Prescribed burning benefits threatened mammals in northern Australia
Despite substantial investment in prescribed burning for biodiversity conservation there has been surprisingly little demonstration of its efficacy in achieving intended conservation aims for fauna. In the case of northern Australia’s threatened mammal fauna, most studies have reported negative resp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2020-08, Vol.29 (9-10), p.2985-3007 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3007 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9-10 |
container_start_page | 2985 |
container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Radford, Ian J. Woolley, Leigh-Ann Corey, Ben Vigilante, Tom Hatherley, Ed Fairman, Richard Carnes, Karin Start, Antony N. |
description | Despite substantial investment in prescribed burning for biodiversity conservation there has been surprisingly little demonstration of its efficacy in achieving intended conservation aims for fauna. In the case of northern Australia’s threatened mammal fauna, most studies have reported negative responses to fire. We used satellite-derived fire scar imagery and small mammal survey data to compare fire regimes and threatened mammal abundance before and after implementation of broad-scale prescribed burning in north-western Australia. Specifically, we tested: (1) whether prescribed burning was effective in changing fire regimes; (2) whether all mammal species and functional groups responded to prescribed burning; and (3) what regional fire and environmental variables explained changes in mammal status. Low-intensity, patchy prescribed burning in the early dry season reduced the extent of high intensity late dry season wildfires. In sandstone habitats the abundance of all mammals, and the large marsupials and specialist rodent functional groups, increased concurrently with early dry season prescribed burning. All mammals and the small dasyurid functional group in woodland habitats also increased during this period. Early dry season prescribed burning extent was the strongest explanatory variable for mammal increases. Early dry season burning was also the strongest explanatory variable for woodland mammal abundance, but these mammals also had a positive association with extent of large patches of old growth vegetation (> 4 years since fire). Generalist rodents did not respond to prescribed burning and two other species declined following prescribed burning in one habitat. Generalist rodents and the two declining species had a negative association with extent of late dry season fire and a positive association with old growth vegetation (interacting with patch size). These results suggest an increased application of patchy early dry season prescribed burning of up to ca. 30% of the area will benefit positive fire responder species of threatened mammals including large specialist rock/arboreal rodents and most marsupial species. For mammals such as generalist terrestrial rodents with predominantly negative associations with fire, managers should seek to increase the size and extent of old growth vegetation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10531-020-02010-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2424690690</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A727335387</galeid><sourcerecordid>A727335387</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-96448355c5cd64ecec522760333eb4adf0a714f7bd90a82aff93bbf75d10da343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPAyEUhYnRxFr9A64mcT318hrKsqlaTZroQteE4dHSdJgK04X_XuqYuDNAyIXzcQ8HoVsMMwwg7jMGTnENBE4LQy3P0ARzQWopMJyjCcgGaooxv0RXOe-gQLzBE_Twllw2KbTOVu0xxRA3Veui82HI1bBNTg-lslWnu07vcxViFfs0bF2K1eKYh6T3QV-jC18u3c3vPkUfT4_vy-d6_bp6WS7WtWEghlo2jM0p54Yb2zBnnOGEiAYopa5l2nrQAjMvWitBz4n2XtK29YJbDFZTRqfobnz3kPrPo8uD2vXFc2mpCCOskVBmUc1G1UbvnQrR98WlKcO6Lpj-9LdyvhBEUMrpXBSAjIBJfc7JeXVIodPpS2FQp3jVGK8q0aqfeJUsEB2hXMRx49Kfl3-ob47HfO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424690690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prescribed burning benefits threatened mammals in northern Australia</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Radford, Ian J. ; Woolley, Leigh-Ann ; Corey, Ben ; Vigilante, Tom ; Hatherley, Ed ; Fairman, Richard ; Carnes, Karin ; Start, Antony N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Radford, Ian J. ; Woolley, Leigh-Ann ; Corey, Ben ; Vigilante, Tom ; Hatherley, Ed ; Fairman, Richard ; Carnes, Karin ; Start, Antony N. ; Wunambal Gaambera Aboriginal Corporation</creatorcontrib><description>Despite substantial investment in prescribed burning for biodiversity conservation there has been surprisingly little demonstration of its efficacy in achieving intended conservation aims for fauna. In the case of northern Australia’s threatened mammal fauna, most studies have reported negative responses to fire. We used satellite-derived fire scar imagery and small mammal survey data to compare fire regimes and threatened mammal abundance before and after implementation of broad-scale prescribed burning in north-western Australia. Specifically, we tested: (1) whether prescribed burning was effective in changing fire regimes; (2) whether all mammal species and functional groups responded to prescribed burning; and (3) what regional fire and environmental variables explained changes in mammal status. Low-intensity, patchy prescribed burning in the early dry season reduced the extent of high intensity late dry season wildfires. In sandstone habitats the abundance of all mammals, and the large marsupials and specialist rodent functional groups, increased concurrently with early dry season prescribed burning. All mammals and the small dasyurid functional group in woodland habitats also increased during this period. Early dry season prescribed burning extent was the strongest explanatory variable for mammal increases. Early dry season burning was also the strongest explanatory variable for woodland mammal abundance, but these mammals also had a positive association with extent of large patches of old growth vegetation (> 4 years since fire). Generalist rodents did not respond to prescribed burning and two other species declined following prescribed burning in one habitat. Generalist rodents and the two declining species had a negative association with extent of late dry season fire and a positive association with old growth vegetation (interacting with patch size). These results suggest an increased application of patchy early dry season prescribed burning of up to ca. 30% of the area will benefit positive fire responder species of threatened mammals including large specialist rock/arboreal rodents and most marsupial species. For mammals such as generalist terrestrial rodents with predominantly negative associations with fire, managers should seek to increase the size and extent of old growth vegetation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-020-02010-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Abundance ; Biodiversity ; Biological diversity conservation ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Burning ; Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts ; Conservation ; Conservation Biology/Ecology ; Controlled burning ; Dry season ; Ecology ; Fauna ; Fires ; Functional groups ; Habitats ; Imagery ; Life Sciences ; Mammals ; Old growth ; Original Paper ; Population decline ; Prescribed burning ; Prescribed fire ; Rodents ; Sandstone ; Satellite imagery ; Seasons ; Sedimentary rocks ; Small mammals ; Surveying ; Surveys ; Threatened species ; Vegetation ; Wildfires ; Wildlife conservation ; Woodlands</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2020-08, Vol.29 (9-10), p.2985-3007</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-96448355c5cd64ecec522760333eb4adf0a714f7bd90a82aff93bbf75d10da343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-96448355c5cd64ecec522760333eb4adf0a714f7bd90a82aff93bbf75d10da343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9388-7100</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10531-020-02010-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10531-020-02010-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,41475,42544,51306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Radford, Ian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolley, Leigh-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corey, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigilante, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatherley, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairman, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnes, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Start, Antony N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunambal Gaambera Aboriginal Corporation</creatorcontrib><title>Prescribed burning benefits threatened mammals in northern Australia</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><addtitle>Biodivers Conserv</addtitle><description>Despite substantial investment in prescribed burning for biodiversity conservation there has been surprisingly little demonstration of its efficacy in achieving intended conservation aims for fauna. In the case of northern Australia’s threatened mammal fauna, most studies have reported negative responses to fire. We used satellite-derived fire scar imagery and small mammal survey data to compare fire regimes and threatened mammal abundance before and after implementation of broad-scale prescribed burning in north-western Australia. Specifically, we tested: (1) whether prescribed burning was effective in changing fire regimes; (2) whether all mammal species and functional groups responded to prescribed burning; and (3) what regional fire and environmental variables explained changes in mammal status. Low-intensity, patchy prescribed burning in the early dry season reduced the extent of high intensity late dry season wildfires. In sandstone habitats the abundance of all mammals, and the large marsupials and specialist rodent functional groups, increased concurrently with early dry season prescribed burning. All mammals and the small dasyurid functional group in woodland habitats also increased during this period. Early dry season prescribed burning extent was the strongest explanatory variable for mammal increases. Early dry season burning was also the strongest explanatory variable for woodland mammal abundance, but these mammals also had a positive association with extent of large patches of old growth vegetation (> 4 years since fire). Generalist rodents did not respond to prescribed burning and two other species declined following prescribed burning in one habitat. Generalist rodents and the two declining species had a negative association with extent of late dry season fire and a positive association with old growth vegetation (interacting with patch size). These results suggest an increased application of patchy early dry season prescribed burning of up to ca. 30% of the area will benefit positive fire responder species of threatened mammals including large specialist rock/arboreal rodents and most marsupial species. For mammals such as generalist terrestrial rodents with predominantly negative associations with fire, managers should seek to increase the size and extent of old growth vegetation.</description><subject>Abundance</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological diversity conservation</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Burning</subject><subject>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Conservation Biology/Ecology</subject><subject>Controlled burning</subject><subject>Dry season</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fauna</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Functional groups</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Mammals</subject><subject>Old growth</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Prescribed burning</subject><subject>Prescribed fire</subject><subject>Rodents</subject><subject>Sandstone</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><subject>Sedimentary rocks</subject><subject>Small mammals</subject><subject>Surveying</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Wildfires</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><subject>Woodlands</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtPAyEUhYnRxFr9A64mcT318hrKsqlaTZroQteE4dHSdJgK04X_XuqYuDNAyIXzcQ8HoVsMMwwg7jMGTnENBE4LQy3P0ARzQWopMJyjCcgGaooxv0RXOe-gQLzBE_Twllw2KbTOVu0xxRA3Veui82HI1bBNTg-lslWnu07vcxViFfs0bF2K1eKYh6T3QV-jC18u3c3vPkUfT4_vy-d6_bp6WS7WtWEghlo2jM0p54Yb2zBnnOGEiAYopa5l2nrQAjMvWitBz4n2XtK29YJbDFZTRqfobnz3kPrPo8uD2vXFc2mpCCOskVBmUc1G1UbvnQrR98WlKcO6Lpj-9LdyvhBEUMrpXBSAjIBJfc7JeXVIodPpS2FQp3jVGK8q0aqfeJUsEB2hXMRx49Kfl3-ob47HfO0</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Radford, Ian J.</creator><creator>Woolley, Leigh-Ann</creator><creator>Corey, Ben</creator><creator>Vigilante, Tom</creator><creator>Hatherley, Ed</creator><creator>Fairman, Richard</creator><creator>Carnes, Karin</creator><creator>Start, Antony N.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-7100</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Prescribed burning benefits threatened mammals in northern Australia</title><author>Radford, Ian J. ; Woolley, Leigh-Ann ; Corey, Ben ; Vigilante, Tom ; Hatherley, Ed ; Fairman, Richard ; Carnes, Karin ; Start, Antony N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c407t-96448355c5cd64ecec522760333eb4adf0a714f7bd90a82aff93bbf75d10da343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abundance</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological diversity conservation</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Burning</topic><topic>Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Conservation Biology/Ecology</topic><topic>Controlled burning</topic><topic>Dry season</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fauna</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Functional groups</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Mammals</topic><topic>Old growth</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Prescribed burning</topic><topic>Prescribed fire</topic><topic>Rodents</topic><topic>Sandstone</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><topic>Sedimentary rocks</topic><topic>Small mammals</topic><topic>Surveying</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Wildfires</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><topic>Woodlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Radford, Ian J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woolley, Leigh-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corey, Ben</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vigilante, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hatherley, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairman, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carnes, Karin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Start, Antony N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wunambal Gaambera Aboriginal Corporation</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Radford, Ian J.</au><au>Woolley, Leigh-Ann</au><au>Corey, Ben</au><au>Vigilante, Tom</au><au>Hatherley, Ed</au><au>Fairman, Richard</au><au>Carnes, Karin</au><au>Start, Antony N.</au><aucorp>Wunambal Gaambera Aboriginal Corporation</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prescribed burning benefits threatened mammals in northern Australia</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><stitle>Biodivers Conserv</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9-10</issue><spage>2985</spage><epage>3007</epage><pages>2985-3007</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>Despite substantial investment in prescribed burning for biodiversity conservation there has been surprisingly little demonstration of its efficacy in achieving intended conservation aims for fauna. In the case of northern Australia’s threatened mammal fauna, most studies have reported negative responses to fire. We used satellite-derived fire scar imagery and small mammal survey data to compare fire regimes and threatened mammal abundance before and after implementation of broad-scale prescribed burning in north-western Australia. Specifically, we tested: (1) whether prescribed burning was effective in changing fire regimes; (2) whether all mammal species and functional groups responded to prescribed burning; and (3) what regional fire and environmental variables explained changes in mammal status. Low-intensity, patchy prescribed burning in the early dry season reduced the extent of high intensity late dry season wildfires. In sandstone habitats the abundance of all mammals, and the large marsupials and specialist rodent functional groups, increased concurrently with early dry season prescribed burning. All mammals and the small dasyurid functional group in woodland habitats also increased during this period. Early dry season prescribed burning extent was the strongest explanatory variable for mammal increases. Early dry season burning was also the strongest explanatory variable for woodland mammal abundance, but these mammals also had a positive association with extent of large patches of old growth vegetation (> 4 years since fire). Generalist rodents did not respond to prescribed burning and two other species declined following prescribed burning in one habitat. Generalist rodents and the two declining species had a negative association with extent of late dry season fire and a positive association with old growth vegetation (interacting with patch size). These results suggest an increased application of patchy early dry season prescribed burning of up to ca. 30% of the area will benefit positive fire responder species of threatened mammals including large specialist rock/arboreal rodents and most marsupial species. For mammals such as generalist terrestrial rodents with predominantly negative associations with fire, managers should seek to increase the size and extent of old growth vegetation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-020-02010-9</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9388-7100</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2020-08, Vol.29 (9-10), p.2985-3007 |
issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2424690690 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abundance Biodiversity Biological diversity conservation Biomedical and Life Sciences Burning Climate Change/Climate Change Impacts Conservation Conservation Biology/Ecology Controlled burning Dry season Ecology Fauna Fires Functional groups Habitats Imagery Life Sciences Mammals Old growth Original Paper Population decline Prescribed burning Prescribed fire Rodents Sandstone Satellite imagery Seasons Sedimentary rocks Small mammals Surveying Surveys Threatened species Vegetation Wildfires Wildlife conservation Woodlands |
title | Prescribed burning benefits threatened mammals in northern Australia |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T04%3A46%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prescribed%20burning%20benefits%20threatened%20mammals%20in%20northern%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Radford,%20Ian%20J.&rft.aucorp=Wunambal%20Gaambera%20Aboriginal%20Corporation&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9-10&rft.spage=2985&rft.epage=3007&rft.pages=2985-3007&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-020-02010-9&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA727335387%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424690690&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A727335387&rfr_iscdi=true |