Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Absorption of R‐ Versus R,S‐Lipoic Acid in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial

We compared the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and assessed for bioequivalent absorption of R‐lipoic acid (LA) in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) in a single‐center, double‐blind, randomized crossover trial. Participants randomly assigned to formulation sequence took 600 mg of R‐...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical pharmacology 2020-08, Vol.60 (8), p.1099-1106
Hauptverfasser: Cameron, Michelle, Taylor, Cassidy, Lapidus, Jodi, Ramsey, Katrina, Koop, Dennis, Spain, Rebecca
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1106
container_issue 8
container_start_page 1099
container_title Journal of clinical pharmacology
container_volume 60
creator Cameron, Michelle
Taylor, Cassidy
Lapidus, Jodi
Ramsey, Katrina
Koop, Dennis
Spain, Rebecca
description We compared the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and assessed for bioequivalent absorption of R‐lipoic acid (LA) in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) in a single‐center, double‐blind, randomized crossover trial. Participants randomly assigned to formulation sequence took 600 mg of R‐LA or 1200 mg of a 1:1 racemic R,S‐LA mixture in single daily doses for 7 to 10 days, underwent a washout of at least 7 days, and then took the other form of LA for 7 to 10 days. At the end of each period on LA, GI symptoms were assessed with GI questions from the Monitoring of Side Effects Scale. Serum LA concentrations were measured before and 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after the first and last day's dose of each form of LA to derive an area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Twenty participants enrolled (12 women; 15 secondary progressive MS, 5 primary progressive MS; mean age, 59.6 years). Two withdrew early due to symptoms while taking R,S‐LA, and one withdrew early while taking R‐LA. The mean GI Monitoring of Side Effects Scale score was 1.7 points lower on R‐LA than on R,S‐LA (P = .069), and there were fewer reports of each GI side effect when taking the R‐LA than the R,S‐LA (31 vs 60; P = .025). The AUC and Cmax for R‐LA were bioequivalent for the 2 formulations (90% confidence intervals 97.4% to 99.3% for AUC and 93.4% to 98.2% for Cmax). This study supports that in people with progressive MS, there is better GI tolerability and bioequivalent serum absorption of R‐LA when 600 mg of R‐LA is taken as R‐LA alone than when taken in a 1:1 racemic R,S‐LA mixture.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/jcph.1605
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2423852347</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2423852347</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-d1176b518ac2fb0915aee8030a0ab89fe60ce938e19b1d8c094d4f9d0242303f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFu0zAUhi3ExMrgghdAlrhCItux46QJd1UF21ARU1e4tRznhLq4cbCTTeWKF0DiGfckOGvhCrBkWcf6zu_z_ybkGYNTBsDPNrpbn7IcsgdkwrKMJyIH8ZBMAEqW8CnAMXkcwgaA5SJjj8hxyjnjqYAJ-XGuQu-daXsMvWmVpStn0avKWNPvqGprOquC811vXEtdQ5d333_ST-jDEOjy1XWsFqZzRtOZNjU1Lb3y7rPHEMwN0veD7U1nkV7rKOqCCa_pjC6jqtuab1jTebwM7gY9XXmj7BNy1Cgb8OnhPCEf375ZzS-SxYfzy_lskWiR5llSMzbNq4wVSvOmiiYzhVhACgpUVZQN5qCxTAtkZcXqQkMpatGUNXDBU0ib9IS82Ot23n0donO5cYOP7oMckSKL4Uwj9XJP6XFKj43svNkqv5MM5Bi8HIOXY_CRfX5QHKot1n_I30lHINkDt872Mb4vdrhFL9eobL_-q6D4Dw9xifixCQcOUMQqiZsVse3s0GYs7v49sHw3v7q4f-gXj-ivYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2423852347</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Absorption of R‐ Versus R,S‐Lipoic Acid in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Cameron, Michelle ; Taylor, Cassidy ; Lapidus, Jodi ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Koop, Dennis ; Spain, Rebecca</creator><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Michelle ; Taylor, Cassidy ; Lapidus, Jodi ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Koop, Dennis ; Spain, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><description>We compared the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and assessed for bioequivalent absorption of R‐lipoic acid (LA) in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) in a single‐center, double‐blind, randomized crossover trial. Participants randomly assigned to formulation sequence took 600 mg of R‐LA or 1200 mg of a 1:1 racemic R,S‐LA mixture in single daily doses for 7 to 10 days, underwent a washout of at least 7 days, and then took the other form of LA for 7 to 10 days. At the end of each period on LA, GI symptoms were assessed with GI questions from the Monitoring of Side Effects Scale. Serum LA concentrations were measured before and 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after the first and last day's dose of each form of LA to derive an area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Twenty participants enrolled (12 women; 15 secondary progressive MS, 5 primary progressive MS; mean age, 59.6 years). Two withdrew early due to symptoms while taking R,S‐LA, and one withdrew early while taking R‐LA. The mean GI Monitoring of Side Effects Scale score was 1.7 points lower on R‐LA than on R,S‐LA (P = .069), and there were fewer reports of each GI side effect when taking the R‐LA than the R,S‐LA (31 vs 60; P = .025). The AUC and Cmax for R‐LA were bioequivalent for the 2 formulations (90% confidence intervals 97.4% to 99.3% for AUC and 93.4% to 98.2% for Cmax). This study supports that in people with progressive MS, there is better GI tolerability and bioequivalent serum absorption of R‐LA when 600 mg of R‐LA is taken as R‐LA alone than when taken in a 1:1 racemic R,S‐LA mixture.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-2700</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1552-4604</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1605</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32212340</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: American College of Clinical Pharmacology</publisher><subject>absorption ; Lipoic acid ; Multiple sclerosis ; pharmacokinetics ; racemic ; Side effects ; thioctic acid ; tolerability</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020-08, Vol.60 (8), p.1099-1106</ispartof><rights>2020, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology</rights><rights>2020 American College of Clinical Pharmacology</rights><rights>2020, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-d1176b518ac2fb0915aee8030a0ab89fe60ce938e19b1d8c094d4f9d0242303f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-d1176b518ac2fb0915aee8030a0ab89fe60ce938e19b1d8c094d4f9d0242303f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8316-3723 ; 0000-0002-1920-6733</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjcph.1605$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjcph.1605$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32212340$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Cassidy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapidus, Jodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koop, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spain, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><title>Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Absorption of R‐ Versus R,S‐Lipoic Acid in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial</title><title>Journal of clinical pharmacology</title><addtitle>J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><description>We compared the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and assessed for bioequivalent absorption of R‐lipoic acid (LA) in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) in a single‐center, double‐blind, randomized crossover trial. Participants randomly assigned to formulation sequence took 600 mg of R‐LA or 1200 mg of a 1:1 racemic R,S‐LA mixture in single daily doses for 7 to 10 days, underwent a washout of at least 7 days, and then took the other form of LA for 7 to 10 days. At the end of each period on LA, GI symptoms were assessed with GI questions from the Monitoring of Side Effects Scale. Serum LA concentrations were measured before and 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after the first and last day's dose of each form of LA to derive an area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Twenty participants enrolled (12 women; 15 secondary progressive MS, 5 primary progressive MS; mean age, 59.6 years). Two withdrew early due to symptoms while taking R,S‐LA, and one withdrew early while taking R‐LA. The mean GI Monitoring of Side Effects Scale score was 1.7 points lower on R‐LA than on R,S‐LA (P = .069), and there were fewer reports of each GI side effect when taking the R‐LA than the R,S‐LA (31 vs 60; P = .025). The AUC and Cmax for R‐LA were bioequivalent for the 2 formulations (90% confidence intervals 97.4% to 99.3% for AUC and 93.4% to 98.2% for Cmax). This study supports that in people with progressive MS, there is better GI tolerability and bioequivalent serum absorption of R‐LA when 600 mg of R‐LA is taken as R‐LA alone than when taken in a 1:1 racemic R,S‐LA mixture.</description><subject>absorption</subject><subject>Lipoic acid</subject><subject>Multiple sclerosis</subject><subject>pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>racemic</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>thioctic acid</subject><subject>tolerability</subject><issn>0091-2700</issn><issn>1552-4604</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdFu0zAUhi3ExMrgghdAlrhCItux46QJd1UF21ARU1e4tRznhLq4cbCTTeWKF0DiGfckOGvhCrBkWcf6zu_z_ybkGYNTBsDPNrpbn7IcsgdkwrKMJyIH8ZBMAEqW8CnAMXkcwgaA5SJjj8hxyjnjqYAJ-XGuQu-daXsMvWmVpStn0avKWNPvqGprOquC811vXEtdQ5d333_ST-jDEOjy1XWsFqZzRtOZNjU1Lb3y7rPHEMwN0veD7U1nkV7rKOqCCa_pjC6jqtuab1jTebwM7gY9XXmj7BNy1Cgb8OnhPCEf375ZzS-SxYfzy_lskWiR5llSMzbNq4wVSvOmiiYzhVhACgpUVZQN5qCxTAtkZcXqQkMpatGUNXDBU0ib9IS82Ot23n0donO5cYOP7oMckSKL4Uwj9XJP6XFKj43svNkqv5MM5Bi8HIOXY_CRfX5QHKot1n_I30lHINkDt872Mb4vdrhFL9eobL_-q6D4Dw9xifixCQcOUMQqiZsVse3s0GYs7v49sHw3v7q4f-gXj-ivYg</recordid><startdate>202008</startdate><enddate>202008</enddate><creator>Cameron, Michelle</creator><creator>Taylor, Cassidy</creator><creator>Lapidus, Jodi</creator><creator>Ramsey, Katrina</creator><creator>Koop, Dennis</creator><creator>Spain, Rebecca</creator><general>American College of Clinical Pharmacology</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8316-3723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-6733</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202008</creationdate><title>Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Absorption of R‐ Versus R,S‐Lipoic Acid in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial</title><author>Cameron, Michelle ; Taylor, Cassidy ; Lapidus, Jodi ; Ramsey, Katrina ; Koop, Dennis ; Spain, Rebecca</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4365-d1176b518ac2fb0915aee8030a0ab89fe60ce938e19b1d8c094d4f9d0242303f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>absorption</topic><topic>Lipoic acid</topic><topic>Multiple sclerosis</topic><topic>pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>racemic</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>thioctic acid</topic><topic>tolerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cameron, Michelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Taylor, Cassidy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lapidus, Jodi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramsey, Katrina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koop, Dennis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spain, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cameron, Michelle</au><au>Taylor, Cassidy</au><au>Lapidus, Jodi</au><au>Ramsey, Katrina</au><au>Koop, Dennis</au><au>Spain, Rebecca</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Absorption of R‐ Versus R,S‐Lipoic Acid in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Pharmacol</addtitle><date>2020-08</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>1099</spage><epage>1106</epage><pages>1099-1106</pages><issn>0091-2700</issn><eissn>1552-4604</eissn><abstract>We compared the gastrointestinal (GI) tolerability and assessed for bioequivalent absorption of R‐lipoic acid (LA) in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) in a single‐center, double‐blind, randomized crossover trial. Participants randomly assigned to formulation sequence took 600 mg of R‐LA or 1200 mg of a 1:1 racemic R,S‐LA mixture in single daily doses for 7 to 10 days, underwent a washout of at least 7 days, and then took the other form of LA for 7 to 10 days. At the end of each period on LA, GI symptoms were assessed with GI questions from the Monitoring of Side Effects Scale. Serum LA concentrations were measured before and 60, 90, 120, 180, and 240 minutes after the first and last day's dose of each form of LA to derive an area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) and maximum serum concentration (Cmax). Twenty participants enrolled (12 women; 15 secondary progressive MS, 5 primary progressive MS; mean age, 59.6 years). Two withdrew early due to symptoms while taking R,S‐LA, and one withdrew early while taking R‐LA. The mean GI Monitoring of Side Effects Scale score was 1.7 points lower on R‐LA than on R,S‐LA (P = .069), and there were fewer reports of each GI side effect when taking the R‐LA than the R,S‐LA (31 vs 60; P = .025). The AUC and Cmax for R‐LA were bioequivalent for the 2 formulations (90% confidence intervals 97.4% to 99.3% for AUC and 93.4% to 98.2% for Cmax). This study supports that in people with progressive MS, there is better GI tolerability and bioequivalent serum absorption of R‐LA when 600 mg of R‐LA is taken as R‐LA alone than when taken in a 1:1 racemic R,S‐LA mixture.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>American College of Clinical Pharmacology</pub><pmid>32212340</pmid><doi>10.1002/jcph.1605</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8316-3723</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1920-6733</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0091-2700
ispartof Journal of clinical pharmacology, 2020-08, Vol.60 (8), p.1099-1106
issn 0091-2700
1552-4604
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2423852347
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects absorption
Lipoic acid
Multiple sclerosis
pharmacokinetics
racemic
Side effects
thioctic acid
tolerability
title Gastrointestinal Tolerability and Absorption of R‐ Versus R,S‐Lipoic Acid in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Crossover Trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T16%3A40%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Gastrointestinal%20Tolerability%20and%20Absorption%20of%20R%E2%80%90%20Versus%20R,S%E2%80%90Lipoic%20Acid%20in%20Progressive%20Multiple%20Sclerosis:%20A%20Randomized%20Crossover%20Trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20pharmacology&rft.au=Cameron,%20Michelle&rft.date=2020-08&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=1099&rft.epage=1106&rft.pages=1099-1106&rft.issn=0091-2700&rft.eissn=1552-4604&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jcph.1605&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2423852347%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2423852347&rft_id=info:pmid/32212340&rfr_iscdi=true