A stab in the dark: The distance threshold of target identification in low light
Prior research shows that increased distance and decreased light result in less correct eyewitness identifications, yet their combined effect is not well understood. The aim of the present study was to establish the maximum distance in low lux (lx) where an eyewitness's later identification in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cogent psychology 2019-01, Vol.6 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Cogent psychology |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Nyman, Thomas J. Antfolk, Jan Lampinen, James Michael Tuomisto, Maria Kaakinen, Johanna K. Korkman, Julia Santtila, Pekka |
description | Prior research shows that increased distance and decreased light result in less correct eyewitness identifications, yet their combined effect is not well understood. The aim of the present study was to establish the maximum distance in low lux (lx) where an eyewitness's later identification in target present (TP) line-ups is no longer reliable. We randomized participants (N = 178) into one of three lx conditions (high:300 lx, medium:10 lx, low:0.7 lx) and presented them with eight targets (one at a time) at eight separate distances (6-20 m). Each target-presentation was followed by an 8-person simultaneous TP line-up (i.e., there was a .125 probability of choosing the target correctly by chance). We found that the rate of correct TP identifications decreased with increased distance in all lx conditions. At 20 m the rate of correct TP identifications was .53 in the high lx condition, .41 in the medium lx condition and .11 in the low lx condition. The generalizability of our findings to overall eyewitness accuracy is limited by the exclusion of target absent line-ups, yet our findings show that reliable and correct target present identifications are very unlikely following observations made in low lighting (0.7 lx) at 20 m. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/23311908.2019.1632047 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2419908688</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_860e89442e8744e39b240ff34e504f60</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2419908688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-53c7d9555b07a535ba415cd3ba1a742c409bdb636ddd99ebe69ed1e8b2e71ae53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQXURBUX-CEPDcOtkkuxtPluJHQdCDnkOymbSp66YmEfHfu2urePI0jzfz3gzziuKMwpRCAxclY5RKaKYlUDmlFSuB13vF0chPxsb-H3xYnKa0BgDK66oGeVQ8zkjK2hDfk7xCYnV8uSRPI_ID37c40BHTKnSWBEeyjkvMxFvss3e-1dmHfhR34YN0frnKJ8WB013C0109Lp5vrp_md5P7h9vFfHY_abmgeSJYW1sphDBQa8GE0ZyK1jKjqa552XKQxpqKVdZaKdFgJdFSbEyJNdUo2HGx2PraoNdqE_2rjp8qaK--iRCXSsfs2w5VUwE2kvMSm5pzZNKUHJxjHAVwV8Hgdb712sTw9o4pq3V4j_1wvio5lcPjqqYZpsR2qo0hpYjudysFNWahfrJQYxZql8Wgu9rqfO9CfNUfIXZWZf3Zheji8GOfFPvf4gspNY5B</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419908688</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A stab in the dark: The distance threshold of target identification in low light</title><source>Taylor & Francis Open Access</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Nyman, Thomas J. ; Antfolk, Jan ; Lampinen, James Michael ; Tuomisto, Maria ; Kaakinen, Johanna K. ; Korkman, Julia ; Santtila, Pekka</creator><creatorcontrib>Nyman, Thomas J. ; Antfolk, Jan ; Lampinen, James Michael ; Tuomisto, Maria ; Kaakinen, Johanna K. ; Korkman, Julia ; Santtila, Pekka</creatorcontrib><description>Prior research shows that increased distance and decreased light result in less correct eyewitness identifications, yet their combined effect is not well understood. The aim of the present study was to establish the maximum distance in low lux (lx) where an eyewitness's later identification in target present (TP) line-ups is no longer reliable. We randomized participants (N = 178) into one of three lx conditions (high:300 lx, medium:10 lx, low:0.7 lx) and presented them with eight targets (one at a time) at eight separate distances (6-20 m). Each target-presentation was followed by an 8-person simultaneous TP line-up (i.e., there was a .125 probability of choosing the target correctly by chance). We found that the rate of correct TP identifications decreased with increased distance in all lx conditions. At 20 m the rate of correct TP identifications was .53 in the high lx condition, .41 in the medium lx condition and .11 in the low lx condition. The generalizability of our findings to overall eyewitness accuracy is limited by the exclusion of target absent line-ups, yet our findings show that reliable and correct target present identifications are very unlikely following observations made in low lighting (0.7 lx) at 20 m.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2331-1908</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2331-1908</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/23311908.2019.1632047</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Cogent</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Criminology ; distance ; Eyewitness identification ; face recognition ; Identification ; Light ; Lighting ; lux ; Retina ; Witnesses</subject><ispartof>Cogent psychology, 2019-01, Vol.6 (1)</ispartof><rights>2019 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. 2019</rights><rights>2019 The Author(s). This open access article is distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 license. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-53c7d9555b07a535ba415cd3ba1a742c409bdb636ddd99ebe69ed1e8b2e71ae53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-53c7d9555b07a535ba415cd3ba1a742c409bdb636ddd99ebe69ed1e8b2e71ae53</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0334-4987 ; 0000-0002-6409-2528</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/23311908.2019.1632047$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311908.2019.1632047$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,2096,27479,27901,27902,59116,59117</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nyman, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antfolk, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampinen, James Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaakinen, Johanna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korkman, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santtila, Pekka</creatorcontrib><title>A stab in the dark: The distance threshold of target identification in low light</title><title>Cogent psychology</title><description>Prior research shows that increased distance and decreased light result in less correct eyewitness identifications, yet their combined effect is not well understood. The aim of the present study was to establish the maximum distance in low lux (lx) where an eyewitness's later identification in target present (TP) line-ups is no longer reliable. We randomized participants (N = 178) into one of three lx conditions (high:300 lx, medium:10 lx, low:0.7 lx) and presented them with eight targets (one at a time) at eight separate distances (6-20 m). Each target-presentation was followed by an 8-person simultaneous TP line-up (i.e., there was a .125 probability of choosing the target correctly by chance). We found that the rate of correct TP identifications decreased with increased distance in all lx conditions. At 20 m the rate of correct TP identifications was .53 in the high lx condition, .41 in the medium lx condition and .11 in the low lx condition. The generalizability of our findings to overall eyewitness accuracy is limited by the exclusion of target absent line-ups, yet our findings show that reliable and correct target present identifications are very unlikely following observations made in low lighting (0.7 lx) at 20 m.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Criminology</subject><subject>distance</subject><subject>Eyewitness identification</subject><subject>face recognition</subject><subject>Identification</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Lighting</subject><subject>lux</subject><subject>Retina</subject><subject>Witnesses</subject><issn>2331-1908</issn><issn>2331-1908</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1LAzEQXURBUX-CEPDcOtkkuxtPluJHQdCDnkOymbSp66YmEfHfu2urePI0jzfz3gzziuKMwpRCAxclY5RKaKYlUDmlFSuB13vF0chPxsb-H3xYnKa0BgDK66oGeVQ8zkjK2hDfk7xCYnV8uSRPI_ID37c40BHTKnSWBEeyjkvMxFvss3e-1dmHfhR34YN0frnKJ8WB013C0109Lp5vrp_md5P7h9vFfHY_abmgeSJYW1sphDBQa8GE0ZyK1jKjqa552XKQxpqKVdZaKdFgJdFSbEyJNdUo2HGx2PraoNdqE_2rjp8qaK--iRCXSsfs2w5VUwE2kvMSm5pzZNKUHJxjHAVwV8Hgdb712sTw9o4pq3V4j_1wvio5lcPjqqYZpsR2qo0hpYjudysFNWahfrJQYxZql8Wgu9rqfO9CfNUfIXZWZf3Zheji8GOfFPvf4gspNY5B</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Nyman, Thomas J.</creator><creator>Antfolk, Jan</creator><creator>Lampinen, James Michael</creator><creator>Tuomisto, Maria</creator><creator>Kaakinen, Johanna K.</creator><creator>Korkman, Julia</creator><creator>Santtila, Pekka</creator><general>Cogent</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-4987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-2528</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>A stab in the dark: The distance threshold of target identification in low light</title><author>Nyman, Thomas J. ; Antfolk, Jan ; Lampinen, James Michael ; Tuomisto, Maria ; Kaakinen, Johanna K. ; Korkman, Julia ; Santtila, Pekka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-53c7d9555b07a535ba415cd3ba1a742c409bdb636ddd99ebe69ed1e8b2e71ae53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Criminology</topic><topic>distance</topic><topic>Eyewitness identification</topic><topic>face recognition</topic><topic>Identification</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Lighting</topic><topic>lux</topic><topic>Retina</topic><topic>Witnesses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nyman, Thomas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Antfolk, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampinen, James Michael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tuomisto, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaakinen, Johanna K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Korkman, Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santtila, Pekka</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Cogent psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nyman, Thomas J.</au><au>Antfolk, Jan</au><au>Lampinen, James Michael</au><au>Tuomisto, Maria</au><au>Kaakinen, Johanna K.</au><au>Korkman, Julia</au><au>Santtila, Pekka</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A stab in the dark: The distance threshold of target identification in low light</atitle><jtitle>Cogent psychology</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2331-1908</issn><eissn>2331-1908</eissn><abstract>Prior research shows that increased distance and decreased light result in less correct eyewitness identifications, yet their combined effect is not well understood. The aim of the present study was to establish the maximum distance in low lux (lx) where an eyewitness's later identification in target present (TP) line-ups is no longer reliable. We randomized participants (N = 178) into one of three lx conditions (high:300 lx, medium:10 lx, low:0.7 lx) and presented them with eight targets (one at a time) at eight separate distances (6-20 m). Each target-presentation was followed by an 8-person simultaneous TP line-up (i.e., there was a .125 probability of choosing the target correctly by chance). We found that the rate of correct TP identifications decreased with increased distance in all lx conditions. At 20 m the rate of correct TP identifications was .53 in the high lx condition, .41 in the medium lx condition and .11 in the low lx condition. The generalizability of our findings to overall eyewitness accuracy is limited by the exclusion of target absent line-ups, yet our findings show that reliable and correct target present identifications are very unlikely following observations made in low lighting (0.7 lx) at 20 m.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Cogent</pub><doi>10.1080/23311908.2019.1632047</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0334-4987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6409-2528</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2331-1908 |
ispartof | Cogent psychology, 2019-01, Vol.6 (1) |
issn | 2331-1908 2331-1908 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2419908688 |
source | Taylor & Francis Open Access; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Accuracy Criminology distance Eyewitness identification face recognition Identification Light Lighting lux Retina Witnesses |
title | A stab in the dark: The distance threshold of target identification in low light |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-18T23%3A04%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20stab%20in%20the%20dark:%20The%20distance%20threshold%20of%20target%20identification%20in%20low%20light&rft.jtitle=Cogent%20psychology&rft.au=Nyman,%20Thomas%20J.&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2331-1908&rft.eissn=2331-1908&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/23311908.2019.1632047&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2419908688%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419908688&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_860e89442e8744e39b240ff34e504f60&rfr_iscdi=true |