Parametric Optimization in Rougher Flotation Performance of a Sulfidized Mixed Copper Ore
The dominant challenge of current copper beneficiation plants is the low recoverability of oxide copper-bearing minerals associated with sulfide type ones. Furthermore, applying commonly used conventional methodologies does not allow the interactional effects of critical parameters in the flotation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Minerals (Basel) 2020-08, Vol.10 (8), p.660 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 660 |
container_title | Minerals (Basel) |
container_volume | 10 |
creator | Azizi, Asghar Masdarian, Mojtaba Hassanzadeh, Ahmad Bahri, Zahra Niedoba, Tomasz Surowiak, Agnieszka |
description | The dominant challenge of current copper beneficiation plants is the low recoverability of oxide copper-bearing minerals associated with sulfide type ones. Furthermore, applying commonly used conventional methodologies does not allow the interactional effects of critical parameters in the flotation processes to be investigated, which is mostly overlooked in the literature. To tackle this issue, the present paper aimed at characterizing the behavior of five key effective factors and their interactions in a sulfidized copper ore. In this context, dosage of collector (sodium di-ethydithiophosphate, 60–100 g/t), depressant (sodium silicate, 80–120 g/t) and frother (methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), 6–10 g/t), pulp pH (7–11) and agitation rate (900–1300 rpm) were examined and statistically analyzed using response surface methodology. Flotation experiments were conducted in a Denver type agitated flotation cell at the rougher stage. The experimental results showed that increasing the pH (from 8 to 10) at low agitation rate (1000 rpm) enhanced the recovery from 80.36% to 85.22%, while at high agitation rate (1200 rpm), a slight declination occurred in the recovery. Meanwhile, increasing the collector dosage at a lower frother value (7 g/t), caused a reduction of about 4.44% in copper recovery owing to the interactions between factors, whereas at a higher frother level (9 g/t), the recovery was almost unchanged. The optimization process was also performed using the goal function approach, and maximum copper recovery of 92.75% was obtained using ~70 g/t collector, 110 g/t depressant, 7 g/t frother, pulp pH of 10 and 1000 rpm agitation rate. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/min10080660 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429341509</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2429341509</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-fd73df9e70adcc65998e5350b452bde83fe8a5f6bce7e30e5b0f12afee2cca143</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUE1LxDAUDKLgsu7JPxDwKNWXpGmboyyuCitd_AA9lTR90SzbpqYt6P56K_Ww7_DeMMy8gSHknMGVEAqua9cwgAySBI7IjEMqI5aIt-MDfEoWXbeFcRQTmeQz8r7RQdfYB2do3vaudnvdO99Q19AnP3x8YqCrne8ncoPB-lDrxiD1lmr6POysq9weK_rovse99G07WvKAZ-TE6l2Hi_87J6-r25flfbTO7x6WN-vIcJX1ka1SUVmFKejKmEQqlaEUEspY8rLCTFjMtLRJaTBFAShLsIxri8iN0SwWc3Ix_W2D_xqw64utH0IzRhY85krETIIaVZeTygTfdQFt0QZX6_BTMCj-6isO6hO_mixkHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429341509</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Parametric Optimization in Rougher Flotation Performance of a Sulfidized Mixed Copper Ore</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Azizi, Asghar ; Masdarian, Mojtaba ; Hassanzadeh, Ahmad ; Bahri, Zahra ; Niedoba, Tomasz ; Surowiak, Agnieszka</creator><creatorcontrib>Azizi, Asghar ; Masdarian, Mojtaba ; Hassanzadeh, Ahmad ; Bahri, Zahra ; Niedoba, Tomasz ; Surowiak, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><description>The dominant challenge of current copper beneficiation plants is the low recoverability of oxide copper-bearing minerals associated with sulfide type ones. Furthermore, applying commonly used conventional methodologies does not allow the interactional effects of critical parameters in the flotation processes to be investigated, which is mostly overlooked in the literature. To tackle this issue, the present paper aimed at characterizing the behavior of five key effective factors and their interactions in a sulfidized copper ore. In this context, dosage of collector (sodium di-ethydithiophosphate, 60–100 g/t), depressant (sodium silicate, 80–120 g/t) and frother (methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), 6–10 g/t), pulp pH (7–11) and agitation rate (900–1300 rpm) were examined and statistically analyzed using response surface methodology. Flotation experiments were conducted in a Denver type agitated flotation cell at the rougher stage. The experimental results showed that increasing the pH (from 8 to 10) at low agitation rate (1000 rpm) enhanced the recovery from 80.36% to 85.22%, while at high agitation rate (1200 rpm), a slight declination occurred in the recovery. Meanwhile, increasing the collector dosage at a lower frother value (7 g/t), caused a reduction of about 4.44% in copper recovery owing to the interactions between factors, whereas at a higher frother level (9 g/t), the recovery was almost unchanged. The optimization process was also performed using the goal function approach, and maximum copper recovery of 92.75% was obtained using ~70 g/t collector, 110 g/t depressant, 7 g/t frother, pulp pH of 10 and 1000 rpm agitation rate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2075-163X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2075-163X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/min10080660</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Agitation ; Anniversaries ; Beneficiation ; Collectors ; Copper ; Copper ores ; Declination ; Design of experiments ; Dosage ; Flotation ; Methyl isobutyl carbinol ; Mineral processing ; Mineralogy ; Minerals ; Optimization ; Optimization techniques ; Oxidation ; Particle size ; pH effects ; Process parameters ; Pulp ; Recoverability ; Recovery ; Response surface methodology ; Silicates ; Sodium ; Sodium silicates ; Sulfides ; Sulphides</subject><ispartof>Minerals (Basel), 2020-08, Vol.10 (8), p.660</ispartof><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-fd73df9e70adcc65998e5350b452bde83fe8a5f6bce7e30e5b0f12afee2cca143</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-fd73df9e70adcc65998e5350b452bde83fe8a5f6bce7e30e5b0f12afee2cca143</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8426-0269 ; 0000-0002-6410-4736 ; 0000-0002-4637-6287 ; 0000-0002-2094-7125</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Azizi, Asghar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masdarian, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanzadeh, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahri, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niedoba, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surowiak, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><title>Parametric Optimization in Rougher Flotation Performance of a Sulfidized Mixed Copper Ore</title><title>Minerals (Basel)</title><description>The dominant challenge of current copper beneficiation plants is the low recoverability of oxide copper-bearing minerals associated with sulfide type ones. Furthermore, applying commonly used conventional methodologies does not allow the interactional effects of critical parameters in the flotation processes to be investigated, which is mostly overlooked in the literature. To tackle this issue, the present paper aimed at characterizing the behavior of five key effective factors and their interactions in a sulfidized copper ore. In this context, dosage of collector (sodium di-ethydithiophosphate, 60–100 g/t), depressant (sodium silicate, 80–120 g/t) and frother (methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), 6–10 g/t), pulp pH (7–11) and agitation rate (900–1300 rpm) were examined and statistically analyzed using response surface methodology. Flotation experiments were conducted in a Denver type agitated flotation cell at the rougher stage. The experimental results showed that increasing the pH (from 8 to 10) at low agitation rate (1000 rpm) enhanced the recovery from 80.36% to 85.22%, while at high agitation rate (1200 rpm), a slight declination occurred in the recovery. Meanwhile, increasing the collector dosage at a lower frother value (7 g/t), caused a reduction of about 4.44% in copper recovery owing to the interactions between factors, whereas at a higher frother level (9 g/t), the recovery was almost unchanged. The optimization process was also performed using the goal function approach, and maximum copper recovery of 92.75% was obtained using ~70 g/t collector, 110 g/t depressant, 7 g/t frother, pulp pH of 10 and 1000 rpm agitation rate.</description><subject>Agitation</subject><subject>Anniversaries</subject><subject>Beneficiation</subject><subject>Collectors</subject><subject>Copper</subject><subject>Copper ores</subject><subject>Declination</subject><subject>Design of experiments</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Flotation</subject><subject>Methyl isobutyl carbinol</subject><subject>Mineral processing</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Minerals</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Optimization techniques</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Pulp</subject><subject>Recoverability</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Response surface methodology</subject><subject>Silicates</subject><subject>Sodium</subject><subject>Sodium silicates</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulphides</subject><issn>2075-163X</issn><issn>2075-163X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUE1LxDAUDKLgsu7JPxDwKNWXpGmboyyuCitd_AA9lTR90SzbpqYt6P56K_Ww7_DeMMy8gSHknMGVEAqua9cwgAySBI7IjEMqI5aIt-MDfEoWXbeFcRQTmeQz8r7RQdfYB2do3vaudnvdO99Q19AnP3x8YqCrne8ncoPB-lDrxiD1lmr6POysq9weK_rovse99G07WvKAZ-TE6l2Hi_87J6-r25flfbTO7x6WN-vIcJX1ka1SUVmFKejKmEQqlaEUEspY8rLCTFjMtLRJaTBFAShLsIxri8iN0SwWc3Ix_W2D_xqw64utH0IzRhY85krETIIaVZeTygTfdQFt0QZX6_BTMCj-6isO6hO_mixkHA</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Azizi, Asghar</creator><creator>Masdarian, Mojtaba</creator><creator>Hassanzadeh, Ahmad</creator><creator>Bahri, Zahra</creator><creator>Niedoba, Tomasz</creator><creator>Surowiak, Agnieszka</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8426-0269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6410-4736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4637-6287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2094-7125</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Parametric Optimization in Rougher Flotation Performance of a Sulfidized Mixed Copper Ore</title><author>Azizi, Asghar ; Masdarian, Mojtaba ; Hassanzadeh, Ahmad ; Bahri, Zahra ; Niedoba, Tomasz ; Surowiak, Agnieszka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c298t-fd73df9e70adcc65998e5350b452bde83fe8a5f6bce7e30e5b0f12afee2cca143</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Agitation</topic><topic>Anniversaries</topic><topic>Beneficiation</topic><topic>Collectors</topic><topic>Copper</topic><topic>Copper ores</topic><topic>Declination</topic><topic>Design of experiments</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Flotation</topic><topic>Methyl isobutyl carbinol</topic><topic>Mineral processing</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Minerals</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Optimization techniques</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Pulp</topic><topic>Recoverability</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Response surface methodology</topic><topic>Silicates</topic><topic>Sodium</topic><topic>Sodium silicates</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulphides</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Azizi, Asghar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Masdarian, Mojtaba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hassanzadeh, Ahmad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahri, Zahra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niedoba, Tomasz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surowiak, Agnieszka</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Minerals (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Azizi, Asghar</au><au>Masdarian, Mojtaba</au><au>Hassanzadeh, Ahmad</au><au>Bahri, Zahra</au><au>Niedoba, Tomasz</au><au>Surowiak, Agnieszka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Parametric Optimization in Rougher Flotation Performance of a Sulfidized Mixed Copper Ore</atitle><jtitle>Minerals (Basel)</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>660</spage><pages>660-</pages><issn>2075-163X</issn><eissn>2075-163X</eissn><abstract>The dominant challenge of current copper beneficiation plants is the low recoverability of oxide copper-bearing minerals associated with sulfide type ones. Furthermore, applying commonly used conventional methodologies does not allow the interactional effects of critical parameters in the flotation processes to be investigated, which is mostly overlooked in the literature. To tackle this issue, the present paper aimed at characterizing the behavior of five key effective factors and their interactions in a sulfidized copper ore. In this context, dosage of collector (sodium di-ethydithiophosphate, 60–100 g/t), depressant (sodium silicate, 80–120 g/t) and frother (methyl isobutyl carbinol (MIBC), 6–10 g/t), pulp pH (7–11) and agitation rate (900–1300 rpm) were examined and statistically analyzed using response surface methodology. Flotation experiments were conducted in a Denver type agitated flotation cell at the rougher stage. The experimental results showed that increasing the pH (from 8 to 10) at low agitation rate (1000 rpm) enhanced the recovery from 80.36% to 85.22%, while at high agitation rate (1200 rpm), a slight declination occurred in the recovery. Meanwhile, increasing the collector dosage at a lower frother value (7 g/t), caused a reduction of about 4.44% in copper recovery owing to the interactions between factors, whereas at a higher frother level (9 g/t), the recovery was almost unchanged. The optimization process was also performed using the goal function approach, and maximum copper recovery of 92.75% was obtained using ~70 g/t collector, 110 g/t depressant, 7 g/t frother, pulp pH of 10 and 1000 rpm agitation rate.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/min10080660</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8426-0269</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6410-4736</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4637-6287</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2094-7125</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2075-163X |
ispartof | Minerals (Basel), 2020-08, Vol.10 (8), p.660 |
issn | 2075-163X 2075-163X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2429341509 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Agitation Anniversaries Beneficiation Collectors Copper Copper ores Declination Design of experiments Dosage Flotation Methyl isobutyl carbinol Mineral processing Mineralogy Minerals Optimization Optimization techniques Oxidation Particle size pH effects Process parameters Pulp Recoverability Recovery Response surface methodology Silicates Sodium Sodium silicates Sulfides Sulphides |
title | Parametric Optimization in Rougher Flotation Performance of a Sulfidized Mixed Copper Ore |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T02%3A12%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Parametric%20Optimization%20in%20Rougher%20Flotation%20Performance%20of%20a%20Sulfidized%20Mixed%20Copper%20Ore&rft.jtitle=Minerals%20(Basel)&rft.au=Azizi,%20Asghar&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=660&rft.pages=660-&rft.issn=2075-163X&rft.eissn=2075-163X&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/min10080660&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429341509%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429341509&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |