How doctors take initiatives in online healthcare communities

PurposeIn China, healthcare services have historically been expensive and difficult to access, with resources being unfairly distributed, often being centralized in large hospitals in major cities. In rural regions, hospitals often suffer from limited supplies, including human capital and equipment....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial management + data systems 2020-07, Vol.120 (7), p.1401-1420
Hauptverfasser: Li, Jiaying, Deng, Zhaohua, Evans, Richard David, Liu, Shan, Wu, Hong
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1420
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1401
container_title Industrial management + data systems
container_volume 120
creator Li, Jiaying
Deng, Zhaohua
Evans, Richard David
Liu, Shan
Wu, Hong
description PurposeIn China, healthcare services have historically been expensive and difficult to access, with resources being unfairly distributed, often being centralized in large hospitals in major cities. In rural regions, hospitals often suffer from limited supplies, including human capital and equipment. E-health technologies have received significant attention from governments and citizens, with online healthcare communities (OHCs) providing easier communication between patients and doctors. Although doctors play a pivotal role in the success of OHCs, they are often unsure how to attract patients, with limited research focusing on this. The purpose of this paper is to explore how doctors can take initiatives in OHCs, from the joint perspectives of individual effort (i.e. intrapersonal factor) and identity in medical teams (MTs) (i.e. interpersonal factor), based on attribution theory.Design/methodology/approachHierarchical linear regression was conducted on data from 3,170 doctors participating in 865 online MTs, to examine the effects of individual effort and identity in MTs on individual performance. Individual effort included central effort (log-in frequency to OHC) and peripheral effort (articles published on doctors' homepages). Identity in MTs was represented as the identity of team leader and multiple team membership (MTM).FindingsThis study found that the main variables – central and peripheral effort, and leader and MTM identity – all had significant and positive impacts on the service quantity (SQ) of both written and telephone consultations. Although positive effects could be experienced in most conditions that were congruent with the logic of identity theory, the interaction terms demonstrated complex influences. Specifically, leader identity did not moderate the effect of article effort in written consultation, while MTM identity could not moderate the relationship between frequency effort and SQ in telephone-consultation services. Further, the leader identity negatively moderated the relationship between article effort and SQ in telephone consultations. Thus, for doctors with the leader identity, the impact of article effort on SQ was weaker. In summary, both aspects were proved to play important roles in individual SQ.Practical implicationsThis study provides empirical findings through focusing on the SQ of both written and telephone consultations in OHCs, thereby enabling healthcare providers to take initiatives and ultimately improve the effic
doi_str_mv 10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0684
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2424681270</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424681270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-827459bfa7c929cabed484e9f7695bd1cf0b36c8ee98c65caeb8172eb9b81c123</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Fz9EkzefBg6wfK6x4UM8hTads17ZZk6ziv7dlvQie3mF43hl4EDqn5JJSoq8en25fMGWYEWowkZofoBlVQmOhdHmIZoTJEguh1DE6SWlDyLhgcoaul-GrqIPPIaYiu3co2qHNrcvtJ6RxLsLQtQMUa3BdXnsXofCh73cTBOkUHTWuS3D2m3P0dn_3ulji1fPD4-JmhX1JecaaKS5M1TjlDTPeVVBzzcE0ShpR1dQ3pCql1wBGeym8g0pTxaAyY3rKyjm62N_dxvCxg5TtJuziML60jDMuNWWKjBTdUz6GlCI0dhvb3sVvS4mdLNnJkqXMTpbsZGnskH0Heoiuq_-t_BFb_gCfC2lt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424681270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How doctors take initiatives in online healthcare communities</title><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Li, Jiaying ; Deng, Zhaohua ; Evans, Richard David ; Liu, Shan ; Wu, Hong</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiaying ; Deng, Zhaohua ; Evans, Richard David ; Liu, Shan ; Wu, Hong</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeIn China, healthcare services have historically been expensive and difficult to access, with resources being unfairly distributed, often being centralized in large hospitals in major cities. In rural regions, hospitals often suffer from limited supplies, including human capital and equipment. E-health technologies have received significant attention from governments and citizens, with online healthcare communities (OHCs) providing easier communication between patients and doctors. Although doctors play a pivotal role in the success of OHCs, they are often unsure how to attract patients, with limited research focusing on this. The purpose of this paper is to explore how doctors can take initiatives in OHCs, from the joint perspectives of individual effort (i.e. intrapersonal factor) and identity in medical teams (MTs) (i.e. interpersonal factor), based on attribution theory.Design/methodology/approachHierarchical linear regression was conducted on data from 3,170 doctors participating in 865 online MTs, to examine the effects of individual effort and identity in MTs on individual performance. Individual effort included central effort (log-in frequency to OHC) and peripheral effort (articles published on doctors' homepages). Identity in MTs was represented as the identity of team leader and multiple team membership (MTM).FindingsThis study found that the main variables – central and peripheral effort, and leader and MTM identity – all had significant and positive impacts on the service quantity (SQ) of both written and telephone consultations. Although positive effects could be experienced in most conditions that were congruent with the logic of identity theory, the interaction terms demonstrated complex influences. Specifically, leader identity did not moderate the effect of article effort in written consultation, while MTM identity could not moderate the relationship between frequency effort and SQ in telephone-consultation services. Further, the leader identity negatively moderated the relationship between article effort and SQ in telephone consultations. Thus, for doctors with the leader identity, the impact of article effort on SQ was weaker. In summary, both aspects were proved to play important roles in individual SQ.Practical implicationsThis study provides empirical findings through focusing on the SQ of both written and telephone consultations in OHCs, thereby enabling healthcare providers to take initiatives and ultimately improve the efficiency and provision of delivered healthcare services. It is worth mentioning that doctors possessing the identity of team leader should be cautious that the more articles published by them may not lead to envisaged telephone-consultation performance, according to the negative moderating effect of leader identity on the relationship between article effort and SQ during telephone consultations.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the OHC literature by investigating how doctors' efforts and identity in OHCs affect individual performance, based on attribution theory and identity theory. Further, we provide healthcare practitioners with an improved understanding of these dimensions to improve autonomy regarding service provision in OHCs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0263-5577</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-5783</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0684</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wembley: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Attribution theory ; COVID-19 ; Decision making ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Initiatives ; Patients ; Physicians ; Quality of service ; Studies ; Teams ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Industrial management + data systems, 2020-07, Vol.120 (7), p.1401-1420</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-827459bfa7c929cabed484e9f7695bd1cf0b36c8ee98c65caeb8172eb9b81c123</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-827459bfa7c929cabed484e9f7695bd1cf0b36c8ee98c65caeb8172eb9b81c123</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6367-0560</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0684/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,967,11635,27924,27925,52689</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiaying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Zhaohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Richard David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hong</creatorcontrib><title>How doctors take initiatives in online healthcare communities</title><title>Industrial management + data systems</title><description>PurposeIn China, healthcare services have historically been expensive and difficult to access, with resources being unfairly distributed, often being centralized in large hospitals in major cities. In rural regions, hospitals often suffer from limited supplies, including human capital and equipment. E-health technologies have received significant attention from governments and citizens, with online healthcare communities (OHCs) providing easier communication between patients and doctors. Although doctors play a pivotal role in the success of OHCs, they are often unsure how to attract patients, with limited research focusing on this. The purpose of this paper is to explore how doctors can take initiatives in OHCs, from the joint perspectives of individual effort (i.e. intrapersonal factor) and identity in medical teams (MTs) (i.e. interpersonal factor), based on attribution theory.Design/methodology/approachHierarchical linear regression was conducted on data from 3,170 doctors participating in 865 online MTs, to examine the effects of individual effort and identity in MTs on individual performance. Individual effort included central effort (log-in frequency to OHC) and peripheral effort (articles published on doctors' homepages). Identity in MTs was represented as the identity of team leader and multiple team membership (MTM).FindingsThis study found that the main variables – central and peripheral effort, and leader and MTM identity – all had significant and positive impacts on the service quantity (SQ) of both written and telephone consultations. Although positive effects could be experienced in most conditions that were congruent with the logic of identity theory, the interaction terms demonstrated complex influences. Specifically, leader identity did not moderate the effect of article effort in written consultation, while MTM identity could not moderate the relationship between frequency effort and SQ in telephone-consultation services. Further, the leader identity negatively moderated the relationship between article effort and SQ in telephone consultations. Thus, for doctors with the leader identity, the impact of article effort on SQ was weaker. In summary, both aspects were proved to play important roles in individual SQ.Practical implicationsThis study provides empirical findings through focusing on the SQ of both written and telephone consultations in OHCs, thereby enabling healthcare providers to take initiatives and ultimately improve the efficiency and provision of delivered healthcare services. It is worth mentioning that doctors possessing the identity of team leader should be cautious that the more articles published by them may not lead to envisaged telephone-consultation performance, according to the negative moderating effect of leader identity on the relationship between article effort and SQ during telephone consultations.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the OHC literature by investigating how doctors' efforts and identity in OHCs affect individual performance, based on attribution theory and identity theory. Further, we provide healthcare practitioners with an improved understanding of these dimensions to improve autonomy regarding service provision in OHCs.</description><subject>Attribution theory</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Initiatives</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Quality of service</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>0263-5577</issn><issn>1758-5783</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Fz9EkzefBg6wfK6x4UM8hTads17ZZk6ziv7dlvQie3mF43hl4EDqn5JJSoq8en25fMGWYEWowkZofoBlVQmOhdHmIZoTJEguh1DE6SWlDyLhgcoaul-GrqIPPIaYiu3co2qHNrcvtJ6RxLsLQtQMUa3BdXnsXofCh73cTBOkUHTWuS3D2m3P0dn_3ulji1fPD4-JmhX1JecaaKS5M1TjlDTPeVVBzzcE0ShpR1dQ3pCql1wBGeym8g0pTxaAyY3rKyjm62N_dxvCxg5TtJuziML60jDMuNWWKjBTdUz6GlCI0dhvb3sVvS4mdLNnJkqXMTpbsZGnskH0Heoiuq_-t_BFb_gCfC2lt</recordid><startdate>20200718</startdate><enddate>20200718</enddate><creator>Li, Jiaying</creator><creator>Deng, Zhaohua</creator><creator>Evans, Richard David</creator><creator>Liu, Shan</creator><creator>Wu, Hong</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-0560</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200718</creationdate><title>How doctors take initiatives in online healthcare communities</title><author>Li, Jiaying ; Deng, Zhaohua ; Evans, Richard David ; Liu, Shan ; Wu, Hong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-827459bfa7c929cabed484e9f7695bd1cf0b36c8ee98c65caeb8172eb9b81c123</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Attribution theory</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Initiatives</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Quality of service</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Jiaying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deng, Zhaohua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Richard David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Shan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Hong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Industrial management + data systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Jiaying</au><au>Deng, Zhaohua</au><au>Evans, Richard David</au><au>Liu, Shan</au><au>Wu, Hong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How doctors take initiatives in online healthcare communities</atitle><jtitle>Industrial management + data systems</jtitle><date>2020-07-18</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1401</spage><epage>1420</epage><pages>1401-1420</pages><issn>0263-5577</issn><eissn>1758-5783</eissn><abstract>PurposeIn China, healthcare services have historically been expensive and difficult to access, with resources being unfairly distributed, often being centralized in large hospitals in major cities. In rural regions, hospitals often suffer from limited supplies, including human capital and equipment. E-health technologies have received significant attention from governments and citizens, with online healthcare communities (OHCs) providing easier communication between patients and doctors. Although doctors play a pivotal role in the success of OHCs, they are often unsure how to attract patients, with limited research focusing on this. The purpose of this paper is to explore how doctors can take initiatives in OHCs, from the joint perspectives of individual effort (i.e. intrapersonal factor) and identity in medical teams (MTs) (i.e. interpersonal factor), based on attribution theory.Design/methodology/approachHierarchical linear regression was conducted on data from 3,170 doctors participating in 865 online MTs, to examine the effects of individual effort and identity in MTs on individual performance. Individual effort included central effort (log-in frequency to OHC) and peripheral effort (articles published on doctors' homepages). Identity in MTs was represented as the identity of team leader and multiple team membership (MTM).FindingsThis study found that the main variables – central and peripheral effort, and leader and MTM identity – all had significant and positive impacts on the service quantity (SQ) of both written and telephone consultations. Although positive effects could be experienced in most conditions that were congruent with the logic of identity theory, the interaction terms demonstrated complex influences. Specifically, leader identity did not moderate the effect of article effort in written consultation, while MTM identity could not moderate the relationship between frequency effort and SQ in telephone-consultation services. Further, the leader identity negatively moderated the relationship between article effort and SQ in telephone consultations. Thus, for doctors with the leader identity, the impact of article effort on SQ was weaker. In summary, both aspects were proved to play important roles in individual SQ.Practical implicationsThis study provides empirical findings through focusing on the SQ of both written and telephone consultations in OHCs, thereby enabling healthcare providers to take initiatives and ultimately improve the efficiency and provision of delivered healthcare services. It is worth mentioning that doctors possessing the identity of team leader should be cautious that the more articles published by them may not lead to envisaged telephone-consultation performance, according to the negative moderating effect of leader identity on the relationship between article effort and SQ during telephone consultations.Originality/valueThis study contributes to the OHC literature by investigating how doctors' efforts and identity in OHCs affect individual performance, based on attribution theory and identity theory. Further, we provide healthcare practitioners with an improved understanding of these dimensions to improve autonomy regarding service provision in OHCs.</abstract><cop>Wembley</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0684</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-0560</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0263-5577
ispartof Industrial management + data systems, 2020-07, Vol.120 (7), p.1401-1420
issn 0263-5577
1758-5783
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2424681270
source Emerald A-Z Current Journals
subjects Attribution theory
COVID-19
Decision making
Health care
Hospitals
Initiatives
Patients
Physicians
Quality of service
Studies
Teams
Theory
title How doctors take initiatives in online healthcare communities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T20%3A41%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20doctors%20take%20initiatives%20in%20online%20healthcare%20communities&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20management%20+%20data%20systems&rft.au=Li,%20Jiaying&rft.date=2020-07-18&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1401&rft.epage=1420&rft.pages=1401-1420&rft.issn=0263-5577&rft.eissn=1758-5783&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0684&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2424681270%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424681270&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true