Biases in Structure Functions from Observations of Submesoscale Flows
Surface drifter observations from the LAgrangian Submesoscale ExpeRiment (LASER) campaign in the Gulf of Mexico are paired with Eulerian (ship‐borne X‐band radar) data to demonstrate that velocity structure functions from drifters differ systematically from Eulerian structure functions over scales f...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2020-06, Vol.125 (6), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans |
container_volume | 125 |
creator | Pearson, Jenna Fox‐Kemper, Baylor Pearson, Brodie Chang, Henry Haus, Brian K. Horstmann, Jochen Huntley, Helga S. Kirwan, A. D. Lund, Björn Poje, Andrew |
description | Surface drifter observations from the LAgrangian Submesoscale ExpeRiment (LASER) campaign in the Gulf of Mexico are paired with Eulerian (ship‐borne X‐band radar) data to demonstrate that velocity structure functions from drifters differ systematically from Eulerian structure functions over scales from 0.4 to 7 km. These differences result from drifters oversampling surface convergences and regions of intense vorticity. The first‐, second‐, and third‐order structure functions are calculated using quasi‐Lagrangian (drifter) and Eulerian data from approximately the same location and time. Differences between quasi‐Lagrangian and Eulerian structure functions are attributed to two forms of bias. The first bias results from the mean divergence or vorticity of the background flow creating nonzero first‐order structure functions. This background bias affects both quasi‐Lagrangian and Eulerian data when insufficiently time‐averaged. It severely biases the drifter third‐order structure functions but is smaller in Eulerian structure functions at both second and third order. This bias can be corrected for using lower‐order structure functions. The second form of bias results from drifters accumulating in regions with flow statistics that differ from undersampled regions. This accumulation bias is diagnosed by identifying the dependence of the Eulerian structure functions on divergence and vorticity as well as scale. Together, both biases suggest that caution is needed when interpreting second‐order drifter statistics and that linking raw third‐order drifter statistics to energy fluxes is often erroneous in ocean data: Even with background correction and sufficient time‐averaging, drifters overestimate the Eulerian estimate of the third‐order structure function by up to a factor of 5 when signs are consistent.
Plain Language Summary
Structure functions are a statistic used to measure the spreading of material floating in the ocean, such as plastics or spilled oil, as well as the transfer of properties like energy across scales. Their calculation requires knowledge of velocities of nearby particles. These can be measured either by (nearly) stationary instruments, such as a radar, or by tracking drifters. Offshore drifter tracking is generally easier, but they are known to be attracted to specific flow features, such as fronts, windrows, and vortices, leading to less sampling of other areas. By considering a unique data set of nearly simultaneous velocity measurements f |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2019JC015769 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2420589390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2420589390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3301-21c0f3d49f504c6604fd5ff09f46ad98c0a0e25475fbdb0b1ff005ab876a8a423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90F9LwzAQAPAgCo65Nz9AwVerl39t86hlm47BwOlzSNMEOrpmJo1j336Vivjkvdxx9-MODqFbDA8YiHgkgMWqBMzzTFygCcGZSAUR-PK3zvk1moWwgyEKXDAmJmj-3KhgQtJ0ybb3UffRm2QRO903rguJ9W6fbKpg_JcaO84m21jtTXBBq3awrTuGG3RlVRvM7CdP0cdi_l6-pOvN8rV8WqeKUsApwRosrZmwHJjOMmC25taCsCxTtSg0KDCEs5zbqq6gwsMMuKqKPFOFYoRO0d249-DdZzShlzsXfTeclIQR4IWgAgZ1PyrtXQjeWHnwzV75k8Qgv38l__5q4HTkx6Y1p3-tXC3fSsIAMD0DHe5p3Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2420589390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biases in Structure Functions from Observations of Submesoscale Flows</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Pearson, Jenna ; Fox‐Kemper, Baylor ; Pearson, Brodie ; Chang, Henry ; Haus, Brian K. ; Horstmann, Jochen ; Huntley, Helga S. ; Kirwan, A. D. ; Lund, Björn ; Poje, Andrew</creator><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Jenna ; Fox‐Kemper, Baylor ; Pearson, Brodie ; Chang, Henry ; Haus, Brian K. ; Horstmann, Jochen ; Huntley, Helga S. ; Kirwan, A. D. ; Lund, Björn ; Poje, Andrew</creatorcontrib><description>Surface drifter observations from the LAgrangian Submesoscale ExpeRiment (LASER) campaign in the Gulf of Mexico are paired with Eulerian (ship‐borne X‐band radar) data to demonstrate that velocity structure functions from drifters differ systematically from Eulerian structure functions over scales from 0.4 to 7 km. These differences result from drifters oversampling surface convergences and regions of intense vorticity. The first‐, second‐, and third‐order structure functions are calculated using quasi‐Lagrangian (drifter) and Eulerian data from approximately the same location and time. Differences between quasi‐Lagrangian and Eulerian structure functions are attributed to two forms of bias. The first bias results from the mean divergence or vorticity of the background flow creating nonzero first‐order structure functions. This background bias affects both quasi‐Lagrangian and Eulerian data when insufficiently time‐averaged. It severely biases the drifter third‐order structure functions but is smaller in Eulerian structure functions at both second and third order. This bias can be corrected for using lower‐order structure functions. The second form of bias results from drifters accumulating in regions with flow statistics that differ from undersampled regions. This accumulation bias is diagnosed by identifying the dependence of the Eulerian structure functions on divergence and vorticity as well as scale. Together, both biases suggest that caution is needed when interpreting second‐order drifter statistics and that linking raw third‐order drifter statistics to energy fluxes is often erroneous in ocean data: Even with background correction and sufficient time‐averaging, drifters overestimate the Eulerian estimate of the third‐order structure function by up to a factor of 5 when signs are consistent.
Plain Language Summary
Structure functions are a statistic used to measure the spreading of material floating in the ocean, such as plastics or spilled oil, as well as the transfer of properties like energy across scales. Their calculation requires knowledge of velocities of nearby particles. These can be measured either by (nearly) stationary instruments, such as a radar, or by tracking drifters. Offshore drifter tracking is generally easier, but they are known to be attracted to specific flow features, such as fronts, windrows, and vortices, leading to less sampling of other areas. By considering a unique data set of nearly simultaneous velocity measurements from both radar and drifters, this paper investigates how the uneven sampling by drifters, as well as the limited area coverage of radar measurements, impacts the structure function statistics and their interpretation.
Key Points
Structure functions calculated from observed drifters are subject to accumulation bias when compared to those from Eulerian observations
Structure functions calculated from either drifters or Eulerian data may be subject to a background bias due to mean gradients in the flow
These biases preclude inferences about energy cascades or fluxes from structure functions from drifters or localized Eulerian data</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9291</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2019JC015769</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Bias ; Data ; Divergence ; Drift ; Drifters ; Fluid dynamics ; Fluid flow ; Fluxes ; Fronts ; Geophysics ; Gulf of Mexico ; Instruments ; Lasers ; Mathematical analysis ; Oceans ; Offshore ; Oil spills ; Oversampling ; Polymers ; Radar ; Radar data ; Radar measurement ; Radar tracking ; Regions ; Sampling ; Statistical methods ; Statistics ; Structure Functions ; Structure-function relationships ; Surface Drifters ; Velocity ; Vorticity ; Windrows ; X‐band Radar</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2020-06, Vol.125 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2020. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3301-21c0f3d49f504c6604fd5ff09f46ad98c0a0e25475fbdb0b1ff005ab876a8a423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3301-21c0f3d49f504c6604fd5ff09f46ad98c0a0e25475fbdb0b1ff005ab876a8a423</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1372-5628 ; 0000-0002-4637-4433 ; 0000-0003-1201-7064 ; 0000-0002-0202-0481 ; 0000-0002-2871-2048 ; 0000-0002-9225-4483 ; 0000-0002-9440-3825</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2019JC015769$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2019JC015769$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27903,27904,45553,45554,46388,46812</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox‐Kemper, Baylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Brodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haus, Brian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horstmann, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntley, Helga S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirwan, A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poje, Andrew</creatorcontrib><title>Biases in Structure Functions from Observations of Submesoscale Flows</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</title><description>Surface drifter observations from the LAgrangian Submesoscale ExpeRiment (LASER) campaign in the Gulf of Mexico are paired with Eulerian (ship‐borne X‐band radar) data to demonstrate that velocity structure functions from drifters differ systematically from Eulerian structure functions over scales from 0.4 to 7 km. These differences result from drifters oversampling surface convergences and regions of intense vorticity. The first‐, second‐, and third‐order structure functions are calculated using quasi‐Lagrangian (drifter) and Eulerian data from approximately the same location and time. Differences between quasi‐Lagrangian and Eulerian structure functions are attributed to two forms of bias. The first bias results from the mean divergence or vorticity of the background flow creating nonzero first‐order structure functions. This background bias affects both quasi‐Lagrangian and Eulerian data when insufficiently time‐averaged. It severely biases the drifter third‐order structure functions but is smaller in Eulerian structure functions at both second and third order. This bias can be corrected for using lower‐order structure functions. The second form of bias results from drifters accumulating in regions with flow statistics that differ from undersampled regions. This accumulation bias is diagnosed by identifying the dependence of the Eulerian structure functions on divergence and vorticity as well as scale. Together, both biases suggest that caution is needed when interpreting second‐order drifter statistics and that linking raw third‐order drifter statistics to energy fluxes is often erroneous in ocean data: Even with background correction and sufficient time‐averaging, drifters overestimate the Eulerian estimate of the third‐order structure function by up to a factor of 5 when signs are consistent.
Plain Language Summary
Structure functions are a statistic used to measure the spreading of material floating in the ocean, such as plastics or spilled oil, as well as the transfer of properties like energy across scales. Their calculation requires knowledge of velocities of nearby particles. These can be measured either by (nearly) stationary instruments, such as a radar, or by tracking drifters. Offshore drifter tracking is generally easier, but they are known to be attracted to specific flow features, such as fronts, windrows, and vortices, leading to less sampling of other areas. By considering a unique data set of nearly simultaneous velocity measurements from both radar and drifters, this paper investigates how the uneven sampling by drifters, as well as the limited area coverage of radar measurements, impacts the structure function statistics and their interpretation.
Key Points
Structure functions calculated from observed drifters are subject to accumulation bias when compared to those from Eulerian observations
Structure functions calculated from either drifters or Eulerian data may be subject to a background bias due to mean gradients in the flow
These biases preclude inferences about energy cascades or fluxes from structure functions from drifters or localized Eulerian data</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Data</subject><subject>Divergence</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>Drifters</subject><subject>Fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Fluxes</subject><subject>Fronts</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Gulf of Mexico</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Oceans</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Oil spills</subject><subject>Oversampling</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Radar</subject><subject>Radar data</subject><subject>Radar measurement</subject><subject>Radar tracking</subject><subject>Regions</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Structure Functions</subject><subject>Structure-function relationships</subject><subject>Surface Drifters</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Vorticity</subject><subject>Windrows</subject><subject>X‐band Radar</subject><issn>2169-9275</issn><issn>2169-9291</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90F9LwzAQAPAgCo65Nz9AwVerl39t86hlm47BwOlzSNMEOrpmJo1j336Vivjkvdxx9-MODqFbDA8YiHgkgMWqBMzzTFygCcGZSAUR-PK3zvk1moWwgyEKXDAmJmj-3KhgQtJ0ybb3UffRm2QRO903rguJ9W6fbKpg_JcaO84m21jtTXBBq3awrTuGG3RlVRvM7CdP0cdi_l6-pOvN8rV8WqeKUsApwRosrZmwHJjOMmC25taCsCxTtSg0KDCEs5zbqq6gwsMMuKqKPFOFYoRO0d249-DdZzShlzsXfTeclIQR4IWgAgZ1PyrtXQjeWHnwzV75k8Qgv38l__5q4HTkx6Y1p3-tXC3fSsIAMD0DHe5p3Q</recordid><startdate>202006</startdate><enddate>202006</enddate><creator>Pearson, Jenna</creator><creator>Fox‐Kemper, Baylor</creator><creator>Pearson, Brodie</creator><creator>Chang, Henry</creator><creator>Haus, Brian K.</creator><creator>Horstmann, Jochen</creator><creator>Huntley, Helga S.</creator><creator>Kirwan, A. D.</creator><creator>Lund, Björn</creator><creator>Poje, Andrew</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1372-5628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4637-4433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1201-7064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0202-0481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2871-2048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9225-4483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-3825</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202006</creationdate><title>Biases in Structure Functions from Observations of Submesoscale Flows</title><author>Pearson, Jenna ; Fox‐Kemper, Baylor ; Pearson, Brodie ; Chang, Henry ; Haus, Brian K. ; Horstmann, Jochen ; Huntley, Helga S. ; Kirwan, A. D. ; Lund, Björn ; Poje, Andrew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3301-21c0f3d49f504c6604fd5ff09f46ad98c0a0e25475fbdb0b1ff005ab876a8a423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Data</topic><topic>Divergence</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>Drifters</topic><topic>Fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Fluxes</topic><topic>Fronts</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Gulf of Mexico</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Oceans</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Oil spills</topic><topic>Oversampling</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Radar</topic><topic>Radar data</topic><topic>Radar measurement</topic><topic>Radar tracking</topic><topic>Regions</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Structure Functions</topic><topic>Structure-function relationships</topic><topic>Surface Drifters</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Vorticity</topic><topic>Windrows</topic><topic>X‐band Radar</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Jenna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fox‐Kemper, Baylor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pearson, Brodie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Henry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haus, Brian K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horstmann, Jochen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huntley, Helga S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirwan, A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Björn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poje, Andrew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pearson, Jenna</au><au>Fox‐Kemper, Baylor</au><au>Pearson, Brodie</au><au>Chang, Henry</au><au>Haus, Brian K.</au><au>Horstmann, Jochen</au><au>Huntley, Helga S.</au><au>Kirwan, A. D.</au><au>Lund, Björn</au><au>Poje, Andrew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biases in Structure Functions from Observations of Submesoscale Flows</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Oceans</jtitle><date>2020-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9275</issn><eissn>2169-9291</eissn><abstract>Surface drifter observations from the LAgrangian Submesoscale ExpeRiment (LASER) campaign in the Gulf of Mexico are paired with Eulerian (ship‐borne X‐band radar) data to demonstrate that velocity structure functions from drifters differ systematically from Eulerian structure functions over scales from 0.4 to 7 km. These differences result from drifters oversampling surface convergences and regions of intense vorticity. The first‐, second‐, and third‐order structure functions are calculated using quasi‐Lagrangian (drifter) and Eulerian data from approximately the same location and time. Differences between quasi‐Lagrangian and Eulerian structure functions are attributed to two forms of bias. The first bias results from the mean divergence or vorticity of the background flow creating nonzero first‐order structure functions. This background bias affects both quasi‐Lagrangian and Eulerian data when insufficiently time‐averaged. It severely biases the drifter third‐order structure functions but is smaller in Eulerian structure functions at both second and third order. This bias can be corrected for using lower‐order structure functions. The second form of bias results from drifters accumulating in regions with flow statistics that differ from undersampled regions. This accumulation bias is diagnosed by identifying the dependence of the Eulerian structure functions on divergence and vorticity as well as scale. Together, both biases suggest that caution is needed when interpreting second‐order drifter statistics and that linking raw third‐order drifter statistics to energy fluxes is often erroneous in ocean data: Even with background correction and sufficient time‐averaging, drifters overestimate the Eulerian estimate of the third‐order structure function by up to a factor of 5 when signs are consistent.
Plain Language Summary
Structure functions are a statistic used to measure the spreading of material floating in the ocean, such as plastics or spilled oil, as well as the transfer of properties like energy across scales. Their calculation requires knowledge of velocities of nearby particles. These can be measured either by (nearly) stationary instruments, such as a radar, or by tracking drifters. Offshore drifter tracking is generally easier, but they are known to be attracted to specific flow features, such as fronts, windrows, and vortices, leading to less sampling of other areas. By considering a unique data set of nearly simultaneous velocity measurements from both radar and drifters, this paper investigates how the uneven sampling by drifters, as well as the limited area coverage of radar measurements, impacts the structure function statistics and their interpretation.
Key Points
Structure functions calculated from observed drifters are subject to accumulation bias when compared to those from Eulerian observations
Structure functions calculated from either drifters or Eulerian data may be subject to a background bias due to mean gradients in the flow
These biases preclude inferences about energy cascades or fluxes from structure functions from drifters or localized Eulerian data</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2019JC015769</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1372-5628</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4637-4433</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1201-7064</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0202-0481</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2871-2048</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9225-4483</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-3825</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9275 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Oceans, 2020-06, Vol.125 (6), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9275 2169-9291 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2420589390 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals; Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Accumulation Bias Data Divergence Drift Drifters Fluid dynamics Fluid flow Fluxes Fronts Geophysics Gulf of Mexico Instruments Lasers Mathematical analysis Oceans Offshore Oil spills Oversampling Polymers Radar Radar data Radar measurement Radar tracking Regions Sampling Statistical methods Statistics Structure Functions Structure-function relationships Surface Drifters Velocity Vorticity Windrows X‐band Radar |
title | Biases in Structure Functions from Observations of Submesoscale Flows |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A11%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biases%20in%20Structure%20Functions%20from%20Observations%20of%20Submesoscale%20Flows&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Oceans&rft.au=Pearson,%20Jenna&rft.date=2020-06&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9275&rft.eissn=2169-9291&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2019JC015769&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420589390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2420589390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |