Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium

This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act ( 2013 ) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi colle...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of family violence 2020-08, Vol.35 (6), p.541-550
Hauptverfasser: Clear, Emily R., Coker, Ann L., Bush, Heather M., Brancato, Candace J., Davidov, Danielle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 550
container_issue 6
container_start_page 541
container_title Journal of family violence
container_volume 35
creator Clear, Emily R.
Coker, Ann L.
Bush, Heather M.
Brancato, Candace J.
Davidov, Danielle
description This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act ( 2013 ) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi college bystander efficacy evaluation (mcBEE)]. Through this consortium 24 public colleges were recruited and their choices regarding bystander programming options were queried. Concurrently, rates of violence perpetration and victimization were measured over 4 years among undergraduate students at each college. Description and details of experiences in recruiting colleges into a college consortium, addressing regulatory compliance, approaches to selecting and launching college-wide surveys to undergraduate students across several large campuses, and strategies to communicate findings and data back to each recruited campus are presented. Suggestions for future consortium building include budgeting sufficient time to recruit colleges, manage regulatory processes, and ensure adequate response rates through short surveys and enticing incentives. In building a national consortium, lessons such as flexibility, networking, and communication contributed to mcBEE’s success.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2424570831</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A629830667</galeid><sourcerecordid>A629830667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-51cab71011864d6aedf6a068fb4814047cf9a4a7ebfa3e2b1d7fe6043fa444573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuCV15knrRpkl6O4cegIPhxHbL2pHR06Uxa0H9v5gQZDMnFgfA85xzOS8g1gxkDkHeBgSoEBVZQAAY5VSdkwnKZ0VTl7JRMQKmcSq7Sc3IRwhoACsXlhECJIfQuJCUa77BOWpcsPJqhdU1ikkXfddhgrC70fmjHzSU5s6YLePVbp-T94f5t8UTL58flYl7SiudqoDmrzEoyYEwJXguDtRUGhLIrrhgHLitbGG4krqzJMF2xWloUwDNrOOdx8Sm52ffd-v5jxDDodT96F0fqlKeRAJWxP6oxHerW2X7wptq0odJzkRYqAyF2vegRqkGH3nS9Q9vG7wN-doSPr8ZNWx0Vbg-EyAz4OTRmDEEvX18O2XTPVr4PwaPVW99ujP_SDPQuTL0PU8cw9U-YWkUp20shwq5B_3eNf6xv3sadiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424570831</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Clear, Emily R. ; Coker, Ann L. ; Bush, Heather M. ; Brancato, Candace J. ; Davidov, Danielle</creator><creatorcontrib>Clear, Emily R. ; Coker, Ann L. ; Bush, Heather M. ; Brancato, Candace J. ; Davidov, Danielle</creatorcontrib><description>This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act ( 2013 ) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi college bystander efficacy evaluation (mcBEE)]. Through this consortium 24 public colleges were recruited and their choices regarding bystander programming options were queried. Concurrently, rates of violence perpetration and victimization were measured over 4 years among undergraduate students at each college. Description and details of experiences in recruiting colleges into a college consortium, addressing regulatory compliance, approaches to selecting and launching college-wide surveys to undergraduate students across several large campuses, and strategies to communicate findings and data back to each recruited campus are presented. Suggestions for future consortium building include budgeting sufficient time to recruit colleges, manage regulatory processes, and ensure adequate response rates through short surveys and enticing incentives. In building a national consortium, lessons such as flexibility, networking, and communication contributed to mcBEE’s success.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-7482</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2851</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Abused women ; Budgets ; Bystanders ; Clinical Psychology ; College sports ; College students ; Colleges &amp; universities ; Communication ; Consortia ; Crimes against ; Criminology and Criminal Justice ; Efficacy ; Flexibility ; Gender-based violence ; Incentives ; Law and Psychology ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Networking ; Original Article ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Psychotherapy and Counseling ; Quality of Life Research ; Recruitment ; Regulatory compliance ; Sex crimes ; Sexual violence ; Training ; Undergraduate students ; Victimization ; Violence ; Violence against women</subject><ispartof>Journal of family violence, 2020-08, Vol.35 (6), p.541-550</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-51cab71011864d6aedf6a068fb4814047cf9a4a7ebfa3e2b1d7fe6043fa444573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-51cab71011864d6aedf6a068fb4814047cf9a4a7ebfa3e2b1d7fe6043fa444573</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8352-5379</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12845,27343,27923,27924,30998,33773,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clear, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coker, Ann L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush, Heather M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancato, Candace J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidov, Danielle</creatorcontrib><title>Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium</title><title>Journal of family violence</title><addtitle>J Fam Viol</addtitle><description>This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act ( 2013 ) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi college bystander efficacy evaluation (mcBEE)]. Through this consortium 24 public colleges were recruited and their choices regarding bystander programming options were queried. Concurrently, rates of violence perpetration and victimization were measured over 4 years among undergraduate students at each college. Description and details of experiences in recruiting colleges into a college consortium, addressing regulatory compliance, approaches to selecting and launching college-wide surveys to undergraduate students across several large campuses, and strategies to communicate findings and data back to each recruited campus are presented. Suggestions for future consortium building include budgeting sufficient time to recruit colleges, manage regulatory processes, and ensure adequate response rates through short surveys and enticing incentives. In building a national consortium, lessons such as flexibility, networking, and communication contributed to mcBEE’s success.</description><subject>Abused women</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>Bystanders</subject><subject>Clinical Psychology</subject><subject>College sports</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Colleges &amp; universities</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Consortia</subject><subject>Crimes against</subject><subject>Criminology and Criminal Justice</subject><subject>Efficacy</subject><subject>Flexibility</subject><subject>Gender-based violence</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Law and Psychology</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Networking</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Psychotherapy and Counseling</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>Regulatory compliance</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual violence</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Undergraduate students</subject><subject>Victimization</subject><subject>Violence</subject><subject>Violence against women</subject><issn>0885-7482</issn><issn>1573-2851</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuCV15knrRpkl6O4cegIPhxHbL2pHR06Uxa0H9v5gQZDMnFgfA85xzOS8g1gxkDkHeBgSoEBVZQAAY5VSdkwnKZ0VTl7JRMQKmcSq7Sc3IRwhoACsXlhECJIfQuJCUa77BOWpcsPJqhdU1ikkXfddhgrC70fmjHzSU5s6YLePVbp-T94f5t8UTL58flYl7SiudqoDmrzEoyYEwJXguDtRUGhLIrrhgHLitbGG4krqzJMF2xWloUwDNrOOdx8Sm52ffd-v5jxDDodT96F0fqlKeRAJWxP6oxHerW2X7wptq0odJzkRYqAyF2vegRqkGH3nS9Q9vG7wN-doSPr8ZNWx0Vbg-EyAz4OTRmDEEvX18O2XTPVr4PwaPVW99ujP_SDPQuTL0PU8cw9U-YWkUp20shwq5B_3eNf6xv3sadiw</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Clear, Emily R.</creator><creator>Coker, Ann L.</creator><creator>Bush, Heather M.</creator><creator>Brancato, Candace J.</creator><creator>Davidov, Danielle</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AM</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGRYB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0O</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8352-5379</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium</title><author>Clear, Emily R. ; Coker, Ann L. ; Bush, Heather M. ; Brancato, Candace J. ; Davidov, Danielle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c458t-51cab71011864d6aedf6a068fb4814047cf9a4a7ebfa3e2b1d7fe6043fa444573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Abused women</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>Bystanders</topic><topic>Clinical Psychology</topic><topic>College sports</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Colleges &amp; universities</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Consortia</topic><topic>Crimes against</topic><topic>Criminology and Criminal Justice</topic><topic>Efficacy</topic><topic>Flexibility</topic><topic>Gender-based violence</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Law and Psychology</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Networking</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Psychotherapy and Counseling</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>Regulatory compliance</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual violence</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Undergraduate students</topic><topic>Victimization</topic><topic>Violence</topic><topic>Violence against women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clear, Emily R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coker, Ann L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bush, Heather M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brancato, Candace J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidov, Danielle</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Criminology Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Criminal Justice Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of family violence</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clear, Emily R.</au><au>Coker, Ann L.</au><au>Bush, Heather M.</au><au>Brancato, Candace J.</au><au>Davidov, Danielle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium</atitle><jtitle>Journal of family violence</jtitle><stitle>J Fam Viol</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>541</spage><epage>550</epage><pages>541-550</pages><issn>0885-7482</issn><eissn>1573-2851</eissn><abstract>This paper offers lessons learned in evaluating the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act ( 2013 ) requirement that colleges receiving Title IX funds provide bystander programming to reduce sexual violence. To conduct this evaluation a national college consortium was created [multi college bystander efficacy evaluation (mcBEE)]. Through this consortium 24 public colleges were recruited and their choices regarding bystander programming options were queried. Concurrently, rates of violence perpetration and victimization were measured over 4 years among undergraduate students at each college. Description and details of experiences in recruiting colleges into a college consortium, addressing regulatory compliance, approaches to selecting and launching college-wide surveys to undergraduate students across several large campuses, and strategies to communicate findings and data back to each recruited campus are presented. Suggestions for future consortium building include budgeting sufficient time to recruit colleges, manage regulatory processes, and ensure adequate response rates through short surveys and enticing incentives. In building a national consortium, lessons such as flexibility, networking, and communication contributed to mcBEE’s success.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8352-5379</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-7482
ispartof Journal of family violence, 2020-08, Vol.35 (6), p.541-550
issn 0885-7482
1573-2851
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2424570831
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Abused women
Budgets
Bystanders
Clinical Psychology
College sports
College students
Colleges & universities
Communication
Consortia
Crimes against
Criminology and Criminal Justice
Efficacy
Flexibility
Gender-based violence
Incentives
Law and Psychology
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Networking
Original Article
Polls & surveys
Psychotherapy and Counseling
Quality of Life Research
Recruitment
Regulatory compliance
Sex crimes
Sexual violence
Training
Undergraduate students
Victimization
Violence
Violence against women
title Lessons Learned in Creating a College Consortium
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A30%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Lessons%20Learned%20in%20Creating%20a%20College%20Consortium&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20family%20violence&rft.au=Clear,%20Emily%20R.&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=541&rft.epage=550&rft.pages=541-550&rft.issn=0885-7482&rft.eissn=1573-2851&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10896-019-00105-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA629830667%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424570831&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A629830667&rfr_iscdi=true