Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery
We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eastern Journal Of Medicine 2020, Vol.25 (2), p.293-298 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 298 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 293 |
container_title | Eastern Journal Of Medicine |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Yilmaz, Gulseren Akça, Aysu Kiyak, Huseyin KARAASLAN, ONUR SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA |
description | We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and general anesthesia who underwent urogynecologic surgery. One hundred and eighty subjects who underwent urogynecologic surgery between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. All subjects underwent a standardized voiding trial subsequent to surgery, which was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. The presence of > 100 ml volume in the post-void bladder scan was defined as POUR. The primary outcome was to compare rates of POUR between spinal and general anesthesia. Identifying the risk factors for POUR was the secondary outcome of this study. Spinal anesthesia group included 80, and the general anesthesia group consisted of 100 patients. The overall rate of the POUR was %22.8. The proportion of the patients with POUR was significantly higher in the spinal anesthesia group compared to that of the subjects in the general anesthesia group (%33.8vs°/o14, P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the adoption of spinal anesthesia (Odds ratio: 3.172, 95%CI: 1.383-7.275, P=0.006) and presence of diabetes (Odds ratio: 5.840, 95% Œ2.32514.666, 14.666, P< 0.001) were independent predictors for the development of POUR. The rate of the POUR is significantly higher in patients receiving spinal anesthesia than those receiving general anesthesia among women undergoing urogynecologic surgery. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5505/ejm.2020.63625 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429069050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2429069050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2225-f9302620db0ee9331edeeface5f3aa761b6a5ffa844e00ab4535ea6a27107683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAQQC0EEqWwMltiTjjbseuMqOJLqsRAd8tJLqmr1g52QtV_T9oy3Q3vTnqPkEcGuZQgn3G7zzlwyJVQXF6RGRNQZkJrdX3eWQZai1tyl9IWgGtdsBkJ373zdketxzRsMDlLXaI2pVA7O2BDD27Y0D6kIfQY7eB-kY5xOolHGnFAP7jgqfP0EPbo6egbjF1wvpuo0B091mEXOlfTNMYO4_Ge3LR2l_Dhf87J-u11vfzIVl_vn8uXVVZzzmXWlgK44tBUgFgKwbBBbG2NshXWLhSrlJVta3VRIICtCikkWmX5gsFCaTEnT5e3fQw_46RmtmGMk2gyvOAlqBIkTFR-oeoYUorYmj66_aRmGJhTUzM1Naem5txU_AHA2m2W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429069050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Yilmaz, Gulseren ; Akça, Aysu ; Kiyak, Huseyin ; KARAASLAN, ONUR ; SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creator><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Gulseren ; Akça, Aysu ; Kiyak, Huseyin ; KARAASLAN, ONUR ; SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creatorcontrib><description>We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and general anesthesia who underwent urogynecologic surgery. One hundred and eighty subjects who underwent urogynecologic surgery between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. All subjects underwent a standardized voiding trial subsequent to surgery, which was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. The presence of > 100 ml volume in the post-void bladder scan was defined as POUR. The primary outcome was to compare rates of POUR between spinal and general anesthesia. Identifying the risk factors for POUR was the secondary outcome of this study. Spinal anesthesia group included 80, and the general anesthesia group consisted of 100 patients. The overall rate of the POUR was %22.8. The proportion of the patients with POUR was significantly higher in the spinal anesthesia group compared to that of the subjects in the general anesthesia group (%33.8vs°/o14, P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the adoption of spinal anesthesia (Odds ratio: 3.172, 95%CI: 1.383-7.275, P=0.006) and presence of diabetes (Odds ratio: 5.840, 95% Œ2.32514.666, 14.666, P< 0.001) were independent predictors for the development of POUR. The rate of the POUR is significantly higher in patients receiving spinal anesthesia than those receiving general anesthesia among women undergoing urogynecologic surgery.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1301-0883</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1309-3886</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5505/ejm.2020.63625</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Van: YYU Tip Fakultesi</publisher><subject>Age ; Bladder ; Body mass index ; Catheters ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Diabetes ; Fecal incontinence ; Fentanyl ; General anesthesia ; Hemoglobin ; Hypertension ; Morphine ; Patients ; Pelvic organ prolapse ; Pelvis ; Regression analysis ; Risk factors ; Studies ; Surgery ; Urinary incontinence ; Urinary retention ; Urogenital system ; Vagina ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Eastern Journal Of Medicine, 2020, Vol.25 (2), p.293-298</ispartof><rights>Copyright YYU Tip Fakultesi 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2225-f9302620db0ee9331edeeface5f3aa761b6a5ffa844e00ab4535ea6a27107683</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Gulseren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akça, Aysu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiyak, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAASLAN, ONUR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creatorcontrib><title>Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery</title><title>Eastern Journal Of Medicine</title><description>We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and general anesthesia who underwent urogynecologic surgery. One hundred and eighty subjects who underwent urogynecologic surgery between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. All subjects underwent a standardized voiding trial subsequent to surgery, which was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. The presence of > 100 ml volume in the post-void bladder scan was defined as POUR. The primary outcome was to compare rates of POUR between spinal and general anesthesia. Identifying the risk factors for POUR was the secondary outcome of this study. Spinal anesthesia group included 80, and the general anesthesia group consisted of 100 patients. The overall rate of the POUR was %22.8. The proportion of the patients with POUR was significantly higher in the spinal anesthesia group compared to that of the subjects in the general anesthesia group (%33.8vs°/o14, P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the adoption of spinal anesthesia (Odds ratio: 3.172, 95%CI: 1.383-7.275, P=0.006) and presence of diabetes (Odds ratio: 5.840, 95% Œ2.32514.666, 14.666, P< 0.001) were independent predictors for the development of POUR. The rate of the POUR is significantly higher in patients receiving spinal anesthesia than those receiving general anesthesia among women undergoing urogynecologic surgery.</description><subject>Age</subject><subject>Bladder</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Catheters</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Fecal incontinence</subject><subject>Fentanyl</subject><subject>General anesthesia</subject><subject>Hemoglobin</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Morphine</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pelvic organ prolapse</subject><subject>Pelvis</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Risk factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urinary retention</subject><subject>Urogenital system</subject><subject>Vagina</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1301-0883</issn><issn>1309-3886</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAQQC0EEqWwMltiTjjbseuMqOJLqsRAd8tJLqmr1g52QtV_T9oy3Q3vTnqPkEcGuZQgn3G7zzlwyJVQXF6RGRNQZkJrdX3eWQZai1tyl9IWgGtdsBkJ373zdketxzRsMDlLXaI2pVA7O2BDD27Y0D6kIfQY7eB-kY5xOolHGnFAP7jgqfP0EPbo6egbjF1wvpuo0B091mEXOlfTNMYO4_Ge3LR2l_Dhf87J-u11vfzIVl_vn8uXVVZzzmXWlgK44tBUgFgKwbBBbG2NshXWLhSrlJVta3VRIICtCikkWmX5gsFCaTEnT5e3fQw_46RmtmGMk2gyvOAlqBIkTFR-oeoYUorYmj66_aRmGJhTUzM1Naem5txU_AHA2m2W</recordid><startdate>2020</startdate><enddate>2020</enddate><creator>Yilmaz, Gulseren</creator><creator>Akça, Aysu</creator><creator>Kiyak, Huseyin</creator><creator>KARAASLAN, ONUR</creator><creator>SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creator><general>YYU Tip Fakultesi</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2020</creationdate><title>Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery</title><author>Yilmaz, Gulseren ; Akça, Aysu ; Kiyak, Huseyin ; KARAASLAN, ONUR ; SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2225-f9302620db0ee9331edeeface5f3aa761b6a5ffa844e00ab4535ea6a27107683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Age</topic><topic>Bladder</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Catheters</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Fecal incontinence</topic><topic>Fentanyl</topic><topic>General anesthesia</topic><topic>Hemoglobin</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Morphine</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pelvic organ prolapse</topic><topic>Pelvis</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Risk factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urinary retention</topic><topic>Urogenital system</topic><topic>Vagina</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yilmaz, Gulseren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akça, Aysu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kiyak, Huseyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KARAASLAN, ONUR</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Eastern Journal Of Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yilmaz, Gulseren</au><au>Akça, Aysu</au><au>Kiyak, Huseyin</au><au>KARAASLAN, ONUR</au><au>SALİHOĞLU, ZİYA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery</atitle><jtitle>Eastern Journal Of Medicine</jtitle><date>2020</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>293</spage><epage>298</epage><pages>293-298</pages><issn>1301-0883</issn><eissn>1309-3886</eissn><abstract>We hypothesized that spinal anesthesia could lead to impairment in bladder function and consequently, to postoperative urinary retention (POUR), particularly in patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery. This study was aimed to compare the rate of the POUR between the subjects receiving spinal and general anesthesia who underwent urogynecologic surgery. One hundred and eighty subjects who underwent urogynecologic surgery between June 2016 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate the risk of POUR after general versus spinal anesthesia. All subjects underwent a standardized voiding trial subsequent to surgery, which was performed by backfilling the bladder with 300 ml of saline. The presence of > 100 ml volume in the post-void bladder scan was defined as POUR. The primary outcome was to compare rates of POUR between spinal and general anesthesia. Identifying the risk factors for POUR was the secondary outcome of this study. Spinal anesthesia group included 80, and the general anesthesia group consisted of 100 patients. The overall rate of the POUR was %22.8. The proportion of the patients with POUR was significantly higher in the spinal anesthesia group compared to that of the subjects in the general anesthesia group (%33.8vs°/o14, P=0.002). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the adoption of spinal anesthesia (Odds ratio: 3.172, 95%CI: 1.383-7.275, P=0.006) and presence of diabetes (Odds ratio: 5.840, 95% Œ2.32514.666, 14.666, P< 0.001) were independent predictors for the development of POUR. The rate of the POUR is significantly higher in patients receiving spinal anesthesia than those receiving general anesthesia among women undergoing urogynecologic surgery.</abstract><cop>Van</cop><pub>YYU Tip Fakultesi</pub><doi>10.5505/ejm.2020.63625</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1301-0883 |
ispartof | Eastern Journal Of Medicine, 2020, Vol.25 (2), p.293-298 |
issn | 1301-0883 1309-3886 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2429069050 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Age Bladder Body mass index Catheters Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Diabetes Fecal incontinence Fentanyl General anesthesia Hemoglobin Hypertension Morphine Patients Pelvic organ prolapse Pelvis Regression analysis Risk factors Studies Surgery Urinary incontinence Urinary retention Urogenital system Vagina Womens health |
title | Spinal anesthesia is associated with postoperative urinary retention in women undergoing urogynecologic surgery |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A49%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spinal%20anesthesia%20is%20associated%20with%20postoperative%20urinary%20retention%20in%20women%20undergoing%20urogynecologic%20surgery&rft.jtitle=Eastern%20Journal%20Of%20Medicine&rft.au=Yilmaz,%20Gulseren&rft.date=2020&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=293&rft.epage=298&rft.pages=293-298&rft.issn=1301-0883&rft.eissn=1309-3886&rft_id=info:doi/10.5505/ejm.2020.63625&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2429069050%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429069050&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |