Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge
How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically a...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2020-07, Vol.53 (3), p.527-531 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 531 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 527 |
container_title | PS, political science & politics |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Soedirgo, Jessica Glas, Aarie |
description | How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically and how it is applied. Ignoring the dynamism of positionality in practice has implications for the research process. This article theorizes one means of recognizing and responding to positionality in practice: a posture of “active reflexivity.” It outlines how we can become actively reflexive by adopting a disposition toward both ongoing reflection about our own social location and ongoing reflection on our assumptions regarding others’ perceptions. We then articulate four strategies for doing active reflexivity: recording assumptions around positionality; routinizing and systemizing reflexivity; bringing other actors into the process; and “showing our work” in the publication process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S1049096519002233 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2421715785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1049096519002233</cupid><sourcerecordid>2421715785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f3767fc53bf6bd36b4d12072a1f1f212943c1a248a31a9f13bd0bde651b914da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwHPq5lks9t4K8UvLFh0PS_ZfGjKdlOTbWv_vSkteBDnMjPMe495D6FLINdAoLx5A5ILIgoOghBKGTtCA-CszLhg_DjN6Zzt7qfoLMY5STXiZICqym9k0Hiserc2-NXY1ny7teu3t3jmo-ud72SbViw7jWdBJpwy2HW4_zRp93qldhjsLX7u_KY1-sOcoxMr22guDn2I3u_vqsljNn15eJqMp5liBekzy8qitIqzxhaNZkWTa6CkpBIsWApU5EyBpPlIMpDCAms0abRJHhsBuZZsiK72usvgv1Ym9vXcr0L6N9Y0p1ACL0c8oWCPUsHHGIytl8EtZNjWQOpdePWf8BKHHThy0QSXPP1K_8_6ATCOcLs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2421715785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Soedirgo, Jessica ; Glas, Aarie</creator><creatorcontrib>Soedirgo, Jessica ; Glas, Aarie</creatorcontrib><description>How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically and how it is applied. Ignoring the dynamism of positionality in practice has implications for the research process. This article theorizes one means of recognizing and responding to positionality in practice: a posture of “active reflexivity.” It outlines how we can become actively reflexive by adopting a disposition toward both ongoing reflection about our own social location and ongoing reflection on our assumptions regarding others’ perceptions. We then articulate four strategies for doing active reflexivity: recording assumptions around positionality; routinizing and systemizing reflexivity; bringing other actors into the process; and “showing our work” in the publication process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049096519002233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Data collection ; Data Interpretation ; Ethics ; Ethnography ; Feminism ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Intersectionality ; Interviews ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Political science ; Positionality ; Posture ; Production ; Qualitative Research ; Reflexivity ; Religious Conflict ; Religious identity ; Research Design ; Researchers ; State Officials ; Teaching Methods ; The Profession</subject><ispartof>PS, political science & politics, 2020-07, Vol.53 (3), p.527-531</ispartof><rights>American Political Science Association 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f3767fc53bf6bd36b4d12072a1f1f212943c1a248a31a9f13bd0bde651b914da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f3767fc53bf6bd36b4d12072a1f1f212943c1a248a31a9f13bd0bde651b914da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6350-9646</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1049096519002233/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,12828,27327,27907,27908,33757,55611</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soedirgo, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glas, Aarie</creatorcontrib><title>Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge</title><title>PS, political science & politics</title><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><description>How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically and how it is applied. Ignoring the dynamism of positionality in practice has implications for the research process. This article theorizes one means of recognizing and responding to positionality in practice: a posture of “active reflexivity.” It outlines how we can become actively reflexive by adopting a disposition toward both ongoing reflection about our own social location and ongoing reflection on our assumptions regarding others’ perceptions. We then articulate four strategies for doing active reflexivity: recording assumptions around positionality; routinizing and systemizing reflexivity; bringing other actors into the process; and “showing our work” in the publication process.</description><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data Interpretation</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Intersectionality</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Positionality</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Religious Conflict</subject><subject>Religious identity</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>State Officials</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>The Profession</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwHPq5lks9t4K8UvLFh0PS_ZfGjKdlOTbWv_vSkteBDnMjPMe495D6FLINdAoLx5A5ILIgoOghBKGTtCA-CszLhg_DjN6Zzt7qfoLMY5STXiZICqym9k0Hiserc2-NXY1ny7teu3t3jmo-ud72SbViw7jWdBJpwy2HW4_zRp93qldhjsLX7u_KY1-sOcoxMr22guDn2I3u_vqsljNn15eJqMp5liBekzy8qitIqzxhaNZkWTa6CkpBIsWApU5EyBpPlIMpDCAms0abRJHhsBuZZsiK72usvgv1Ym9vXcr0L6N9Y0p1ACL0c8oWCPUsHHGIytl8EtZNjWQOpdePWf8BKHHThy0QSXPP1K_8_6ATCOcLs</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Soedirgo, Jessica</creator><creator>Glas, Aarie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-9646</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge</title><author>Soedirgo, Jessica ; Glas, Aarie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f3767fc53bf6bd36b4d12072a1f1f212943c1a248a31a9f13bd0bde651b914da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data Interpretation</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Intersectionality</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Positionality</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Religious Conflict</topic><topic>Religious identity</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>State Officials</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>The Profession</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soedirgo, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glas, Aarie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soedirgo, Jessica</au><au>Glas, Aarie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science & politics</jtitle><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>527-531</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract>How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically and how it is applied. Ignoring the dynamism of positionality in practice has implications for the research process. This article theorizes one means of recognizing and responding to positionality in practice: a posture of “active reflexivity.” It outlines how we can become actively reflexive by adopting a disposition toward both ongoing reflection about our own social location and ongoing reflection on our assumptions regarding others’ perceptions. We then articulate four strategies for doing active reflexivity: recording assumptions around positionality; routinizing and systemizing reflexivity; bringing other actors into the process; and “showing our work” in the publication process.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049096519002233</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-9646</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1049-0965 |
ispartof | PS, political science & politics, 2020-07, Vol.53 (3), p.527-531 |
issn | 1049-0965 1537-5935 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2421715785 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Data collection Data Interpretation Ethics Ethnography Feminism Interpersonal Relationship Intersectionality Interviews Minority & ethnic groups Political science Positionality Posture Production Qualitative Research Reflexivity Religious Conflict Religious identity Research Design Researchers State Officials Teaching Methods The Profession |
title | Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T01%3A55%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20Active%20Reflexivity:%20Positionality%20and%20Practice%20in%20the%20Production%20of%20Knowledge&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Soedirgo,%20Jessica&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=527-531&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049096519002233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2421715785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2421715785&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1049096519002233&rfr_iscdi=true |