Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis

The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019. Hospitalized patients. VHAs compared to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical anesthesia 2020-09, Vol.64, p.109809-109809, Article 109809
Hauptverfasser: Santos, André Soares, Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix, Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage, Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 109809
container_issue
container_start_page 109809
container_title Journal of clinical anesthesia
container_volume 64
creator Santos, André Soares
Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix
Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage
Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos
description The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019. Hospitalized patients. VHAs compared to the Standard-Of-Care (SOC), which are represented by standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions. Primary - Risk of death, acute kidney injury, thrombotic events and reoperation for bleeding; Secondary – Risk of use of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, factor VIIa, prothrombin complex, volume of RBC, platelets and FFP, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay. VHAs were associated to a statistically significant reduction in mortality (7.3% vs. 12.1%; RR = 0.64, p-value = 0.03), risk of acute kidney injury (10.5% vs. 17.6%; RR = 0.53, p-value = 0.005), volume of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused (MD = -1.63 U, p-value = 0.02), risk of platelet transfusion (23.9% vs. 27.3%; RR = 0.74, p-value = 0.006), risk of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (RR = 0.57, p-value = 0.001), and volume of FFP transfused (MD = -0.90, p-value = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in terms of thrombotic events, reexploration for bleeding, RBC transfusion, volume of platelets transfused, use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, or factor VIIa, length of hospitalization and length of ICU stay. Viscoelastic haemostatic assays are safe and efficacious for coagulation control in patients undergoing surgical procedures, therefore it should be considered for use in practice. •Allogeneic blood product transfusion has been associated with adverse outcomes.•The transfusion of blood can be driven by laboratory tests, clinical decision, and/or viscoelastic haemostatic assays.•The VHAs significantly reduced patients' risk of death, risk of acute kidney injury and tranfusions of platelets and FFP.•In only one of six previous systematic reviews, the mortality advantage with the use of VHA was demonstrated.•VHAs were considered efficacious and safe to guide transfusion in patients undergoing surgery based on final outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109809
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_webof</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2425684986</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0952818019320288</els_id><sourcerecordid>2425684986</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7c81cd61fef587d46649d0d3386637bab4a53bf9ac119ebc85d8b6928290192c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL1SWuCChLP6K1-ZEteJLqsSBj6vl2BPqKIkXO-lq_z0O2fbABS722PO8o5l5EbqiZEsJlW-6bef6MNoRtoyw5VMroh-hDVU7Xoma6cdoQ3TNKkUVuUDPcu4IISVBn6ILzpjWRIgNOv4I2UXobZ6Cw7cWhpgnu8Q2Z3vKOIx4ugV8gBRiOUrq7vzyOLY4z-lncLbHhxQd-DlBfou_nvIEw58qCe4CHLEdPR5gspUdbX_KIT9HT1rbZ3hxvi_R9w_vv-0_VTdfPn7eX99UTkg2VTunqPOSttDWaueFlEJ74jlXUvJdYxtha9602jpKNTRO1V41UjPFNKGaOX6JXq11S3-_ZsiTGcrA0Pdlc3HOhnFN9U6WxRT05V9oF-dU-i2UYLVUQitZKLlSLsWcE7TmkMJg08lQYhZrTGfurTGLNWa1pgivzuXnZgD_ILv3ogBqBY7QxDa7AKODB6yYV3NeUyFKxNU-LC7FcR_ncSrS1_8vLfS7lYay-GJPMmeFDwncZHwM_xrmN5KGxUw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2425684986</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Santos, André Soares ; Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix ; Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage ; Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creator><creatorcontrib>Santos, André Soares ; Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix ; Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage ; Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019. Hospitalized patients. VHAs compared to the Standard-Of-Care (SOC), which are represented by standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions. Primary - Risk of death, acute kidney injury, thrombotic events and reoperation for bleeding; Secondary – Risk of use of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, factor VIIa, prothrombin complex, volume of RBC, platelets and FFP, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay. VHAs were associated to a statistically significant reduction in mortality (7.3% vs. 12.1%; RR = 0.64, p-value = 0.03), risk of acute kidney injury (10.5% vs. 17.6%; RR = 0.53, p-value = 0.005), volume of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused (MD = -1.63 U, p-value = 0.02), risk of platelet transfusion (23.9% vs. 27.3%; RR = 0.74, p-value = 0.006), risk of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (RR = 0.57, p-value = 0.001), and volume of FFP transfused (MD = -0.90, p-value = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in terms of thrombotic events, reexploration for bleeding, RBC transfusion, volume of platelets transfused, use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, or factor VIIa, length of hospitalization and length of ICU stay. Viscoelastic haemostatic assays are safe and efficacious for coagulation control in patients undergoing surgical procedures, therefore it should be considered for use in practice. •Allogeneic blood product transfusion has been associated with adverse outcomes.•The transfusion of blood can be driven by laboratory tests, clinical decision, and/or viscoelastic haemostatic assays.•The VHAs significantly reduced patients' risk of death, risk of acute kidney injury and tranfusions of platelets and FFP.•In only one of six previous systematic reviews, the mortality advantage with the use of VHA was demonstrated.•VHAs were considered efficacious and safe to guide transfusion in patients undergoing surgery based on final outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0952-8180</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109809</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32299044</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NEW YORK: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Anesthesiology ; Bias ; Blood coagulation ; Blood coagulation tests ; Blood platelets ; Clinical trials ; Collaboration ; General surgery ; Heart surgery ; Laboratories ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Meta-analysis ; Mortality ; Review ; Science &amp; Technology ; Systematic review ; Thrombelastography ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Viscoelasticity</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2020-09, Vol.64, p.109809-109809, Article 109809</ispartof><rights>2020 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2020. Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>19</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000533514400038</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7c81cd61fef587d46649d0d3386637bab4a53bf9ac119ebc85d8b6928290192c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7c81cd61fef587d46649d0d3386637bab4a53bf9ac119ebc85d8b6928290192c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2425684986?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,28253,46000,64390,64392,64394,72474</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32299044$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Santos, André Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creatorcontrib><title>Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>Journal of clinical anesthesia</title><addtitle>J CLIN ANESTH</addtitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019. Hospitalized patients. VHAs compared to the Standard-Of-Care (SOC), which are represented by standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions. Primary - Risk of death, acute kidney injury, thrombotic events and reoperation for bleeding; Secondary – Risk of use of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, factor VIIa, prothrombin complex, volume of RBC, platelets and FFP, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay. VHAs were associated to a statistically significant reduction in mortality (7.3% vs. 12.1%; RR = 0.64, p-value = 0.03), risk of acute kidney injury (10.5% vs. 17.6%; RR = 0.53, p-value = 0.005), volume of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused (MD = -1.63 U, p-value = 0.02), risk of platelet transfusion (23.9% vs. 27.3%; RR = 0.74, p-value = 0.006), risk of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (RR = 0.57, p-value = 0.001), and volume of FFP transfused (MD = -0.90, p-value = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in terms of thrombotic events, reexploration for bleeding, RBC transfusion, volume of platelets transfused, use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, or factor VIIa, length of hospitalization and length of ICU stay. Viscoelastic haemostatic assays are safe and efficacious for coagulation control in patients undergoing surgical procedures, therefore it should be considered for use in practice. •Allogeneic blood product transfusion has been associated with adverse outcomes.•The transfusion of blood can be driven by laboratory tests, clinical decision, and/or viscoelastic haemostatic assays.•The VHAs significantly reduced patients' risk of death, risk of acute kidney injury and tranfusions of platelets and FFP.•In only one of six previous systematic reviews, the mortality advantage with the use of VHA was demonstrated.•VHAs were considered efficacious and safe to guide transfusion in patients undergoing surgery based on final outcomes.</description><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Blood coagulation</subject><subject>Blood coagulation tests</subject><subject>Blood platelets</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>General surgery</subject><subject>Heart surgery</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Review</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Thrombelastography</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Viscoelasticity</subject><issn>0952-8180</issn><issn>1873-4529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1v1DAQhi0EokvhL1SWuCChLP6K1-ZEteJLqsSBj6vl2BPqKIkXO-lq_z0O2fbABS722PO8o5l5EbqiZEsJlW-6bef6MNoRtoyw5VMroh-hDVU7Xoma6cdoQ3TNKkUVuUDPcu4IISVBn6ILzpjWRIgNOv4I2UXobZ6Cw7cWhpgnu8Q2Z3vKOIx4ugV8gBRiOUrq7vzyOLY4z-lncLbHhxQd-DlBfou_nvIEw58qCe4CHLEdPR5gspUdbX_KIT9HT1rbZ3hxvi_R9w_vv-0_VTdfPn7eX99UTkg2VTunqPOSttDWaueFlEJ74jlXUvJdYxtha9602jpKNTRO1V41UjPFNKGaOX6JXq11S3-_ZsiTGcrA0Pdlc3HOhnFN9U6WxRT05V9oF-dU-i2UYLVUQitZKLlSLsWcE7TmkMJg08lQYhZrTGfurTGLNWa1pgivzuXnZgD_ILv3ogBqBY7QxDa7AKODB6yYV3NeUyFKxNU-LC7FcR_ncSrS1_8vLfS7lYay-GJPMmeFDwncZHwM_xrmN5KGxUw</recordid><startdate>20200901</startdate><enddate>20200901</enddate><creator>Santos, André Soares</creator><creator>Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix</creator><creator>Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage</creator><creator>Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200901</creationdate><title>Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Santos, André Soares ; Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix ; Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage ; Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-7c81cd61fef587d46649d0d3386637bab4a53bf9ac119ebc85d8b6928290192c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Blood coagulation</topic><topic>Blood coagulation tests</topic><topic>Blood platelets</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>General surgery</topic><topic>Heart surgery</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Review</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Thrombelastography</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Viscoelasticity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Santos, André Soares</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Santos, André Soares</au><au>Oliveira, Ananda Jessyla Felix</au><au>Barbosa, Maria Carolina Lage</au><au>Nogueira, José Luiz dos Santos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical anesthesia</jtitle><stitle>J CLIN ANESTH</stitle><addtitle>J Clin Anesth</addtitle><date>2020-09-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>64</volume><spage>109809</spage><epage>109809</epage><pages>109809-109809</pages><artnum>109809</artnum><issn>0952-8180</issn><eissn>1873-4529</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Viscoelastic Haemostatic Assays (VHA) to guide transfusions in patients undergoing surgical procedures. Systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials up until June 5, 2019. Hospitalized patients. VHAs compared to the Standard-Of-Care (SOC), which are represented by standard laboratory tests and/or clinical decisions. Primary - Risk of death, acute kidney injury, thrombotic events and reoperation for bleeding; Secondary – Risk of use of red blood cells (RBC), platelets, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen, factor VIIa, prothrombin complex, volume of RBC, platelets and FFP, length of hospital stay, and length of ICU stay. VHAs were associated to a statistically significant reduction in mortality (7.3% vs. 12.1%; RR = 0.64, p-value = 0.03), risk of acute kidney injury (10.5% vs. 17.6%; RR = 0.53, p-value = 0.005), volume of red blood cells (RBCs) transfused (MD = -1.63 U, p-value = 0.02), risk of platelet transfusion (23.9% vs. 27.3%; RR = 0.74, p-value = 0.006), risk of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) transfusion (RR = 0.57, p-value = 0.001), and volume of FFP transfused (MD = -0.90, p-value = 0.0003). No significant differences were observed in terms of thrombotic events, reexploration for bleeding, RBC transfusion, volume of platelets transfused, use of fibrinogen, prothrombin complex, or factor VIIa, length of hospitalization and length of ICU stay. Viscoelastic haemostatic assays are safe and efficacious for coagulation control in patients undergoing surgical procedures, therefore it should be considered for use in practice. •Allogeneic blood product transfusion has been associated with adverse outcomes.•The transfusion of blood can be driven by laboratory tests, clinical decision, and/or viscoelastic haemostatic assays.•The VHAs significantly reduced patients' risk of death, risk of acute kidney injury and tranfusions of platelets and FFP.•In only one of six previous systematic reviews, the mortality advantage with the use of VHA was demonstrated.•VHAs were considered efficacious and safe to guide transfusion in patients undergoing surgery based on final outcomes.</abstract><cop>NEW YORK</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>32299044</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109809</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0952-8180
ispartof Journal of clinical anesthesia, 2020-09, Vol.64, p.109809-109809, Article 109809
issn 0952-8180
1873-4529
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2425684986
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present); Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Anesthesiology
Bias
Blood coagulation
Blood coagulation tests
Blood platelets
Clinical trials
Collaboration
General surgery
Heart surgery
Laboratories
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Meta-analysis
Mortality
Review
Science & Technology
Systematic review
Thrombelastography
Transplants & implants
Viscoelasticity
title Viscoelastic haemostatic assays in the perioperative period of surgical procedures: Systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-15T11%3A26%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_webof&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Viscoelastic%20haemostatic%20assays%20in%20the%20perioperative%20period%20of%20surgical%20procedures:%20Systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20anesthesia&rft.au=Santos,%20Andr%C3%A9%20Soares&rft.date=2020-09-01&rft.volume=64&rft.spage=109809&rft.epage=109809&rft.pages=109809-109809&rft.artnum=109809&rft.issn=0952-8180&rft.eissn=1873-4529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jclinane.2020.109809&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_webof%3E2425684986%3C/proquest_webof%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2425684986&rft_id=info:pmid/32299044&rft_els_id=S0952818019320288&rfr_iscdi=true