How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?
The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science & education 2020-06, Vol.29 (3), p.513-547 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 547 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 513 |
container_title | Science & education |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento El-Hani, Charbel N. Nunes-Neto, Nei |
description | The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an integrated science, but as a collection of unrelated sub-areas, say, zoology, botany, physiology, genetics, and evolution. In this paper, we advance a proposal on how to develop non-arbitrary, clear criteria for selecting conceptual content to be taught and learnt in order to make the biology high school curriculum more integrated and less loaded with content. We argue that we should adopt the idea of structuring concepts for seizing the prominent role some ideas play in biological thinking. We discuss how a hierarchical conceptual framework of biology can help us to identify key concepts as well as connections between these concepts that can allow students understand sub-areas of biology. We also advocate for establishing a balance between the concepts from functional and evolutionary biology, on the one hand, and concepts representing (i) systemic components, (ii) processes, and (iii) descriptive elements, on the other hand. Finally we exemplify how these criteria can be applied by providing a proposal for structuring concepts of biology as a whole and the theory of evolution in particular. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2418755042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1258408</ericid><sourcerecordid>2418755042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3695cd9f37ff9e30481bb9e09f23ee32c835028ac9074ff2e51443ce118d5b4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gCAEPK_O5KO7OYmWapWChyoew26a9IN1U5NdpP-9qSt68zQDv_feMI-Qc4QrBMivIyIqzIBBBoAoM3VABihznqECPCQDUGyU5YzBMTmJcQMAXAEbkKep_6Tzle_qBX2zdG5ra1o69o2x27Yr6_3a2qalzgd6t_a1X-7odL1c0blZeZ94F8LadHV5c0qOXFlHe_Yzh-T1fvIynmaz54fH8e0sM1xgm_GRkmahHM-dU5aDKLCqlAXlGLeWM1NwCawojYJcOMesRCG4sYjFQlai4kNy2edug__obGz1xnehSSc1E1jkUoJgScV6lQk-xmCd3ob1exl2GkHvO9N9Zzp1pr870yqZLnqTTT_9GiZPyGQhoEic9zwm1ixt-Dv9T-oXxep2pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418755042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento ; El-Hani, Charbel N. ; Nunes-Neto, Nei</creator><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento ; El-Hani, Charbel N. ; Nunes-Neto, Nei</creatorcontrib><description>The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an integrated science, but as a collection of unrelated sub-areas, say, zoology, botany, physiology, genetics, and evolution. In this paper, we advance a proposal on how to develop non-arbitrary, clear criteria for selecting conceptual content to be taught and learnt in order to make the biology high school curriculum more integrated and less loaded with content. We argue that we should adopt the idea of structuring concepts for seizing the prominent role some ideas play in biological thinking. We discuss how a hierarchical conceptual framework of biology can help us to identify key concepts as well as connections between these concepts that can allow students understand sub-areas of biology. We also advocate for establishing a balance between the concepts from functional and evolutionary biology, on the one hand, and concepts representing (i) systemic components, (ii) processes, and (iii) descriptive elements, on the other hand. Finally we exemplify how these criteria can be applied by providing a proposal for structuring concepts of biology as a whole and the theory of evolution in particular.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-7220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biological evolution ; Biology ; Botany ; Core curriculum ; Criteria ; Curricula ; Curriculum Development ; Education ; Evolution ; Genetics ; History ; Philosophy of Science ; Science Education ; Scientific Concepts ; Secondary School Science ; Secondary schools ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Science & education, 2020-06, Vol.29 (3), p.513-547</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3695cd9f37ff9e30481bb9e09f23ee32c835028ac9074ff2e51443ce118d5b4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3695cd9f37ff9e30481bb9e09f23ee32c835028ac9074ff2e51443ce118d5b4b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2308-3983 ; 0000-0002-3600-9168</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1258408$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hani, Charbel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes-Neto, Nei</creatorcontrib><title>How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?</title><title>Science & education</title><addtitle>Sci & Educ</addtitle><description>The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an integrated science, but as a collection of unrelated sub-areas, say, zoology, botany, physiology, genetics, and evolution. In this paper, we advance a proposal on how to develop non-arbitrary, clear criteria for selecting conceptual content to be taught and learnt in order to make the biology high school curriculum more integrated and less loaded with content. We argue that we should adopt the idea of structuring concepts for seizing the prominent role some ideas play in biological thinking. We discuss how a hierarchical conceptual framework of biology can help us to identify key concepts as well as connections between these concepts that can allow students understand sub-areas of biology. We also advocate for establishing a balance between the concepts from functional and evolutionary biology, on the one hand, and concepts representing (i) systemic components, (ii) processes, and (iii) descriptive elements, on the other hand. Finally we exemplify how these criteria can be applied by providing a proposal for structuring concepts of biology as a whole and the theory of evolution in particular.</description><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><subject>Secondary School Science</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0926-7220</issn><issn>1573-1901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gCAEPK_O5KO7OYmWapWChyoew26a9IN1U5NdpP-9qSt68zQDv_feMI-Qc4QrBMivIyIqzIBBBoAoM3VABihznqECPCQDUGyU5YzBMTmJcQMAXAEbkKep_6Tzle_qBX2zdG5ra1o69o2x27Yr6_3a2qalzgd6t_a1X-7odL1c0blZeZ94F8LadHV5c0qOXFlHe_Yzh-T1fvIynmaz54fH8e0sM1xgm_GRkmahHM-dU5aDKLCqlAXlGLeWM1NwCawojYJcOMesRCG4sYjFQlai4kNy2edug__obGz1xnehSSc1E1jkUoJgScV6lQk-xmCd3ob1exl2GkHvO9N9Zzp1pr870yqZLnqTTT_9GiZPyGQhoEic9zwm1ixt-Dv9T-oXxep2pw</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento</creator><creator>El-Hani, Charbel N.</creator><creator>Nunes-Neto, Nei</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2308-3983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-9168</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?</title><author>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento ; El-Hani, Charbel N. ; Nunes-Neto, Nei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3695cd9f37ff9e30481bb9e09f23ee32c835028ac9074ff2e51443ce118d5b4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><topic>Secondary School Science</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hani, Charbel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes-Neto, Nei</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science & education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento</au><au>El-Hani, Charbel N.</au><au>Nunes-Neto, Nei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1258408</ericid><atitle>How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?</atitle><jtitle>Science & education</jtitle><stitle>Sci & Educ</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>547</epage><pages>513-547</pages><issn>0926-7220</issn><eissn>1573-1901</eissn><abstract>The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an integrated science, but as a collection of unrelated sub-areas, say, zoology, botany, physiology, genetics, and evolution. In this paper, we advance a proposal on how to develop non-arbitrary, clear criteria for selecting conceptual content to be taught and learnt in order to make the biology high school curriculum more integrated and less loaded with content. We argue that we should adopt the idea of structuring concepts for seizing the prominent role some ideas play in biological thinking. We discuss how a hierarchical conceptual framework of biology can help us to identify key concepts as well as connections between these concepts that can allow students understand sub-areas of biology. We also advocate for establishing a balance between the concepts from functional and evolutionary biology, on the one hand, and concepts representing (i) systemic components, (ii) processes, and (iii) descriptive elements, on the other hand. Finally we exemplify how these criteria can be applied by providing a proposal for structuring concepts of biology as a whole and the theory of evolution in particular.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9</doi><tpages>35</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2308-3983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-9168</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0926-7220 |
ispartof | Science & education, 2020-06, Vol.29 (3), p.513-547 |
issn | 0926-7220 1573-1901 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2418755042 |
source | SpringerNature Journals; Education Source |
subjects | Biological evolution Biology Botany Core curriculum Criteria Curricula Curriculum Development Education Evolution Genetics History Philosophy of Science Science Education Scientific Concepts Secondary School Science Secondary schools Zoology |
title | How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Should%20We%20Select%20Conceptual%20Content%20for%20Biology%20High%20School%20Curricula?&rft.jtitle=Science%20&%20education&rft.au=de%20Carvalho,%20%C3%8Dtalo%20Nascimento&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=547&rft.pages=513-547&rft.issn=0926-7220&rft.eissn=1573-1901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418755042%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418755042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1258408&rfr_iscdi=true |