656-P: Multidisciplinary Predialysis Team Education for Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy Produced Not Only Good Effects on the Hemodialysis Course, but Also Prolonged the Survival

To determine whether or not a multidisciplinary individual team approach (MTA) benefited the hemodialysis (HD) course and prognosis after HD induction in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN), we compared the effect of an MTA on the HD course of 42 DN patients with that of 33 DN patients managed b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Diabetes (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-06, Vol.69 (Supplement_1)
Hauptverfasser: HITOMI, MAMIKO, SATO, TERUKO, MORIYA, TATSUMI
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_1
container_start_page
container_title Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)
container_volume 69
creator HITOMI, MAMIKO
SATO, TERUKO
MORIYA, TATSUMI
description To determine whether or not a multidisciplinary individual team approach (MTA) benefited the hemodialysis (HD) course and prognosis after HD induction in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN), we compared the effect of an MTA on the HD course of 42 DN patients with that of 33 DN patients managed by a dietitian approach alone (DA) (n=75 total; 50 men, 62±12 years old; 73 with type 2 diabetes mellitus). In all cases, HD was initiated between January 2010 and June 2016. There were no significant differences in the HbA1c or age between the groups when serum creatinine (S-Cr) was 2.0 mg/dL at the study start. MTA staff members were doctors, dietitians, nurses, laboratory technologists, and pharmacists. The team provided broad education, including advice on nutrition, medication, medical exams, and foot care. The duration from S-Cr 2.0 mg/dL to HD induction was significantly longer in the MTA group (3.3±2.2 yrs) than the DA group (2.3±1.8 yrs; p=0.021). The MTA group had a shorter hospitalization for HD induction and lower cost per admission than the DA group (44±33 days vs. 32±20 days, p=0.035; $20,506 ±14,219 vs. $14,554 ± 826, p=0.019). Urine collection (24-h) was more frequent in the MTA group than the DA group (likelihood ratio 5.05; p=0.025). Patients with urine collection tended to live longer than those without it (8.2±3.1 yrs vs. 6.9±2.6 yrs, p=0.075). The CTR at the HD induction tended to be smaller in the MTA group than in the DA group (53.0±5.7% vs. 55.6±7.3%, p=0.057). The hematocrit value in the MTA group (29.2±4.6%) was significantly better than in the DA group (26.5±4.0%, p=0.004). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the MTA group had a better survival than the DA group (log rank 4.430, p=0.035). An MTA provided multiple effects that postpone HD induction, better clinical HD course, cost reduction, and prolonged survival compared with a DA, even when observation was started at the same S-Cr level.
doi_str_mv 10.2337/db20-656-P
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2419453527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2419453527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c637-ab32b9754d1399b455c87ed1c496a7eef1a34304e9e7c0fef2e1304f30228ea83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kdtKxDAQhoMouB5ufIKAd2I1h7bZeCfregAPC-6FdyVNJ26k29QkVfbBfD9TFZmLmYF_vn-YQeiIkjPGuThvakaysiizxRaaUMllxpl42UYTQijLqJBiF-2F8EYIKVNM0NeP-AI_DG20jQ3a9q3tlN_ghYfGqnYTbMBLUGs8bwatonUdNs7jRSqhiwF_2rjCV1bVEK3Gj9CvvOtVXI0El0agwY8u4qeu3eAb5xo8NwZ0GkyguAJ8C2v3bzRzgw9wiush4ss2uJHRuu41QUbt8-A_7IdqD9COUW2Aw7-8j5bX8-XsNrt_urmbXd5nuuQiUzVntRRF3lAuZZ0XhZ4KaKjOZakEgKGK55zkIEFoYsAwoKk1nDA2BTXl--j4F9t79z5AiNVb2q9LjhXLqcwLXjCRVCe_Ku1dCB5M1Xu7TiesKKnGr1TjV6p06GrBvwFquIJK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2419453527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>656-P: Multidisciplinary Predialysis Team Education for Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy Produced Not Only Good Effects on the Hemodialysis Course, but Also Prolonged the Survival</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>HITOMI, MAMIKO ; SATO, TERUKO ; MORIYA, TATSUMI</creator><creatorcontrib>HITOMI, MAMIKO ; SATO, TERUKO ; MORIYA, TATSUMI</creatorcontrib><description>To determine whether or not a multidisciplinary individual team approach (MTA) benefited the hemodialysis (HD) course and prognosis after HD induction in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN), we compared the effect of an MTA on the HD course of 42 DN patients with that of 33 DN patients managed by a dietitian approach alone (DA) (n=75 total; 50 men, 62±12 years old; 73 with type 2 diabetes mellitus). In all cases, HD was initiated between January 2010 and June 2016. There were no significant differences in the HbA1c or age between the groups when serum creatinine (S-Cr) was 2.0 mg/dL at the study start. MTA staff members were doctors, dietitians, nurses, laboratory technologists, and pharmacists. The team provided broad education, including advice on nutrition, medication, medical exams, and foot care. The duration from S-Cr 2.0 mg/dL to HD induction was significantly longer in the MTA group (3.3±2.2 yrs) than the DA group (2.3±1.8 yrs; p=0.021). The MTA group had a shorter hospitalization for HD induction and lower cost per admission than the DA group (44±33 days vs. 32±20 days, p=0.035; $20,506 ±14,219 vs. $14,554 ± 826, p=0.019). Urine collection (24-h) was more frequent in the MTA group than the DA group (likelihood ratio 5.05; p=0.025). Patients with urine collection tended to live longer than those without it (8.2±3.1 yrs vs. 6.9±2.6 yrs, p=0.075). The CTR at the HD induction tended to be smaller in the MTA group than in the DA group (53.0±5.7% vs. 55.6±7.3%, p=0.057). The hematocrit value in the MTA group (29.2±4.6%) was significantly better than in the DA group (26.5±4.0%, p=0.004). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the MTA group had a better survival than the DA group (log rank 4.430, p=0.035). An MTA provided multiple effects that postpone HD induction, better clinical HD course, cost reduction, and prolonged survival compared with a DA, even when observation was started at the same S-Cr level.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-1797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-327X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2337/db20-656-P</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: American Diabetes Association</publisher><subject>Creatinine ; Diabetes ; Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent) ; Diabetic nephropathy ; Hematocrit ; Hemodialysis ; Medical prognosis ; Nephropathy ; Patients ; Survival ; Survival analysis</subject><ispartof>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2020-06, Vol.69 (Supplement_1)</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Diabetes Association Jun 1, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>HITOMI, MAMIKO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SATO, TERUKO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORIYA, TATSUMI</creatorcontrib><title>656-P: Multidisciplinary Predialysis Team Education for Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy Produced Not Only Good Effects on the Hemodialysis Course, but Also Prolonged the Survival</title><title>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</title><description>To determine whether or not a multidisciplinary individual team approach (MTA) benefited the hemodialysis (HD) course and prognosis after HD induction in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN), we compared the effect of an MTA on the HD course of 42 DN patients with that of 33 DN patients managed by a dietitian approach alone (DA) (n=75 total; 50 men, 62±12 years old; 73 with type 2 diabetes mellitus). In all cases, HD was initiated between January 2010 and June 2016. There were no significant differences in the HbA1c or age between the groups when serum creatinine (S-Cr) was 2.0 mg/dL at the study start. MTA staff members were doctors, dietitians, nurses, laboratory technologists, and pharmacists. The team provided broad education, including advice on nutrition, medication, medical exams, and foot care. The duration from S-Cr 2.0 mg/dL to HD induction was significantly longer in the MTA group (3.3±2.2 yrs) than the DA group (2.3±1.8 yrs; p=0.021). The MTA group had a shorter hospitalization for HD induction and lower cost per admission than the DA group (44±33 days vs. 32±20 days, p=0.035; $20,506 ±14,219 vs. $14,554 ± 826, p=0.019). Urine collection (24-h) was more frequent in the MTA group than the DA group (likelihood ratio 5.05; p=0.025). Patients with urine collection tended to live longer than those without it (8.2±3.1 yrs vs. 6.9±2.6 yrs, p=0.075). The CTR at the HD induction tended to be smaller in the MTA group than in the DA group (53.0±5.7% vs. 55.6±7.3%, p=0.057). The hematocrit value in the MTA group (29.2±4.6%) was significantly better than in the DA group (26.5±4.0%, p=0.004). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the MTA group had a better survival than the DA group (log rank 4.430, p=0.035). An MTA provided multiple effects that postpone HD induction, better clinical HD course, cost reduction, and prolonged survival compared with a DA, even when observation was started at the same S-Cr level.</description><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>Diabetes</subject><subject>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</subject><subject>Diabetic nephropathy</subject><subject>Hematocrit</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Medical prognosis</subject><subject>Nephropathy</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Survival analysis</subject><issn>0012-1797</issn><issn>1939-327X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kdtKxDAQhoMouB5ufIKAd2I1h7bZeCfregAPC-6FdyVNJ26k29QkVfbBfD9TFZmLmYF_vn-YQeiIkjPGuThvakaysiizxRaaUMllxpl42UYTQijLqJBiF-2F8EYIKVNM0NeP-AI_DG20jQ3a9q3tlN_ghYfGqnYTbMBLUGs8bwatonUdNs7jRSqhiwF_2rjCV1bVEK3Gj9CvvOtVXI0El0agwY8u4qeu3eAb5xo8NwZ0GkyguAJ8C2v3bzRzgw9wiush4ss2uJHRuu41QUbt8-A_7IdqD9COUW2Aw7-8j5bX8-XsNrt_urmbXd5nuuQiUzVntRRF3lAuZZ0XhZ4KaKjOZakEgKGK55zkIEFoYsAwoKk1nDA2BTXl--j4F9t79z5AiNVb2q9LjhXLqcwLXjCRVCe_Ku1dCB5M1Xu7TiesKKnGr1TjV6p06GrBvwFquIJK</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>HITOMI, MAMIKO</creator><creator>SATO, TERUKO</creator><creator>MORIYA, TATSUMI</creator><general>American Diabetes Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>656-P: Multidisciplinary Predialysis Team Education for Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy Produced Not Only Good Effects on the Hemodialysis Course, but Also Prolonged the Survival</title><author>HITOMI, MAMIKO ; SATO, TERUKO ; MORIYA, TATSUMI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c637-ab32b9754d1399b455c87ed1c496a7eef1a34304e9e7c0fef2e1304f30228ea83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>Diabetes</topic><topic>Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)</topic><topic>Diabetic nephropathy</topic><topic>Hematocrit</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Medical prognosis</topic><topic>Nephropathy</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Survival analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>HITOMI, MAMIKO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SATO, TERUKO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MORIYA, TATSUMI</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>HITOMI, MAMIKO</au><au>SATO, TERUKO</au><au>MORIYA, TATSUMI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>656-P: Multidisciplinary Predialysis Team Education for Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy Produced Not Only Good Effects on the Hemodialysis Course, but Also Prolonged the Survival</atitle><jtitle>Diabetes (New York, N.Y.)</jtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><issn>0012-1797</issn><eissn>1939-327X</eissn><abstract>To determine whether or not a multidisciplinary individual team approach (MTA) benefited the hemodialysis (HD) course and prognosis after HD induction in patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN), we compared the effect of an MTA on the HD course of 42 DN patients with that of 33 DN patients managed by a dietitian approach alone (DA) (n=75 total; 50 men, 62±12 years old; 73 with type 2 diabetes mellitus). In all cases, HD was initiated between January 2010 and June 2016. There were no significant differences in the HbA1c or age between the groups when serum creatinine (S-Cr) was 2.0 mg/dL at the study start. MTA staff members were doctors, dietitians, nurses, laboratory technologists, and pharmacists. The team provided broad education, including advice on nutrition, medication, medical exams, and foot care. The duration from S-Cr 2.0 mg/dL to HD induction was significantly longer in the MTA group (3.3±2.2 yrs) than the DA group (2.3±1.8 yrs; p=0.021). The MTA group had a shorter hospitalization for HD induction and lower cost per admission than the DA group (44±33 days vs. 32±20 days, p=0.035; $20,506 ±14,219 vs. $14,554 ± 826, p=0.019). Urine collection (24-h) was more frequent in the MTA group than the DA group (likelihood ratio 5.05; p=0.025). Patients with urine collection tended to live longer than those without it (8.2±3.1 yrs vs. 6.9±2.6 yrs, p=0.075). The CTR at the HD induction tended to be smaller in the MTA group than in the DA group (53.0±5.7% vs. 55.6±7.3%, p=0.057). The hematocrit value in the MTA group (29.2±4.6%) was significantly better than in the DA group (26.5±4.0%, p=0.004). A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that the MTA group had a better survival than the DA group (log rank 4.430, p=0.035). An MTA provided multiple effects that postpone HD induction, better clinical HD course, cost reduction, and prolonged survival compared with a DA, even when observation was started at the same S-Cr level.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>American Diabetes Association</pub><doi>10.2337/db20-656-P</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-1797
ispartof Diabetes (New York, N.Y.), 2020-06, Vol.69 (Supplement_1)
issn 0012-1797
1939-327X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2419453527
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central
subjects Creatinine
Diabetes
Diabetes mellitus (non-insulin dependent)
Diabetic nephropathy
Hematocrit
Hemodialysis
Medical prognosis
Nephropathy
Patients
Survival
Survival analysis
title 656-P: Multidisciplinary Predialysis Team Education for Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy Produced Not Only Good Effects on the Hemodialysis Course, but Also Prolonged the Survival
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T02%3A32%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=656-P:%20Multidisciplinary%20Predialysis%20Team%20Education%20for%20Patients%20with%20Diabetic%20Nephropathy%20Produced%20Not%20Only%20Good%20Effects%20on%20the%20Hemodialysis%20Course,%20but%20Also%20Prolonged%20the%20Survival&rft.jtitle=Diabetes%20(New%20York,%20N.Y.)&rft.au=HITOMI,%20MAMIKO&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.issn=0012-1797&rft.eissn=1939-327X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2337/db20-656-P&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2419453527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2419453527&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true