSzotN7V1c6WNPhthtXncUXlILLlMhrNJvNrduHs1tPNT-2z18nDYvzEp_PH5_FoyguZpA2PU51JJHKQg9UqcWrpYpfmlKVWxxKtVZmEMOcFpU4qq7W0iDbJRUJUxLLP7rrc8Mi-Jd-YTdXWZThpRCwBUaSIQSU6VVFX3tfkzK5ev9v6aBDMCZbpYJkAy3zDModgkp3JB3G5ovov-h_XF6d1bAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2430112611</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Studies of the TNT equivalence of propane, propane/oxygen, and ANFO</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Dewey, J. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dewey, J. M.</creatorcontrib><description>The TNT equivalences of equal masses of propane, a stoichiometric mixture of propane and oxygen, and ammonium-nitrate–fuel-oil (ANFO) were calculated based on the peak hydrostatic and dynamic pressures, the hydrostatic and dynamic pressure positive-phase impulses, and the positive-phase integrated work flux. It was assumed that the propane had been dispersed as a vapour/droplet cloud to form a stoichiometric mixture with atmospheric oxygen before detonation. This is the objective for fuel–air weapons and the worst-case scenario for accidental propane explosions such as boiling liquid expanding vapour explosions. The TNT equivalences of propane/oxygen and ANFO, which have energy yields less than TNT, show little variation when calculated using the different blast wave physical properties. In contrast, the equivalences for propane, which has a significantly higher energy yield than TNT, show a broad range of values, with those based on the impulses being significantly larger than those based on the peak values. The equivalence based on the positive-phase integrated work flux is intermediate between the peak and impulse values. The reasons for these differences are illustrated and discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0938-1287</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-2153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00193-020-00949-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Acoustics ; Condensed Matter Physics ; Detonation ; Dynamic pressure ; Engineering ; Engineering Fluid Dynamics ; Engineering Thermodynamics ; Equivalence ; Explosions ; Fluid- and Aerodynamics ; Fuels ; Heat and Mass Transfer ; Impulses ; Mathematical analysis ; Original Article ; Oxygen ; Physical properties ; Propane ; Thermodynamics</subject><ispartof>Shock waves, 2020-07, Vol.30 (5), p.483-489</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-469831eef0b0a975f7df4f6be86a9431aa78306bebce6f37a993a11a5b25eec43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-469831eef0b0a975f7df4f6be86a9431aa78306bebce6f37a993a11a5b25eec43</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4611-130X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00193-020-00949-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00193-020-00949-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27906,27907,41470,42539,51301</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dewey, J. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Studies of the TNT equivalence of propane, propane/oxygen, and ANFO</title><title>Shock waves</title><addtitle>Shock Waves</addtitle><description>The TNT equivalences of equal masses of propane, a stoichiometric mixture of propane and oxygen, and ammonium-nitrate–fuel-oil (ANFO) were calculated based on the peak hydrostatic and dynamic pressures, the hydrostatic and dynamic pressure positive-phase impulses, and the positive-phase integrated work flux. It was assumed that the propane had been dispersed as a vapour/droplet cloud to form a stoichiometric mixture with atmospheric oxygen before detonation. This is the objective for fuel–air weapons and the worst-case scenario for accidental propane explosions such as boiling liquid expanding vapour explosions. The TNT equivalences of propane/oxygen and ANFO, which have energy yields less than TNT, show little variation when calculated using the different blast wave physical properties. In contrast, the equivalences for propane, which has a significantly higher energy yield than TNT, show a broad range of values, with those based on the impulses being significantly larger than those based on the peak values. The equivalence based on the positive-phase integrated work flux is intermediate between the peak and impulse values. The reasons for these differences are illustrated and discussed.</description><subject>Acoustics</subject><subject>Condensed Matter Physics</subject><subject>Detonation</subject><subject>Dynamic pressure</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</subject><subject>Engineering Thermodynamics</subject><subject>Equivalence</subject><subject>Explosions</subject><subject>Fluid- and Aerodynamics</subject><subject>Fuels</subject><subject>Heat and Mass Transfer</subject><subject>Impulses</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Oxygen</subject><subject>Physical properties</subject><subject>Propane</subject><subject>Thermodynamics</subject><issn>0938-1287</issn><issn>1432-2153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9PwkAQxTdGExH9Ap6aeGVlZrftdo-EiJoQOIjnzbbMIgRb6LYi397Farx5mj95783kx9gtwj0CqKEHQC05COAAOtb8cMZ6GEvBBSbynPVAy4yjyNQlu_J-E-QqVarHxi9Nu1yTjyoXNW8ULWaLiPbt-sNuqSzotN7V1c6WNPhthtXncUXlILLlMhrNJvNrduHs1tPNT-2z18nDYvzEp_PH5_FoyguZpA2PU51JJHKQg9UqcWrpYpfmlKVWxxKtVZmEMOcFpU4qq7W0iDbJRUJUxLLP7rrc8Mi-Jd-YTdXWZThpRCwBUaSIQSU6VVFX3tfkzK5ev9v6aBDMCZbpYJkAy3zDModgkp3JB3G5ovov-h_XF6d1bAA</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Dewey, J. M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4611-130X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Studies of the TNT equivalence of propane, propane/oxygen, and ANFO</title><author>Dewey, J. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-469831eef0b0a975f7df4f6be86a9431aa78306bebce6f37a993a11a5b25eec43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acoustics</topic><topic>Condensed Matter Physics</topic><topic>Detonation</topic><topic>Dynamic pressure</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering Fluid Dynamics</topic><topic>Engineering Thermodynamics</topic><topic>Equivalence</topic><topic>Explosions</topic><topic>Fluid- and Aerodynamics</topic><topic>Fuels</topic><topic>Heat and Mass Transfer</topic><topic>Impulses</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Oxygen</topic><topic>Physical properties</topic><topic>Propane</topic><topic>Thermodynamics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dewey, J. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Shock waves</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dewey, J. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Studies of the TNT equivalence of propane, propane/oxygen, and ANFO</atitle><jtitle>Shock waves</jtitle><stitle>Shock Waves</stitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>483</spage><epage>489</epage><pages>483-489</pages><issn>0938-1287</issn><eissn>1432-2153</eissn><abstract>The TNT equivalences of equal masses of propane, a stoichiometric mixture of propane and oxygen, and ammonium-nitrate–fuel-oil (ANFO) were calculated based on the peak hydrostatic and dynamic pressures, the hydrostatic and dynamic pressure positive-phase impulses, and the positive-phase integrated work flux. It was assumed that the propane had been dispersed as a vapour/droplet cloud to form a stoichiometric mixture with atmospheric oxygen before detonation. This is the objective for fuel–air weapons and the worst-case scenario for accidental propane explosions such as boiling liquid expanding vapour explosions. The TNT equivalences of propane/oxygen and ANFO, which have energy yields less than TNT, show little variation when calculated using the different blast wave physical properties. In contrast, the equivalences for propane, which has a significantly higher energy yield than TNT, show a broad range of values, with those based on the impulses being significantly larger than those based on the peak values. The equivalence based on the positive-phase integrated work flux is intermediate between the peak and impulse values. The reasons for these differences are illustrated and discussed.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00193-020-00949-w</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4611-130X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0938-1287 |
ispartof | Shock waves, 2020-07, Vol.30 (5), p.483-489 |
issn | 0938-1287 1432-2153 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2430112611 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Acoustics Condensed Matter Physics Detonation Dynamic pressure Engineering Engineering Fluid Dynamics Engineering Thermodynamics Equivalence Explosions Fluid- and Aerodynamics Fuels Heat and Mass Transfer Impulses Mathematical analysis Original Article Oxygen Physical properties Propane Thermodynamics |
title | Studies of the TNT equivalence of propane, propane/oxygen, and ANFO |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T09%3A30%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Studies%20of%20the%20TNT%20equivalence%20of%20propane,%20propane/oxygen,%20and%20ANFO&rft.jtitle=Shock%20waves&rft.au=Dewey,%20J.%20M.&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=483&rft.epage=489&rft.pages=483-489&rft.issn=0938-1287&rft.eissn=1432-2153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00193-020-00949-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2430112611%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2430112611&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |