Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery

We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eastern Journal Of Medicine 2020, Vol.25 (2), p.293-298
Hauptverfasser: Yilmaz, Gulseren, Akça, Aysu, Kiyak, Huseyin, KARAASLAN, ONUR, SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 298
container_issue 2
container_start_page 293
container_title Eastern Journal Of Medicine
container_volume 25
creator Yilmaz, Gulseren
Akça, Aysu
Kiyak, Huseyin
KARAASLAN, ONUR
SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA
description We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and general anesthesia who underwent urogynecologic surgery. One hundred and eighty subjects who underwent urogynecologic surgery between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. All subjects underwent a standardized voiding trial subsequent to surgery, which was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. The presence of > 100 ml volume in the post-void bladder scan was defined as POUR. The primary outcome was to compare rates of POUR between spinal and general anesthesia. Identifying the risk factors for POUR was the secondary outcome of this study. Spinal anesthesia group included 80, and the general anesthesia group consisted of 100 patients. The overall rate of the POUR was %22.8. The proportion of the patients with POUR was significantly higher in the spinal anesthesia group compared to that of the subjects in the general anesthesia group (%33.8vs°/o14, P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the adoption of spinal anesthesia (Odds ratio: 3.172, 95%CI: 1.383-7.275, P=0.006) and presence of diabetes (Odds ratio: 5.840, 95% Œ2.32514.666, 14.666, P< 0.001) were independent predictors for the development of POUR. The rate of the POUR is significantly higher in patients receiving spinal anesthesia than those receiving general anesthesia among women undergoing urogynecologic surgery.
doi_str_mv 10.5505/ejm.2020.63625
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429069050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2429069050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2225-f9302620db0ee9331edeeface5f3aa761b6a5ffa844e00ab4535ea6a27107683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAQQC0EEqWwMltiTjjbseuMqOJLqsRAd8tJLqmr1g52QtV_T9oy3Q3vTnqPkEcGuZQgn3G7zzlwyJVQXF6RGRNQZkJrdX3eWQZai1tyl9IWgGtdsBkJ373zdketxzRsMDlLXaI2pVA7O2BDD27Y0D6kIfQY7eB-kY5xOolHGnFAP7jgqfP0EPbo6egbjF1wvpuo0B091mEXOlfTNMYO4_Ge3LR2l_Dhf87J-u11vfzIVl_vn8uXVVZzzmXWlgK44tBUgFgKwbBBbG2NshXWLhSrlJVta3VRIICtCikkWmX5gsFCaTEnT5e3fQw_46RmtmGMk2gyvOAlqBIkTFR-oeoYUorYmj66_aRmGJhTUzM1Naem5txU_AHA2m2W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429069050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Yilmaz, Gulseren ; Akça, Aysu ; Kiyak, Huseyin ; KARAASLAN, ONUR ; SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creator><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Gulseren ; Akça, Aysu ; Kiyak, Huseyin ; KARAASLAN, ONUR ; SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creatorcontrib><description>We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and general anesthesia who underwent urogynecologic surgery. One hundred and eighty subjects who underwent urogynecologic surgery between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. All subjects underwent a standardized voiding trial subsequent to surgery, which was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. The presence of &gt; 100 ml volume in the post-void bladder scan was defined as POUR. The primary outcome was to compare rates of POUR between spinal and general anesthesia. Identifying the risk factors for POUR was the secondary outcome of this study. Spinal anesthesia group included 80, and the general anesthesia group consisted of 100 patients. The overall rate of the POUR was %22.8. The proportion of the patients with POUR was significantly higher in the spinal anesthesia group compared to that of the subjects in the general anesthesia group (%33.8vs°/o14, P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the adoption of spinal anesthesia (Odds ratio: 3.172, 95%CI: 1.383-7.275, P=0.006) and presence of diabetes (Odds ratio: 5.840, 95% Œ2.32514.666, 14.666, P&lt; 0.001) were independent predictors for the development of POUR. The rate of the POUR is significantly higher in patients receiving spinal anesthesia than those receiving general anesthesia among women undergoing urogynecologic surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1301-0883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1309-3886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5505/ejm.2020.63625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Van: YYU Tip Fakultesi</publisher><subject>Age ; Bladder ; Body mass index ; Catheters ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Diabetes ; Fecal incontinence ; Fentanyl ; General anesthesia ; Hemoglobin ; Hypertension ; Morphine ; Patients ; Pelvic organ prolapse ; Pelvis ; Regression analysis ; Risk factors ; Studies ; Surgery ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary retention ; Urogenital system ; Vagina ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Eastern Journal Of Medicine, 2020, Vol.25 (2), p.293-298</ispartof><rights>Copyright YYU Tip Fakultesi 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2225-f9302620db0ee9331edeeface5f3aa761b6a5ffa844e00ab4535ea6a27107683</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Gulseren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akça, Aysu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiyak, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAASLAN, ONUR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creatorcontrib><title>Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery</title><title>Eastern Journal Of Medicine</title><description>We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and general anesthesia who underwent urogynecologic surgery. One hundred and eighty subjects who underwent urogynecologic surgery between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. All subjects underwent a standardized voiding trial subsequent to surgery, which was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. The presence of &gt; 100 ml volume in the post-void bladder scan was defined as POUR. The primary outcome was to compare rates of POUR between spinal and general anesthesia. Identifying the risk factors for POUR was the secondary outcome of this study. Spinal anesthesia group included 80, and the general anesthesia group consisted of 100 patients. The overall rate of the POUR was %22.8. The proportion of the patients with POUR was significantly higher in the spinal anesthesia group compared to that of the subjects in the general anesthesia group (%33.8vs°/o14, P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the adoption of spinal anesthesia (Odds ratio: 3.172, 95%CI: 1.383-7.275, P=0.006) and presence of diabetes (Odds ratio: 5.840, 95% Œ2.32514.666, 14.666, P&lt; 0.001) were independent predictors for the development of POUR. The rate of the POUR is significantly higher in patients receiving spinal anesthesia than those receiving general anesthesia among women undergoing urogynecologic surgery.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Fecal incontinence</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pelvic organ prolapse</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary retention</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1301-0883</issn><issn>1309-3886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAQQC0EEqWwMltiTjjbseuMqOJLqsRAd8tJLqmr1g52QtV_T9oy3Q3vTnqPkEcGuZQgn3G7zzlwyJVQXF6RGRNQZkJrdX3eWQZai1tyl9IWgGtdsBkJ373zdketxzRsMDlLXaI2pVA7O2BDD27Y0D6kIfQY7eB-kY5xOolHGnFAP7jgqfP0EPbo6egbjF1wvpuo0B091mEXOlfTNMYO4_Ge3LR2l_Dhf87J-u11vfzIVl_vn8uXVVZzzmXWlgK44tBUgFgKwbBBbG2NshXWLhSrlJVta3VRIICtCikkWmX5gsFCaTEnT5e3fQw_46RmtmGMk2gyvOAlqBIkTFR-oeoYUorYmj66_aRmGJhTUzM1Naem5txU_AHA2m2W</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Yilmaz, Gulseren</creator><creator>Akça, Aysu</creator><creator>Kiyak, Huseyin</creator><creator>KARAASLAN, ONUR</creator><creator>SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creator><general>YYU Tip Fakultesi</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery</title><author>Yilmaz, Gulseren ; Akça, Aysu ; Kiyak, Huseyin ; KARAASLAN, ONUR ; SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2225-f9302620db0ee9331edeeface5f3aa761b6a5ffa844e00ab4535ea6a27107683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Fecal incontinence</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pelvic organ prolapse</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary retention</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Gulseren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akça, Aysu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiyak, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAASLAN, ONUR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Eastern Journal Of Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yilmaz, Gulseren</au><au>Akça, Aysu</au><au>Kiyak, Huseyin</au><au>KARAASLAN, ONUR</au><au>SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery</atitle><jtitle>Eastern Journal Of Medicine</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>293-298</pages><issn>1301-0883</issn><eissn>1309-3886</eissn><abstract>We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and general anesthesia who underwent urogynecologic surgery. One hundred and eighty subjects who underwent urogynecologic surgery between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. All subjects underwent a standardized voiding trial subsequent to surgery, which was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. The presence of &gt; 100 ml volume in the post-void bladder scan was defined as POUR. The primary outcome was to compare rates of POUR between spinal and general anesthesia. Identifying the risk factors for POUR was the secondary outcome of this study. Spinal anesthesia group included 80, and the general anesthesia group consisted of 100 patients. The overall rate of the POUR was %22.8. The proportion of the patients with POUR was significantly higher in the spinal anesthesia group compared to that of the subjects in the general anesthesia group (%33.8vs°/o14, P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the adoption of spinal anesthesia (Odds ratio: 3.172, 95%CI: 1.383-7.275, P=0.006) and presence of diabetes (Odds ratio: 5.840, 95% Œ2.32514.666, 14.666, P&lt; 0.001) were independent predictors for the development of POUR. The rate of the POUR is significantly higher in patients receiving spinal anesthesia than those receiving general anesthesia among women undergoing urogynecologic surgery.</abstract><cop>Van</cop><pub>YYU Tip Fakultesi</pub><doi>10.5505/ejm.2020.63625</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1301-0883
ispartof Eastern Journal Of Medicine, 2020, Vol.25 (2), p.293-298
issn 1301-0883
1309-3886
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2429069050
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Age
Bladder
Body mass index
Catheters
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Diabetes
Fecal incontinence
Fentanyl
General anesthesia
Hemoglobin
Hypertension
Morphine
Patients
Pelvic organ prolapse
Pelvis
Regression analysis
Risk factors
Studies
Surgery
Urinary incontinence
Urinary retention
Urogenital system
Vagina
Womens health
title Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A49%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spinal%20anesthesia%20is%20associated%20with%20postoperative%20urinary%20retention%20in%20women%20undergoing%20urogynecologic%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Eastern%20Journal%20Of%20Medicine&rft.au=Yilmaz,%20Gulseren&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=293-298&rft.issn=1301-0883&rft.eissn=1309-3886&rft_id=info:doi/10.5505/ejm.2020.63625&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429069050%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429069050&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true