Multiculturalism: A tradition of political thought that liberal nationalists can use
When confronted with a scholar of Tamir's distinction, one is reminded not of Tamir's teacher, Isaiah Berlin, but of a thinker with whom Berlin disagreed. This is Hannah Arendt, as she taught that the vita activa had, for too long, been defined in opposition to the vita contempliva, yet th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nations and nationalism 2020-07, Vol.26 (3), p.531-533 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 533 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 531 |
container_title | Nations and nationalism |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Uberoi, Varun |
description | When confronted with a scholar of Tamir's distinction, one is reminded not of Tamir's teacher, Isaiah Berlin, but of a thinker with whom Berlin disagreed. This is Hannah Arendt, as she taught that the vita activa had, for too long, been defined in opposition to the vita contempliva, yet the two are not opposed. Tamir illustrates this as her first book, Liberal Nationalism, helped to create the contemporary forms of a liberal doctrine that we now call “liberal nationalism,” and she was an Israeli cabinet minister. Her new book, Why Nationalism, reflects her ability to combine theory and practice as she offers a range of moral and prudential insights when showing why contemporary forms of nationalism emerged and how we should react politically to them. I agree with much of the book, but I will discuss three areas of disagreement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/nana.12618 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2424812952</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424812952</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-c72bb2687075c7e609f0ebd908de5e78c33d886a7e6d7c045945544d1bc762623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEEmNw4QkicUPqSNKkSblVEwOkMS7jHKVpyjJ1zUhSob09KeWMD7Ylf79l_wDcYrTAKR561asFJgUWZ2CGaVFmApPyPPU5oxlDXFyCqxD2CCHOMJ2B7dvQRatTGrzqbDg8wgpGrxobreuha-HRdanXqoNx54bPXUxVRdjZ2iQF7NUIjtIYoFY9HIK5Bhet6oK5-atz8LF62i5fsvX78-uyWmc6z7nINCd1TQrB0y2amwKVLTJ1UyLRGGa4SFQjRKHSqOEaUVZSxihtcK15QQqSz8HdtPfo3ddgQpR7N_h0TJCEEjq-zkbqfqK0dyF408qjtwflTxIjObomR9fkr2sJxhP8bTtz-oeUm2pTTZofnHFvUQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424812952</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multiculturalism: A tradition of political thought that liberal nationalists can use</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><creator>Uberoi, Varun</creator><creatorcontrib>Uberoi, Varun</creatorcontrib><description>When confronted with a scholar of Tamir's distinction, one is reminded not of Tamir's teacher, Isaiah Berlin, but of a thinker with whom Berlin disagreed. This is Hannah Arendt, as she taught that the vita activa had, for too long, been defined in opposition to the vita contempliva, yet the two are not opposed. Tamir illustrates this as her first book, Liberal Nationalism, helped to create the contemporary forms of a liberal doctrine that we now call “liberal nationalism,” and she was an Israeli cabinet minister. Her new book, Why Nationalism, reflects her ability to combine theory and practice as she offers a range of moral and prudential insights when showing why contemporary forms of nationalism emerged and how we should react politically to them. I agree with much of the book, but I will discuss three areas of disagreement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1354-5078</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-8129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/nana.12618</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Nationalism ; Political philosophy ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Nations and nationalism, 2020-07, Vol.26 (3), p.531-533</ispartof><rights>2020 The Author. Nations and Nationalism published by Association for the Study of Ethnicity and Nationalism and John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-c72bb2687075c7e609f0ebd908de5e78c33d886a7e6d7c045945544d1bc762623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-c72bb2687075c7e609f0ebd908de5e78c33d886a7e6d7c045945544d1bc762623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fnana.12618$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fnana.12618$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27903,27904,33753,45553,45554</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Uberoi, Varun</creatorcontrib><title>Multiculturalism: A tradition of political thought that liberal nationalists can use</title><title>Nations and nationalism</title><description>When confronted with a scholar of Tamir's distinction, one is reminded not of Tamir's teacher, Isaiah Berlin, but of a thinker with whom Berlin disagreed. This is Hannah Arendt, as she taught that the vita activa had, for too long, been defined in opposition to the vita contempliva, yet the two are not opposed. Tamir illustrates this as her first book, Liberal Nationalism, helped to create the contemporary forms of a liberal doctrine that we now call “liberal nationalism,” and she was an Israeli cabinet minister. Her new book, Why Nationalism, reflects her ability to combine theory and practice as she offers a range of moral and prudential insights when showing why contemporary forms of nationalism emerged and how we should react politically to them. I agree with much of the book, but I will discuss three areas of disagreement.</description><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Nationalism</subject><subject>Political philosophy</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>1354-5078</issn><issn>1469-8129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFOwzAMhiMEEmNw4QkicUPqSNKkSblVEwOkMS7jHKVpyjJ1zUhSob09KeWMD7Ylf79l_wDcYrTAKR561asFJgUWZ2CGaVFmApPyPPU5oxlDXFyCqxD2CCHOMJ2B7dvQRatTGrzqbDg8wgpGrxobreuha-HRdanXqoNx54bPXUxVRdjZ2iQF7NUIjtIYoFY9HIK5Bhet6oK5-atz8LF62i5fsvX78-uyWmc6z7nINCd1TQrB0y2amwKVLTJ1UyLRGGa4SFQjRKHSqOEaUVZSxihtcK15QQqSz8HdtPfo3ddgQpR7N_h0TJCEEjq-zkbqfqK0dyF408qjtwflTxIjObomR9fkr2sJxhP8bTtz-oeUm2pTTZofnHFvUQ</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Uberoi, Varun</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Multiculturalism: A tradition of political thought that liberal nationalists can use</title><author>Uberoi, Varun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3378-c72bb2687075c7e609f0ebd908de5e78c33d886a7e6d7c045945544d1bc762623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Nationalism</topic><topic>Political philosophy</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Uberoi, Varun</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Nations and nationalism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Uberoi, Varun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multiculturalism: A tradition of political thought that liberal nationalists can use</atitle><jtitle>Nations and nationalism</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>531</spage><epage>533</epage><pages>531-533</pages><issn>1354-5078</issn><eissn>1469-8129</eissn><abstract>When confronted with a scholar of Tamir's distinction, one is reminded not of Tamir's teacher, Isaiah Berlin, but of a thinker with whom Berlin disagreed. This is Hannah Arendt, as she taught that the vita activa had, for too long, been defined in opposition to the vita contempliva, yet the two are not opposed. Tamir illustrates this as her first book, Liberal Nationalism, helped to create the contemporary forms of a liberal doctrine that we now call “liberal nationalism,” and she was an Israeli cabinet minister. Her new book, Why Nationalism, reflects her ability to combine theory and practice as she offers a range of moral and prudential insights when showing why contemporary forms of nationalism emerged and how we should react politically to them. I agree with much of the book, but I will discuss three areas of disagreement.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/nana.12618</doi><tpages>3</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1354-5078 |
ispartof | Nations and nationalism, 2020-07, Vol.26 (3), p.531-533 |
issn | 1354-5078 1469-8129 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2424812952 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete |
subjects | Multiculturalism & pluralism Nationalism Political philosophy Teachers |
title | Multiculturalism: A tradition of political thought that liberal nationalists can use |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A50%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multiculturalism:%20A%20tradition%20of%20political%20thought%20that%20liberal%20nationalists%20can%20use&rft.jtitle=Nations%20and%20nationalism&rft.au=Uberoi,%20Varun&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=531&rft.epage=533&rft.pages=531-533&rft.issn=1354-5078&rft.eissn=1469-8129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/nana.12618&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2424812952%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424812952&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |