Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market
A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regional science and urban economics 2020-03, Vol.81, p.103501, Article 103501 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 103501 |
container_title | Regional science and urban economics |
container_volume | 81 |
creator | Lin, Yatang Qin, Yu Yang, Yang Zhu, Hongjia |
description | A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial market that results from low transaction prices; it varies across counties or districts. We show that this policy increases the overall land-use intensity in the industrial market: for each additional 100 yuan increase in imposed minimum prices, the unit transaction prices range from 31.4 to 59.7 yuan higher, and the output and total factor productivity of new entrants range from 11.8% to 16.1% higher, respectively. Furthermore, we provide suggestive evidence that higher minimum prices reduce the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions, which has the effect of increasing the industrial output per unit of land.
•The minimum price policy increases the land-use intensity in the industrial land market.•Higher minimum prices increased the transaction prices and reduced the volumes.•Higher minimum prices reduced the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions.•The policy affects the quality of buyers by screening out low-productivity firms.•The policy leads to higher probability of land being converted to built-up areas. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2427323796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166046218302965</els_id><sourcerecordid>2427323796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c24dd81f50650f6040f7535b57c12c79918233c32653ac09aedc58caabee86b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPxCAYRYnRxHH0PzS6cNWRR6GtG2Pq-EgmcaNbCYWvSu3QEdpJ5t_LWBcuXUHg3AvfQeic4AXBRFy1Cw_vQdvR16D7BcWkjBeMY3KAZqTIy5QyXByiWYRFijNBj9FJCC3G8YCyGXqrlEs23mpIYtPYqcH2LrFOe1ABkk45k45xY90ALthhd5Mst9aAi4HG9-uk-rBOXYYImDEM3qruJ5Sslf-E4RQdNaoLcPa7ztHr_fKlekxXzw9P1e0q1azIhlTTzJiCNBwLjhuBM9zknPGa55pQnZclKShjmlHBmdK4VGA0L7RSNUAh6pzN0cXUu_H91whhkG0_eheflDSjOaMsL0WkridK-z4ED42Mk8eP7iTBcu9TtvKvT7n3KSefMXw3hSHOsbXgZeT2Hoz1oAdpevufmm8YVYW2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427323796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lin, Yatang ; Qin, Yu ; Yang, Yang ; Zhu, Hongjia</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yatang ; Qin, Yu ; Yang, Yang ; Zhu, Hongjia</creatorcontrib><description>A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial market that results from low transaction prices; it varies across counties or districts. We show that this policy increases the overall land-use intensity in the industrial market: for each additional 100 yuan increase in imposed minimum prices, the unit transaction prices range from 31.4 to 59.7 yuan higher, and the output and total factor productivity of new entrants range from 11.8% to 16.1% higher, respectively. Furthermore, we provide suggestive evidence that higher minimum prices reduce the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions, which has the effect of increasing the industrial output per unit of land.
•The minimum price policy increases the land-use intensity in the industrial land market.•Higher minimum prices increased the transaction prices and reduced the volumes.•Higher minimum prices reduced the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions.•The policy affects the quality of buyers by screening out low-productivity firms.•The policy leads to higher probability of land being converted to built-up areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-0462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>China ; Industrial land ; Industrial markets ; Industrial space ; Land market ; Land purchases ; Land use ; Land use regulation ; Lying ; Minimum price ; Price regulations ; Prices ; Productivity ; Real estate sales ; Transactions</subject><ispartof>Regional science and urban economics, 2020-03, Vol.81, p.103501, Article 103501</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c24dd81f50650f6040f7535b57c12c79918233c32653ac09aedc58caabee86b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c24dd81f50650f6040f7535b57c12c79918233c32653ac09aedc58caabee86b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yatang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Hongjia</creatorcontrib><title>Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market</title><title>Regional science and urban economics</title><description>A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial market that results from low transaction prices; it varies across counties or districts. We show that this policy increases the overall land-use intensity in the industrial market: for each additional 100 yuan increase in imposed minimum prices, the unit transaction prices range from 31.4 to 59.7 yuan higher, and the output and total factor productivity of new entrants range from 11.8% to 16.1% higher, respectively. Furthermore, we provide suggestive evidence that higher minimum prices reduce the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions, which has the effect of increasing the industrial output per unit of land.
•The minimum price policy increases the land-use intensity in the industrial land market.•Higher minimum prices increased the transaction prices and reduced the volumes.•Higher minimum prices reduced the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions.•The policy affects the quality of buyers by screening out low-productivity firms.•The policy leads to higher probability of land being converted to built-up areas.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Industrial land</subject><subject>Industrial markets</subject><subject>Industrial space</subject><subject>Land market</subject><subject>Land purchases</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use regulation</subject><subject>Lying</subject><subject>Minimum price</subject><subject>Price regulations</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Real estate sales</subject><subject>Transactions</subject><issn>0166-0462</issn><issn>1879-2308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtPxCAYRYnRxHH0PzS6cNWRR6GtG2Pq-EgmcaNbCYWvSu3QEdpJ5t_LWBcuXUHg3AvfQeic4AXBRFy1Cw_vQdvR16D7BcWkjBeMY3KAZqTIy5QyXByiWYRFijNBj9FJCC3G8YCyGXqrlEs23mpIYtPYqcH2LrFOe1ABkk45k45xY90ALthhd5Mst9aAi4HG9-uk-rBOXYYImDEM3qruJ5Sslf-E4RQdNaoLcPa7ztHr_fKlekxXzw9P1e0q1azIhlTTzJiCNBwLjhuBM9zknPGa55pQnZclKShjmlHBmdK4VGA0L7RSNUAh6pzN0cXUu_H91whhkG0_eheflDSjOaMsL0WkridK-z4ED42Mk8eP7iTBcu9TtvKvT7n3KSefMXw3hSHOsbXgZeT2Hoz1oAdpevufmm8YVYW2</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Lin, Yatang</creator><creator>Qin, Yu</creator><creator>Yang, Yang</creator><creator>Zhu, Hongjia</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market</title><author>Lin, Yatang ; Qin, Yu ; Yang, Yang ; Zhu, Hongjia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c24dd81f50650f6040f7535b57c12c79918233c32653ac09aedc58caabee86b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Industrial land</topic><topic>Industrial markets</topic><topic>Industrial space</topic><topic>Land market</topic><topic>Land purchases</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use regulation</topic><topic>Lying</topic><topic>Minimum price</topic><topic>Price regulations</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Real estate sales</topic><topic>Transactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yatang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Hongjia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Yatang</au><au>Qin, Yu</au><au>Yang, Yang</au><au>Zhu, Hongjia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market</atitle><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>103501</spage><pages>103501-</pages><artnum>103501</artnum><issn>0166-0462</issn><eissn>1879-2308</eissn><abstract>A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial market that results from low transaction prices; it varies across counties or districts. We show that this policy increases the overall land-use intensity in the industrial market: for each additional 100 yuan increase in imposed minimum prices, the unit transaction prices range from 31.4 to 59.7 yuan higher, and the output and total factor productivity of new entrants range from 11.8% to 16.1% higher, respectively. Furthermore, we provide suggestive evidence that higher minimum prices reduce the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions, which has the effect of increasing the industrial output per unit of land.
•The minimum price policy increases the land-use intensity in the industrial land market.•Higher minimum prices increased the transaction prices and reduced the volumes.•Higher minimum prices reduced the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions.•The policy affects the quality of buyers by screening out low-productivity firms.•The policy leads to higher probability of land being converted to built-up areas.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0166-0462 |
ispartof | Regional science and urban economics, 2020-03, Vol.81, p.103501, Article 103501 |
issn | 0166-0462 1879-2308 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2427323796 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier) |
subjects | China Industrial land Industrial markets Industrial space Land market Land purchases Land use Land use regulation Lying Minimum price Price regulations Prices Productivity Real estate sales Transactions |
title | Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A26%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20price%20regulation%20increase%20land-use%20intensity?%20Evidence%20from%20China's%20industrial%20land%20market&rft.jtitle=Regional%20science%20and%20urban%20economics&rft.au=Lin,%20Yatang&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=103501&rft.pages=103501-&rft.artnum=103501&rft.issn=0166-0462&rft.eissn=1879-2308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2427323796%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427323796&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0166046218302965&rfr_iscdi=true |