Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis
The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019. Hospitalized patients. VHAs compared to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical anesthesia 2020-09, Vol.64, p.109809-109809, Article 109809 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 109809 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 109809 |
container_title | Journal of clinical anesthesia |
container_volume | 64 |
creator | Santos, André Soares Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos |
description | The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures.
Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019.
Hospitalized patients.
VHAs compared to the Standard-Of-Care (SOC), which are represented by standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions.
Primary - Risk of death, acute kidney injury, thrombotic events and reoperation for bleeding; Secondary – Risk of use of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, factor VIIa, prothrombin complex, volume of RBC, platelets and FFP, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay.
VHAs were associated to a statistically significant reduction in mortality (7.3% vs. 12.1%; RR = 0.64, p-value = 0.03), risk of acute kidney injury (10.5% vs. 17.6%; RR = 0.53, p-value = 0.005), volume of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused (MD = -1.63 U, p-value = 0.02), risk of platelet transfusion (23.9% vs. 27.3%; RR = 0.74, p-value = 0.006), risk of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (RR = 0.57, p-value = 0.001), and volume of FFP transfused (MD = -0.90, p-value = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in terms of thrombotic events, reexploration for bleeding, RBC transfusion, volume of platelets transfused, use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, or factor VIIa, length of hospitalization and length of ICU stay.
Viscoelastic haemostatic assays are safe and efficacious for coagulation control in patients undergoing surgical procedures, therefore it should be considered for use in practice.
•Allogeneic blood product transfusion has been associated with adverse outcomes.•The transfusion of blood can be driven by laboratory tests, clinical decision, and/or viscoelastic haemostatic assays.•The VHAs significantly reduced patients' risk of death, risk of acute kidney injury and tranfusions of platelets and FFP.•In only one of six previous systematic reviews, the mortality advantage with the use of VHA was demonstrated.•VHAs were considered efficacious and safe to guide transfusion in patients undergoing surgery based on final outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109809 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2425684986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0952818019320288</els_id><sourcerecordid>2425684986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7c81cd61fef587d46649d0d3386637bab4a53bf9ac119ebc85d8b6928290192c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL1SWuCChLP6K1-ZEteJLqsSBj6vl2BPqKIkXO-lq_z0O2fbABS722PO8o5l5EbqiZEsJlW-6bef6MNoRtoyw5VMroh-hDVU7Xoma6cdoQ3TNKkUVuUDPcu4IISVBn6ILzpjWRIgNOv4I2UXobZ6Cw7cWhpgnu8Q2Z3vKOIx4ugV8gBRiOUrq7vzyOLY4z-lncLbHhxQd-DlBfou_nvIEw58qCe4CHLEdPR5gspUdbX_KIT9HT1rbZ3hxvi_R9w_vv-0_VTdfPn7eX99UTkg2VTunqPOSttDWaueFlEJ74jlXUvJdYxtha9602jpKNTRO1V41UjPFNKGaOX6JXq11S3-_ZsiTGcrA0Pdlc3HOhnFN9U6WxRT05V9oF-dU-i2UYLVUQitZKLlSLsWcE7TmkMJg08lQYhZrTGfurTGLNWa1pgivzuXnZgD_ILv3ogBqBY7QxDa7AKODB6yYV3NeUyFKxNU-LC7FcR_ncSrS1_8vLfS7lYay-GJPMmeFDwncZHwM_xrmN5KGxUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425684986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Santos, André Soares ; Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix ; Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage ; Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos, André Soares ; Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix ; Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage ; Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures.
Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019.
Hospitalized patients.
VHAs compared to the Standard-Of-Care (SOC), which are represented by standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions.
Primary - Risk of death, acute kidney injury, thrombotic events and reoperation for bleeding; Secondary – Risk of use of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, factor VIIa, prothrombin complex, volume of RBC, platelets and FFP, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay.
VHAs were associated to a statistically significant reduction in mortality (7.3% vs. 12.1%; RR = 0.64, p-value = 0.03), risk of acute kidney injury (10.5% vs. 17.6%; RR = 0.53, p-value = 0.005), volume of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused (MD = -1.63 U, p-value = 0.02), risk of platelet transfusion (23.9% vs. 27.3%; RR = 0.74, p-value = 0.006), risk of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (RR = 0.57, p-value = 0.001), and volume of FFP transfused (MD = -0.90, p-value = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in terms of thrombotic events, reexploration for bleeding, RBC transfusion, volume of platelets transfused, use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, or factor VIIa, length of hospitalization and length of ICU stay.
Viscoelastic haemostatic assays are safe and efficacious for coagulation control in patients undergoing surgical procedures, therefore it should be considered for use in practice.
•Allogeneic blood product transfusion has been associated with adverse outcomes.•The transfusion of blood can be driven by laboratory tests, clinical decision, and/or viscoelastic haemostatic assays.•The VHAs significantly reduced patients' risk of death, risk of acute kidney injury and tranfusions of platelets and FFP.•In only one of six previous systematic reviews, the mortality advantage with the use of VHA was demonstrated.•VHAs were considered efficacious and safe to guide transfusion in patients undergoing surgery based on final outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109809</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32299044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Bias ; Blood coagulation ; Blood coagulation tests ; Blood platelets ; Clinical trials ; Collaboration ; General surgery ; Heart surgery ; Laboratories ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Review ; Science & Technology ; Systematic review ; Thrombelastography ; Transplants & implants ; Viscoelasticity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2020-09, Vol.64, p.109809-109809, Article 109809</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>19</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000533514400038</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7c81cd61fef587d46649d0d3386637bab4a53bf9ac119ebc85d8b6928290192c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7c81cd61fef587d46649d0d3386637bab4a53bf9ac119ebc85d8b6928290192c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2425684986?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,28253,46000,64390,64392,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos, André Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creatorcontrib><title>Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J CLIN ANESTH</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures.
Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019.
Hospitalized patients.
VHAs compared to the Standard-Of-Care (SOC), which are represented by standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions.
Primary - Risk of death, acute kidney injury, thrombotic events and reoperation for bleeding; Secondary – Risk of use of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, factor VIIa, prothrombin complex, volume of RBC, platelets and FFP, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay.
VHAs were associated to a statistically significant reduction in mortality (7.3% vs. 12.1%; RR = 0.64, p-value = 0.03), risk of acute kidney injury (10.5% vs. 17.6%; RR = 0.53, p-value = 0.005), volume of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused (MD = -1.63 U, p-value = 0.02), risk of platelet transfusion (23.9% vs. 27.3%; RR = 0.74, p-value = 0.006), risk of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (RR = 0.57, p-value = 0.001), and volume of FFP transfused (MD = -0.90, p-value = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in terms of thrombotic events, reexploration for bleeding, RBC transfusion, volume of platelets transfused, use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, or factor VIIa, length of hospitalization and length of ICU stay.
Viscoelastic haemostatic assays are safe and efficacious for coagulation control in patients undergoing surgical procedures, therefore it should be considered for use in practice.
•Allogeneic blood product transfusion has been associated with adverse outcomes.•The transfusion of blood can be driven by laboratory tests, clinical decision, and/or viscoelastic haemostatic assays.•The VHAs significantly reduced patients' risk of death, risk of acute kidney injury and tranfusions of platelets and FFP.•In only one of six previous systematic reviews, the mortality advantage with the use of VHA was demonstrated.•VHAs were considered efficacious and safe to guide transfusion in patients undergoing surgery based on final outcomes.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Blood coagulation</subject><subject>Blood coagulation tests</subject><subject>Blood platelets</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>General surgery</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Thrombelastography</subject><subject>Transplants & implants</subject><subject>Viscoelasticity</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL1SWuCChLP6K1-ZEteJLqsSBj6vl2BPqKIkXO-lq_z0O2fbABS722PO8o5l5EbqiZEsJlW-6bef6MNoRtoyw5VMroh-hDVU7Xoma6cdoQ3TNKkUVuUDPcu4IISVBn6ILzpjWRIgNOv4I2UXobZ6Cw7cWhpgnu8Q2Z3vKOIx4ugV8gBRiOUrq7vzyOLY4z-lncLbHhxQd-DlBfou_nvIEw58qCe4CHLEdPR5gspUdbX_KIT9HT1rbZ3hxvi_R9w_vv-0_VTdfPn7eX99UTkg2VTunqPOSttDWaueFlEJ74jlXUvJdYxtha9602jpKNTRO1V41UjPFNKGaOX6JXq11S3-_ZsiTGcrA0Pdlc3HOhnFN9U6WxRT05V9oF-dU-i2UYLVUQitZKLlSLsWcE7TmkMJg08lQYhZrTGfurTGLNWa1pgivzuXnZgD_ILv3ogBqBY7QxDa7AKODB6yYV3NeUyFKxNU-LC7FcR_ncSrS1_8vLfS7lYay-GJPMmeFDwncZHwM_xrmN5KGxUw</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Santos, André Soares</creator><creator>Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix</creator><creator>Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage</creator><creator>Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Santos, André Soares ; Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix ; Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage ; Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7c81cd61fef587d46649d0d3386637bab4a53bf9ac119ebc85d8b6928290192c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Blood coagulation</topic><topic>Blood coagulation tests</topic><topic>Blood platelets</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>General surgery</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Thrombelastography</topic><topic>Transplants & implants</topic><topic>Viscoelasticity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos, André Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos, André Soares</au><au>Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix</au><au>Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage</au><au>Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><stitle>J CLIN ANESTH</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>64</volume><spage>109809</spage><epage>109809</epage><pages>109809-109809</pages><artnum>109809</artnum><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures.
Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019.
Hospitalized patients.
VHAs compared to the Standard-Of-Care (SOC), which are represented by standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions.
Primary - Risk of death, acute kidney injury, thrombotic events and reoperation for bleeding; Secondary – Risk of use of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, factor VIIa, prothrombin complex, volume of RBC, platelets and FFP, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay.
VHAs were associated to a statistically significant reduction in mortality (7.3% vs. 12.1%; RR = 0.64, p-value = 0.03), risk of acute kidney injury (10.5% vs. 17.6%; RR = 0.53, p-value = 0.005), volume of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused (MD = -1.63 U, p-value = 0.02), risk of platelet transfusion (23.9% vs. 27.3%; RR = 0.74, p-value = 0.006), risk of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (RR = 0.57, p-value = 0.001), and volume of FFP transfused (MD = -0.90, p-value = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in terms of thrombotic events, reexploration for bleeding, RBC transfusion, volume of platelets transfused, use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, or factor VIIa, length of hospitalization and length of ICU stay.
Viscoelastic haemostatic assays are safe and efficacious for coagulation control in patients undergoing surgical procedures, therefore it should be considered for use in practice.
•Allogeneic blood product transfusion has been associated with adverse outcomes.•The transfusion of blood can be driven by laboratory tests, clinical decision, and/or viscoelastic haemostatic assays.•The VHAs significantly reduced patients' risk of death, risk of acute kidney injury and tranfusions of platelets and FFP.•In only one of six previous systematic reviews, the mortality advantage with the use of VHA was demonstrated.•VHAs were considered efficacious and safe to guide transfusion in patients undergoing surgery based on final outcomes.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32299044</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109809</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0952-8180 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2020-09, Vol.64, p.109809-109809, Article 109809 |
issn | 0952-8180 1873-4529 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2425684986 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland |
subjects | Anesthesiology Bias Blood coagulation Blood coagulation tests Blood platelets Clinical trials Collaboration General surgery Heart surgery Laboratories Life Sciences & Biomedicine Meta-analysis Mortality Review Science & Technology Systematic review Thrombelastography Transplants & implants Viscoelasticity |
title | Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T11%3A26%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viscoelastic%20haemostatic%20assays%20in%20the%20perioperative%20period%20of%20surgical%20procedures:%20Systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Santos,%20Andr%C3%A9%20Soares&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=64&rft.spage=109809&rft.epage=109809&rft.pages=109809-109809&rft.artnum=109809&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109809&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2425684986%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425684986&rft_id=info:pmid/32299044&rft_els_id=S0952818019320288&rfr_iscdi=true |