The Myth of Bureaucratic Neutrality: Institutionalized Inequity in Local Government Hiring
As a field, we often relate merit and neutrality to the technical skills needed to be the “best” candidate for a job, but that was not necessarily what civil service reformers had in mind. The civil service system was meant to replace widespread political patronage, but the myth around the origins o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Review of public personnel administration 2020-09, Vol.40 (3), p.516-531 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 531 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 516 |
container_title | Review of public personnel administration |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Portillo, Shannon Bearfield, Domonic Humphrey, Nicole |
description | As a field, we often relate merit and neutrality to the technical skills needed to be the “best” candidate for a job, but that was not necessarily what civil service reformers had in mind. The civil service system was meant to replace widespread political patronage, but the myth around the origins of the civil service system masked inequalities built into early testing requirements and institutionalized racial inequities in hiring practices. In this article, we argue the founding myth of bureaucratic neutrality was so powerful that it continues to reverberate in our field. We trace the current reverberations of the myth of neutrality through modern hiring practices and the contemporary legal landscape. By doing this, we present a systematic review of this rationalized myth in public employment, using an institutionalism framework. As the myth of bureaucratic neutrality continues to permeate decision-making, policy creation, and implementation, it will continue to institutionalize inequity within the field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/0734371X19828431 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429418497</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0734371X19828431</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429418497</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-3c783f10115841521f3e3230fa9843971d391eaaf117ee758b69a97cb827e1863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49BjyvZpLdJvGmRdtC1UuF4mVJt7NtSrvb5kOov96UCoLgaeB9Me8Rcg3sFkDKOyZFLiRMQSuucgEnpANFwTNZ6Okp6Rzo7MCfkwvvV4wBzwvZIR-TJdKXfVjStqaP0aGJlTPBVvQVY3BmbcP-no4aH2yIwbZNQr5wnhDcxcRR29BxW5k1HbSf6JoNNoEOrbPN4pKc1Wbt8erndsn789OkP8zGb4NR_2GcVYLpkIlKKlEDAyhUDgWHWqDggtVGpx5awlxoQGPqVBNRFmrW00bLaqa4RFA90SU3x9yta3cRfShXbXTpUV_ynOscVK5lUrGjqnKt9w7rcuvsxrh9Caw8LFj-XTBZsqPFmwX-hv6r_wbce3AL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429418497</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Myth of Bureaucratic Neutrality: Institutionalized Inequity in Local Government Hiring</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sage Journals</source><creator>Portillo, Shannon ; Bearfield, Domonic ; Humphrey, Nicole</creator><creatorcontrib>Portillo, Shannon ; Bearfield, Domonic ; Humphrey, Nicole</creatorcontrib><description>As a field, we often relate merit and neutrality to the technical skills needed to be the “best” candidate for a job, but that was not necessarily what civil service reformers had in mind. The civil service system was meant to replace widespread political patronage, but the myth around the origins of the civil service system masked inequalities built into early testing requirements and institutionalized racial inequities in hiring practices. In this article, we argue the founding myth of bureaucratic neutrality was so powerful that it continues to reverberate in our field. We trace the current reverberations of the myth of neutrality through modern hiring practices and the contemporary legal landscape. By doing this, we present a systematic review of this rationalized myth in public employment, using an institutionalism framework. As the myth of bureaucratic neutrality continues to permeate decision-making, policy creation, and implementation, it will continue to institutionalize inequity within the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-371X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-759X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0734371X19828431</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Affirmative action ; Civil service ; Decision making ; Discrimination ; Employment ; Hiring ; Inequality ; Institutionalism ; Institutionalization ; Local government ; Mythology ; Neutrality ; Patronage</subject><ispartof>Review of public personnel administration, 2020-09, Vol.40 (3), p.516-531</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-3c783f10115841521f3e3230fa9843971d391eaaf117ee758b69a97cb827e1863</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-3c783f10115841521f3e3230fa9843971d391eaaf117ee758b69a97cb827e1863</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3283-5286</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0734371X19828431$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0734371X19828431$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Portillo, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearfield, Domonic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Nicole</creatorcontrib><title>The Myth of Bureaucratic Neutrality: Institutionalized Inequity in Local Government Hiring</title><title>Review of public personnel administration</title><description>As a field, we often relate merit and neutrality to the technical skills needed to be the “best” candidate for a job, but that was not necessarily what civil service reformers had in mind. The civil service system was meant to replace widespread political patronage, but the myth around the origins of the civil service system masked inequalities built into early testing requirements and institutionalized racial inequities in hiring practices. In this article, we argue the founding myth of bureaucratic neutrality was so powerful that it continues to reverberate in our field. We trace the current reverberations of the myth of neutrality through modern hiring practices and the contemporary legal landscape. By doing this, we present a systematic review of this rationalized myth in public employment, using an institutionalism framework. As the myth of bureaucratic neutrality continues to permeate decision-making, policy creation, and implementation, it will continue to institutionalize inequity within the field.</description><subject>Affirmative action</subject><subject>Civil service</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Discrimination</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Institutionalism</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Mythology</subject><subject>Neutrality</subject><subject>Patronage</subject><issn>0734-371X</issn><issn>1552-759X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrd49BjyvZpLdJvGmRdtC1UuF4mVJt7NtSrvb5kOov96UCoLgaeB9Me8Rcg3sFkDKOyZFLiRMQSuucgEnpANFwTNZ6Okp6Rzo7MCfkwvvV4wBzwvZIR-TJdKXfVjStqaP0aGJlTPBVvQVY3BmbcP-no4aH2yIwbZNQr5wnhDcxcRR29BxW5k1HbSf6JoNNoEOrbPN4pKc1Wbt8erndsn789OkP8zGb4NR_2GcVYLpkIlKKlEDAyhUDgWHWqDggtVGpx5awlxoQGPqVBNRFmrW00bLaqa4RFA90SU3x9yta3cRfShXbXTpUV_ynOscVK5lUrGjqnKt9w7rcuvsxrh9Caw8LFj-XTBZsqPFmwX-hv6r_wbce3AL</recordid><startdate>202009</startdate><enddate>202009</enddate><creator>Portillo, Shannon</creator><creator>Bearfield, Domonic</creator><creator>Humphrey, Nicole</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-5286</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202009</creationdate><title>The Myth of Bureaucratic Neutrality: Institutionalized Inequity in Local Government Hiring</title><author>Portillo, Shannon ; Bearfield, Domonic ; Humphrey, Nicole</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-3c783f10115841521f3e3230fa9843971d391eaaf117ee758b69a97cb827e1863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Affirmative action</topic><topic>Civil service</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Discrimination</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Institutionalism</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Mythology</topic><topic>Neutrality</topic><topic>Patronage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Portillo, Shannon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bearfield, Domonic</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Humphrey, Nicole</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Review of public personnel administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Portillo, Shannon</au><au>Bearfield, Domonic</au><au>Humphrey, Nicole</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Myth of Bureaucratic Neutrality: Institutionalized Inequity in Local Government Hiring</atitle><jtitle>Review of public personnel administration</jtitle><date>2020-09</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>516</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>516-531</pages><issn>0734-371X</issn><eissn>1552-759X</eissn><abstract>As a field, we often relate merit and neutrality to the technical skills needed to be the “best” candidate for a job, but that was not necessarily what civil service reformers had in mind. The civil service system was meant to replace widespread political patronage, but the myth around the origins of the civil service system masked inequalities built into early testing requirements and institutionalized racial inequities in hiring practices. In this article, we argue the founding myth of bureaucratic neutrality was so powerful that it continues to reverberate in our field. We trace the current reverberations of the myth of neutrality through modern hiring practices and the contemporary legal landscape. By doing this, we present a systematic review of this rationalized myth in public employment, using an institutionalism framework. As the myth of bureaucratic neutrality continues to permeate decision-making, policy creation, and implementation, it will continue to institutionalize inequity within the field.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0734371X19828431</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3283-5286</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0734-371X |
ispartof | Review of public personnel administration, 2020-09, Vol.40 (3), p.516-531 |
issn | 0734-371X 1552-759X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2429418497 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sage Journals |
subjects | Affirmative action Civil service Decision making Discrimination Employment Hiring Inequality Institutionalism Institutionalization Local government Mythology Neutrality Patronage |
title | The Myth of Bureaucratic Neutrality: Institutionalized Inequity in Local Government Hiring |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T18%3A51%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Myth%20of%20Bureaucratic%20Neutrality:%20Institutionalized%20Inequity%20in%20Local%20Government%20Hiring&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20public%20personnel%20administration&rft.au=Portillo,%20Shannon&rft.date=2020-09&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=516&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=516-531&rft.issn=0734-371X&rft.eissn=1552-759X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0734371X19828431&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429418497%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429418497&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0734371X19828431&rfr_iscdi=true |