Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs
The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 student...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of career and technical education 2003-05, Vol.19 (2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of career and technical education |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Belcher, Gregory Frisbee, Robert Sandford, Brian |
description | The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 students (Freshmen through Seniors) and 27 faculty members of the eight universities in the United States that offer automotive technology baccalaureate degrees. The survey instrument used in this study employed a scale to measure the perceptions of the students and faculty members concerning the importance of selected recruitment items. Overall, the responses between the faculty and the students were similar. Reputation of the automotive program, reputation of the university, campus visits and high school/community college teacher/counselor were four of the top five most effective recruitment items reported by both groups. Students and faculty differed in that students indicated parent/relatives were more important to them in the recruitment process than what the faculty perceived them to be, and the faculty revealed that friends at the university/community college/ high school, alumni of the university, and articulation or direct transfer from a community college were more important recruitment items than did the students. |
doi_str_mv | 10.21061/jcte.v19i2.613 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2424995038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424995038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1553-76c063f95b52553a48411955d274fed8e0936ccd1e1e4ec22c48f41a05eafd9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9PAjEQxTdGExE9e23ieaF_l90joigJiUbx4Kkp3aksgRbbLoYP4Xe2gImeZibz5jcvL8uuCe5RggvSX-oIvS2pGtorCDvJOkQwlpOS4dN__Xl2EcISY8EJ5Z3s-64xBjxYDQHdQvwCsGisdLuKO6RsjV5jW4ONAT2D17CJjbPIGfQC2rdNXKcVmoFe2OazTYTZQkU0sWbV7ol_x9GhYYyQeGPX-vwdlEfDNrq1i80W0LN3H16tw2V2ZtQqwNVv7WZv4_vZ6DGfPj1MRsNprokQLB8UGhfMVGIuaJoVLzkhlRA1HXADdQm4YoXWNQECHDSlmpeGE4UFKFNXc9bNbo7cjXd731Euky2bXkrKKa8qgVmZVP2jSnsXggcjN75ZK7-TBMtD5nKfuTxkLlPm7AczbXiG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424995038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Belcher, Gregory ; Frisbee, Robert ; Sandford, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Belcher, Gregory ; Frisbee, Robert ; Sandford, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 students (Freshmen through Seniors) and 27 faculty members of the eight universities in the United States that offer automotive technology baccalaureate degrees. The survey instrument used in this study employed a scale to measure the perceptions of the students and faculty members concerning the importance of selected recruitment items. Overall, the responses between the faculty and the students were similar. Reputation of the automotive program, reputation of the university, campus visits and high school/community college teacher/counselor were four of the top five most effective recruitment items reported by both groups. Students and faculty differed in that students indicated parent/relatives were more important to them in the recruitment process than what the faculty perceived them to be, and the faculty revealed that friends at the university/community college/ high school, alumni of the university, and articulation or direct transfer from a community college were more important recruitment items than did the students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-1830</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1531-4952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-1830</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21061/jcte.v19i2.613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Athens: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Digital Library and Archives</publisher><subject>College faculty ; Community colleges ; Enrollments ; Population ; Recruitment ; Reputations ; Secondary schools ; Student Surveys ; Students ; Technical Education ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Journal of career and technical education, 2003-05, Vol.19 (2)</ispartof><rights>2003. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1553-76c063f95b52553a48411955d274fed8e0936ccd1e1e4ec22c48f41a05eafd9b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belcher, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisbee, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandford, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs</title><title>Journal of career and technical education</title><description>The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 students (Freshmen through Seniors) and 27 faculty members of the eight universities in the United States that offer automotive technology baccalaureate degrees. The survey instrument used in this study employed a scale to measure the perceptions of the students and faculty members concerning the importance of selected recruitment items. Overall, the responses between the faculty and the students were similar. Reputation of the automotive program, reputation of the university, campus visits and high school/community college teacher/counselor were four of the top five most effective recruitment items reported by both groups. Students and faculty differed in that students indicated parent/relatives were more important to them in the recruitment process than what the faculty perceived them to be, and the faculty revealed that friends at the university/community college/ high school, alumni of the university, and articulation or direct transfer from a community college were more important recruitment items than did the students.</description><subject>College faculty</subject><subject>Community colleges</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Technical Education</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>1533-1830</issn><issn>1531-4952</issn><issn>1533-1830</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9PAjEQxTdGExE9e23ieaF_l90joigJiUbx4Kkp3aksgRbbLoYP4Xe2gImeZibz5jcvL8uuCe5RggvSX-oIvS2pGtorCDvJOkQwlpOS4dN__Xl2EcISY8EJ5Z3s-64xBjxYDQHdQvwCsGisdLuKO6RsjV5jW4ONAT2D17CJjbPIGfQC2rdNXKcVmoFe2OazTYTZQkU0sWbV7ol_x9GhYYyQeGPX-vwdlEfDNrq1i80W0LN3H16tw2V2ZtQqwNVv7WZv4_vZ6DGfPj1MRsNprokQLB8UGhfMVGIuaJoVLzkhlRA1HXADdQm4YoXWNQECHDSlmpeGE4UFKFNXc9bNbo7cjXd731Euky2bXkrKKa8qgVmZVP2jSnsXggcjN75ZK7-TBMtD5nKfuTxkLlPm7AczbXiG</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>Belcher, Gregory</creator><creator>Frisbee, Robert</creator><creator>Sandford, Brian</creator><general>Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Digital Library and Archives</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs</title><author>Belcher, Gregory ; Frisbee, Robert ; Sandford, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1553-76c063f95b52553a48411955d274fed8e0936ccd1e1e4ec22c48f41a05eafd9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>College faculty</topic><topic>Community colleges</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Technical Education</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belcher, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisbee, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandford, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of career and technical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belcher, Gregory</au><au>Frisbee, Robert</au><au>Sandford, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of career and technical education</jtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>1533-1830</issn><issn>1531-4952</issn><eissn>1533-1830</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 students (Freshmen through Seniors) and 27 faculty members of the eight universities in the United States that offer automotive technology baccalaureate degrees. The survey instrument used in this study employed a scale to measure the perceptions of the students and faculty members concerning the importance of selected recruitment items. Overall, the responses between the faculty and the students were similar. Reputation of the automotive program, reputation of the university, campus visits and high school/community college teacher/counselor were four of the top five most effective recruitment items reported by both groups. Students and faculty differed in that students indicated parent/relatives were more important to them in the recruitment process than what the faculty perceived them to be, and the faculty revealed that friends at the university/community college/ high school, alumni of the university, and articulation or direct transfer from a community college were more important recruitment items than did the students.</abstract><cop>Athens</cop><pub>Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Digital Library and Archives</pub><doi>10.21061/jcte.v19i2.613</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1533-1830 |
ispartof | Journal of career and technical education, 2003-05, Vol.19 (2) |
issn | 1533-1830 1531-4952 1533-1830 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2424995038 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | College faculty Community colleges Enrollments Population Recruitment Reputations Secondary schools Student Surveys Students Technical Education Universities |
title | Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T16%3A32%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20Between%20Faculty%20and%20Students%20Perception%20of%20Recruitment%20Techniques%20That%20Influence%20Students%20to%20Attend%20Four-Year%20Automotive%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20career%20and%20technical%20education&rft.au=Belcher,%20Gregory&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=1533-1830&rft.eissn=1533-1830&rft_id=info:doi/10.21061/jcte.v19i2.613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2424995038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424995038&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |