Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan

Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed Phragmites australis , and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sa...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ichthyological research 2020-07, Vol.67 (3), p.439-450
Hauptverfasser: Kaneko, Seiya, Kanou, Kouki, Sano, Mitsuhiko
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 450
container_issue 3
container_start_page 439
container_title Ichthyological research
container_volume 67
creator Kaneko, Seiya
Kanou, Kouki
Sano, Mitsuhiko
description Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed Phragmites australis , and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sampling in October 2014, and January, April and July 2015. A total of 4,076 fish individuals from 30 species and 5,431 individuals from 23 species were collected in the tidal marshes and sandy areas, respectively. Higher species richness in the former habitat was due to the restricted occurrence of ten species, including threatened or near threatened, only to that habitat. Species composition and the abundances of several dominant species, such as the commercially important icefish Salangichthys microdon and the goby Acanthogobius lactipes , also differed between the two habitats, although no interhabitat differences in the mean species and individual numbers per haul were found. Moreover, the individual number of small benthic and epiphytic crustacean feeders, including A . lactipes , was greater in the tidal marshes than in the sandy areas, whereas zooplankton feeders, including S . microdon , showed the opposite pattern. Such interhabitat differences in fish assemblage structures may be partly related to food availability, sediment condition and/or the presence or absence of vegetative structures. Because each of the two habitats harbored a unique fish assemblage, conservation efforts for both habitats are important for enhancing overall fish species diversity and sustaining fishery resources in Lake Hinuma.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2418755054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2418755054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-49730fd26baf258ba9a2dbd841244095da9fcb03b6209d033dec2de306156b313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMxisEEmPwApwicaXgJE3XHNH4r0lc4Bw5jbt167qRZEJ7AZ6bbEPixsm2_Ps-y1-WXXK44QCj28BBiCoHAXkapc7VUTbgJS9zqbk6Tr0seF5pXZ1mZyHMAUCOlBhk3_dt05CnvqbA2p41bZgxDIGWtsMpsRD9po4bn7aW4hdRz2LrsGNL9Duyd8yiT1zqtqxrY1z5tJ2hbSPGvSUy67Fe7Iy_MJJnHS7omhGGNPTsFdfYn2cnDXaBLn7rMPt4fHgfP-eTt6eX8d0kr2VRxrzQIwmNE6XFRqjKokbhrKsKLooCtHKom9qCtKUA7UBKR7VwJKHkqrSSy2F2dfBd-9XnhkI089XG9-mkEQWvRkqBKhIlDlTtVyF4aszat-nhreFgdnmbQ94m5W32eRuVRPIgCgnup-T_rP9R_QCfZIS5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418755054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kaneko, Seiya ; Kanou, Kouki ; Sano, Mitsuhiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Seiya ; Kanou, Kouki ; Sano, Mitsuhiko</creatorcontrib><description>Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed Phragmites australis , and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sampling in October 2014, and January, April and July 2015. A total of 4,076 fish individuals from 30 species and 5,431 individuals from 23 species were collected in the tidal marshes and sandy areas, respectively. Higher species richness in the former habitat was due to the restricted occurrence of ten species, including threatened or near threatened, only to that habitat. Species composition and the abundances of several dominant species, such as the commercially important icefish Salangichthys microdon and the goby Acanthogobius lactipes , also differed between the two habitats, although no interhabitat differences in the mean species and individual numbers per haul were found. Moreover, the individual number of small benthic and epiphytic crustacean feeders, including A . lactipes , was greater in the tidal marshes than in the sandy areas, whereas zooplankton feeders, including S . microdon , showed the opposite pattern. Such interhabitat differences in fish assemblage structures may be partly related to food availability, sediment condition and/or the presence or absence of vegetative structures. Because each of the two habitats harbored a unique fish assemblage, conservation efforts for both habitats are important for enhancing overall fish species diversity and sustaining fishery resources in Lake Hinuma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-8998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-3915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Acanthogobius lactipes ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Aquatic crustaceans ; Aquatic plants ; Benthos ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Brackish water ; Brackishwater fishes ; Crustaceans ; Dominant species ; Ecology ; Fish ; Fish conservation ; Fisheries ; Fishery resources ; Food availability ; Food supply ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Freshwater plants ; Habitats ; Lake fisheries ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; Marine fishes ; Marshes ; Phragmites australis ; Prey ; Salangichthys microdon ; Sediment ; Seine nets ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Structures ; Threatened species ; Tidal marshes ; Water quality ; Wetlands ; Zoology ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Ichthyological research, 2020-07, Vol.67 (3), p.439-450</ispartof><rights>The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2020</rights><rights>The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-49730fd26baf258ba9a2dbd841244095da9fcb03b6209d033dec2de306156b313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-49730fd26baf258ba9a2dbd841244095da9fcb03b6209d033dec2de306156b313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Seiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanou, Kouki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mitsuhiko</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan</title><title>Ichthyological research</title><addtitle>Ichthyol Res</addtitle><description>Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed Phragmites australis , and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sampling in October 2014, and January, April and July 2015. A total of 4,076 fish individuals from 30 species and 5,431 individuals from 23 species were collected in the tidal marshes and sandy areas, respectively. Higher species richness in the former habitat was due to the restricted occurrence of ten species, including threatened or near threatened, only to that habitat. Species composition and the abundances of several dominant species, such as the commercially important icefish Salangichthys microdon and the goby Acanthogobius lactipes , also differed between the two habitats, although no interhabitat differences in the mean species and individual numbers per haul were found. Moreover, the individual number of small benthic and epiphytic crustacean feeders, including A . lactipes , was greater in the tidal marshes than in the sandy areas, whereas zooplankton feeders, including S . microdon , showed the opposite pattern. Such interhabitat differences in fish assemblage structures may be partly related to food availability, sediment condition and/or the presence or absence of vegetative structures. Because each of the two habitats harbored a unique fish assemblage, conservation efforts for both habitats are important for enhancing overall fish species diversity and sustaining fishery resources in Lake Hinuma.</description><subject>Acanthogobius lactipes</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Aquatic crustaceans</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brackish water</subject><subject>Brackishwater fishes</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish conservation</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishery resources</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater plants</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Lake fisheries</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Phragmites australis</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Salangichthys microdon</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Seine nets</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Tidal marshes</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>1341-8998</issn><issn>1616-3915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMxisEEmPwApwicaXgJE3XHNH4r0lc4Bw5jbt167qRZEJ7AZ6bbEPixsm2_Ps-y1-WXXK44QCj28BBiCoHAXkapc7VUTbgJS9zqbk6Tr0seF5pXZ1mZyHMAUCOlBhk3_dt05CnvqbA2p41bZgxDIGWtsMpsRD9po4bn7aW4hdRz2LrsGNL9Duyd8yiT1zqtqxrY1z5tJ2hbSPGvSUy67Fe7Iy_MJJnHS7omhGGNPTsFdfYn2cnDXaBLn7rMPt4fHgfP-eTt6eX8d0kr2VRxrzQIwmNE6XFRqjKokbhrKsKLooCtHKom9qCtKUA7UBKR7VwJKHkqrSSy2F2dfBd-9XnhkI089XG9-mkEQWvRkqBKhIlDlTtVyF4aszat-nhreFgdnmbQ94m5W32eRuVRPIgCgnup-T_rP9R_QCfZIS5</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Kaneko, Seiya</creator><creator>Kanou, Kouki</creator><creator>Sano, Mitsuhiko</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan</title><author>Kaneko, Seiya ; Kanou, Kouki ; Sano, Mitsuhiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-49730fd26baf258ba9a2dbd841244095da9fcb03b6209d033dec2de306156b313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acanthogobius lactipes</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Aquatic crustaceans</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brackish water</topic><topic>Brackishwater fishes</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish conservation</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishery resources</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater plants</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Lake fisheries</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Phragmites australis</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Salangichthys microdon</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Seine nets</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Tidal marshes</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Seiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanou, Kouki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mitsuhiko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ichthyological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaneko, Seiya</au><au>Kanou, Kouki</au><au>Sano, Mitsuhiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan</atitle><jtitle>Ichthyological research</jtitle><stitle>Ichthyol Res</stitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>439-450</pages><issn>1341-8998</issn><eissn>1616-3915</eissn><abstract>Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed Phragmites australis , and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sampling in October 2014, and January, April and July 2015. A total of 4,076 fish individuals from 30 species and 5,431 individuals from 23 species were collected in the tidal marshes and sandy areas, respectively. Higher species richness in the former habitat was due to the restricted occurrence of ten species, including threatened or near threatened, only to that habitat. Species composition and the abundances of several dominant species, such as the commercially important icefish Salangichthys microdon and the goby Acanthogobius lactipes , also differed between the two habitats, although no interhabitat differences in the mean species and individual numbers per haul were found. Moreover, the individual number of small benthic and epiphytic crustacean feeders, including A . lactipes , was greater in the tidal marshes than in the sandy areas, whereas zooplankton feeders, including S . microdon , showed the opposite pattern. Such interhabitat differences in fish assemblage structures may be partly related to food availability, sediment condition and/or the presence or absence of vegetative structures. Because each of the two habitats harbored a unique fish assemblage, conservation efforts for both habitats are important for enhancing overall fish species diversity and sustaining fishery resources in Lake Hinuma.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><doi>10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1341-8998
ispartof Ichthyological research, 2020-07, Vol.67 (3), p.439-450
issn 1341-8998
1616-3915
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2418755054
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acanthogobius lactipes
Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
Aquatic crustaceans
Aquatic plants
Benthos
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Brackish water
Brackishwater fishes
Crustaceans
Dominant species
Ecology
Fish
Fish conservation
Fisheries
Fishery resources
Food availability
Food supply
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Freshwater plants
Habitats
Lake fisheries
Lakes
Life Sciences
Marine fishes
Marshes
Phragmites australis
Prey
Salangichthys microdon
Sediment
Seine nets
Species composition
Species diversity
Species richness
Structures
Threatened species
Tidal marshes
Water quality
Wetlands
Zoology
Zooplankton
title Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20fish%20assemblage%20structures%20between%20tidal%20marsh%20and%20bare%20sandy%20littoral%20habitats%20in%20a%20brackish%20water%20lake,%20eastern%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Ichthyological%20research&rft.au=Kaneko,%20Seiya&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=439-450&rft.issn=1341-8998&rft.eissn=1616-3915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418755054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418755054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true