Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction
The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political studies 2020-08, Vol.68 (3), p.565-581 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 581 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 565 |
container_title | Political studies |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Schaap, Andrew |
description | The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might sometimes prefer not to accept the burden of educating the dominant. In circumstances of structural inequality, withdrawing from privileged subjects’ ignorance can be a form of self-preservation. But such withdrawal also has the potential to induce epistemic friction insofar as it depletes the opportunities for active ignorance to reproduce itself. Herman Melville’s tragicomic short story of Bartleby – the legal copyist who ‘would prefer not to’ – has been celebrated by philosophers as emblematic of such resistant withdrawal. Interpreting the story as a dramatisation of the epistemic friction encountered by its narrator makes vivid how such withdrawal can be political. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0032321719873865 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429445321</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0032321719873865</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429445321</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-7abcce3615f7fb5b7eb88bf297d374082fc53bb9d42197d3202229c106b310583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3GPBczatNexLRXRUWFR-Ip5KkEzdLt1mTLOq_t3UFQfA0w3wv5kPokJJjSqU8IYQzzqikVSl5WeRbaERFIbOKiXIbjQY4G_BdtBfjghDKWSFGCC48fvFrfOMTfgDAaQ74HlT0HbY-DFCI0NpTfOdbl5xRLX52ad4E9d6vqmu-FZOPFQQHnQHsLZ6sXEywdAZPgzPJ-W4f7VjVRjj4mWP0NJ08nl9ls9vL6_OzWWZ4TlMmlTYGeEFzK63OtQRdltqySjZcClIya3KuddUIRocbI4yxylBSaE5JXvIxOtr4roJ_W0NM9aJ_oOsjayZYJUTeV9CzyIZlgo8xgK1XwS1V-KwpqYcy679l9pJsI4nqFX5N_-V_AQnUcqY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429445321</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete</source><creator>Schaap, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaap, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might sometimes prefer not to accept the burden of educating the dominant. In circumstances of structural inequality, withdrawing from privileged subjects’ ignorance can be a form of self-preservation. But such withdrawal also has the potential to induce epistemic friction insofar as it depletes the opportunities for active ignorance to reproduce itself. Herman Melville’s tragicomic short story of Bartleby – the legal copyist who ‘would prefer not to’ – has been celebrated by philosophers as emblematic of such resistant withdrawal. Interpreting the story as a dramatisation of the epistemic friction encountered by its narrator makes vivid how such withdrawal can be political.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-3217</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0032321719873865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Epistemology ; Friction ; Ignorance ; Inequality ; Oppression ; Philosophers ; Politics ; Preservation ; Privileges & immunities ; Social relations</subject><ispartof>Political studies, 2020-08, Vol.68 (3), p.565-581</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-7abcce3615f7fb5b7eb88bf297d374082fc53bb9d42197d3202229c106b310583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-7abcce3615f7fb5b7eb88bf297d374082fc53bb9d42197d3202229c106b310583</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9608-0129</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0032321719873865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0032321719873865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaap, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction</title><title>Political studies</title><description>The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might sometimes prefer not to accept the burden of educating the dominant. In circumstances of structural inequality, withdrawing from privileged subjects’ ignorance can be a form of self-preservation. But such withdrawal also has the potential to induce epistemic friction insofar as it depletes the opportunities for active ignorance to reproduce itself. Herman Melville’s tragicomic short story of Bartleby – the legal copyist who ‘would prefer not to’ – has been celebrated by philosophers as emblematic of such resistant withdrawal. Interpreting the story as a dramatisation of the epistemic friction encountered by its narrator makes vivid how such withdrawal can be political.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Ignorance</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Oppression</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Preservation</subject><subject>Privileges & immunities</subject><subject>Social relations</subject><issn>0032-3217</issn><issn>1467-9248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3GPBczatNexLRXRUWFR-Ip5KkEzdLt1mTLOq_t3UFQfA0w3wv5kPokJJjSqU8IYQzzqikVSl5WeRbaERFIbOKiXIbjQY4G_BdtBfjghDKWSFGCC48fvFrfOMTfgDAaQ74HlT0HbY-DFCI0NpTfOdbl5xRLX52ad4E9d6vqmu-FZOPFQQHnQHsLZ6sXEywdAZPgzPJ-W4f7VjVRjj4mWP0NJ08nl9ls9vL6_OzWWZ4TlMmlTYGeEFzK63OtQRdltqySjZcClIya3KuddUIRocbI4yxylBSaE5JXvIxOtr4roJ_W0NM9aJ_oOsjayZYJUTeV9CzyIZlgo8xgK1XwS1V-KwpqYcy679l9pJsI4nqFX5N_-V_AQnUcqY</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Schaap, Andrew</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-0129</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction</title><author>Schaap, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c351t-7abcce3615f7fb5b7eb88bf297d374082fc53bb9d42197d3202229c106b310583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Ignorance</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Oppression</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Preservation</topic><topic>Privileges & immunities</topic><topic>Social relations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaap, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaap, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction</atitle><jtitle>Political studies</jtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>565</spage><epage>581</epage><pages>565-581</pages><issn>0032-3217</issn><eissn>1467-9248</eissn><abstract>The epistemic friction that is generated when privileged subjects are confronted by different social perspectives is important for democratic politics since it can interrupt their active ignorance about oppressive social relations from which they benefit. However, members of oppressed groups might sometimes prefer not to accept the burden of educating the dominant. In circumstances of structural inequality, withdrawing from privileged subjects’ ignorance can be a form of self-preservation. But such withdrawal also has the potential to induce epistemic friction insofar as it depletes the opportunities for active ignorance to reproduce itself. Herman Melville’s tragicomic short story of Bartleby – the legal copyist who ‘would prefer not to’ – has been celebrated by philosophers as emblematic of such resistant withdrawal. Interpreting the story as a dramatisation of the epistemic friction encountered by its narrator makes vivid how such withdrawal can be political.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0032321719873865</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9608-0129</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-3217 |
ispartof | Political studies, 2020-08, Vol.68 (3), p.565-581 |
issn | 0032-3217 1467-9248 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2429445321 |
source | EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete |
subjects | Democracy Epistemology Friction Ignorance Inequality Oppression Philosophers Politics Preservation Privileges & immunities Social relations |
title | Do You Not See the Reason for Yourself? Political Withdrawal and the Experience of Epistemic Friction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T14%3A42%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20You%20Not%20See%20the%20Reason%20for%20Yourself?%20Political%20Withdrawal%20and%20the%20Experience%20of%20Epistemic%20Friction&rft.jtitle=Political%20studies&rft.au=Schaap,%20Andrew&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=565&rft.epage=581&rft.pages=565-581&rft.issn=0032-3217&rft.eissn=1467-9248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0032321719873865&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429445321%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429445321&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0032321719873865&rfr_iscdi=true |