Archipiélagos politicos bajo la tormenta en Venezuela: Coaliciones, actores y autocratización
The evolution of the hybrid regime in Venezuela has caused an extended political conflict that has led to deinstitutionalization and to a complex humanitarian crisis. Based on this mutation, this article conceptualizes the emergence of two coalitions that have interacted for twenty years as archipel...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European review of Latin American and Caribbean studies 2020-01 (109), p.21-40 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; spa |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 40 |
---|---|
container_issue | 109 |
container_start_page | 21 |
container_title | European review of Latin American and Caribbean studies |
container_volume | |
creator | Pareja, Francisco José Alfaro |
description | The evolution of the hybrid regime in Venezuela has caused an extended political conflict that has led to deinstitutionalization and to a complex humanitarian crisis. Based on this mutation, this article conceptualizes the emergence of two coalitions that have interacted for twenty years as archipelagos, each made up of groups (islets) with different visions and ways of relating. Disputing power, these coalitions have promoted actions and speeches based on fundamental ideas: one, with an illiberal and revolutionary tendency (CIR); another, with a liberal and democratic tendency (CLD). This article also analyses how their interaction has promoted the development of a pattern: escalation of violence; installation of alternative mechanisms for dialogue and negotiation (MADN), de-escalation of violence; no transformation of the conflict. Finally, the involvement of external actors represents an essential factor in the composition and displacement of each islet to radicalize its position or, on the contrary, contribute to a democratic and negotiated solution.
La evolución del régimen híbrido en Venezuela ha provocado un conflicto político extendido que ha derivado en desinstitucionalización y una crisis humanitaria compleja. Partiendo de esta mutación, este artículo conceptualiza la emergencia de dos coaliciones que han interactuado durante veinte años a modo de archipiélagos, cada una compuesta por grupos (islotes) con diversas visiones y formas de relacionarse. Disputando el poder, estas coaliciones han promovido acciones y discursos basados en ideas fundamentales: una, de tendencia iliberal y revolucionaria (CIR); otra, de tendencia liberal y democrática (CLD). También, se analiza cómo su interacción ha promovido el desarrollo de un patrón: escalamiento de violencia; instalación de mecanismos alternativos de diálogo y negociación (MADN) desescalamiento de violencia; no transformación del conflicto. Finalmente, el involucramiento de los actores externos representa un factor consustancial a la composición y desplazamiento de cada islote para radicalizar su postura o, por el contrario, contribuir a una solución democrática y negociada. |
doi_str_mv | 10.32992/ERLACS.10568 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2428114582</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A622718627</galeid><jstor_id>26936901</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A622718627</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1838-a609dc5fcfd6f8e6aa52bd242f53ebd2fb350785e27c273614feea7257a516193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotj8tKxDAYhYMoOI4uXYoF1x1zaW7LMowXKAjetuVvm9SWTFuTdqFv5HP4YgbG1TmLj-9wELokeMOo1vR291zk25cNwVyoI7QiSuo0kxwfoxXWNEuxwOoUnYXQ44hoqVZI5L7-6Kbu98dBO4ZkGl03d3VsFfRj4iCZR783wwyJGZJ3M5jvxTg4RycWXDAX_7lGb3e71-1DWjzdP27zIm2JYioFgXVTc1vbRlhlBACnVUMzajkzsdiKcSwVN1TWVDJBMmsMSMolcCKIZmt0c_BOfvxcTJjLflz8ECfLaFGEZFzRSF0fqBacKZ2vW1hCKHNBqSRKRPMaXR2IPsQ_5eS7PfivkgrNhMaE_QFDD1ud</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2428114582</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Archipiélagos politicos bajo la tormenta en Venezuela: Coaliciones, actores y autocratización</title><source>Uopen Journals</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Open Access Journals</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Pareja, Francisco José Alfaro</creator><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Francisco José Alfaro</creatorcontrib><description>The evolution of the hybrid regime in Venezuela has caused an extended political conflict that has led to deinstitutionalization and to a complex humanitarian crisis. Based on this mutation, this article conceptualizes the emergence of two coalitions that have interacted for twenty years as archipelagos, each made up of groups (islets) with different visions and ways of relating. Disputing power, these coalitions have promoted actions and speeches based on fundamental ideas: one, with an illiberal and revolutionary tendency (CIR); another, with a liberal and democratic tendency (CLD). This article also analyses how their interaction has promoted the development of a pattern: escalation of violence; installation of alternative mechanisms for dialogue and negotiation (MADN), de-escalation of violence; no transformation of the conflict. Finally, the involvement of external actors represents an essential factor in the composition and displacement of each islet to radicalize its position or, on the contrary, contribute to a democratic and negotiated solution.
La evolución del régimen híbrido en Venezuela ha provocado un conflicto político extendido que ha derivado en desinstitucionalización y una crisis humanitaria compleja. Partiendo de esta mutación, este artículo conceptualiza la emergencia de dos coaliciones que han interactuado durante veinte años a modo de archipiélagos, cada una compuesta por grupos (islotes) con diversas visiones y formas de relacionarse. Disputando el poder, estas coaliciones han promovido acciones y discursos basados en ideas fundamentales: una, de tendencia iliberal y revolucionaria (CIR); otra, de tendencia liberal y democrática (CLD). También, se analiza cómo su interacción ha promovido el desarrollo de un patrón: escalamiento de violencia; instalación de mecanismos alternativos de diálogo y negociación (MADN) desescalamiento de violencia; no transformación del conflicto. Finalmente, el involucramiento de los actores externos representa un factor consustancial a la composición y desplazamiento de cada islote para radicalizar su postura o, por el contrario, contribuir a una solución democrática y negociada.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0924-0608</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-4750</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.32992/ERLACS.10568</identifier><language>eng ; spa</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Centrum voor Studie en Documentatie van Latijns Amerika (CEDLA)</publisher><subject>Actors ; Autocracy ; Coalitions ; Conflict ; Crises ; De-escalation ; Deinstitutionalization ; Dialogue (Literary technique) ; Escalation ; Humanitarianism ; Installation ; Lung diseases ; Negotiation ; Politics ; Power (Philosophy) ; Radicalism ; Special Collection | Colección Especial ; Speeches ; Transformation ; Violence</subject><ispartof>European review of Latin American and Caribbean studies, 2020-01 (109), p.21-40</ispartof><rights>Francisco José Alfaro Pareja</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Centrum voor Studie en Documentatie</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26936901$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26936901$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,861,12826,25335,27325,27905,27906,33755,54505,54511,57998,58231</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Francisco José Alfaro</creatorcontrib><title>Archipiélagos politicos bajo la tormenta en Venezuela: Coaliciones, actores y autocratización</title><title>European review of Latin American and Caribbean studies</title><description>The evolution of the hybrid regime in Venezuela has caused an extended political conflict that has led to deinstitutionalization and to a complex humanitarian crisis. Based on this mutation, this article conceptualizes the emergence of two coalitions that have interacted for twenty years as archipelagos, each made up of groups (islets) with different visions and ways of relating. Disputing power, these coalitions have promoted actions and speeches based on fundamental ideas: one, with an illiberal and revolutionary tendency (CIR); another, with a liberal and democratic tendency (CLD). This article also analyses how their interaction has promoted the development of a pattern: escalation of violence; installation of alternative mechanisms for dialogue and negotiation (MADN), de-escalation of violence; no transformation of the conflict. Finally, the involvement of external actors represents an essential factor in the composition and displacement of each islet to radicalize its position or, on the contrary, contribute to a democratic and negotiated solution.
La evolución del régimen híbrido en Venezuela ha provocado un conflicto político extendido que ha derivado en desinstitucionalización y una crisis humanitaria compleja. Partiendo de esta mutación, este artículo conceptualiza la emergencia de dos coaliciones que han interactuado durante veinte años a modo de archipiélagos, cada una compuesta por grupos (islotes) con diversas visiones y formas de relacionarse. Disputando el poder, estas coaliciones han promovido acciones y discursos basados en ideas fundamentales: una, de tendencia iliberal y revolucionaria (CIR); otra, de tendencia liberal y democrática (CLD). También, se analiza cómo su interacción ha promovido el desarrollo de un patrón: escalamiento de violencia; instalación de mecanismos alternativos de diálogo y negociación (MADN) desescalamiento de violencia; no transformación del conflicto. Finalmente, el involucramiento de los actores externos representa un factor consustancial a la composición y desplazamiento de cada islote para radicalizar su postura o, por el contrario, contribuir a una solución democrática y negociada.</description><subject>Actors</subject><subject>Autocracy</subject><subject>Coalitions</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Crises</subject><subject>De-escalation</subject><subject>Deinstitutionalization</subject><subject>Dialogue (Literary technique)</subject><subject>Escalation</subject><subject>Humanitarianism</subject><subject>Installation</subject><subject>Lung diseases</subject><subject>Negotiation</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Power (Philosophy)</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Special Collection | Colección Especial</subject><subject>Speeches</subject><subject>Transformation</subject><subject>Violence</subject><issn>0924-0608</issn><issn>1879-4750</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>JFNAL</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNotj8tKxDAYhYMoOI4uXYoF1x1zaW7LMowXKAjetuVvm9SWTFuTdqFv5HP4YgbG1TmLj-9wELokeMOo1vR291zk25cNwVyoI7QiSuo0kxwfoxXWNEuxwOoUnYXQ44hoqVZI5L7-6Kbu98dBO4ZkGl03d3VsFfRj4iCZR783wwyJGZJ3M5jvxTg4RycWXDAX_7lGb3e71-1DWjzdP27zIm2JYioFgXVTc1vbRlhlBACnVUMzajkzsdiKcSwVN1TWVDJBMmsMSMolcCKIZmt0c_BOfvxcTJjLflz8ECfLaFGEZFzRSF0fqBacKZ2vW1hCKHNBqSRKRPMaXR2IPsQ_5eS7PfivkgrNhMaE_QFDD1ud</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Pareja, Francisco José Alfaro</creator><general>Centrum voor Studie en Documentatie van Latijns Amerika (CEDLA)</general><general>Centrum voor Studie en Documentatie</general><general>CEDLA - Centre for Latin American Research and Documentation</general><scope>JFNAL</scope><scope>ILR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>89V</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8BY</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Archipiélagos politicos bajo la tormenta en Venezuela</title><author>Pareja, Francisco José Alfaro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1838-a609dc5fcfd6f8e6aa52bd242f53ebd2fb350785e27c273614feea7257a516193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; spa</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Actors</topic><topic>Autocracy</topic><topic>Coalitions</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Crises</topic><topic>De-escalation</topic><topic>Deinstitutionalization</topic><topic>Dialogue (Literary technique)</topic><topic>Escalation</topic><topic>Humanitarianism</topic><topic>Installation</topic><topic>Lung diseases</topic><topic>Negotiation</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Power (Philosophy)</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Special Collection | Colección Especial</topic><topic>Speeches</topic><topic>Transformation</topic><topic>Violence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pareja, Francisco José Alfaro</creatorcontrib><collection>JSTOR Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Gale Literature Resource Center</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PRISMA Database with HAPI Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European review of Latin American and Caribbean studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pareja, Francisco José Alfaro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Archipiélagos politicos bajo la tormenta en Venezuela: Coaliciones, actores y autocratización</atitle><jtitle>European review of Latin American and Caribbean studies</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><issue>109</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>21-40</pages><issn>0924-0608</issn><eissn>1879-4750</eissn><abstract>The evolution of the hybrid regime in Venezuela has caused an extended political conflict that has led to deinstitutionalization and to a complex humanitarian crisis. Based on this mutation, this article conceptualizes the emergence of two coalitions that have interacted for twenty years as archipelagos, each made up of groups (islets) with different visions and ways of relating. Disputing power, these coalitions have promoted actions and speeches based on fundamental ideas: one, with an illiberal and revolutionary tendency (CIR); another, with a liberal and democratic tendency (CLD). This article also analyses how their interaction has promoted the development of a pattern: escalation of violence; installation of alternative mechanisms for dialogue and negotiation (MADN), de-escalation of violence; no transformation of the conflict. Finally, the involvement of external actors represents an essential factor in the composition and displacement of each islet to radicalize its position or, on the contrary, contribute to a democratic and negotiated solution.
La evolución del régimen híbrido en Venezuela ha provocado un conflicto político extendido que ha derivado en desinstitucionalización y una crisis humanitaria compleja. Partiendo de esta mutación, este artículo conceptualiza la emergencia de dos coaliciones que han interactuado durante veinte años a modo de archipiélagos, cada una compuesta por grupos (islotes) con diversas visiones y formas de relacionarse. Disputando el poder, estas coaliciones han promovido acciones y discursos basados en ideas fundamentales: una, de tendencia iliberal y revolucionaria (CIR); otra, de tendencia liberal y democrática (CLD). También, se analiza cómo su interacción ha promovido el desarrollo de un patrón: escalamiento de violencia; instalación de mecanismos alternativos de diálogo y negociación (MADN) desescalamiento de violencia; no transformación del conflicto. Finalmente, el involucramiento de los actores externos representa un factor consustancial a la composición y desplazamiento de cada islote para radicalizar su postura o, por el contrario, contribuir a una solución democrática y negociada.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Centrum voor Studie en Documentatie van Latijns Amerika (CEDLA)</pub><doi>10.32992/ERLACS.10568</doi><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0924-0608 |
ispartof | European review of Latin American and Caribbean studies, 2020-01 (109), p.21-40 |
issn | 0924-0608 1879-4750 |
language | eng ; spa |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2428114582 |
source | Uopen Journals; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Open Access Journals; Jstor Complete Legacy; Free E- Journals |
subjects | Actors Autocracy Coalitions Conflict Crises De-escalation Deinstitutionalization Dialogue (Literary technique) Escalation Humanitarianism Installation Lung diseases Negotiation Politics Power (Philosophy) Radicalism Special Collection | Colección Especial Speeches Transformation Violence |
title | Archipiélagos politicos bajo la tormenta en Venezuela: Coaliciones, actores y autocratización |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T08%3A45%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Archipi%C3%A9lagos%20politicos%20bajo%20la%20tormenta%20en%20Venezuela:%20Coaliciones,%20actores%20y%20autocratizaci%C3%B3n&rft.jtitle=European%20review%20of%20Latin%20American%20and%20Caribbean%20studies&rft.au=Pareja,%20Francisco%20Jos%C3%A9%20Alfaro&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.issue=109&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=21-40&rft.issn=0924-0608&rft.eissn=1879-4750&rft_id=info:doi/10.32992/ERLACS.10568&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA622718627%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2428114582&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A622718627&rft_jstor_id=26936901&rfr_iscdi=true |