Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups

Examining coauthorship networks is key to study scientific collaboration patterns and structural characteristics of scientific communities. Here, we studied coauthorship networks of sociologists in Italy, using temporal and multi-level quantitative analysis. By looking at publications indexed in Sco...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scientometrics 2020-09, Vol.124 (3), p.2361-2382
Hauptverfasser: Akbaritabar, Aliakbar, Traag, Vincent Antonio, Caimo, Alberto, Squazzoni, Flaminio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2382
container_issue 3
container_start_page 2361
container_title Scientometrics
container_volume 124
creator Akbaritabar, Aliakbar
Traag, Vincent Antonio
Caimo, Alberto
Squazzoni, Flaminio
description Examining coauthorship networks is key to study scientific collaboration patterns and structural characteristics of scientific communities. Here, we studied coauthorship networks of sociologists in Italy, using temporal and multi-level quantitative analysis. By looking at publications indexed in Scopus, we detected research communities among Italian sociologists. We found that Italian sociologists are fractured in many disconnected groups. The giant connected component could be split into five main groups with a mix of three main disciplinary topics: sociology of culture and communication (present in two groups), economic sociology (present in three groups) and general sociology (present in three groups). By applying an exponential random graph model, we found that collaboration ties are mainly driven by the research interests of these groups. Other factors, such as preferential attachment , gender and affiliation homophily are also important, but the effect of gender fades away once other factors are controlled for. Our research shows the advantages of multi-level and temporal network analysis in revealing the complexity of scientific collaboration patterns.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11192-020-03555-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2427315815</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2427315815</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-195a4b0a11aca74ea38dcc0367aa4d74b9b701d68412c59ba30cf191b8bd15363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOI7-AVcF19H38tGm7mTQcWDAja5DmqZDh7YZk5Zh_r3RCu5cvc099_IOIbcI9whQPERELBkFBhS4lJIez8gCpVKUqRzPyQKQK1oih0tyFeMeEsRBLYjajKZrzZBFb1vf-V0bx_iYmcz6vp-GdjxlvsnqNlo_DM6Ors52wU-HeE0uGtNFd_N7l-Tj5fl99Uq3b-vN6mlLrUAcKZbSiAoMorGmEM5wVVsLPC-MEXUhqrIqAOtcCWRWlpXhYBsssVJVjZLnfEnu5t5D8J-Ti6Pe-ykMaVIzwQqenky5JWFzygYfY3CNPoS2N-GkEfS3IT0b0smQ_jGkjwniMxRTeNi58Ff9D_UFob5pGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2427315815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Akbaritabar, Aliakbar ; Traag, Vincent Antonio ; Caimo, Alberto ; Squazzoni, Flaminio</creator><creatorcontrib>Akbaritabar, Aliakbar ; Traag, Vincent Antonio ; Caimo, Alberto ; Squazzoni, Flaminio</creatorcontrib><description>Examining coauthorship networks is key to study scientific collaboration patterns and structural characteristics of scientific communities. Here, we studied coauthorship networks of sociologists in Italy, using temporal and multi-level quantitative analysis. By looking at publications indexed in Scopus, we detected research communities among Italian sociologists. We found that Italian sociologists are fractured in many disconnected groups. The giant connected component could be split into five main groups with a mix of three main disciplinary topics: sociology of culture and communication (present in two groups), economic sociology (present in three groups) and general sociology (present in three groups). By applying an exponential random graph model, we found that collaboration ties are mainly driven by the research interests of these groups. Other factors, such as preferential attachment , gender and affiliation homophily are also important, but the effect of gender fades away once other factors are controlled for. Our research shows the advantages of multi-level and temporal network analysis in revealing the complexity of scientific collaboration patterns.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0138-9130</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2861</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11192-020-03555-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Co authorship ; Collaboration ; Computer Science ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Library Science ; Network analysis ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Scientometrics, 2020-09, Vol.124 (3), p.2361-2382</ispartof><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2020</rights><rights>Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-195a4b0a11aca74ea38dcc0367aa4d74b9b701d68412c59ba30cf191b8bd15363</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-195a4b0a11aca74ea38dcc0367aa4d74b9b701d68412c59ba30cf191b8bd15363</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6503-6077 ; 0000-0003-3170-3879 ; 0000-0001-8956-7166 ; 0000-0003-3828-1533</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11192-020-03555-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11192-020-03555-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Akbaritabar, Aliakbar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traag, Vincent Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caimo, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Squazzoni, Flaminio</creatorcontrib><title>Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups</title><title>Scientometrics</title><addtitle>Scientometrics</addtitle><description>Examining coauthorship networks is key to study scientific collaboration patterns and structural characteristics of scientific communities. Here, we studied coauthorship networks of sociologists in Italy, using temporal and multi-level quantitative analysis. By looking at publications indexed in Scopus, we detected research communities among Italian sociologists. We found that Italian sociologists are fractured in many disconnected groups. The giant connected component could be split into five main groups with a mix of three main disciplinary topics: sociology of culture and communication (present in two groups), economic sociology (present in three groups) and general sociology (present in three groups). By applying an exponential random graph model, we found that collaboration ties are mainly driven by the research interests of these groups. Other factors, such as preferential attachment , gender and affiliation homophily are also important, but the effect of gender fades away once other factors are controlled for. Our research shows the advantages of multi-level and temporal network analysis in revealing the complexity of scientific collaboration patterns.</description><subject>Co authorship</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Library Science</subject><subject>Network analysis</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>0138-9130</issn><issn>1588-2861</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoOI7-AVcF19H38tGm7mTQcWDAja5DmqZDh7YZk5Zh_r3RCu5cvc099_IOIbcI9whQPERELBkFBhS4lJIez8gCpVKUqRzPyQKQK1oih0tyFeMeEsRBLYjajKZrzZBFb1vf-V0bx_iYmcz6vp-GdjxlvsnqNlo_DM6Ors52wU-HeE0uGtNFd_N7l-Tj5fl99Uq3b-vN6mlLrUAcKZbSiAoMorGmEM5wVVsLPC-MEXUhqrIqAOtcCWRWlpXhYBsssVJVjZLnfEnu5t5D8J-Ti6Pe-ykMaVIzwQqenky5JWFzygYfY3CNPoS2N-GkEfS3IT0b0smQ_jGkjwniMxRTeNi58Ff9D_UFob5pGA</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Akbaritabar, Aliakbar</creator><creator>Traag, Vincent Antonio</creator><creator>Caimo, Alberto</creator><creator>Squazzoni, Flaminio</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>E3H</scope><scope>F2A</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6503-6077</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3170-3879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8956-7166</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3828-1533</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups</title><author>Akbaritabar, Aliakbar ; Traag, Vincent Antonio ; Caimo, Alberto ; Squazzoni, Flaminio</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-195a4b0a11aca74ea38dcc0367aa4d74b9b701d68412c59ba30cf191b8bd15363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Co authorship</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Library Science</topic><topic>Network analysis</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Akbaritabar, Aliakbar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traag, Vincent Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caimo, Alberto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Squazzoni, Flaminio</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Sciences Abstracts (LISA)</collection><collection>Library &amp; Information Science Abstracts (LISA)</collection><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Akbaritabar, Aliakbar</au><au>Traag, Vincent Antonio</au><au>Caimo, Alberto</au><au>Squazzoni, Flaminio</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups</atitle><jtitle>Scientometrics</jtitle><stitle>Scientometrics</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>2361</spage><epage>2382</epage><pages>2361-2382</pages><issn>0138-9130</issn><eissn>1588-2861</eissn><abstract>Examining coauthorship networks is key to study scientific collaboration patterns and structural characteristics of scientific communities. Here, we studied coauthorship networks of sociologists in Italy, using temporal and multi-level quantitative analysis. By looking at publications indexed in Scopus, we detected research communities among Italian sociologists. We found that Italian sociologists are fractured in many disconnected groups. The giant connected component could be split into five main groups with a mix of three main disciplinary topics: sociology of culture and communication (present in two groups), economic sociology (present in three groups) and general sociology (present in three groups). By applying an exponential random graph model, we found that collaboration ties are mainly driven by the research interests of these groups. Other factors, such as preferential attachment , gender and affiliation homophily are also important, but the effect of gender fades away once other factors are controlled for. Our research shows the advantages of multi-level and temporal network analysis in revealing the complexity of scientific collaboration patterns.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s11192-020-03555-w</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6503-6077</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3170-3879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8956-7166</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3828-1533</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0138-9130
ispartof Scientometrics, 2020-09, Vol.124 (3), p.2361-2382
issn 0138-9130
1588-2861
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2427315815
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Co authorship
Collaboration
Computer Science
Information Storage and Retrieval
Library Science
Network analysis
Sociology
title Italian sociologists: a community of disconnected groups
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T22%3A55%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Italian%20sociologists:%20a%20community%20of%20disconnected%20groups&rft.jtitle=Scientometrics&rft.au=Akbaritabar,%20Aliakbar&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=2361&rft.epage=2382&rft.pages=2361-2382&rft.issn=0138-9130&rft.eissn=1588-2861&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11192-020-03555-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2427315815%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2427315815&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true