Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs

The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 student...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of career and technical education 2003-05, Vol.19 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Belcher, Gregory, Frisbee, Robert, Sandford, Brian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Journal of career and technical education
container_volume 19
creator Belcher, Gregory
Frisbee, Robert
Sandford, Brian
description The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 students (Freshmen through Seniors) and 27 faculty members of the eight universities in the United States that offer automotive technology baccalaureate degrees. The survey instrument used in this study employed a scale to measure the perceptions of the students and faculty members concerning the importance of selected recruitment items. Overall, the responses between the faculty and the students were similar. Reputation of the automotive program, reputation of the university, campus visits and high school/community college teacher/counselor were four of the top five most effective recruitment items reported by both groups. Students and faculty differed in that students indicated parent/relatives were more important to them in the recruitment process than what the faculty perceived them to be, and the faculty revealed that friends at the university/community college/ high school, alumni of the university, and articulation or direct transfer from a community college were more important recruitment items than did the students.
doi_str_mv 10.21061/jcte.v19i2.613
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2424995038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424995038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1553-76c063f95b52553a48411955d274fed8e0936ccd1e1e4ec22c48f41a05eafd9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9PAjEQxTdGExE9e23ieaF_l90joigJiUbx4Kkp3aksgRbbLoYP4Xe2gImeZibz5jcvL8uuCe5RggvSX-oIvS2pGtorCDvJOkQwlpOS4dN__Xl2EcISY8EJ5Z3s-64xBjxYDQHdQvwCsGisdLuKO6RsjV5jW4ONAT2D17CJjbPIGfQC2rdNXKcVmoFe2OazTYTZQkU0sWbV7ol_x9GhYYyQeGPX-vwdlEfDNrq1i80W0LN3H16tw2V2ZtQqwNVv7WZv4_vZ6DGfPj1MRsNprokQLB8UGhfMVGIuaJoVLzkhlRA1HXADdQm4YoXWNQECHDSlmpeGE4UFKFNXc9bNbo7cjXd731Euky2bXkrKKa8qgVmZVP2jSnsXggcjN75ZK7-TBMtD5nKfuTxkLlPm7AczbXiG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424995038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Belcher, Gregory ; Frisbee, Robert ; Sandford, Brian</creator><creatorcontrib>Belcher, Gregory ; Frisbee, Robert ; Sandford, Brian</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 students (Freshmen through Seniors) and 27 faculty members of the eight universities in the United States that offer automotive technology baccalaureate degrees. The survey instrument used in this study employed a scale to measure the perceptions of the students and faculty members concerning the importance of selected recruitment items. Overall, the responses between the faculty and the students were similar. Reputation of the automotive program, reputation of the university, campus visits and high school/community college teacher/counselor were four of the top five most effective recruitment items reported by both groups. Students and faculty differed in that students indicated parent/relatives were more important to them in the recruitment process than what the faculty perceived them to be, and the faculty revealed that friends at the university/community college/ high school, alumni of the university, and articulation or direct transfer from a community college were more important recruitment items than did the students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1533-1830</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1531-4952</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-1830</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21061/jcte.v19i2.613</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Athens: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Digital Library and Archives</publisher><subject>College faculty ; Community colleges ; Enrollments ; Population ; Recruitment ; Reputations ; Secondary schools ; Student Surveys ; Students ; Technical Education ; Universities</subject><ispartof>Journal of career and technical education, 2003-05, Vol.19 (2)</ispartof><rights>2003. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1553-76c063f95b52553a48411955d274fed8e0936ccd1e1e4ec22c48f41a05eafd9b3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Belcher, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisbee, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandford, Brian</creatorcontrib><title>Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs</title><title>Journal of career and technical education</title><description>The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 students (Freshmen through Seniors) and 27 faculty members of the eight universities in the United States that offer automotive technology baccalaureate degrees. The survey instrument used in this study employed a scale to measure the perceptions of the students and faculty members concerning the importance of selected recruitment items. Overall, the responses between the faculty and the students were similar. Reputation of the automotive program, reputation of the university, campus visits and high school/community college teacher/counselor were four of the top five most effective recruitment items reported by both groups. Students and faculty differed in that students indicated parent/relatives were more important to them in the recruitment process than what the faculty perceived them to be, and the faculty revealed that friends at the university/community college/ high school, alumni of the university, and articulation or direct transfer from a community college were more important recruitment items than did the students.</description><subject>College faculty</subject><subject>Community colleges</subject><subject>Enrollments</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Reputations</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Student Surveys</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Technical Education</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>1533-1830</issn><issn>1531-4952</issn><issn>1533-1830</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE9PAjEQxTdGExE9e23ieaF_l90joigJiUbx4Kkp3aksgRbbLoYP4Xe2gImeZibz5jcvL8uuCe5RggvSX-oIvS2pGtorCDvJOkQwlpOS4dN__Xl2EcISY8EJ5Z3s-64xBjxYDQHdQvwCsGisdLuKO6RsjV5jW4ONAT2D17CJjbPIGfQC2rdNXKcVmoFe2OazTYTZQkU0sWbV7ol_x9GhYYyQeGPX-vwdlEfDNrq1i80W0LN3H16tw2V2ZtQqwNVv7WZv4_vZ6DGfPj1MRsNprokQLB8UGhfMVGIuaJoVLzkhlRA1HXADdQm4YoXWNQECHDSlmpeGE4UFKFNXc9bNbo7cjXd731Euky2bXkrKKa8qgVmZVP2jSnsXggcjN75ZK7-TBMtD5nKfuTxkLlPm7AczbXiG</recordid><startdate>20030501</startdate><enddate>20030501</enddate><creator>Belcher, Gregory</creator><creator>Frisbee, Robert</creator><creator>Sandford, Brian</creator><general>Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Digital Library and Archives</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030501</creationdate><title>Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs</title><author>Belcher, Gregory ; Frisbee, Robert ; Sandford, Brian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1553-76c063f95b52553a48411955d274fed8e0936ccd1e1e4ec22c48f41a05eafd9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>College faculty</topic><topic>Community colleges</topic><topic>Enrollments</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Reputations</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Student Surveys</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Technical Education</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Belcher, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frisbee, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sandford, Brian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of career and technical education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Belcher, Gregory</au><au>Frisbee, Robert</au><au>Sandford, Brian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of career and technical education</jtitle><date>2003-05-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>1533-1830</issn><issn>1531-4952</issn><eissn>1533-1830</eissn><abstract>The purpose of this study was to identify if differences existed between the perceptions of importance of recruitment techniques as reported by students within baccalaureate automotive technology programs and the faculty members who teach in these programs. Participants in the study were 382 students (Freshmen through Seniors) and 27 faculty members of the eight universities in the United States that offer automotive technology baccalaureate degrees. The survey instrument used in this study employed a scale to measure the perceptions of the students and faculty members concerning the importance of selected recruitment items. Overall, the responses between the faculty and the students were similar. Reputation of the automotive program, reputation of the university, campus visits and high school/community college teacher/counselor were four of the top five most effective recruitment items reported by both groups. Students and faculty differed in that students indicated parent/relatives were more important to them in the recruitment process than what the faculty perceived them to be, and the faculty revealed that friends at the university/community college/ high school, alumni of the university, and articulation or direct transfer from a community college were more important recruitment items than did the students.</abstract><cop>Athens</cop><pub>Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Digital Library and Archives</pub><doi>10.21061/jcte.v19i2.613</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1533-1830
ispartof Journal of career and technical education, 2003-05, Vol.19 (2)
issn 1533-1830
1531-4952
1533-1830
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2424995038
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects College faculty
Community colleges
Enrollments
Population
Recruitment
Reputations
Secondary schools
Student Surveys
Students
Technical Education
Universities
title Differences Between Faculty and Students Perception of Recruitment Techniques That Influence Students to Attend Four-Year Automotive Programs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T16%3A32%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20Between%20Faculty%20and%20Students%20Perception%20of%20Recruitment%20Techniques%20That%20Influence%20Students%20to%20Attend%20Four-Year%20Automotive%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20career%20and%20technical%20education&rft.au=Belcher,%20Gregory&rft.date=2003-05-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=1533-1830&rft.eissn=1533-1830&rft_id=info:doi/10.21061/jcte.v19i2.613&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2424995038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424995038&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true