Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among U.S. Federal Employees: An Investigation of Racial and Gender Differences

The purpose of this study is to examine whether the determinants of job satisfaction vary between male and female and between White and minority employees of the U.S. federal government. The study investigates nine potential determinants associated with existence, relatedness, growth needs, and orga...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Public personnel management 2020-09, Vol.49 (3), p.336-366
Hauptverfasser: Lee, Hyung-Woo, Robertson, Peter J., Kim, Kitai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 366
container_issue 3
container_start_page 336
container_title Public personnel management
container_volume 49
creator Lee, Hyung-Woo
Robertson, Peter J.
Kim, Kitai
description The purpose of this study is to examine whether the determinants of job satisfaction vary between male and female and between White and minority employees of the U.S. federal government. The study investigates nine potential determinants associated with existence, relatedness, growth needs, and organizational equity, based on data from the 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. The study uses multiple regression analysis to assess and compare the strength of the relationships between these determinants and work satisfaction among each of four demographic subgroups (White males, White females, minority males, and minority females). Results indicate that there are no dramatic differences among these groups in terms of which factors have the strongest impact on satisfaction. However, a few subtle distinctions are apparent. In particular, employee development is a higher priority for men than for women, and recognition for good work is not as important to minorities as it is to Whites. There is also some evidence of intersectionality, in that pay satisfaction and diversity management are most important to minority women and least important to White men, and workplace participation is most important to White men and least important to minority women. The study provides potential explanations of these findings, and briefly addresses implications for research and practice.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0091026019869371
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429085299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0091026019869371</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2429085299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-9122e15bf65401cd2f77b351935e407f3738c30cd002701648c5baf354a84f7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEUhIMoWKt3jwHPW1-S3c3GW2ltrRQEa89Lmr6ULW1Sk63Qf29qhYLg6R3mm5nHEHLPoMeYlI8AigEvgamqVEKyC9JhKi8ymXN2STpHOTvq1-QmxjUAMMF5h-yG2GLYNk67NlJv6atf0Jlum2i1aRvvaH_r3YrOe7MeHeESg97Q5-1u4w-I8Yn2HZ24L4xts9I_eIp416ZJlHZLOkaXLHTYWIsBncF4S66s3kS8-71dMh89fwxesunbeDLoTzMjyrLNFOMcWbGwZZEDM0tupVyIgilRYA7SCikqI8AsAbgEVuaVKRbaiiLXVW4T2iUPp9xd8J_79GC99vvgUmXNc66gKrhSiYITZYKPMaCtd6HZ6nCoGdTHXeu_uyYLPVnQeNfEsyF9JBQvZZWQ7IREvcJz77-R3xxwgAU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429085299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among U.S. Federal Employees: An Investigation of Racial and Gender Differences</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Lee, Hyung-Woo ; Robertson, Peter J. ; Kim, Kitai</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyung-Woo ; Robertson, Peter J. ; Kim, Kitai</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study is to examine whether the determinants of job satisfaction vary between male and female and between White and minority employees of the U.S. federal government. The study investigates nine potential determinants associated with existence, relatedness, growth needs, and organizational equity, based on data from the 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. The study uses multiple regression analysis to assess and compare the strength of the relationships between these determinants and work satisfaction among each of four demographic subgroups (White males, White females, minority males, and minority females). Results indicate that there are no dramatic differences among these groups in terms of which factors have the strongest impact on satisfaction. However, a few subtle distinctions are apparent. In particular, employee development is a higher priority for men than for women, and recognition for good work is not as important to minorities as it is to Whites. There is also some evidence of intersectionality, in that pay satisfaction and diversity management are most important to minority women and least important to White men, and workplace participation is most important to White men and least important to minority women. The study provides potential explanations of these findings, and briefly addresses implications for research and practice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-0260</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-7421</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0091026019869371</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Federal employees ; Females ; Gender differences ; Government Employees ; Human resource management ; Job satisfaction ; Males ; Multiple Regression Analysis ; Staff Development ; White people ; Whites</subject><ispartof>Public personnel management, 2020-09, Vol.49 (3), p.336-366</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-9122e15bf65401cd2f77b351935e407f3738c30cd002701648c5baf354a84f7b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-9122e15bf65401cd2f77b351935e407f3738c30cd002701648c5baf354a84f7b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5167-9250 ; 0000-0001-8520-5088</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0091026019869371$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0091026019869371$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kitai</creatorcontrib><title>Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among U.S. Federal Employees: An Investigation of Racial and Gender Differences</title><title>Public personnel management</title><description>The purpose of this study is to examine whether the determinants of job satisfaction vary between male and female and between White and minority employees of the U.S. federal government. The study investigates nine potential determinants associated with existence, relatedness, growth needs, and organizational equity, based on data from the 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. The study uses multiple regression analysis to assess and compare the strength of the relationships between these determinants and work satisfaction among each of four demographic subgroups (White males, White females, minority males, and minority females). Results indicate that there are no dramatic differences among these groups in terms of which factors have the strongest impact on satisfaction. However, a few subtle distinctions are apparent. In particular, employee development is a higher priority for men than for women, and recognition for good work is not as important to minorities as it is to Whites. There is also some evidence of intersectionality, in that pay satisfaction and diversity management are most important to minority women and least important to White men, and workplace participation is most important to White men and least important to minority women. The study provides potential explanations of these findings, and briefly addresses implications for research and practice.</description><subject>Federal employees</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Gender differences</subject><subject>Government Employees</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Multiple Regression Analysis</subject><subject>Staff Development</subject><subject>White people</subject><subject>Whites</subject><issn>0091-0260</issn><issn>1945-7421</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEUhIMoWKt3jwHPW1-S3c3GW2ltrRQEa89Lmr6ULW1Sk63Qf29qhYLg6R3mm5nHEHLPoMeYlI8AigEvgamqVEKyC9JhKi8ymXN2STpHOTvq1-QmxjUAMMF5h-yG2GLYNk67NlJv6atf0Jlum2i1aRvvaH_r3YrOe7MeHeESg97Q5-1u4w-I8Yn2HZ24L4xts9I_eIp416ZJlHZLOkaXLHTYWIsBncF4S66s3kS8-71dMh89fwxesunbeDLoTzMjyrLNFOMcWbGwZZEDM0tupVyIgilRYA7SCikqI8AsAbgEVuaVKRbaiiLXVW4T2iUPp9xd8J_79GC99vvgUmXNc66gKrhSiYITZYKPMaCtd6HZ6nCoGdTHXeu_uyYLPVnQeNfEsyF9JBQvZZWQ7IREvcJz77-R3xxwgAU</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Lee, Hyung-Woo</creator><creator>Robertson, Peter J.</creator><creator>Kim, Kitai</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5167-9250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-5088</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among U.S. Federal Employees: An Investigation of Racial and Gender Differences</title><author>Lee, Hyung-Woo ; Robertson, Peter J. ; Kim, Kitai</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c366t-9122e15bf65401cd2f77b351935e407f3738c30cd002701648c5baf354a84f7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Federal employees</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Gender differences</topic><topic>Government Employees</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Multiple Regression Analysis</topic><topic>Staff Development</topic><topic>White people</topic><topic>Whites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Hyung-Woo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kitai</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Public personnel management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Hyung-Woo</au><au>Robertson, Peter J.</au><au>Kim, Kitai</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among U.S. Federal Employees: An Investigation of Racial and Gender Differences</atitle><jtitle>Public personnel management</jtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>336</spage><epage>366</epage><pages>336-366</pages><issn>0091-0260</issn><eissn>1945-7421</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study is to examine whether the determinants of job satisfaction vary between male and female and between White and minority employees of the U.S. federal government. The study investigates nine potential determinants associated with existence, relatedness, growth needs, and organizational equity, based on data from the 2015 Federal Employee Viewpoint Survey. The study uses multiple regression analysis to assess and compare the strength of the relationships between these determinants and work satisfaction among each of four demographic subgroups (White males, White females, minority males, and minority females). Results indicate that there are no dramatic differences among these groups in terms of which factors have the strongest impact on satisfaction. However, a few subtle distinctions are apparent. In particular, employee development is a higher priority for men than for women, and recognition for good work is not as important to minorities as it is to Whites. There is also some evidence of intersectionality, in that pay satisfaction and diversity management are most important to minority women and least important to White men, and workplace participation is most important to White men and least important to minority women. The study provides potential explanations of these findings, and briefly addresses implications for research and practice.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0091026019869371</doi><tpages>31</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5167-9250</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8520-5088</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-0260
ispartof Public personnel management, 2020-09, Vol.49 (3), p.336-366
issn 0091-0260
1945-7421
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2429085299
source Access via SAGE; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Federal employees
Females
Gender differences
Government Employees
Human resource management
Job satisfaction
Males
Multiple Regression Analysis
Staff Development
White people
Whites
title Determinants of Job Satisfaction Among U.S. Federal Employees: An Investigation of Racial and Gender Differences
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A13%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determinants%20of%20Job%20Satisfaction%20Among%20U.S.%20Federal%20Employees:%20An%20Investigation%20of%20Racial%20and%20Gender%20Differences&rft.jtitle=Public%20personnel%20management&rft.au=Lee,%20Hyung-Woo&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=336&rft.epage=366&rft.pages=336-366&rft.issn=0091-0260&rft.eissn=1945-7421&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0091026019869371&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429085299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429085299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0091026019869371&rfr_iscdi=true