Bank Erosion Processes in Regulated Navigable Rivers

Vessel‐induced waves affect the morphology and ecology of banks and shorelines around the world. In rivers used as waterways, ship passages contribute to the erosion of unprotected banks, but their short‐ and long‐term impacts remain unclear. This work investigates the effects of navigation on bank...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface 2020-07, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Duró, G., Crosato, A., Kleinhans, M. G., Roelvink, D., Uijttewaal, W. S. J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface
container_volume 125
creator Duró, G.
Crosato, A.
Kleinhans, M. G.
Roelvink, D.
Uijttewaal, W. S. J.
description Vessel‐induced waves affect the morphology and ecology of banks and shorelines around the world. In rivers used as waterways, ship passages contribute to the erosion of unprotected banks, but their short‐ and long‐term impacts remain unclear. This work investigates the effects of navigation on bank erosion along a reach of the regulated Meuse River with recently renaturalized banks. We apply UAV‐SfM photogrammetry, RTK‐GPS, acoustic Doppler velocimetry, aerial and terrestrial photography, soil tests, and multibeam echosounding to analyze the progression of bank retreat after riprap removal. After having analyzed the effects of ship‐generated waves and currents, floods, and vegetation dynamics, a process‐based model is proposed to estimate the long‐term bank retreat. The results show that a terrace evolves in length and depth across the bank according to local lithology, which we clustered in three types. Floods contribute to upper‐bank erosion‐inducing mass failures, while near‐bank flow appears increasingly ineffective to remove the failed material due to terrace elongation. Vegetation growth at the upper‐bank toe reduces bank failure and delays erosion, but its permanence is limited by terrace stability and efficiency to dissipate waves. The results also indicate that long‐term bank retreat is controlled by deep primary waves acting like bores over the terrace. Understanding the underlying drivers of bank evolution can support process‐based management to optimize the benefits of structural and functional diversity in navigable rivers. Plain Language Summary Ship waves can be an important cause of bank erosion and ecological disturbance in rivers used as waterways. Despite present needs to improve riverine habitats, our understanding of ship‐generated erosion is still poor. This is the first systematic and thorough investigation of bank erosion processes driven by ship waves. We focus on a river reach with recently renaturalized banks presenting diverse erosion rates to study the mechanisms and factors that determine bank retreat. The results show that banks retreat forming a terrace with length and depth that mainly depend on soil composition. Floods are responsible for bank collapse, but the near‐bank flow gradually reduces as the terrace extends. As a result, floods become eventually unable to remove the failed material and produce further bank retreat. Plants and trees growing at the bank toe delay erosion, but their survival depends on the terrace ev
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2019JF005441
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2427460451</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2427460451</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3682-ed4e72b135cd4e0cb4d0dd1aba21aa81d21760ececdd84322cf6214a9040d7973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LA0EMxQdRsGhvfoAFr64mmen-OWppq6WoFD0PszNp2bru1pm20m_vSEU8mRzyCD_yyBPiAuEagcobAiynY4CBUngkeoRZmZaAePyrQZ6KfggriFXEFVJPqDvTviUj34W6a5Nn31kOgUNSt8mcl9vGbNglj2ZXL03VcDKvd-zDuThZmCZw_2eeidfx6GV4n86eJg_D21lqZFZQyk5xThXKgY0KbKUcOIemMoTGFOgI8wzYsnWuUJLILjJCZUpQ4PIyl2fi8nB37buPLYeNXnVb30ZLTYpylYEaYKSuDpSNXwTPC7329bvxe42gv6PRf6OJuDzgn3XD-39ZPZ3Mx4Sx5Rc_OWL3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427460451</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bank Erosion Processes in Regulated Navigable Rivers</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Duró, G. ; Crosato, A. ; Kleinhans, M. G. ; Roelvink, D. ; Uijttewaal, W. S. J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Duró, G. ; Crosato, A. ; Kleinhans, M. G. ; Roelvink, D. ; Uijttewaal, W. S. J.</creatorcontrib><description>Vessel‐induced waves affect the morphology and ecology of banks and shorelines around the world. In rivers used as waterways, ship passages contribute to the erosion of unprotected banks, but their short‐ and long‐term impacts remain unclear. This work investigates the effects of navigation on bank erosion along a reach of the regulated Meuse River with recently renaturalized banks. We apply UAV‐SfM photogrammetry, RTK‐GPS, acoustic Doppler velocimetry, aerial and terrestrial photography, soil tests, and multibeam echosounding to analyze the progression of bank retreat after riprap removal. After having analyzed the effects of ship‐generated waves and currents, floods, and vegetation dynamics, a process‐based model is proposed to estimate the long‐term bank retreat. The results show that a terrace evolves in length and depth across the bank according to local lithology, which we clustered in three types. Floods contribute to upper‐bank erosion‐inducing mass failures, while near‐bank flow appears increasingly ineffective to remove the failed material due to terrace elongation. Vegetation growth at the upper‐bank toe reduces bank failure and delays erosion, but its permanence is limited by terrace stability and efficiency to dissipate waves. The results also indicate that long‐term bank retreat is controlled by deep primary waves acting like bores over the terrace. Understanding the underlying drivers of bank evolution can support process‐based management to optimize the benefits of structural and functional diversity in navigable rivers. Plain Language Summary Ship waves can be an important cause of bank erosion and ecological disturbance in rivers used as waterways. Despite present needs to improve riverine habitats, our understanding of ship‐generated erosion is still poor. This is the first systematic and thorough investigation of bank erosion processes driven by ship waves. We focus on a river reach with recently renaturalized banks presenting diverse erosion rates to study the mechanisms and factors that determine bank retreat. The results show that banks retreat forming a terrace with length and depth that mainly depend on soil composition. Floods are responsible for bank collapse, but the near‐bank flow gradually reduces as the terrace extends. As a result, floods become eventually unable to remove the failed material and produce further bank retreat. Plants and trees growing at the bank toe delay erosion, but their survival depends on the terrace evolution. Based on the analysis of field data, we developed a model to predict the final extent of bank retreat. Our results indicate that primary ship waves, acting like bores, determine the ultimate terrace shape. Understanding how banks erode due to navigation allows practitioners and managers to improve the ecological conditions of riparian habitats. Key Points A conceptualization of bank erosion processes in navigable rivers is given, including the role of vegetation Ship waves dominate bank erosion progression, while floods progressively lose their influence on net erosion rates The proposed model predicts final stages of bank erosion considering the bank erodibility and highest ship waves generated in a river reach</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9011</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JF005441</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerial photography ; Bank erosion ; Depth indicators ; Doppler sonar ; Echo sounding ; Echosounding ; Ecological conditions ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Ecosystem disturbance ; Elastic waves ; Elongation ; erosion model ; Erosion processes ; Erosion rates ; Evolution ; Floods ; Global positioning systems ; GPS ; Length ; Lithology ; Morphology ; Navigable rivers ; Navigation ; Permanence ; Photogrammetry ; Photography ; Riprap ; River banks ; river restoration ; Rivers ; ship waves ; Shorelines ; Soil ; Soil composition ; Soil testing ; Soils ; Stability ; Structure-function relationships ; Survival ; Terraces ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Vegetation ; Vegetation growth ; Velocimetry ; water management ; Waterways</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface, 2020-07, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. The Authors.</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3682-ed4e72b135cd4e0cb4d0dd1aba21aa81d21760ececdd84322cf6214a9040d7973</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3682-ed4e72b135cd4e0cb4d0dd1aba21aa81d21760ececdd84322cf6214a9040d7973</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5367-0003 ; 0000-0002-9131-9716 ; 0000-0002-6043-8026 ; 0000-0002-9484-1673 ; 0000-0001-9531-005X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JF005441$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JF005441$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,11494,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46447,46812,46871</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Duró, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosato, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinhans, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roelvink, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uijttewaal, W. S. J.</creatorcontrib><title>Bank Erosion Processes in Regulated Navigable Rivers</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</title><description>Vessel‐induced waves affect the morphology and ecology of banks and shorelines around the world. In rivers used as waterways, ship passages contribute to the erosion of unprotected banks, but their short‐ and long‐term impacts remain unclear. This work investigates the effects of navigation on bank erosion along a reach of the regulated Meuse River with recently renaturalized banks. We apply UAV‐SfM photogrammetry, RTK‐GPS, acoustic Doppler velocimetry, aerial and terrestrial photography, soil tests, and multibeam echosounding to analyze the progression of bank retreat after riprap removal. After having analyzed the effects of ship‐generated waves and currents, floods, and vegetation dynamics, a process‐based model is proposed to estimate the long‐term bank retreat. The results show that a terrace evolves in length and depth across the bank according to local lithology, which we clustered in three types. Floods contribute to upper‐bank erosion‐inducing mass failures, while near‐bank flow appears increasingly ineffective to remove the failed material due to terrace elongation. Vegetation growth at the upper‐bank toe reduces bank failure and delays erosion, but its permanence is limited by terrace stability and efficiency to dissipate waves. The results also indicate that long‐term bank retreat is controlled by deep primary waves acting like bores over the terrace. Understanding the underlying drivers of bank evolution can support process‐based management to optimize the benefits of structural and functional diversity in navigable rivers. Plain Language Summary Ship waves can be an important cause of bank erosion and ecological disturbance in rivers used as waterways. Despite present needs to improve riverine habitats, our understanding of ship‐generated erosion is still poor. This is the first systematic and thorough investigation of bank erosion processes driven by ship waves. We focus on a river reach with recently renaturalized banks presenting diverse erosion rates to study the mechanisms and factors that determine bank retreat. The results show that banks retreat forming a terrace with length and depth that mainly depend on soil composition. Floods are responsible for bank collapse, but the near‐bank flow gradually reduces as the terrace extends. As a result, floods become eventually unable to remove the failed material and produce further bank retreat. Plants and trees growing at the bank toe delay erosion, but their survival depends on the terrace evolution. Based on the analysis of field data, we developed a model to predict the final extent of bank retreat. Our results indicate that primary ship waves, acting like bores, determine the ultimate terrace shape. Understanding how banks erode due to navigation allows practitioners and managers to improve the ecological conditions of riparian habitats. Key Points A conceptualization of bank erosion processes in navigable rivers is given, including the role of vegetation Ship waves dominate bank erosion progression, while floods progressively lose their influence on net erosion rates The proposed model predicts final stages of bank erosion considering the bank erodibility and highest ship waves generated in a river reach</description><subject>Aerial photography</subject><subject>Bank erosion</subject><subject>Depth indicators</subject><subject>Doppler sonar</subject><subject>Echo sounding</subject><subject>Echosounding</subject><subject>Ecological conditions</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Ecosystem disturbance</subject><subject>Elastic waves</subject><subject>Elongation</subject><subject>erosion model</subject><subject>Erosion processes</subject><subject>Erosion rates</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Global positioning systems</subject><subject>GPS</subject><subject>Length</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Navigable rivers</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Permanence</subject><subject>Photogrammetry</subject><subject>Photography</subject><subject>Riprap</subject><subject>River banks</subject><subject>river restoration</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>ship waves</subject><subject>Shorelines</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil composition</subject><subject>Soil testing</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Terraces</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation growth</subject><subject>Velocimetry</subject><subject>water management</subject><subject>Waterways</subject><issn>2169-9003</issn><issn>2169-9011</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LA0EMxQdRsGhvfoAFr64mmen-OWppq6WoFD0PszNp2bru1pm20m_vSEU8mRzyCD_yyBPiAuEagcobAiynY4CBUngkeoRZmZaAePyrQZ6KfggriFXEFVJPqDvTviUj34W6a5Nn31kOgUNSt8mcl9vGbNglj2ZXL03VcDKvd-zDuThZmCZw_2eeidfx6GV4n86eJg_D21lqZFZQyk5xThXKgY0KbKUcOIemMoTGFOgI8wzYsnWuUJLILjJCZUpQ4PIyl2fi8nB37buPLYeNXnVb30ZLTYpylYEaYKSuDpSNXwTPC7329bvxe42gv6PRf6OJuDzgn3XD-39ZPZ3Mx4Sx5Rc_OWL3</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Duró, G.</creator><creator>Crosato, A.</creator><creator>Kleinhans, M. G.</creator><creator>Roelvink, D.</creator><creator>Uijttewaal, W. S. J.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-0003</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9131-9716</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6043-8026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-1673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9531-005X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Bank Erosion Processes in Regulated Navigable Rivers</title><author>Duró, G. ; Crosato, A. ; Kleinhans, M. G. ; Roelvink, D. ; Uijttewaal, W. S. J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3682-ed4e72b135cd4e0cb4d0dd1aba21aa81d21760ececdd84322cf6214a9040d7973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aerial photography</topic><topic>Bank erosion</topic><topic>Depth indicators</topic><topic>Doppler sonar</topic><topic>Echo sounding</topic><topic>Echosounding</topic><topic>Ecological conditions</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Ecosystem disturbance</topic><topic>Elastic waves</topic><topic>Elongation</topic><topic>erosion model</topic><topic>Erosion processes</topic><topic>Erosion rates</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Global positioning systems</topic><topic>GPS</topic><topic>Length</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Navigable rivers</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Permanence</topic><topic>Photogrammetry</topic><topic>Photography</topic><topic>Riprap</topic><topic>River banks</topic><topic>river restoration</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>ship waves</topic><topic>Shorelines</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil composition</topic><topic>Soil testing</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Terraces</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation growth</topic><topic>Velocimetry</topic><topic>water management</topic><topic>Waterways</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Duró, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crosato, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleinhans, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roelvink, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uijttewaal, W. S. J.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Duró, G.</au><au>Crosato, A.</au><au>Kleinhans, M. G.</au><au>Roelvink, D.</au><au>Uijttewaal, W. S. J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bank Erosion Processes in Regulated Navigable Rivers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9003</issn><eissn>2169-9011</eissn><abstract>Vessel‐induced waves affect the morphology and ecology of banks and shorelines around the world. In rivers used as waterways, ship passages contribute to the erosion of unprotected banks, but their short‐ and long‐term impacts remain unclear. This work investigates the effects of navigation on bank erosion along a reach of the regulated Meuse River with recently renaturalized banks. We apply UAV‐SfM photogrammetry, RTK‐GPS, acoustic Doppler velocimetry, aerial and terrestrial photography, soil tests, and multibeam echosounding to analyze the progression of bank retreat after riprap removal. After having analyzed the effects of ship‐generated waves and currents, floods, and vegetation dynamics, a process‐based model is proposed to estimate the long‐term bank retreat. The results show that a terrace evolves in length and depth across the bank according to local lithology, which we clustered in three types. Floods contribute to upper‐bank erosion‐inducing mass failures, while near‐bank flow appears increasingly ineffective to remove the failed material due to terrace elongation. Vegetation growth at the upper‐bank toe reduces bank failure and delays erosion, but its permanence is limited by terrace stability and efficiency to dissipate waves. The results also indicate that long‐term bank retreat is controlled by deep primary waves acting like bores over the terrace. Understanding the underlying drivers of bank evolution can support process‐based management to optimize the benefits of structural and functional diversity in navigable rivers. Plain Language Summary Ship waves can be an important cause of bank erosion and ecological disturbance in rivers used as waterways. Despite present needs to improve riverine habitats, our understanding of ship‐generated erosion is still poor. This is the first systematic and thorough investigation of bank erosion processes driven by ship waves. We focus on a river reach with recently renaturalized banks presenting diverse erosion rates to study the mechanisms and factors that determine bank retreat. The results show that banks retreat forming a terrace with length and depth that mainly depend on soil composition. Floods are responsible for bank collapse, but the near‐bank flow gradually reduces as the terrace extends. As a result, floods become eventually unable to remove the failed material and produce further bank retreat. Plants and trees growing at the bank toe delay erosion, but their survival depends on the terrace evolution. Based on the analysis of field data, we developed a model to predict the final extent of bank retreat. Our results indicate that primary ship waves, acting like bores, determine the ultimate terrace shape. Understanding how banks erode due to navigation allows practitioners and managers to improve the ecological conditions of riparian habitats. Key Points A conceptualization of bank erosion processes in navigable rivers is given, including the role of vegetation Ship waves dominate bank erosion progression, while floods progressively lose their influence on net erosion rates The proposed model predicts final stages of bank erosion considering the bank erodibility and highest ship waves generated in a river reach</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JF005441</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5367-0003</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9131-9716</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6043-8026</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9484-1673</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9531-005X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9003
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Earth surface, 2020-07, Vol.125 (7), p.n/a
issn 2169-9003
2169-9011
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2427460451
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Aerial photography
Bank erosion
Depth indicators
Doppler sonar
Echo sounding
Echosounding
Ecological conditions
Ecological effects
Ecology
Ecosystem disturbance
Elastic waves
Elongation
erosion model
Erosion processes
Erosion rates
Evolution
Floods
Global positioning systems
GPS
Length
Lithology
Morphology
Navigable rivers
Navigation
Permanence
Photogrammetry
Photography
Riprap
River banks
river restoration
Rivers
ship waves
Shorelines
Soil
Soil composition
Soil testing
Soils
Stability
Structure-function relationships
Survival
Terraces
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Vegetation
Vegetation growth
Velocimetry
water management
Waterways
title Bank Erosion Processes in Regulated Navigable Rivers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T12%3A42%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bank%20Erosion%20Processes%20in%20Regulated%20Navigable%20Rivers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Earth%20surface&rft.au=Dur%C3%B3,%20G.&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9003&rft.eissn=2169-9011&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JF005441&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2427460451%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427460451&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true