Determination of 14 Lipophilic Pesticide Residues in Raw Propolis by Selective Sample Preparation and Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

A selective and reliable method was developed and validated for the determination of 14 lipophilic pesticides in raw propolis by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) analysis. A test portion of milled sample was extracted with n-hexane followed by back extraction with acetonitrile...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Food analytical methods 2020-09, Vol.13 (9), p.1726-1735
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Xiangyun, Wang, Zhiwei, Di, Shanshan, Xue, Xiaofeng, Jin, Yinyin, Qi, Peipei, Wang, Xinquan, Han, Lijun, Xiao, Yingping, Min, Shungeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1735
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1726
container_title Food analytical methods
container_volume 13
creator Wang, Xiangyun
Wang, Zhiwei
Di, Shanshan
Xue, Xiaofeng
Jin, Yinyin
Qi, Peipei
Wang, Xinquan
Han, Lijun
Xiao, Yingping
Min, Shungeng
description A selective and reliable method was developed and validated for the determination of 14 lipophilic pesticides in raw propolis by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) analysis. A test portion of milled sample was extracted with n-hexane followed by back extraction with acetonitrile and cleanup using EMR-Lipid and Florisil column adsorption. Matrix-matched standards were used to compensate for matrix effects. Typical linear correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) were ≥ 0.989 in concentration range of 0.001–0.200 μg/mL. Method validation was carried out at three spiking levels and three individual days, and it was found that the mean interday average recoveries were 61.0–106.8% with relative standard deviations ≤ 16.9%. Limits of quantification were ranged from 0.002 to 0.020 μg/g. Analysis of market propolis samples showed contamination by pesticides (e.g., tau-fluvalinate) to some degree.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12161-020-01712-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2426933131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2426933131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-69d56c285f102f4f506fef16572ff38fe52fd561a18ff86b0785ef2e9e985c883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQxoMoqKsv4CnguZpJt2l6lPUvrCiugrcQuxM30jYx6Sp78x18Q5_EaEVvMocZ-L75DfMRsgfsABgrDyNwEJAxzjIGJfBMrpEtqHKRVaW4X_-dC9gk2zE-MSbYGPgWeT_GHkNrO91b11FnKIzp1HrnF7axNb3G2NvazpHeYLTzJUZqO3qjX-l1cN41NtKHFZ1hg3VvX5DOdOsbTCJ6HQam7ub0TEc6WQTX6t49Bu0Xq4-399ukYEsvdYx05hMg6diH1Q7ZMLqJuPvTR-Tu9OR2cp5Nr84uJkfTrM6h6jNRzQtRc1kYYNyMTcGEQQOiKLkxuTRYcJMcoEEaI8UDK2WBhmOFlSxqKfMR2R-4Prjn9FmvntwydOmk4mMuqjyHVCPCB1cdXIwBjfLBtjqsFDD1Fb4awlcpfPUdvvpC58NSTObuEcMf-p-tT3svip8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2426933131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Determination of 14 Lipophilic Pesticide Residues in Raw Propolis by Selective Sample Preparation and Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wang, Xiangyun ; Wang, Zhiwei ; Di, Shanshan ; Xue, Xiaofeng ; Jin, Yinyin ; Qi, Peipei ; Wang, Xinquan ; Han, Lijun ; Xiao, Yingping ; Min, Shungeng</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiangyun ; Wang, Zhiwei ; Di, Shanshan ; Xue, Xiaofeng ; Jin, Yinyin ; Qi, Peipei ; Wang, Xinquan ; Han, Lijun ; Xiao, Yingping ; Min, Shungeng</creatorcontrib><description>A selective and reliable method was developed and validated for the determination of 14 lipophilic pesticides in raw propolis by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) analysis. A test portion of milled sample was extracted with n-hexane followed by back extraction with acetonitrile and cleanup using EMR-Lipid and Florisil column adsorption. Matrix-matched standards were used to compensate for matrix effects. Typical linear correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) were ≥ 0.989 in concentration range of 0.001–0.200 μg/mL. Method validation was carried out at three spiking levels and three individual days, and it was found that the mean interday average recoveries were 61.0–106.8% with relative standard deviations ≤ 16.9%. Limits of quantification were ranged from 0.002 to 0.020 μg/g. Analysis of market propolis samples showed contamination by pesticides (e.g., tau-fluvalinate) to some degree.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1936-9751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-976X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12161-020-01712-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Acetonitrile ; Analytical Chemistry ; Chemistry ; Chemistry and Materials Science ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Chromatography ; Contamination ; Correlation coefficient ; Correlation coefficients ; Economic conditions ; Environmental cleanup ; Fluvalinate ; Food Science ; Gas chromatography ; Lipids ; Lipophilic ; Mass spectrometry ; Mass spectroscopy ; Mathematical analysis ; Matrix methods ; Microbiology ; n-Hexane ; Pesticide residues ; Pesticides ; Propolis ; Sample preparation ; Scientific imaging ; Spectroscopy</subject><ispartof>Food analytical methods, 2020-09, Vol.13 (9), p.1726-1735</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-69d56c285f102f4f506fef16572ff38fe52fd561a18ff86b0785ef2e9e985c883</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-69d56c285f102f4f506fef16572ff38fe52fd561a18ff86b0785ef2e9e985c883</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4235-3413</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12161-020-01712-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12161-020-01712-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiangyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Shanshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Yinyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Peipei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xinquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yingping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Shungeng</creatorcontrib><title>Determination of 14 Lipophilic Pesticide Residues in Raw Propolis by Selective Sample Preparation and Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry</title><title>Food analytical methods</title><addtitle>Food Anal. Methods</addtitle><description>A selective and reliable method was developed and validated for the determination of 14 lipophilic pesticides in raw propolis by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) analysis. A test portion of milled sample was extracted with n-hexane followed by back extraction with acetonitrile and cleanup using EMR-Lipid and Florisil column adsorption. Matrix-matched standards were used to compensate for matrix effects. Typical linear correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) were ≥ 0.989 in concentration range of 0.001–0.200 μg/mL. Method validation was carried out at three spiking levels and three individual days, and it was found that the mean interday average recoveries were 61.0–106.8% with relative standard deviations ≤ 16.9%. Limits of quantification were ranged from 0.002 to 0.020 μg/g. Analysis of market propolis samples showed contamination by pesticides (e.g., tau-fluvalinate) to some degree.</description><subject>Acetonitrile</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemistry and Materials Science</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Chromatography</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>Correlation coefficient</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Environmental cleanup</subject><subject>Fluvalinate</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Gas chromatography</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Lipophilic</subject><subject>Mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Mass spectroscopy</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Matrix methods</subject><subject>Microbiology</subject><subject>n-Hexane</subject><subject>Pesticide residues</subject><subject>Pesticides</subject><subject>Propolis</subject><subject>Sample preparation</subject><subject>Scientific imaging</subject><subject>Spectroscopy</subject><issn>1936-9751</issn><issn>1936-976X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9KxDAQxoMoqKsv4CnguZpJt2l6lPUvrCiugrcQuxM30jYx6Sp78x18Q5_EaEVvMocZ-L75DfMRsgfsABgrDyNwEJAxzjIGJfBMrpEtqHKRVaW4X_-dC9gk2zE-MSbYGPgWeT_GHkNrO91b11FnKIzp1HrnF7axNb3G2NvazpHeYLTzJUZqO3qjX-l1cN41NtKHFZ1hg3VvX5DOdOsbTCJ6HQam7ub0TEc6WQTX6t49Bu0Xq4-399ukYEsvdYx05hMg6diH1Q7ZMLqJuPvTR-Tu9OR2cp5Nr84uJkfTrM6h6jNRzQtRc1kYYNyMTcGEQQOiKLkxuTRYcJMcoEEaI8UDK2WBhmOFlSxqKfMR2R-4Prjn9FmvntwydOmk4mMuqjyHVCPCB1cdXIwBjfLBtjqsFDD1Fb4awlcpfPUdvvpC58NSTObuEcMf-p-tT3svip8</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Wang, Xiangyun</creator><creator>Wang, Zhiwei</creator><creator>Di, Shanshan</creator><creator>Xue, Xiaofeng</creator><creator>Jin, Yinyin</creator><creator>Qi, Peipei</creator><creator>Wang, Xinquan</creator><creator>Han, Lijun</creator><creator>Xiao, Yingping</creator><creator>Min, Shungeng</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-3413</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Determination of 14 Lipophilic Pesticide Residues in Raw Propolis by Selective Sample Preparation and Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry</title><author>Wang, Xiangyun ; Wang, Zhiwei ; Di, Shanshan ; Xue, Xiaofeng ; Jin, Yinyin ; Qi, Peipei ; Wang, Xinquan ; Han, Lijun ; Xiao, Yingping ; Min, Shungeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-69d56c285f102f4f506fef16572ff38fe52fd561a18ff86b0785ef2e9e985c883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acetonitrile</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemistry and Materials Science</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Chromatography</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>Correlation coefficient</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Environmental cleanup</topic><topic>Fluvalinate</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Gas chromatography</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Lipophilic</topic><topic>Mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Mass spectroscopy</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Matrix methods</topic><topic>Microbiology</topic><topic>n-Hexane</topic><topic>Pesticide residues</topic><topic>Pesticides</topic><topic>Propolis</topic><topic>Sample preparation</topic><topic>Scientific imaging</topic><topic>Spectroscopy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiangyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Zhiwei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Di, Shanshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xue, Xiaofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Yinyin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, Peipei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xinquan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Lijun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Yingping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Min, Shungeng</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Food analytical methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Xiangyun</au><au>Wang, Zhiwei</au><au>Di, Shanshan</au><au>Xue, Xiaofeng</au><au>Jin, Yinyin</au><au>Qi, Peipei</au><au>Wang, Xinquan</au><au>Han, Lijun</au><au>Xiao, Yingping</au><au>Min, Shungeng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Determination of 14 Lipophilic Pesticide Residues in Raw Propolis by Selective Sample Preparation and Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry</atitle><jtitle>Food analytical methods</jtitle><stitle>Food Anal. Methods</stitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1726</spage><epage>1735</epage><pages>1726-1735</pages><issn>1936-9751</issn><eissn>1936-976X</eissn><abstract>A selective and reliable method was developed and validated for the determination of 14 lipophilic pesticides in raw propolis by gas chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS) analysis. A test portion of milled sample was extracted with n-hexane followed by back extraction with acetonitrile and cleanup using EMR-Lipid and Florisil column adsorption. Matrix-matched standards were used to compensate for matrix effects. Typical linear correlation coefficients ( R 2 ) were ≥ 0.989 in concentration range of 0.001–0.200 μg/mL. Method validation was carried out at three spiking levels and three individual days, and it was found that the mean interday average recoveries were 61.0–106.8% with relative standard deviations ≤ 16.9%. Limits of quantification were ranged from 0.002 to 0.020 μg/g. Analysis of market propolis samples showed contamination by pesticides (e.g., tau-fluvalinate) to some degree.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12161-020-01712-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-3413</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1936-9751
ispartof Food analytical methods, 2020-09, Vol.13 (9), p.1726-1735
issn 1936-9751
1936-976X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2426933131
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acetonitrile
Analytical Chemistry
Chemistry
Chemistry and Materials Science
Chemistry/Food Science
Chromatography
Contamination
Correlation coefficient
Correlation coefficients
Economic conditions
Environmental cleanup
Fluvalinate
Food Science
Gas chromatography
Lipids
Lipophilic
Mass spectrometry
Mass spectroscopy
Mathematical analysis
Matrix methods
Microbiology
n-Hexane
Pesticide residues
Pesticides
Propolis
Sample preparation
Scientific imaging
Spectroscopy
title Determination of 14 Lipophilic Pesticide Residues in Raw Propolis by Selective Sample Preparation and Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T05%3A55%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Determination%20of%2014%20Lipophilic%20Pesticide%20Residues%20in%20Raw%20Propolis%20by%20Selective%20Sample%20Preparation%20and%20Gas%20Chromatography%E2%80%93Tandem%20Mass%20Spectrometry&rft.jtitle=Food%20analytical%20methods&rft.au=Wang,%20Xiangyun&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1726&rft.epage=1735&rft.pages=1726-1735&rft.issn=1936-9751&rft.eissn=1936-976X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12161-020-01712-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2426933131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2426933131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true