The just city. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice, social justice and distributive justice, concept of justice and conceptions of justice
In the fields of planning theory and human geography, there is a growing discussion of the just city. The impression is that in order to continue the discussion of the crucial issue of the just city, certain methodological considerations and precautions are necessary. The article is focused on three...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Planning theory (London, England) England), 2020-08, Vol.19 (3), p.251-267 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 267 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 251 |
| container_title | Planning theory (London, England) |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Moroni, Stefano |
| description | In the fields of planning theory and human geography, there is a growing discussion of the just city. The impression is that in order to continue the discussion of the crucial issue of the just city, certain methodological considerations and precautions are necessary. The article is focused on three in particular: (a) (urban) institutions as the first subject of justice, (b) the incomplete overlap between social justice and distributive justice, (c) the distinction between the concept and the conceptions of social justice. The impression is that these three issues are not always recognised, or at least not always to the fullest extent, in the current debate in planning theory. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1473095219877670 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2429068635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27001871</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1177_1473095219877670</sage_id><sourcerecordid>27001871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d294b4414964ee0c346aab86ed925f1cbbbca5a784ca9e4acd19212303cfc5493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7evQgFwVvXmWSSNEdZ_IIFL_Vc0jTdbdXtmrSH_e_tUlHw4GkG3u-9B4-xS4QFota3SFqAkRxNprXScMRmqAlTAZIfj_8opwf9lJ3F2AJwVJJm7Cbf-KQdYp-4pt8vknwTvE9K697WoRu2VdLEOPh4zk5q-x79xfeds9eH-3z5lK5eHp-Xd6vUCYF9WnFDJRGSUeQ9OEHK2jJTvjJc1ujKsnRWWp2Rs8aTdRUajlyAcLWTZMScXU-5u9B9jr190XZD2I6VBSduQGVKyJGCiXKhizH4utiF5sOGfYFQHNYo_q4xWtLJEu3a_4b-w19NfBv7Lvzkcw2AmUbxBWlDZoQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2429068635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The just city. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice, social justice and distributive justice, concept of justice and conceptions of justice</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Moroni, Stefano</creator><creatorcontrib>Moroni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><description>In the fields of planning theory and human geography, there is a growing discussion of the just city. The impression is that in order to continue the discussion of the crucial issue of the just city, certain methodological considerations and precautions are necessary. The article is focused on three in particular: (a) (urban) institutions as the first subject of justice, (b) the incomplete overlap between social justice and distributive justice, (c) the distinction between the concept and the conceptions of social justice. The impression is that these three issues are not always recognised, or at least not always to the fullest extent, in the current debate in planning theory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1473-0952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1473095219877670</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: Sage Publications, Inc</publisher><subject>Cities ; Distributive justice ; Local government ; Social justice</subject><ispartof>Planning theory (London, England), 2020-08, Vol.19 (3), p.251-267</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d294b4414964ee0c346aab86ed925f1cbbbca5a784ca9e4acd19212303cfc5493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d294b4414964ee0c346aab86ed925f1cbbbca5a784ca9e4acd19212303cfc5493</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3542-2073</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27001871$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27001871$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21799,27903,27904,43600,43601,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Moroni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><title>The just city. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice, social justice and distributive justice, concept of justice and conceptions of justice</title><title>Planning theory (London, England)</title><description>In the fields of planning theory and human geography, there is a growing discussion of the just city. The impression is that in order to continue the discussion of the crucial issue of the just city, certain methodological considerations and precautions are necessary. The article is focused on three in particular: (a) (urban) institutions as the first subject of justice, (b) the incomplete overlap between social justice and distributive justice, (c) the distinction between the concept and the conceptions of social justice. The impression is that these three issues are not always recognised, or at least not always to the fullest extent, in the current debate in planning theory.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Distributive justice</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Social justice</subject><issn>1473-0952</issn><issn>1741-3052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LxDAQxYMouK7evQgFwVvXmWSSNEdZ_IIFL_Vc0jTdbdXtmrSH_e_tUlHw4GkG3u-9B4-xS4QFota3SFqAkRxNprXScMRmqAlTAZIfj_8opwf9lJ3F2AJwVJJm7Cbf-KQdYp-4pt8vknwTvE9K697WoRu2VdLEOPh4zk5q-x79xfeds9eH-3z5lK5eHp-Xd6vUCYF9WnFDJRGSUeQ9OEHK2jJTvjJc1ujKsnRWWp2Rs8aTdRUajlyAcLWTZMScXU-5u9B9jr190XZD2I6VBSduQGVKyJGCiXKhizH4utiF5sOGfYFQHNYo_q4xWtLJEu3a_4b-w19NfBv7Lvzkcw2AmUbxBWlDZoQ</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Moroni, Stefano</creator><general>Sage Publications, Inc</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3542-2073</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>The just city. Three background issues</title><author>Moroni, Stefano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-d294b4414964ee0c346aab86ed925f1cbbbca5a784ca9e4acd19212303cfc5493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Distributive justice</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Social justice</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Moroni, Stefano</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Planning theory (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Moroni, Stefano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The just city. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice, social justice and distributive justice, concept of justice and conceptions of justice</atitle><jtitle>Planning theory (London, England)</jtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>251</spage><epage>267</epage><pages>251-267</pages><issn>1473-0952</issn><eissn>1741-3052</eissn><abstract>In the fields of planning theory and human geography, there is a growing discussion of the just city. The impression is that in order to continue the discussion of the crucial issue of the just city, certain methodological considerations and precautions are necessary. The article is focused on three in particular: (a) (urban) institutions as the first subject of justice, (b) the incomplete overlap between social justice and distributive justice, (c) the distinction between the concept and the conceptions of social justice. The impression is that these three issues are not always recognised, or at least not always to the fullest extent, in the current debate in planning theory.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>Sage Publications, Inc</pub><doi>10.1177/1473095219877670</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3542-2073</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1473-0952 |
| ispartof | Planning theory (London, England), 2020-08, Vol.19 (3), p.251-267 |
| issn | 1473-0952 1741-3052 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2429068635 |
| source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; SAGE Complete A-Z List; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Cities Distributive justice Local government Social justice |
| title | The just city. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice, social justice and distributive justice, concept of justice and conceptions of justice |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T17%3A25%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20just%20city.%20Three%20background%20issues:%20Institutional%20justice%20and%20spatial%20justice,%20social%20justice%20and%20distributive%20justice,%20concept%20of%20justice%20and%20conceptions%20of%20justice&rft.jtitle=Planning%20theory%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Moroni,%20Stefano&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=251&rft.epage=267&rft.pages=251-267&rft.issn=1473-0952&rft.eissn=1741-3052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1473095219877670&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27001871%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2429068635&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27001871&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1473095219877670&rfr_iscdi=true |