Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan
Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed Phragmites australis , and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sa...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ichthyological research 2020-07, Vol.67 (3), p.439-450 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 450 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 439 |
container_title | Ichthyological research |
container_volume | 67 |
creator | Kaneko, Seiya Kanou, Kouki Sano, Mitsuhiko |
description | Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed
Phragmites australis
, and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sampling in October 2014, and January, April and July 2015. A total of 4,076 fish individuals from 30 species and 5,431 individuals from 23 species were collected in the tidal marshes and sandy areas, respectively. Higher species richness in the former habitat was due to the restricted occurrence of ten species, including threatened or near threatened, only to that habitat. Species composition and the abundances of several dominant species, such as the commercially important icefish
Salangichthys microdon
and the goby
Acanthogobius lactipes
, also differed between the two habitats, although no interhabitat differences in the mean species and individual numbers per haul were found. Moreover, the individual number of small benthic and epiphytic crustacean feeders, including
A
.
lactipes
, was greater in the tidal marshes than in the sandy areas, whereas zooplankton feeders, including
S
.
microdon
, showed the opposite pattern. Such interhabitat differences in fish assemblage structures may be partly related to food availability, sediment condition and/or the presence or absence of vegetative structures. Because each of the two habitats harbored a unique fish assemblage, conservation efforts for both habitats are important for enhancing overall fish species diversity and sustaining fishery resources in Lake Hinuma. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2418755054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2418755054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-49730fd26baf258ba9a2dbd841244095da9fcb03b6209d033dec2de306156b313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMxisEEmPwApwicaXgJE3XHNH4r0lc4Bw5jbt167qRZEJ7AZ6bbEPixsm2_Ps-y1-WXXK44QCj28BBiCoHAXkapc7VUTbgJS9zqbk6Tr0seF5pXZ1mZyHMAUCOlBhk3_dt05CnvqbA2p41bZgxDIGWtsMpsRD9po4bn7aW4hdRz2LrsGNL9Duyd8yiT1zqtqxrY1z5tJ2hbSPGvSUy67Fe7Iy_MJJnHS7omhGGNPTsFdfYn2cnDXaBLn7rMPt4fHgfP-eTt6eX8d0kr2VRxrzQIwmNE6XFRqjKokbhrKsKLooCtHKom9qCtKUA7UBKR7VwJKHkqrSSy2F2dfBd-9XnhkI089XG9-mkEQWvRkqBKhIlDlTtVyF4aszat-nhreFgdnmbQ94m5W32eRuVRPIgCgnup-T_rP9R_QCfZIS5</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418755054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Kaneko, Seiya ; Kanou, Kouki ; Sano, Mitsuhiko</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Seiya ; Kanou, Kouki ; Sano, Mitsuhiko</creatorcontrib><description>Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed
Phragmites australis
, and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sampling in October 2014, and January, April and July 2015. A total of 4,076 fish individuals from 30 species and 5,431 individuals from 23 species were collected in the tidal marshes and sandy areas, respectively. Higher species richness in the former habitat was due to the restricted occurrence of ten species, including threatened or near threatened, only to that habitat. Species composition and the abundances of several dominant species, such as the commercially important icefish
Salangichthys microdon
and the goby
Acanthogobius lactipes
, also differed between the two habitats, although no interhabitat differences in the mean species and individual numbers per haul were found. Moreover, the individual number of small benthic and epiphytic crustacean feeders, including
A
.
lactipes
, was greater in the tidal marshes than in the sandy areas, whereas zooplankton feeders, including
S
.
microdon
, showed the opposite pattern. Such interhabitat differences in fish assemblage structures may be partly related to food availability, sediment condition and/or the presence or absence of vegetative structures. Because each of the two habitats harbored a unique fish assemblage, conservation efforts for both habitats are important for enhancing overall fish species diversity and sustaining fishery resources in Lake Hinuma.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1341-8998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1616-3915</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Tokyo: Springer Japan</publisher><subject>Acanthogobius lactipes ; Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Aquatic crustaceans ; Aquatic plants ; Benthos ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Brackish water ; Brackishwater fishes ; Crustaceans ; Dominant species ; Ecology ; Fish ; Fish conservation ; Fisheries ; Fishery resources ; Food availability ; Food supply ; Freshwater & Marine Ecology ; Freshwater plants ; Habitats ; Lake fisheries ; Lakes ; Life Sciences ; Marine fishes ; Marshes ; Phragmites australis ; Prey ; Salangichthys microdon ; Sediment ; Seine nets ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Species richness ; Structures ; Threatened species ; Tidal marshes ; Water quality ; Wetlands ; Zoology ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Ichthyological research, 2020-07, Vol.67 (3), p.439-450</ispartof><rights>The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2020</rights><rights>The Ichthyological Society of Japan 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-49730fd26baf258ba9a2dbd841244095da9fcb03b6209d033dec2de306156b313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-49730fd26baf258ba9a2dbd841244095da9fcb03b6209d033dec2de306156b313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Seiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanou, Kouki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mitsuhiko</creatorcontrib><title>Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan</title><title>Ichthyological research</title><addtitle>Ichthyol Res</addtitle><description>Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed
Phragmites australis
, and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sampling in October 2014, and January, April and July 2015. A total of 4,076 fish individuals from 30 species and 5,431 individuals from 23 species were collected in the tidal marshes and sandy areas, respectively. Higher species richness in the former habitat was due to the restricted occurrence of ten species, including threatened or near threatened, only to that habitat. Species composition and the abundances of several dominant species, such as the commercially important icefish
Salangichthys microdon
and the goby
Acanthogobius lactipes
, also differed between the two habitats, although no interhabitat differences in the mean species and individual numbers per haul were found. Moreover, the individual number of small benthic and epiphytic crustacean feeders, including
A
.
lactipes
, was greater in the tidal marshes than in the sandy areas, whereas zooplankton feeders, including
S
.
microdon
, showed the opposite pattern. Such interhabitat differences in fish assemblage structures may be partly related to food availability, sediment condition and/or the presence or absence of vegetative structures. Because each of the two habitats harbored a unique fish assemblage, conservation efforts for both habitats are important for enhancing overall fish species diversity and sustaining fishery resources in Lake Hinuma.</description><subject>Acanthogobius lactipes</subject><subject>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Aquatic crustaceans</subject><subject>Aquatic plants</subject><subject>Benthos</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Brackish water</subject><subject>Brackishwater fishes</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Dominant species</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish conservation</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishery resources</subject><subject>Food availability</subject><subject>Food supply</subject><subject>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater plants</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Lake fisheries</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>Phragmites australis</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>Salangichthys microdon</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Seine nets</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>Threatened species</subject><subject>Tidal marshes</subject><subject>Water quality</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>1341-8998</issn><issn>1616-3915</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9OwzAMxisEEmPwApwicaXgJE3XHNH4r0lc4Bw5jbt167qRZEJ7AZ6bbEPixsm2_Ps-y1-WXXK44QCj28BBiCoHAXkapc7VUTbgJS9zqbk6Tr0seF5pXZ1mZyHMAUCOlBhk3_dt05CnvqbA2p41bZgxDIGWtsMpsRD9po4bn7aW4hdRz2LrsGNL9Duyd8yiT1zqtqxrY1z5tJ2hbSPGvSUy67Fe7Iy_MJJnHS7omhGGNPTsFdfYn2cnDXaBLn7rMPt4fHgfP-eTt6eX8d0kr2VRxrzQIwmNE6XFRqjKokbhrKsKLooCtHKom9qCtKUA7UBKR7VwJKHkqrSSy2F2dfBd-9XnhkI089XG9-mkEQWvRkqBKhIlDlTtVyF4aszat-nhreFgdnmbQ94m5W32eRuVRPIgCgnup-T_rP9R_QCfZIS5</recordid><startdate>20200701</startdate><enddate>20200701</enddate><creator>Kaneko, Seiya</creator><creator>Kanou, Kouki</creator><creator>Sano, Mitsuhiko</creator><general>Springer Japan</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200701</creationdate><title>Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan</title><author>Kaneko, Seiya ; Kanou, Kouki ; Sano, Mitsuhiko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-49730fd26baf258ba9a2dbd841244095da9fcb03b6209d033dec2de306156b313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acanthogobius lactipes</topic><topic>Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Aquatic crustaceans</topic><topic>Aquatic plants</topic><topic>Benthos</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Brackish water</topic><topic>Brackishwater fishes</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Dominant species</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish conservation</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishery resources</topic><topic>Food availability</topic><topic>Food supply</topic><topic>Freshwater & Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater plants</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Lake fisheries</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>Phragmites australis</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>Salangichthys microdon</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Seine nets</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>Threatened species</topic><topic>Tidal marshes</topic><topic>Water quality</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaneko, Seiya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanou, Kouki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sano, Mitsuhiko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ichthyological research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaneko, Seiya</au><au>Kanou, Kouki</au><au>Sano, Mitsuhiko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan</atitle><jtitle>Ichthyological research</jtitle><stitle>Ichthyol Res</stitle><date>2020-07-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>439</spage><epage>450</epage><pages>439-450</pages><issn>1341-8998</issn><eissn>1616-3915</eissn><abstract>Fish assemblage structures and environmental properties (e.g., water quality, sediment condition and prey abundance) were compared between tidal marshes, dominated by the common reed
Phragmites australis
, and bare sandy areas in the brackish-water Lake Hinuma, eastern Japan, by daytime seine net sampling in October 2014, and January, April and July 2015. A total of 4,076 fish individuals from 30 species and 5,431 individuals from 23 species were collected in the tidal marshes and sandy areas, respectively. Higher species richness in the former habitat was due to the restricted occurrence of ten species, including threatened or near threatened, only to that habitat. Species composition and the abundances of several dominant species, such as the commercially important icefish
Salangichthys microdon
and the goby
Acanthogobius lactipes
, also differed between the two habitats, although no interhabitat differences in the mean species and individual numbers per haul were found. Moreover, the individual number of small benthic and epiphytic crustacean feeders, including
A
.
lactipes
, was greater in the tidal marshes than in the sandy areas, whereas zooplankton feeders, including
S
.
microdon
, showed the opposite pattern. Such interhabitat differences in fish assemblage structures may be partly related to food availability, sediment condition and/or the presence or absence of vegetative structures. Because each of the two habitats harbored a unique fish assemblage, conservation efforts for both habitats are important for enhancing overall fish species diversity and sustaining fishery resources in Lake Hinuma.</abstract><cop>Tokyo</cop><pub>Springer Japan</pub><doi>10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1341-8998 |
ispartof | Ichthyological research, 2020-07, Vol.67 (3), p.439-450 |
issn | 1341-8998 1616-3915 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2418755054 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Acanthogobius lactipes Animal Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Aquatic crustaceans Aquatic plants Benthos Biomedical and Life Sciences Brackish water Brackishwater fishes Crustaceans Dominant species Ecology Fish Fish conservation Fisheries Fishery resources Food availability Food supply Freshwater & Marine Ecology Freshwater plants Habitats Lake fisheries Lakes Life Sciences Marine fishes Marshes Phragmites australis Prey Salangichthys microdon Sediment Seine nets Species composition Species diversity Species richness Structures Threatened species Tidal marshes Water quality Wetlands Zoology Zooplankton |
title | Differences in fish assemblage structures between tidal marsh and bare sandy littoral habitats in a brackish water lake, eastern Japan |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T01%3A13%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Differences%20in%20fish%20assemblage%20structures%20between%20tidal%20marsh%20and%20bare%20sandy%20littoral%20habitats%20in%20a%20brackish%20water%20lake,%20eastern%20Japan&rft.jtitle=Ichthyological%20research&rft.au=Kaneko,%20Seiya&rft.date=2020-07-01&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=439&rft.epage=450&rft.pages=439-450&rft.issn=1341-8998&rft.eissn=1616-3915&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10228-020-00739-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418755054%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418755054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |