Citizen science to monitor the distribution of the Egyptian mongoose in southern Spain: who provide the most reliable information?

The Egyptian mongoose ( Herpestes ichneumon L.) is a medium-size carnivore widely distributed in Africa and in a small part of southern Europe, the Iberian Peninsula, where mongoose populations have recently expanded. The mongoose is relatively easily detectable because of its diurnal habits and bec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of wildlife research 2020-08, Vol.66 (4), Article 65
Hauptverfasser: Linares, Olmo, Carranza, Juan, Soliño, Mario, Delibes-Mateos, Miguel, Ferreras, Pablo, Descalzo, Esther, Martínez-Jauregui, María
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page
container_title European journal of wildlife research
container_volume 66
creator Linares, Olmo
Carranza, Juan
Soliño, Mario
Delibes-Mateos, Miguel
Ferreras, Pablo
Descalzo, Esther
Martínez-Jauregui, María
description The Egyptian mongoose ( Herpestes ichneumon L.) is a medium-size carnivore widely distributed in Africa and in a small part of southern Europe, the Iberian Peninsula, where mongoose populations have recently expanded. The mongoose is relatively easily detectable because of its diurnal habits and because it is the only species of Herpestidae occurring in the Iberian Peninsula. Therefore, its distribution could be monitored through citizen science. In this sense, information provided by stakeholders that make frequent use of natural environments, including hunters, landowners, or wildlife rangers, would be potentially very valuable. Nevertheless, the accuracy of the information provided by these stakeholders as regards mongoose occurrence has never been tested. To do so, we compared mongoose occurrences gathered through field transects (i.e., 2-km walking surveys in which direct observations and indirect signs were recorded) carried out in 218 Andalusian municipalities during 2010–2015 with those obtained through questionnaires conducted in 2016 to hunters ( n  = 251), landowners ( n  = 116), and wildlife rangers ( n  = 133). We did not find any significant difference between mongoose distribution estimated by the reference method (i.e., field surveys) and by questionnaire to wildlife rangers. In contrast, mongoose occurrences reported by hunters and landowners were significantly correlated among them, but not with those collected in field transects (nor with those provided by the rangers). This suggests that a participatory network for monitoring mongoose distribution could rely on the information provided by wildlife rangers. Previous studies showed that hunters can provide useful information from less accessible areas like private estates where official data are not collected. In this sense, our results suggest that further effort is needed to incorporate hunters and landowners in a participatory network to monitor mongoose distribution, and this could include collaborative actions to promote their involvement in addition to increasing their skills in mongoose detection.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10344-020-01408-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2424343144</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2424343144</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-d6e4234906c71c4b70103c3015f83ff9555a2d5ee9a76d0612c44525d0c53afa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OAyEUhSdGE2v1BVyRuB69wGWm48aYxr-kiQt1TSjDtDQtVGA0demTS1sTd64gcL5z7zlFcU7hkgLUV5ECRyyBQQkUYVSODooBRd6UIGo8zPeKshIrZMfFSYwLANYAF4Pie2yT_TKORG2N04YkT1be2eQDSXNDWhtTsNM-We-I73Zvd7PNOlnltsKZ99EQm3nf57_gyMtaWXdNPueerIP_sK3ZQSsfEwlmadV0uQU6H1Zq63pzWhx1ahnN2e85LN7u717Hj-Xk-eFpfDspNa94KtvKIOPYQKVrqnFaQ86sOVDRjXjXNUIIxVphTKPqqoWcVyMKJlrQgqtO8WFxsffNa733Jia58H1weaRkyJAjp4hZxfYqHXyMwXRyHexKhY2kILddy33XMnctd13LUYb4HopZ7GYm_Fn_Q_0AUtqDPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2424343144</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Citizen science to monitor the distribution of the Egyptian mongoose in southern Spain: who provide the most reliable information?</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Linares, Olmo ; Carranza, Juan ; Soliño, Mario ; Delibes-Mateos, Miguel ; Ferreras, Pablo ; Descalzo, Esther ; Martínez-Jauregui, María</creator><creatorcontrib>Linares, Olmo ; Carranza, Juan ; Soliño, Mario ; Delibes-Mateos, Miguel ; Ferreras, Pablo ; Descalzo, Esther ; Martínez-Jauregui, María</creatorcontrib><description>The Egyptian mongoose ( Herpestes ichneumon L.) is a medium-size carnivore widely distributed in Africa and in a small part of southern Europe, the Iberian Peninsula, where mongoose populations have recently expanded. The mongoose is relatively easily detectable because of its diurnal habits and because it is the only species of Herpestidae occurring in the Iberian Peninsula. Therefore, its distribution could be monitored through citizen science. In this sense, information provided by stakeholders that make frequent use of natural environments, including hunters, landowners, or wildlife rangers, would be potentially very valuable. Nevertheless, the accuracy of the information provided by these stakeholders as regards mongoose occurrence has never been tested. To do so, we compared mongoose occurrences gathered through field transects (i.e., 2-km walking surveys in which direct observations and indirect signs were recorded) carried out in 218 Andalusian municipalities during 2010–2015 with those obtained through questionnaires conducted in 2016 to hunters ( n  = 251), landowners ( n  = 116), and wildlife rangers ( n  = 133). We did not find any significant difference between mongoose distribution estimated by the reference method (i.e., field surveys) and by questionnaire to wildlife rangers. In contrast, mongoose occurrences reported by hunters and landowners were significantly correlated among them, but not with those collected in field transects (nor with those provided by the rangers). This suggests that a participatory network for monitoring mongoose distribution could rely on the information provided by wildlife rangers. Previous studies showed that hunters can provide useful information from less accessible areas like private estates where official data are not collected. In this sense, our results suggest that further effort is needed to incorporate hunters and landowners in a participatory network to monitor mongoose distribution, and this could include collaborative actions to promote their involvement in addition to increasing their skills in mongoose detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1612-4642</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-0574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10344-020-01408-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Diurnal ; Ecology ; Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management ; Landowners ; Life Sciences ; Municipalities ; Natural environment ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Questionnaires ; Short Communication ; Wildlife ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>European journal of wildlife research, 2020-08, Vol.66 (4), Article 65</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-d6e4234906c71c4b70103c3015f83ff9555a2d5ee9a76d0612c44525d0c53afa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-d6e4234906c71c4b70103c3015f83ff9555a2d5ee9a76d0612c44525d0c53afa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1116-6706 ; 0000-0002-9826-7920 ; 0000-0002-0809-4422 ; 0000-0002-0368-7173 ; 0000-0001-7065-7348 ; 0000-0002-3823-5935 ; 0000-0002-7590-822X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10344-020-01408-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10344-020-01408-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linares, Olmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carranza, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliño, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delibes-Mateos, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreras, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Descalzo, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Jauregui, María</creatorcontrib><title>Citizen science to monitor the distribution of the Egyptian mongoose in southern Spain: who provide the most reliable information?</title><title>European journal of wildlife research</title><addtitle>Eur J Wildl Res</addtitle><description>The Egyptian mongoose ( Herpestes ichneumon L.) is a medium-size carnivore widely distributed in Africa and in a small part of southern Europe, the Iberian Peninsula, where mongoose populations have recently expanded. The mongoose is relatively easily detectable because of its diurnal habits and because it is the only species of Herpestidae occurring in the Iberian Peninsula. Therefore, its distribution could be monitored through citizen science. In this sense, information provided by stakeholders that make frequent use of natural environments, including hunters, landowners, or wildlife rangers, would be potentially very valuable. Nevertheless, the accuracy of the information provided by these stakeholders as regards mongoose occurrence has never been tested. To do so, we compared mongoose occurrences gathered through field transects (i.e., 2-km walking surveys in which direct observations and indirect signs were recorded) carried out in 218 Andalusian municipalities during 2010–2015 with those obtained through questionnaires conducted in 2016 to hunters ( n  = 251), landowners ( n  = 116), and wildlife rangers ( n  = 133). We did not find any significant difference between mongoose distribution estimated by the reference method (i.e., field surveys) and by questionnaire to wildlife rangers. In contrast, mongoose occurrences reported by hunters and landowners were significantly correlated among them, but not with those collected in field transects (nor with those provided by the rangers). This suggests that a participatory network for monitoring mongoose distribution could rely on the information provided by wildlife rangers. Previous studies showed that hunters can provide useful information from less accessible areas like private estates where official data are not collected. In this sense, our results suggest that further effort is needed to incorporate hunters and landowners in a participatory network to monitor mongoose distribution, and this could include collaborative actions to promote their involvement in addition to increasing their skills in mongoose detection.</description><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Diurnal</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</subject><subject>Landowners</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Municipalities</subject><subject>Natural environment</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Short Communication</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>1612-4642</issn><issn>1439-0574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1OAyEUhSdGE2v1BVyRuB69wGWm48aYxr-kiQt1TSjDtDQtVGA0demTS1sTd64gcL5z7zlFcU7hkgLUV5ECRyyBQQkUYVSODooBRd6UIGo8zPeKshIrZMfFSYwLANYAF4Pie2yT_TKORG2N04YkT1be2eQDSXNDWhtTsNM-We-I73Zvd7PNOlnltsKZ99EQm3nf57_gyMtaWXdNPueerIP_sK3ZQSsfEwlmadV0uQU6H1Zq63pzWhx1ahnN2e85LN7u717Hj-Xk-eFpfDspNa94KtvKIOPYQKVrqnFaQ86sOVDRjXjXNUIIxVphTKPqqoWcVyMKJlrQgqtO8WFxsffNa733Jia58H1weaRkyJAjp4hZxfYqHXyMwXRyHexKhY2kILddy33XMnctd13LUYb4HopZ7GYm_Fn_Q_0AUtqDPw</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Linares, Olmo</creator><creator>Carranza, Juan</creator><creator>Soliño, Mario</creator><creator>Delibes-Mateos, Miguel</creator><creator>Ferreras, Pablo</creator><creator>Descalzo, Esther</creator><creator>Martínez-Jauregui, María</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-6706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9826-7920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0809-4422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-7173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-7348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3823-5935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7590-822X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Citizen science to monitor the distribution of the Egyptian mongoose in southern Spain: who provide the most reliable information?</title><author>Linares, Olmo ; Carranza, Juan ; Soliño, Mario ; Delibes-Mateos, Miguel ; Ferreras, Pablo ; Descalzo, Esther ; Martínez-Jauregui, María</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-d6e4234906c71c4b70103c3015f83ff9555a2d5ee9a76d0612c44525d0c53afa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Diurnal</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fish &amp; Wildlife Biology &amp; Management</topic><topic>Landowners</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Municipalities</topic><topic>Natural environment</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Short Communication</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linares, Olmo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carranza, Juan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soliño, Mario</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delibes-Mateos, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreras, Pablo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Descalzo, Esther</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez-Jauregui, María</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>European journal of wildlife research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linares, Olmo</au><au>Carranza, Juan</au><au>Soliño, Mario</au><au>Delibes-Mateos, Miguel</au><au>Ferreras, Pablo</au><au>Descalzo, Esther</au><au>Martínez-Jauregui, María</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Citizen science to monitor the distribution of the Egyptian mongoose in southern Spain: who provide the most reliable information?</atitle><jtitle>European journal of wildlife research</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Wildl Res</stitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>4</issue><artnum>65</artnum><issn>1612-4642</issn><eissn>1439-0574</eissn><abstract>The Egyptian mongoose ( Herpestes ichneumon L.) is a medium-size carnivore widely distributed in Africa and in a small part of southern Europe, the Iberian Peninsula, where mongoose populations have recently expanded. The mongoose is relatively easily detectable because of its diurnal habits and because it is the only species of Herpestidae occurring in the Iberian Peninsula. Therefore, its distribution could be monitored through citizen science. In this sense, information provided by stakeholders that make frequent use of natural environments, including hunters, landowners, or wildlife rangers, would be potentially very valuable. Nevertheless, the accuracy of the information provided by these stakeholders as regards mongoose occurrence has never been tested. To do so, we compared mongoose occurrences gathered through field transects (i.e., 2-km walking surveys in which direct observations and indirect signs were recorded) carried out in 218 Andalusian municipalities during 2010–2015 with those obtained through questionnaires conducted in 2016 to hunters ( n  = 251), landowners ( n  = 116), and wildlife rangers ( n  = 133). We did not find any significant difference between mongoose distribution estimated by the reference method (i.e., field surveys) and by questionnaire to wildlife rangers. In contrast, mongoose occurrences reported by hunters and landowners were significantly correlated among them, but not with those collected in field transects (nor with those provided by the rangers). This suggests that a participatory network for monitoring mongoose distribution could rely on the information provided by wildlife rangers. Previous studies showed that hunters can provide useful information from less accessible areas like private estates where official data are not collected. In this sense, our results suggest that further effort is needed to incorporate hunters and landowners in a participatory network to monitor mongoose distribution, and this could include collaborative actions to promote their involvement in addition to increasing their skills in mongoose detection.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10344-020-01408-8</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1116-6706</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9826-7920</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0809-4422</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0368-7173</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7065-7348</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3823-5935</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7590-822X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1612-4642
ispartof European journal of wildlife research, 2020-08, Vol.66 (4), Article 65
issn 1612-4642
1439-0574
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2424343144
source Springer Nature
subjects Biomedical and Life Sciences
Diurnal
Ecology
Fish & Wildlife Biology & Management
Landowners
Life Sciences
Municipalities
Natural environment
Polls & surveys
Questionnaires
Short Communication
Wildlife
Zoology
title Citizen science to monitor the distribution of the Egyptian mongoose in southern Spain: who provide the most reliable information?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T11%3A02%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Citizen%20science%20to%20monitor%20the%20distribution%20of%20the%20Egyptian%20mongoose%20in%20southern%20Spain:%20who%20provide%20the%20most%20reliable%20information?&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20wildlife%20research&rft.au=Linares,%20Olmo&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=4&rft.artnum=65&rft.issn=1612-4642&rft.eissn=1439-0574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10344-020-01408-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2424343144%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2424343144&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true