Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge

How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PS, political science & politics political science & politics, 2020-07, Vol.53 (3), p.527-531
Hauptverfasser: Soedirgo, Jessica, Glas, Aarie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 531
container_issue 3
container_start_page 527
container_title PS, political science & politics
container_volume 53
creator Soedirgo, Jessica
Glas, Aarie
description How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically and how it is applied. Ignoring the dynamism of positionality in practice has implications for the research process. This article theorizes one means of recognizing and responding to positionality in practice: a posture of “active reflexivity.” It outlines how we can become actively reflexive by adopting a disposition toward both ongoing reflection about our own social location and ongoing reflection on our assumptions regarding others’ perceptions. We then articulate four strategies for doing active reflexivity: recording assumptions around positionality; routinizing and systemizing reflexivity; bringing other actors into the process; and “showing our work” in the publication process.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1049096519002233
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2421715785</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1049096519002233</cupid><sourcerecordid>2421715785</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f3767fc53bf6bd36b4d12072a1f1f212943c1a248a31a9f13bd0bde651b914da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwHPq5lks9t4K8UvLFh0PS_ZfGjKdlOTbWv_vSkteBDnMjPMe495D6FLINdAoLx5A5ILIgoOghBKGTtCA-CszLhg_DjN6Zzt7qfoLMY5STXiZICqym9k0Hiserc2-NXY1ny7teu3t3jmo-ud72SbViw7jWdBJpwy2HW4_zRp93qldhjsLX7u_KY1-sOcoxMr22guDn2I3u_vqsljNn15eJqMp5liBekzy8qitIqzxhaNZkWTa6CkpBIsWApU5EyBpPlIMpDCAms0abRJHhsBuZZsiK72usvgv1Ym9vXcr0L6N9Y0p1ACL0c8oWCPUsHHGIytl8EtZNjWQOpdePWf8BKHHThy0QSXPP1K_8_6ATCOcLs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2421715785</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Soedirgo, Jessica ; Glas, Aarie</creator><creatorcontrib>Soedirgo, Jessica ; Glas, Aarie</creatorcontrib><description>How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically and how it is applied. Ignoring the dynamism of positionality in practice has implications for the research process. This article theorizes one means of recognizing and responding to positionality in practice: a posture of “active reflexivity.” It outlines how we can become actively reflexive by adopting a disposition toward both ongoing reflection about our own social location and ongoing reflection on our assumptions regarding others’ perceptions. We then articulate four strategies for doing active reflexivity: recording assumptions around positionality; routinizing and systemizing reflexivity; bringing other actors into the process; and “showing our work” in the publication process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1049-0965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5935</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1049096519002233</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Data collection ; Data Interpretation ; Ethics ; Ethnography ; Feminism ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Intersectionality ; Interviews ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Political science ; Positionality ; Posture ; Production ; Qualitative Research ; Reflexivity ; Religious Conflict ; Religious identity ; Research Design ; Researchers ; State Officials ; Teaching Methods ; The Profession</subject><ispartof>PS, political science &amp; politics, 2020-07, Vol.53 (3), p.527-531</ispartof><rights>American Political Science Association 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f3767fc53bf6bd36b4d12072a1f1f212943c1a248a31a9f13bd0bde651b914da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f3767fc53bf6bd36b4d12072a1f1f212943c1a248a31a9f13bd0bde651b914da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6350-9646</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1049096519002233/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,778,782,12828,27327,27907,27908,33757,55611</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Soedirgo, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glas, Aarie</creatorcontrib><title>Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge</title><title>PS, political science &amp; politics</title><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><description>How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically and how it is applied. Ignoring the dynamism of positionality in practice has implications for the research process. This article theorizes one means of recognizing and responding to positionality in practice: a posture of “active reflexivity.” It outlines how we can become actively reflexive by adopting a disposition toward both ongoing reflection about our own social location and ongoing reflection on our assumptions regarding others’ perceptions. We then articulate four strategies for doing active reflexivity: recording assumptions around positionality; routinizing and systemizing reflexivity; bringing other actors into the process; and “showing our work” in the publication process.</description><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Data Interpretation</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>Feminism</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Intersectionality</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Positionality</subject><subject>Posture</subject><subject>Production</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Reflexivity</subject><subject>Religious Conflict</subject><subject>Religious identity</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>State Officials</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>The Profession</subject><issn>1049-0965</issn><issn>1537-5935</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4AbwHPq5lks9t4K8UvLFh0PS_ZfGjKdlOTbWv_vSkteBDnMjPMe495D6FLINdAoLx5A5ILIgoOghBKGTtCA-CszLhg_DjN6Zzt7qfoLMY5STXiZICqym9k0Hiserc2-NXY1ny7teu3t3jmo-ud72SbViw7jWdBJpwy2HW4_zRp93qldhjsLX7u_KY1-sOcoxMr22guDn2I3u_vqsljNn15eJqMp5liBekzy8qitIqzxhaNZkWTa6CkpBIsWApU5EyBpPlIMpDCAms0abRJHhsBuZZsiK72usvgv1Ym9vXcr0L6N9Y0p1ACL0c8oWCPUsHHGIytl8EtZNjWQOpdePWf8BKHHThy0QSXPP1K_8_6ATCOcLs</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Soedirgo, Jessica</creator><creator>Glas, Aarie</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88F</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M1Q</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-9646</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge</title><author>Soedirgo, Jessica ; Glas, Aarie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-f3767fc53bf6bd36b4d12072a1f1f212943c1a248a31a9f13bd0bde651b914da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Data Interpretation</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>Feminism</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Intersectionality</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Positionality</topic><topic>Posture</topic><topic>Production</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Reflexivity</topic><topic>Religious Conflict</topic><topic>Religious identity</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>State Officials</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>The Profession</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Soedirgo, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glas, Aarie</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Military Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Military Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>PS, political science &amp; politics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Soedirgo, Jessica</au><au>Glas, Aarie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge</atitle><jtitle>PS, political science &amp; politics</jtitle><addtitle>APSC</addtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>527</spage><epage>531</epage><pages>527-531</pages><issn>1049-0965</issn><eissn>1537-5935</eissn><abstract>How should scholars recognize and respond to the complexities of positionality during the research process? Although there has been much theorizing on the intersectional and context-dependent nature of positionality, there remains a disjuncture between how positionality is understood theoretically and how it is applied. Ignoring the dynamism of positionality in practice has implications for the research process. This article theorizes one means of recognizing and responding to positionality in practice: a posture of “active reflexivity.” It outlines how we can become actively reflexive by adopting a disposition toward both ongoing reflection about our own social location and ongoing reflection on our assumptions regarding others’ perceptions. We then articulate four strategies for doing active reflexivity: recording assumptions around positionality; routinizing and systemizing reflexivity; bringing other actors into the process; and “showing our work” in the publication process.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1049096519002233</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6350-9646</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1049-0965
ispartof PS, political science & politics, 2020-07, Vol.53 (3), p.527-531
issn 1049-0965
1537-5935
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2421715785
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts; Cambridge University Press Journals Complete
subjects Data collection
Data Interpretation
Ethics
Ethnography
Feminism
Interpersonal Relationship
Intersectionality
Interviews
Minority & ethnic groups
Political science
Positionality
Posture
Production
Qualitative Research
Reflexivity
Religious Conflict
Religious identity
Research Design
Researchers
State Officials
Teaching Methods
The Profession
title Toward Active Reflexivity: Positionality and Practice in the Production of Knowledge
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T01%3A55%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Toward%20Active%20Reflexivity:%20Positionality%20and%20Practice%20in%20the%20Production%20of%20Knowledge&rft.jtitle=PS,%20political%20science%20&%20politics&rft.au=Soedirgo,%20Jessica&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=527&rft.epage=531&rft.pages=527-531&rft.issn=1049-0965&rft.eissn=1537-5935&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1049096519002233&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2421715785%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2421715785&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1049096519002233&rfr_iscdi=true