Channel and vegetation recovery from dredging of a large river in the Gulf coastal plain, USA
Anthropogenic impacts in large rivers are widely studied, but studies of recovery once a disturbance has stopped are uncommon. This study examines the biogeomorphic recovery of a 40‐km river corridor on the mid‐Apalachicola River, Florida following the cessation of dredging, disposal, and snag remov...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earth surface processes and landforms 2020-07, Vol.45 (9), p.1926-1944 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1944 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 1926 |
container_title | Earth surface processes and landforms |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Mossa, Joann Chen, Yin‐Hsuen Kondolf, G. Mathias Walls, Scott Porter |
description | Anthropogenic impacts in large rivers are widely studied, but studies of recovery once a disturbance has stopped are uncommon. This study examines the biogeomorphic recovery of a 40‐km river corridor on the mid‐Apalachicola River, Florida following the cessation of dredging, disposal, and snag removal in 2002. This failed navigation project resulted in vegetation losses (~166 ha between 1941 and 2004), river widening, and increased point bar areas. We used paired sets of imagery for a 10‐year period during the recovery process at two different flow levels to assess sand bar change, land cover change, and their spatial variations.
Most large sand bars decreased significantly in area due to growth of pioneer species, typically from the bankside of the bar. Mean bar area shrank 0.17 and 0.20 ha for the 30th and 1st percentile flows, respectively. For the entire study area, both water‐level comparisons showed gains in vegetation (23.36 and 15.83 ha), compensated by losses in the extent of water (16.83 and 8.55 ha) and sand bar losses (6.53 and 7.28 ha). Overall, these gains during the 10‐year passive recovery period are equivalent to ~15% of the vegetation losses that resulted from the navigational dredging.
As found in other studies, most of the pioneer vegetation grew approximately 2 m relative elevation above the low‐water surface. The initial length of the tree line and the area of herbaceous growth both had a significant and positive relationship with the area of new vegetation growth over the study interval. As parts of the river are healing, reduced channel capacity from narrowing and tree growth will benefit the floodplain. As elsewhere, understanding of a river's biogeomorphology, hydrology, and disturbance history can help in selecting appropriate recovery metrics to further advance the understanding and management of disturbed floodplains. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Many factors influence the passive recovery of sand bars enlarged by dredging and disposal in a river modified for navigation. Using paired imagery following the cessation of dredging in 2002, we found notable recovery of ~15% of prior vegetation losses a decade later. Most pioneer vegetation grew ~2 m relative elevation above the low‐water surface, and the area of new tree growth correlates with the initial tree line length and the area of herbaceous growth. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/esp.4856 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2420170547</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2420170547</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3166-ebf8707d12bcba387770ac6af231790ac103ee89f312ddc6e22bbdd511f93a9e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p-BMC3nhhZz66prkcY5vCQGHuUkLanHQdXVKTbrJ_b-e89eocOA_vgRehe0pGlBD2DLEdpfk4u0ADSmSWyJyLSzQgVIpEci6u0U2MW0IoTXM5QJ_TjXYOGqydwQeooNNd7R0OUPoDhCO2we-wCWCq2lXYW6xxo0MFONT9HdcOdxvAi31jcel17HSD20bX7gmvV5NbdGV1E-Hubw7Rej77mL4ky7fF63SyTDSnWZZAYXNBhKGsKAvNcyEE0WWmLeNUyH6lhAPk0nLKjCkzYKwojBlTaiXXEvgQPZxz2-C_9hA7tfX74PqXiqWMUEHGqejV41mVwccYwKo21DsdjooSdSpP9eWpU3k9Tc70u27g-K9Ts9X7r_8BvW5wEg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2420170547</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Channel and vegetation recovery from dredging of a large river in the Gulf coastal plain, USA</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Mossa, Joann ; Chen, Yin‐Hsuen ; Kondolf, G. Mathias ; Walls, Scott Porter</creator><creatorcontrib>Mossa, Joann ; Chen, Yin‐Hsuen ; Kondolf, G. Mathias ; Walls, Scott Porter</creatorcontrib><description>Anthropogenic impacts in large rivers are widely studied, but studies of recovery once a disturbance has stopped are uncommon. This study examines the biogeomorphic recovery of a 40‐km river corridor on the mid‐Apalachicola River, Florida following the cessation of dredging, disposal, and snag removal in 2002. This failed navigation project resulted in vegetation losses (~166 ha between 1941 and 2004), river widening, and increased point bar areas. We used paired sets of imagery for a 10‐year period during the recovery process at two different flow levels to assess sand bar change, land cover change, and their spatial variations.
Most large sand bars decreased significantly in area due to growth of pioneer species, typically from the bankside of the bar. Mean bar area shrank 0.17 and 0.20 ha for the 30th and 1st percentile flows, respectively. For the entire study area, both water‐level comparisons showed gains in vegetation (23.36 and 15.83 ha), compensated by losses in the extent of water (16.83 and 8.55 ha) and sand bar losses (6.53 and 7.28 ha). Overall, these gains during the 10‐year passive recovery period are equivalent to ~15% of the vegetation losses that resulted from the navigational dredging.
As found in other studies, most of the pioneer vegetation grew approximately 2 m relative elevation above the low‐water surface. The initial length of the tree line and the area of herbaceous growth both had a significant and positive relationship with the area of new vegetation growth over the study interval. As parts of the river are healing, reduced channel capacity from narrowing and tree growth will benefit the floodplain. As elsewhere, understanding of a river's biogeomorphology, hydrology, and disturbance history can help in selecting appropriate recovery metrics to further advance the understanding and management of disturbed floodplains. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Many factors influence the passive recovery of sand bars enlarged by dredging and disposal in a river modified for navigation. Using paired imagery following the cessation of dredging in 2002, we found notable recovery of ~15% of prior vegetation losses a decade later. Most pioneer vegetation grew ~2 m relative elevation above the low‐water surface, and the area of new tree growth correlates with the initial tree line length and the area of herbaceous growth.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0197-9337</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9837</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/esp.4856</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; biogeomorphology ; Biological effects ; Bottom trawling ; Channel capacity ; Coastal plains ; Dredging ; dredging impacts ; Floodplains ; fluvial geomorphology ; Geomorphology ; Human influences ; Hydrology ; Imagery ; Land cover ; Navigation ; Navigation behavior ; passive restoration ; Recovery ; River channels ; Rivers ; Sand ; Sand bars ; Spatial variations ; Tree growth ; Treeline ; Vegetation ; Vegetation growth ; vegetative recovery ; Water levels</subject><ispartof>Earth surface processes and landforms, 2020-07, Vol.45 (9), p.1926-1944</ispartof><rights>2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3166-ebf8707d12bcba387770ac6af231790ac103ee89f312ddc6e22bbdd511f93a9e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3166-ebf8707d12bcba387770ac6af231790ac103ee89f312ddc6e22bbdd511f93a9e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4809-5718 ; 0000-0003-4192-6056 ; 0000-0001-5639-9995</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fesp.4856$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fesp.4856$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mossa, Joann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yin‐Hsuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondolf, G. Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walls, Scott Porter</creatorcontrib><title>Channel and vegetation recovery from dredging of a large river in the Gulf coastal plain, USA</title><title>Earth surface processes and landforms</title><description>Anthropogenic impacts in large rivers are widely studied, but studies of recovery once a disturbance has stopped are uncommon. This study examines the biogeomorphic recovery of a 40‐km river corridor on the mid‐Apalachicola River, Florida following the cessation of dredging, disposal, and snag removal in 2002. This failed navigation project resulted in vegetation losses (~166 ha between 1941 and 2004), river widening, and increased point bar areas. We used paired sets of imagery for a 10‐year period during the recovery process at two different flow levels to assess sand bar change, land cover change, and their spatial variations.
Most large sand bars decreased significantly in area due to growth of pioneer species, typically from the bankside of the bar. Mean bar area shrank 0.17 and 0.20 ha for the 30th and 1st percentile flows, respectively. For the entire study area, both water‐level comparisons showed gains in vegetation (23.36 and 15.83 ha), compensated by losses in the extent of water (16.83 and 8.55 ha) and sand bar losses (6.53 and 7.28 ha). Overall, these gains during the 10‐year passive recovery period are equivalent to ~15% of the vegetation losses that resulted from the navigational dredging.
As found in other studies, most of the pioneer vegetation grew approximately 2 m relative elevation above the low‐water surface. The initial length of the tree line and the area of herbaceous growth both had a significant and positive relationship with the area of new vegetation growth over the study interval. As parts of the river are healing, reduced channel capacity from narrowing and tree growth will benefit the floodplain. As elsewhere, understanding of a river's biogeomorphology, hydrology, and disturbance history can help in selecting appropriate recovery metrics to further advance the understanding and management of disturbed floodplains. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Many factors influence the passive recovery of sand bars enlarged by dredging and disposal in a river modified for navigation. Using paired imagery following the cessation of dredging in 2002, we found notable recovery of ~15% of prior vegetation losses a decade later. Most pioneer vegetation grew ~2 m relative elevation above the low‐water surface, and the area of new tree growth correlates with the initial tree line length and the area of herbaceous growth.</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>biogeomorphology</subject><subject>Biological effects</subject><subject>Bottom trawling</subject><subject>Channel capacity</subject><subject>Coastal plains</subject><subject>Dredging</subject><subject>dredging impacts</subject><subject>Floodplains</subject><subject>fluvial geomorphology</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Imagery</subject><subject>Land cover</subject><subject>Navigation</subject><subject>Navigation behavior</subject><subject>passive restoration</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>River channels</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Sand bars</subject><subject>Spatial variations</subject><subject>Tree growth</subject><subject>Treeline</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><subject>Vegetation growth</subject><subject>vegetative recovery</subject><subject>Water levels</subject><issn>0197-9337</issn><issn>1096-9837</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10F1LwzAUBuAgCs4p-BMC3nhhZz66prkcY5vCQGHuUkLanHQdXVKTbrJ_b-e89eocOA_vgRehe0pGlBD2DLEdpfk4u0ADSmSWyJyLSzQgVIpEci6u0U2MW0IoTXM5QJ_TjXYOGqydwQeooNNd7R0OUPoDhCO2we-wCWCq2lXYW6xxo0MFONT9HdcOdxvAi31jcel17HSD20bX7gmvV5NbdGV1E-Hubw7Rej77mL4ky7fF63SyTDSnWZZAYXNBhKGsKAvNcyEE0WWmLeNUyH6lhAPk0nLKjCkzYKwojBlTaiXXEvgQPZxz2-C_9hA7tfX74PqXiqWMUEHGqejV41mVwccYwKo21DsdjooSdSpP9eWpU3k9Tc70u27g-K9Ts9X7r_8BvW5wEg</recordid><startdate>202007</startdate><enddate>202007</enddate><creator>Mossa, Joann</creator><creator>Chen, Yin‐Hsuen</creator><creator>Kondolf, G. Mathias</creator><creator>Walls, Scott Porter</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4809-5718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-6056</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-9995</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202007</creationdate><title>Channel and vegetation recovery from dredging of a large river in the Gulf coastal plain, USA</title><author>Mossa, Joann ; Chen, Yin‐Hsuen ; Kondolf, G. Mathias ; Walls, Scott Porter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3166-ebf8707d12bcba387770ac6af231790ac103ee89f312ddc6e22bbdd511f93a9e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>biogeomorphology</topic><topic>Biological effects</topic><topic>Bottom trawling</topic><topic>Channel capacity</topic><topic>Coastal plains</topic><topic>Dredging</topic><topic>dredging impacts</topic><topic>Floodplains</topic><topic>fluvial geomorphology</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Imagery</topic><topic>Land cover</topic><topic>Navigation</topic><topic>Navigation behavior</topic><topic>passive restoration</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>River channels</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Sand bars</topic><topic>Spatial variations</topic><topic>Tree growth</topic><topic>Treeline</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><topic>Vegetation growth</topic><topic>vegetative recovery</topic><topic>Water levels</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mossa, Joann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Yin‐Hsuen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondolf, G. Mathias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walls, Scott Porter</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mossa, Joann</au><au>Chen, Yin‐Hsuen</au><au>Kondolf, G. Mathias</au><au>Walls, Scott Porter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Channel and vegetation recovery from dredging of a large river in the Gulf coastal plain, USA</atitle><jtitle>Earth surface processes and landforms</jtitle><date>2020-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1926</spage><epage>1944</epage><pages>1926-1944</pages><issn>0197-9337</issn><eissn>1096-9837</eissn><abstract>Anthropogenic impacts in large rivers are widely studied, but studies of recovery once a disturbance has stopped are uncommon. This study examines the biogeomorphic recovery of a 40‐km river corridor on the mid‐Apalachicola River, Florida following the cessation of dredging, disposal, and snag removal in 2002. This failed navigation project resulted in vegetation losses (~166 ha between 1941 and 2004), river widening, and increased point bar areas. We used paired sets of imagery for a 10‐year period during the recovery process at two different flow levels to assess sand bar change, land cover change, and their spatial variations.
Most large sand bars decreased significantly in area due to growth of pioneer species, typically from the bankside of the bar. Mean bar area shrank 0.17 and 0.20 ha for the 30th and 1st percentile flows, respectively. For the entire study area, both water‐level comparisons showed gains in vegetation (23.36 and 15.83 ha), compensated by losses in the extent of water (16.83 and 8.55 ha) and sand bar losses (6.53 and 7.28 ha). Overall, these gains during the 10‐year passive recovery period are equivalent to ~15% of the vegetation losses that resulted from the navigational dredging.
As found in other studies, most of the pioneer vegetation grew approximately 2 m relative elevation above the low‐water surface. The initial length of the tree line and the area of herbaceous growth both had a significant and positive relationship with the area of new vegetation growth over the study interval. As parts of the river are healing, reduced channel capacity from narrowing and tree growth will benefit the floodplain. As elsewhere, understanding of a river's biogeomorphology, hydrology, and disturbance history can help in selecting appropriate recovery metrics to further advance the understanding and management of disturbed floodplains. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Many factors influence the passive recovery of sand bars enlarged by dredging and disposal in a river modified for navigation. Using paired imagery following the cessation of dredging in 2002, we found notable recovery of ~15% of prior vegetation losses a decade later. Most pioneer vegetation grew ~2 m relative elevation above the low‐water surface, and the area of new tree growth correlates with the initial tree line length and the area of herbaceous growth.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/esp.4856</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4809-5718</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4192-6056</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5639-9995</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0197-9337 |
ispartof | Earth surface processes and landforms, 2020-07, Vol.45 (9), p.1926-1944 |
issn | 0197-9337 1096-9837 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2420170547 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Anthropogenic factors biogeomorphology Biological effects Bottom trawling Channel capacity Coastal plains Dredging dredging impacts Floodplains fluvial geomorphology Geomorphology Human influences Hydrology Imagery Land cover Navigation Navigation behavior passive restoration Recovery River channels Rivers Sand Sand bars Spatial variations Tree growth Treeline Vegetation Vegetation growth vegetative recovery Water levels |
title | Channel and vegetation recovery from dredging of a large river in the Gulf coastal plain, USA |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A12%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Channel%20and%20vegetation%20recovery%20from%20dredging%20of%20a%20large%20river%20in%20the%20Gulf%20coastal%20plain,%20USA&rft.jtitle=Earth%20surface%20processes%20and%20landforms&rft.au=Mossa,%20Joann&rft.date=2020-07&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1926&rft.epage=1944&rft.pages=1926-1944&rft.issn=0197-9337&rft.eissn=1096-9837&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/esp.4856&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2420170547%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2420170547&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |