Seismic resilience evaluation of base-isolated RC buildings using a loss-recovery approach
Seismic isolation systems, especially friction pendulum bearings (FPBs), are used as ideal seismic protection strategies in performance-based design. Furthermore, FPBs can increase the functionality of buildings by minimizing interruption of use of the facility (e.g., operational performance level)...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2020-08, Vol.18 (10), p.5031-5061 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 5061 |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 5031 |
container_title | Bulletin of earthquake engineering |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Mokhtari, Mehdi Naderpour, Hosein |
description | Seismic isolation systems, especially friction pendulum bearings (FPBs), are used as ideal seismic protection strategies in performance-based design. Furthermore, FPBs can increase the functionality of buildings by minimizing interruption of use of the facility (e.g., operational performance level) and reducing seismic demands on the structural and non-structural elements. The primary objective of this paper is to investigate the seismic resilience of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, especially essential buildings in compliance with a loss-recovery approach. To this end, an analytical examination is conducted concerning a six-story RC building, which was mainly designed under the Uniform Building Code (UBC in International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA, 1997) for a high-risk seismic zone. The incremental dynamic analyses of the fixed-base and base-isolated structures subjected to a set of near and far-fault ground motions are carried out for getting seismic fragility and functionality curves as well as the resilience of structures using a loss-recovery approach. The proposed methodology is employed to special buildings such as hospital buildings, with and without using the FPBs considering different seismic hazard scenarios that could occur within the investigated region. At the end of the paper, a parametric study is conducted by changing the building and pendulum parameters. The benefit of the suggested approach is found in terms of loss-recovery and seismic resilience that will be well recognized by the decision-maker for better planning to decrease seismic losses, rather than waiting for an earthquake and paying for it afterward. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10518-020-00895-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2424343778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424343778</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c2c264233dfcea43784e0007ee485b02d0106eab37081707ebda822b13fa33173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLxDAQDqLguvoHPAU8RydJ23SPsvgCQfAB4iWk6XTN0m3WpF3Y_fXGreDN0zcM32PmI-ScwyUHUFeRQ85LBgIYQDnL2e6ATHiuJONZXhzuZ2Cq4O_H5CTGJYDI1Qwm5OMFXVw5SwNG1zrsLFLcmHYwvfMd9Q2tTETmom9NjzV9ntNqcG3tukWkQ0xADW19jCyg9RsMW2rW6-CN_TwlR41pI5794pS83d68zu_Z49Pdw_z6kVnJZz2zwooiE1LWjUWTSVVmCOknxKzMKxA1cCjQVFJByVXaV7Uphai4bIyUXMkpuRh9U-zXgLHXSz-ELkVqkYlMJktVJpYYWTakawM2eh3cyoSt5qB_OtRjhzp1qPcd6l0SyVEUE7lbYPiz_kf1DfkMdUc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424343778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic resilience evaluation of base-isolated RC buildings using a loss-recovery approach</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Mokhtari, Mehdi ; Naderpour, Hosein</creator><creatorcontrib>Mokhtari, Mehdi ; Naderpour, Hosein</creatorcontrib><description>Seismic isolation systems, especially friction pendulum bearings (FPBs), are used as ideal seismic protection strategies in performance-based design. Furthermore, FPBs can increase the functionality of buildings by minimizing interruption of use of the facility (e.g., operational performance level) and reducing seismic demands on the structural and non-structural elements. The primary objective of this paper is to investigate the seismic resilience of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, especially essential buildings in compliance with a loss-recovery approach. To this end, an analytical examination is conducted concerning a six-story RC building, which was mainly designed under the Uniform Building Code (UBC in International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA, 1997) for a high-risk seismic zone. The incremental dynamic analyses of the fixed-base and base-isolated structures subjected to a set of near and far-fault ground motions are carried out for getting seismic fragility and functionality curves as well as the resilience of structures using a loss-recovery approach. The proposed methodology is employed to special buildings such as hospital buildings, with and without using the FPBs considering different seismic hazard scenarios that could occur within the investigated region. At the end of the paper, a parametric study is conducted by changing the building and pendulum parameters. The benefit of the suggested approach is found in terms of loss-recovery and seismic resilience that will be well recognized by the decision-maker for better planning to decrease seismic losses, rather than waiting for an earthquake and paying for it afterward.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-020-00895-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Building codes ; Buildings ; Civil Engineering ; Concrete ; Concrete construction ; Decision making ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake resistance ; Earthquakes ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Fragility ; Geological hazards ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground motion ; Hydrogeology ; Isolation systems ; Nonstructural members ; Original Research ; Pendulums ; Recovery ; Reinforced concrete ; Resilience ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; Seismic isolation ; Seismic response ; Seismic zones ; Structural Geology ; Structural members</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2020-08, Vol.18 (10), p.5031-5061</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c2c264233dfcea43784e0007ee485b02d0106eab37081707ebda822b13fa33173</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c2c264233dfcea43784e0007ee485b02d0106eab37081707ebda822b13fa33173</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4179-7816</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-020-00895-z$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-020-00895-z$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mokhtari, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naderpour, Hosein</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic resilience evaluation of base-isolated RC buildings using a loss-recovery approach</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>Seismic isolation systems, especially friction pendulum bearings (FPBs), are used as ideal seismic protection strategies in performance-based design. Furthermore, FPBs can increase the functionality of buildings by minimizing interruption of use of the facility (e.g., operational performance level) and reducing seismic demands on the structural and non-structural elements. The primary objective of this paper is to investigate the seismic resilience of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, especially essential buildings in compliance with a loss-recovery approach. To this end, an analytical examination is conducted concerning a six-story RC building, which was mainly designed under the Uniform Building Code (UBC in International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA, 1997) for a high-risk seismic zone. The incremental dynamic analyses of the fixed-base and base-isolated structures subjected to a set of near and far-fault ground motions are carried out for getting seismic fragility and functionality curves as well as the resilience of structures using a loss-recovery approach. The proposed methodology is employed to special buildings such as hospital buildings, with and without using the FPBs considering different seismic hazard scenarios that could occur within the investigated region. At the end of the paper, a parametric study is conducted by changing the building and pendulum parameters. The benefit of the suggested approach is found in terms of loss-recovery and seismic resilience that will be well recognized by the decision-maker for better planning to decrease seismic losses, rather than waiting for an earthquake and paying for it afterward.</description><subject>Building codes</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Concrete construction</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake resistance</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Isolation systems</subject><subject>Nonstructural members</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Pendulums</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismic isolation</subject><subject>Seismic response</subject><subject>Seismic zones</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Structural members</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UEtLxDAQDqLguvoHPAU8RydJ23SPsvgCQfAB4iWk6XTN0m3WpF3Y_fXGreDN0zcM32PmI-ScwyUHUFeRQ85LBgIYQDnL2e6ATHiuJONZXhzuZ2Cq4O_H5CTGJYDI1Qwm5OMFXVw5SwNG1zrsLFLcmHYwvfMd9Q2tTETmom9NjzV9ntNqcG3tukWkQ0xADW19jCyg9RsMW2rW6-CN_TwlR41pI5794pS83d68zu_Z49Pdw_z6kVnJZz2zwooiE1LWjUWTSVVmCOknxKzMKxA1cCjQVFJByVXaV7Uphai4bIyUXMkpuRh9U-zXgLHXSz-ELkVqkYlMJktVJpYYWTakawM2eh3cyoSt5qB_OtRjhzp1qPcd6l0SyVEUE7lbYPiz_kf1DfkMdUc</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Mokhtari, Mehdi</creator><creator>Naderpour, Hosein</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-7816</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Seismic resilience evaluation of base-isolated RC buildings using a loss-recovery approach</title><author>Mokhtari, Mehdi ; Naderpour, Hosein</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-c2c264233dfcea43784e0007ee485b02d0106eab37081707ebda822b13fa33173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Building codes</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Concrete construction</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake resistance</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Isolation systems</topic><topic>Nonstructural members</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Pendulums</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismic isolation</topic><topic>Seismic response</topic><topic>Seismic zones</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Structural members</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mokhtari, Mehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naderpour, Hosein</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mokhtari, Mehdi</au><au>Naderpour, Hosein</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic resilience evaluation of base-isolated RC buildings using a loss-recovery approach</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>5031</spage><epage>5061</epage><pages>5031-5061</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>Seismic isolation systems, especially friction pendulum bearings (FPBs), are used as ideal seismic protection strategies in performance-based design. Furthermore, FPBs can increase the functionality of buildings by minimizing interruption of use of the facility (e.g., operational performance level) and reducing seismic demands on the structural and non-structural elements. The primary objective of this paper is to investigate the seismic resilience of reinforced concrete (RC) buildings, especially essential buildings in compliance with a loss-recovery approach. To this end, an analytical examination is conducted concerning a six-story RC building, which was mainly designed under the Uniform Building Code (UBC in International Conference of Building Officials, Whittier, CA, 1997) for a high-risk seismic zone. The incremental dynamic analyses of the fixed-base and base-isolated structures subjected to a set of near and far-fault ground motions are carried out for getting seismic fragility and functionality curves as well as the resilience of structures using a loss-recovery approach. The proposed methodology is employed to special buildings such as hospital buildings, with and without using the FPBs considering different seismic hazard scenarios that could occur within the investigated region. At the end of the paper, a parametric study is conducted by changing the building and pendulum parameters. The benefit of the suggested approach is found in terms of loss-recovery and seismic resilience that will be well recognized by the decision-maker for better planning to decrease seismic losses, rather than waiting for an earthquake and paying for it afterward.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-020-00895-z</doi><tpages>31</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4179-7816</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1570-761X |
ispartof | Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2020-08, Vol.18 (10), p.5031-5061 |
issn | 1570-761X 1573-1456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2424343778 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Building codes Buildings Civil Engineering Concrete Concrete construction Decision making Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquake resistance Earthquakes Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Fragility Geological hazards Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Ground motion Hydrogeology Isolation systems Nonstructural members Original Research Pendulums Recovery Reinforced concrete Resilience Seismic activity Seismic hazard Seismic isolation Seismic response Seismic zones Structural Geology Structural members |
title | Seismic resilience evaluation of base-isolated RC buildings using a loss-recovery approach |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T15%3A21%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20resilience%20evaluation%20of%20base-isolated%20RC%20buildings%20using%20a%20loss-recovery%20approach&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Mokhtari,%20Mehdi&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=5031&rft.epage=5061&rft.pages=5031-5061&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-020-00895-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2424343778%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424343778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |