Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium
This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act ( 2013 ) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi colle...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of family violence 2020-08, Vol.35 (6), p.541-550 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 550 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 541 |
container_title | Journal of family violence |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Clear, Emily R. Coker, Ann L. Bush, Heather M. Brancato, Candace J. Davidov, Danielle |
description | This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (
2013
) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi college bystander efficacy evaluation (mcBEE)]. Through this consortium 24 public colleges were recruited and their choices regarding bystander programming options were queried. Concurrently, rates of violence perpetration and victimization were measured over 4 years among undergraduate students at each college. Description and details of experiences in recruiting colleges into a college consortium, addressing regulatory compliance, approaches to selecting and launching college-wide surveys to undergraduate students across several large campuses, and strategies to communicate findings and data back to each recruited campus are presented. Suggestions for future consortium building include budgeting sufficient time to recruit colleges, manage regulatory processes, and ensure adequate response rates through short surveys and enticing incentives. In building a national consortium, lessons such as flexibility, networking, and communication contributed to mcBEE’s success. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2424570831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A629830667</galeid><sourcerecordid>A629830667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-51cab71011864d6aedf6a068fb4814047cf9a4a7ebfa3e2b1d7fe6043fa444573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuCV15knrRpkl6O4cegIPhxHbL2pHR06Uxa0H9v5gQZDMnFgfA85xzOS8g1gxkDkHeBgSoEBVZQAAY5VSdkwnKZ0VTl7JRMQKmcSq7Sc3IRwhoACsXlhECJIfQuJCUa77BOWpcsPJqhdU1ikkXfddhgrC70fmjHzSU5s6YLePVbp-T94f5t8UTL58flYl7SiudqoDmrzEoyYEwJXguDtRUGhLIrrhgHLitbGG4krqzJMF2xWloUwDNrOOdx8Sm52ffd-v5jxDDodT96F0fqlKeRAJWxP6oxHerW2X7wptq0odJzkRYqAyF2vegRqkGH3nS9Q9vG7wN-doSPr8ZNWx0Vbg-EyAz4OTRmDEEvX18O2XTPVr4PwaPVW99ujP_SDPQuTL0PU8cw9U-YWkUp20shwq5B_3eNf6xv3sadiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424570831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Clear, Emily R. ; Coker, Ann L. ; Bush, Heather M. ; Brancato, Candace J. ; Davidov, Danielle</creator><creatorcontrib>Clear, Emily R. ; Coker, Ann L. ; Bush, Heather M. ; Brancato, Candace J. ; Davidov, Danielle</creatorcontrib><description>This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (
2013
) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi college bystander efficacy evaluation (mcBEE)]. Through this consortium 24 public colleges were recruited and their choices regarding bystander programming options were queried. Concurrently, rates of violence perpetration and victimization were measured over 4 years among undergraduate students at each college. Description and details of experiences in recruiting colleges into a college consortium, addressing regulatory compliance, approaches to selecting and launching college-wide surveys to undergraduate students across several large campuses, and strategies to communicate findings and data back to each recruited campus are presented. Suggestions for future consortium building include budgeting sufficient time to recruit colleges, manage regulatory processes, and ensure adequate response rates through short surveys and enticing incentives. In building a national consortium, lessons such as flexibility, networking, and communication contributed to mcBEE’s success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-7482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abused women ; Budgets ; Bystanders ; Clinical Psychology ; College sports ; College students ; Colleges & universities ; Communication ; Consortia ; Crimes against ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Efficacy ; Flexibility ; Gender-based violence ; Incentives ; Law and Psychology ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Networking ; Original Article ; Polls & surveys ; Psychotherapy and Counseling ; Quality of Life Research ; Recruitment ; Regulatory compliance ; Sex crimes ; Sexual violence ; Training ; Undergraduate students ; Victimization ; Violence ; Violence against women</subject><ispartof>Journal of family violence, 2020-08, Vol.35 (6), p.541-550</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-51cab71011864d6aedf6a068fb4814047cf9a4a7ebfa3e2b1d7fe6043fa444573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-51cab71011864d6aedf6a068fb4814047cf9a4a7ebfa3e2b1d7fe6043fa444573</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8352-5379</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27343,27923,27924,30998,33773,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clear, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coker, Ann L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush, Heather M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancato, Candace J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidov, Danielle</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium</title><title>Journal of family violence</title><addtitle>J Fam Viol</addtitle><description>This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (
2013
) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi college bystander efficacy evaluation (mcBEE)]. Through this consortium 24 public colleges were recruited and their choices regarding bystander programming options were queried. Concurrently, rates of violence perpetration and victimization were measured over 4 years among undergraduate students at each college. Description and details of experiences in recruiting colleges into a college consortium, addressing regulatory compliance, approaches to selecting and launching college-wide surveys to undergraduate students across several large campuses, and strategies to communicate findings and data back to each recruited campus are presented. Suggestions for future consortium building include budgeting sufficient time to recruit colleges, manage regulatory processes, and ensure adequate response rates through short surveys and enticing incentives. In building a national consortium, lessons such as flexibility, networking, and communication contributed to mcBEE’s success.</description><subject>Abused women</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Bystanders</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>College sports</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Crimes against</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Gender-based violence</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Law and Psychology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Networking</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Psychotherapy and Counseling</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Regulatory compliance</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual violence</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Undergraduate students</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence against women</subject><issn>0885-7482</issn><issn>1573-2851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuCV15knrRpkl6O4cegIPhxHbL2pHR06Uxa0H9v5gQZDMnFgfA85xzOS8g1gxkDkHeBgSoEBVZQAAY5VSdkwnKZ0VTl7JRMQKmcSq7Sc3IRwhoACsXlhECJIfQuJCUa77BOWpcsPJqhdU1ikkXfddhgrC70fmjHzSU5s6YLePVbp-T94f5t8UTL58flYl7SiudqoDmrzEoyYEwJXguDtRUGhLIrrhgHLitbGG4krqzJMF2xWloUwDNrOOdx8Sm52ffd-v5jxDDodT96F0fqlKeRAJWxP6oxHerW2X7wptq0odJzkRYqAyF2vegRqkGH3nS9Q9vG7wN-doSPr8ZNWx0Vbg-EyAz4OTRmDEEvX18O2XTPVr4PwaPVW99ujP_SDPQuTL0PU8cw9U-YWkUp20shwq5B_3eNf6xv3sadiw</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Clear, Emily R.</creator><creator>Coker, Ann L.</creator><creator>Bush, Heather M.</creator><creator>Brancato, Candace J.</creator><creator>Davidov, Danielle</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8352-5379</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium</title><author>Clear, Emily R. ; Coker, Ann L. ; Bush, Heather M. ; Brancato, Candace J. ; Davidov, Danielle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-51cab71011864d6aedf6a068fb4814047cf9a4a7ebfa3e2b1d7fe6043fa444573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abused women</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Bystanders</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>College sports</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Crimes against</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Gender-based violence</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Law and Psychology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Networking</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Psychotherapy and Counseling</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Regulatory compliance</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual violence</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Undergraduate students</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence against women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clear, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coker, Ann L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush, Heather M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancato, Candace J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidov, Danielle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of family violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clear, Emily R.</au><au>Coker, Ann L.</au><au>Bush, Heather M.</au><au>Brancato, Candace J.</au><au>Davidov, Danielle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium</atitle><jtitle>Journal of family violence</jtitle><stitle>J Fam Viol</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>541</spage><epage>550</epage><pages>541-550</pages><issn>0885-7482</issn><eissn>1573-2851</eissn><abstract>This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act (
2013
) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi college bystander efficacy evaluation (mcBEE)]. Through this consortium 24 public colleges were recruited and their choices regarding bystander programming options were queried. Concurrently, rates of violence perpetration and victimization were measured over 4 years among undergraduate students at each college. Description and details of experiences in recruiting colleges into a college consortium, addressing regulatory compliance, approaches to selecting and launching college-wide surveys to undergraduate students across several large campuses, and strategies to communicate findings and data back to each recruited campus are presented. Suggestions for future consortium building include budgeting sufficient time to recruit colleges, manage regulatory processes, and ensure adequate response rates through short surveys and enticing incentives. In building a national consortium, lessons such as flexibility, networking, and communication contributed to mcBEE’s success.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8352-5379</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0885-7482 |
ispartof | Journal of family violence, 2020-08, Vol.35 (6), p.541-550 |
issn | 0885-7482 1573-2851 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2424570831 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Abused women Budgets Bystanders Clinical Psychology College sports College students Colleges & universities Communication Consortia Crimes against Criminology and Criminal Justice Efficacy Flexibility Gender-based violence Incentives Law and Psychology Medicine Medicine & Public Health Networking Original Article Polls & surveys Psychotherapy and Counseling Quality of Life Research Recruitment Regulatory compliance Sex crimes Sexual violence Training Undergraduate students Victimization Violence Violence against women |
title | Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A30%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20Learned%20in%20Creating%20a%20College%20Consortium&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20family%20violence&rft.au=Clear,%20Emily%20R.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=550&rft.pages=541-550&rft.issn=0885-7482&rft.eissn=1573-2851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA629830667%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424570831&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A629830667&rfr_iscdi=true |