Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction

The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political studies 2020-08, Vol.68 (3), p.565-581
1. Verfasser: Schaap, Andrew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 581
container_issue 3
container_start_page 565
container_title Political studies
container_volume 68
creator Schaap, Andrew
description The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might sometimes prefer not to accept the burden of educating the dominant. In circumstances of structural inequality, withdrawing from privileged subjects’ ignorance can be a form of self-preservation. But such withdrawal also has the potential to induce epistemic friction insofar as it depletes the opportunities for active ignorance to reproduce itself. Herman Melville’s tragicomic short story of Bartleby – the legal copyist who ‘would prefer not to’ – has been celebrated by philosophers as emblematic of such resistant withdrawal. Interpreting the story as a dramatisation of the epistemic friction encountered by its narrator makes vivid how such withdrawal can be political.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0032321719873865
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429445321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0032321719873865</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429445321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-7abcce3615f7fb5b7eb88bf297d374082fc53bb9d42197d3202229c106b310583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3GPBczatNexLRXRUWFR-Ip5KkEzdLt1mTLOq_t3UFQfA0w3wv5kPokJJjSqU8IYQzzqikVSl5WeRbaERFIbOKiXIbjQY4G_BdtBfjghDKWSFGCC48fvFrfOMTfgDAaQ74HlT0HbY-DFCI0NpTfOdbl5xRLX52ad4E9d6vqmu-FZOPFQQHnQHsLZ6sXEywdAZPgzPJ-W4f7VjVRjj4mWP0NJ08nl9ls9vL6_OzWWZ4TlMmlTYGeEFzK63OtQRdltqySjZcClIya3KuddUIRocbI4yxylBSaE5JXvIxOtr4roJ_W0NM9aJ_oOsjayZYJUTeV9CzyIZlgo8xgK1XwS1V-KwpqYcy679l9pJsI4nqFX5N_-V_AQnUcqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429445321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Schaap, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaap, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might sometimes prefer not to accept the burden of educating the dominant. In circumstances of structural inequality, withdrawing from privileged subjects’ ignorance can be a form of self-preservation. But such withdrawal also has the potential to induce epistemic friction insofar as it depletes the opportunities for active ignorance to reproduce itself. Herman Melville’s tragicomic short story of Bartleby – the legal copyist who ‘would prefer not to’ – has been celebrated by philosophers as emblematic of such resistant withdrawal. Interpreting the story as a dramatisation of the epistemic friction encountered by its narrator makes vivid how such withdrawal can be political.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0032321719873865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Epistemology ; Friction ; Ignorance ; Inequality ; Oppression ; Philosophers ; Politics ; Preservation ; Privileges &amp; immunities ; Social relations</subject><ispartof>Political studies, 2020-08, Vol.68 (3), p.565-581</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-7abcce3615f7fb5b7eb88bf297d374082fc53bb9d42197d3202229c106b310583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-7abcce3615f7fb5b7eb88bf297d374082fc53bb9d42197d3202229c106b310583</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9608-0129</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0032321719873865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032321719873865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaap, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction</title><title>Political studies</title><description>The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might sometimes prefer not to accept the burden of educating the dominant. In circumstances of structural inequality, withdrawing from privileged subjects’ ignorance can be a form of self-preservation. But such withdrawal also has the potential to induce epistemic friction insofar as it depletes the opportunities for active ignorance to reproduce itself. Herman Melville’s tragicomic short story of Bartleby – the legal copyist who ‘would prefer not to’ – has been celebrated by philosophers as emblematic of such resistant withdrawal. Interpreting the story as a dramatisation of the epistemic friction encountered by its narrator makes vivid how such withdrawal can be political.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Ignorance</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Privileges &amp; immunities</subject><subject>Social relations</subject><issn>0032-3217</issn><issn>1467-9248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3GPBczatNexLRXRUWFR-Ip5KkEzdLt1mTLOq_t3UFQfA0w3wv5kPokJJjSqU8IYQzzqikVSl5WeRbaERFIbOKiXIbjQY4G_BdtBfjghDKWSFGCC48fvFrfOMTfgDAaQ74HlT0HbY-DFCI0NpTfOdbl5xRLX52ad4E9d6vqmu-FZOPFQQHnQHsLZ6sXEywdAZPgzPJ-W4f7VjVRjj4mWP0NJ08nl9ls9vL6_OzWWZ4TlMmlTYGeEFzK63OtQRdltqySjZcClIya3KuddUIRocbI4yxylBSaE5JXvIxOtr4roJ_W0NM9aJ_oOsjayZYJUTeV9CzyIZlgo8xgK1XwS1V-KwpqYcy679l9pJsI4nqFX5N_-V_AQnUcqY</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Schaap, Andrew</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-0129</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction</title><author>Schaap, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-7abcce3615f7fb5b7eb88bf297d374082fc53bb9d42197d3202229c106b310583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Ignorance</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Privileges &amp; immunities</topic><topic>Social relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaap, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaap, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction</atitle><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>581</epage><pages>565-581</pages><issn>0032-3217</issn><eissn>1467-9248</eissn><abstract>The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might sometimes prefer not to accept the burden of educating the dominant. In circumstances of structural inequality, withdrawing from privileged subjects’ ignorance can be a form of self-preservation. But such withdrawal also has the potential to induce epistemic friction insofar as it depletes the opportunities for active ignorance to reproduce itself. Herman Melville’s tragicomic short story of Bartleby – the legal copyist who ‘would prefer not to’ – has been celebrated by philosophers as emblematic of such resistant withdrawal. Interpreting the story as a dramatisation of the epistemic friction encountered by its narrator makes vivid how such withdrawal can be political.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0032321719873865</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-0129</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0032-3217
ispartof Political studies, 2020-08, Vol.68 (3), p.565-581
issn 0032-3217
1467-9248
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2429445321
source EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete
subjects Democracy
Epistemology
Friction
Ignorance
Inequality
Oppression
Philosophers
Politics
Preservation
Privileges & immunities
Social relations
title Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A42%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20You%20Not%20See%20the%20Reason%20for%20Yourself?%20Political%20Withdrawal%20and%20the%20Experience%20of%20Epistemic%20Friction&rft.jtitle=Political%20studies&rft.au=Schaap,%20Andrew&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=581&rft.pages=565-581&rft.issn=0032-3217&rft.eissn=1467-9248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0032321719873865&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429445321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429445321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0032321719873865&rfr_iscdi=true