Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market

A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regional science and urban economics 2020-03, Vol.81, p.103501, Article 103501
Hauptverfasser: Lin, Yatang, Qin, Yu, Yang, Yang, Zhu, Hongjia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 103501
container_title Regional science and urban economics
container_volume 81
creator Lin, Yatang
Qin, Yu
Yang, Yang
Zhu, Hongjia
description A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial market that results from low transaction prices; it varies across counties or districts. We show that this policy increases the overall land-use intensity in the industrial market: for each additional 100 yuan increase in imposed minimum prices, the unit transaction prices range from 31.4 to 59.7 yuan higher, and the output and total factor productivity of new entrants range from 11.8% to 16.1% higher, respectively. Furthermore, we provide suggestive evidence that higher minimum prices reduce the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions, which has the effect of increasing the industrial output per unit of land. •The minimum price policy increases the land-use intensity in the industrial land market.•Higher minimum prices increased the transaction prices and reduced the volumes.•Higher minimum prices reduced the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions.•The policy affects the quality of buyers by screening out low-productivity firms.•The policy leads to higher probability of land being converted to built-up areas.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2427323796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0166046218302965</els_id><sourcerecordid>2427323796</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c24dd81f50650f6040f7535b57c12c79918233c32653ac09aedc58caabee86b73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEtPxCAYRYnRxHH0PzS6cNWRR6GtG2Pq-EgmcaNbCYWvSu3QEdpJ5t_LWBcuXUHg3AvfQeic4AXBRFy1Cw_vQdvR16D7BcWkjBeMY3KAZqTIy5QyXByiWYRFijNBj9FJCC3G8YCyGXqrlEs23mpIYtPYqcH2LrFOe1ABkk45k45xY90ALthhd5Mst9aAi4HG9-uk-rBOXYYImDEM3qruJ5Sslf-E4RQdNaoLcPa7ztHr_fKlekxXzw9P1e0q1azIhlTTzJiCNBwLjhuBM9zknPGa55pQnZclKShjmlHBmdK4VGA0L7RSNUAh6pzN0cXUu_H91whhkG0_eheflDSjOaMsL0WkridK-z4ED42Mk8eP7iTBcu9TtvKvT7n3KSefMXw3hSHOsbXgZeT2Hoz1oAdpevufmm8YVYW2</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427323796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)</source><creator>Lin, Yatang ; Qin, Yu ; Yang, Yang ; Zhu, Hongjia</creator><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yatang ; Qin, Yu ; Yang, Yang ; Zhu, Hongjia</creatorcontrib><description>A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial market that results from low transaction prices; it varies across counties or districts. We show that this policy increases the overall land-use intensity in the industrial market: for each additional 100 yuan increase in imposed minimum prices, the unit transaction prices range from 31.4 to 59.7 yuan higher, and the output and total factor productivity of new entrants range from 11.8% to 16.1% higher, respectively. Furthermore, we provide suggestive evidence that higher minimum prices reduce the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions, which has the effect of increasing the industrial output per unit of land. •The minimum price policy increases the land-use intensity in the industrial land market.•Higher minimum prices increased the transaction prices and reduced the volumes.•Higher minimum prices reduced the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions.•The policy affects the quality of buyers by screening out low-productivity firms.•The policy leads to higher probability of land being converted to built-up areas.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0166-0462</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2308</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>China ; Industrial land ; Industrial markets ; Industrial space ; Land market ; Land purchases ; Land use ; Land use regulation ; Lying ; Minimum price ; Price regulations ; Prices ; Productivity ; Real estate sales ; Transactions</subject><ispartof>Regional science and urban economics, 2020-03, Vol.81, p.103501, Article 103501</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Mar 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c24dd81f50650f6040f7535b57c12c79918233c32653ac09aedc58caabee86b73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c24dd81f50650f6040f7535b57c12c79918233c32653ac09aedc58caabee86b73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yatang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Hongjia</creatorcontrib><title>Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market</title><title>Regional science and urban economics</title><description>A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial market that results from low transaction prices; it varies across counties or districts. We show that this policy increases the overall land-use intensity in the industrial market: for each additional 100 yuan increase in imposed minimum prices, the unit transaction prices range from 31.4 to 59.7 yuan higher, and the output and total factor productivity of new entrants range from 11.8% to 16.1% higher, respectively. Furthermore, we provide suggestive evidence that higher minimum prices reduce the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions, which has the effect of increasing the industrial output per unit of land. •The minimum price policy increases the land-use intensity in the industrial land market.•Higher minimum prices increased the transaction prices and reduced the volumes.•Higher minimum prices reduced the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions.•The policy affects the quality of buyers by screening out low-productivity firms.•The policy leads to higher probability of land being converted to built-up areas.</description><subject>China</subject><subject>Industrial land</subject><subject>Industrial markets</subject><subject>Industrial space</subject><subject>Land market</subject><subject>Land purchases</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use regulation</subject><subject>Lying</subject><subject>Minimum price</subject><subject>Price regulations</subject><subject>Prices</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Real estate sales</subject><subject>Transactions</subject><issn>0166-0462</issn><issn>1879-2308</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEtPxCAYRYnRxHH0PzS6cNWRR6GtG2Pq-EgmcaNbCYWvSu3QEdpJ5t_LWBcuXUHg3AvfQeic4AXBRFy1Cw_vQdvR16D7BcWkjBeMY3KAZqTIy5QyXByiWYRFijNBj9FJCC3G8YCyGXqrlEs23mpIYtPYqcH2LrFOe1ABkk45k45xY90ALthhd5Mst9aAi4HG9-uk-rBOXYYImDEM3qruJ5Sslf-E4RQdNaoLcPa7ztHr_fKlekxXzw9P1e0q1azIhlTTzJiCNBwLjhuBM9zknPGa55pQnZclKShjmlHBmdK4VGA0L7RSNUAh6pzN0cXUu_H91whhkG0_eheflDSjOaMsL0WkridK-z4ED42Mk8eP7iTBcu9TtvKvT7n3KSefMXw3hSHOsbXgZeT2Hoz1oAdpevufmm8YVYW2</recordid><startdate>20200301</startdate><enddate>20200301</enddate><creator>Lin, Yatang</creator><creator>Qin, Yu</creator><creator>Yang, Yang</creator><creator>Zhu, Hongjia</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200301</creationdate><title>Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market</title><author>Lin, Yatang ; Qin, Yu ; Yang, Yang ; Zhu, Hongjia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c384t-c24dd81f50650f6040f7535b57c12c79918233c32653ac09aedc58caabee86b73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>China</topic><topic>Industrial land</topic><topic>Industrial markets</topic><topic>Industrial space</topic><topic>Land market</topic><topic>Land purchases</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use regulation</topic><topic>Lying</topic><topic>Minimum price</topic><topic>Price regulations</topic><topic>Prices</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Real estate sales</topic><topic>Transactions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lin, Yatang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qin, Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Yang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhu, Hongjia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lin, Yatang</au><au>Qin, Yu</au><au>Yang, Yang</au><au>Zhu, Hongjia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market</atitle><jtitle>Regional science and urban economics</jtitle><date>2020-03-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>81</volume><spage>103501</spage><pages>103501-</pages><artnum>103501</artnum><issn>0166-0462</issn><eissn>1879-2308</eissn><abstract>A major part of the literature on land use regulations focuses on the residential land market. In this paper, we examine the impact of the minimum price policy on the large, but understudied, industrial land market in China. The minimum price policy aims to reduce wasteful land use in the industrial market that results from low transaction prices; it varies across counties or districts. We show that this policy increases the overall land-use intensity in the industrial market: for each additional 100 yuan increase in imposed minimum prices, the unit transaction prices range from 31.4 to 59.7 yuan higher, and the output and total factor productivity of new entrants range from 11.8% to 16.1% higher, respectively. Furthermore, we provide suggestive evidence that higher minimum prices reduce the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions, which has the effect of increasing the industrial output per unit of land. •The minimum price policy increases the land-use intensity in the industrial land market.•Higher minimum prices increased the transaction prices and reduced the volumes.•Higher minimum prices reduced the likelihood of land lying unused post transactions.•The policy affects the quality of buyers by screening out low-productivity firms.•The policy leads to higher probability of land being converted to built-up areas.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0166-0462
ispartof Regional science and urban economics, 2020-03, Vol.81, p.103501, Article 103501
issn 0166-0462
1879-2308
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2427323796
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection (Elsevier)
subjects China
Industrial land
Industrial markets
Industrial space
Land market
Land purchases
Land use
Land use regulation
Lying
Minimum price
Price regulations
Prices
Productivity
Real estate sales
Transactions
title Can price regulation increase land-use intensity? Evidence from China's industrial land market
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T17%3A26%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20price%20regulation%20increase%20land-use%20intensity?%20Evidence%20from%20China's%20industrial%20land%20market&rft.jtitle=Regional%20science%20and%20urban%20economics&rft.au=Lin,%20Yatang&rft.date=2020-03-01&rft.volume=81&rft.spage=103501&rft.pages=103501-&rft.artnum=103501&rft.issn=0166-0462&rft.eissn=1879-2308&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2019.103501&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2427323796%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427323796&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0166046218302965&rfr_iscdi=true