How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?

The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Science & education 2020-06, Vol.29 (3), p.513-547
Hauptverfasser: de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento, El-Hani, Charbel N., Nunes-Neto, Nei
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 547
container_issue 3
container_start_page 513
container_title Science & education
container_volume 29
creator de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento
El-Hani, Charbel N.
Nunes-Neto, Nei
description The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an integrated science, but as a collection of unrelated sub-areas, say, zoology, botany, physiology, genetics, and evolution. In this paper, we advance a proposal on how to develop non-arbitrary, clear criteria for selecting conceptual content to be taught and learnt in order to make the biology high school curriculum more integrated and less loaded with content. We argue that we should adopt the idea of structuring concepts for seizing the prominent role some ideas play in biological thinking. We discuss how a hierarchical conceptual framework of biology can help us to identify key concepts as well as connections between these concepts that can allow students understand sub-areas of biology. We also advocate for establishing a balance between the concepts from functional and evolutionary biology, on the one hand, and concepts representing (i) systemic components, (ii) processes, and (iii) descriptive elements, on the other hand. Finally we exemplify how these criteria can be applied by providing a proposal for structuring concepts of biology as a whole and the theory of evolution in particular.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2418755042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1258408</ericid><sourcerecordid>2418755042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3695cd9f37ff9e30481bb9e09f23ee32c835028ac9074ff2e51443ce118d5b4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gCAEPK_O5KO7OYmWapWChyoew26a9IN1U5NdpP-9qSt68zQDv_feMI-Qc4QrBMivIyIqzIBBBoAoM3VABihznqECPCQDUGyU5YzBMTmJcQMAXAEbkKep_6Tzle_qBX2zdG5ra1o69o2x27Yr6_3a2qalzgd6t_a1X-7odL1c0blZeZ94F8LadHV5c0qOXFlHe_Yzh-T1fvIynmaz54fH8e0sM1xgm_GRkmahHM-dU5aDKLCqlAXlGLeWM1NwCawojYJcOMesRCG4sYjFQlai4kNy2edug__obGz1xnehSSc1E1jkUoJgScV6lQk-xmCd3ob1exl2GkHvO9N9Zzp1pr870yqZLnqTTT_9GiZPyGQhoEic9zwm1ixt-Dv9T-oXxep2pw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2418755042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento ; El-Hani, Charbel N. ; Nunes-Neto, Nei</creator><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento ; El-Hani, Charbel N. ; Nunes-Neto, Nei</creatorcontrib><description>The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an integrated science, but as a collection of unrelated sub-areas, say, zoology, botany, physiology, genetics, and evolution. In this paper, we advance a proposal on how to develop non-arbitrary, clear criteria for selecting conceptual content to be taught and learnt in order to make the biology high school curriculum more integrated and less loaded with content. We argue that we should adopt the idea of structuring concepts for seizing the prominent role some ideas play in biological thinking. We discuss how a hierarchical conceptual framework of biology can help us to identify key concepts as well as connections between these concepts that can allow students understand sub-areas of biology. We also advocate for establishing a balance between the concepts from functional and evolutionary biology, on the one hand, and concepts representing (i) systemic components, (ii) processes, and (iii) descriptive elements, on the other hand. Finally we exemplify how these criteria can be applied by providing a proposal for structuring concepts of biology as a whole and the theory of evolution in particular.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0926-7220</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1901</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Biological evolution ; Biology ; Botany ; Core curriculum ; Criteria ; Curricula ; Curriculum Development ; Education ; Evolution ; Genetics ; History ; Philosophy of Science ; Science Education ; Scientific Concepts ; Secondary School Science ; Secondary schools ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Science &amp; education, 2020-06, Vol.29 (3), p.513-547</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020</rights><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3695cd9f37ff9e30481bb9e09f23ee32c835028ac9074ff2e51443ce118d5b4b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3695cd9f37ff9e30481bb9e09f23ee32c835028ac9074ff2e51443ce118d5b4b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2308-3983 ; 0000-0002-3600-9168</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1258408$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hani, Charbel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes-Neto, Nei</creatorcontrib><title>How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?</title><title>Science &amp; education</title><addtitle>Sci &amp; Educ</addtitle><description>The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an integrated science, but as a collection of unrelated sub-areas, say, zoology, botany, physiology, genetics, and evolution. In this paper, we advance a proposal on how to develop non-arbitrary, clear criteria for selecting conceptual content to be taught and learnt in order to make the biology high school curriculum more integrated and less loaded with content. We argue that we should adopt the idea of structuring concepts for seizing the prominent role some ideas play in biological thinking. We discuss how a hierarchical conceptual framework of biology can help us to identify key concepts as well as connections between these concepts that can allow students understand sub-areas of biology. We also advocate for establishing a balance between the concepts from functional and evolutionary biology, on the one hand, and concepts representing (i) systemic components, (ii) processes, and (iii) descriptive elements, on the other hand. Finally we exemplify how these criteria can be applied by providing a proposal for structuring concepts of biology as a whole and the theory of evolution in particular.</description><subject>Biological evolution</subject><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Botany</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Genetics</subject><subject>History</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><subject>Secondary School Science</subject><subject>Secondary schools</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0926-7220</issn><issn>1573-1901</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gCAEPK_O5KO7OYmWapWChyoew26a9IN1U5NdpP-9qSt68zQDv_feMI-Qc4QrBMivIyIqzIBBBoAoM3VABihznqECPCQDUGyU5YzBMTmJcQMAXAEbkKep_6Tzle_qBX2zdG5ra1o69o2x27Yr6_3a2qalzgd6t_a1X-7odL1c0blZeZ94F8LadHV5c0qOXFlHe_Yzh-T1fvIynmaz54fH8e0sM1xgm_GRkmahHM-dU5aDKLCqlAXlGLeWM1NwCawojYJcOMesRCG4sYjFQlai4kNy2edug__obGz1xnehSSc1E1jkUoJgScV6lQk-xmCd3ob1exl2GkHvO9N9Zzp1pr870yqZLnqTTT_9GiZPyGQhoEic9zwm1ixt-Dv9T-oXxep2pw</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento</creator><creator>El-Hani, Charbel N.</creator><creator>Nunes-Neto, Nei</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2308-3983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-9168</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?</title><author>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento ; El-Hani, Charbel N. ; Nunes-Neto, Nei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-3695cd9f37ff9e30481bb9e09f23ee32c835028ac9074ff2e51443ce118d5b4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Biological evolution</topic><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Botany</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Genetics</topic><topic>History</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><topic>Secondary School Science</topic><topic>Secondary schools</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El-Hani, Charbel N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nunes-Neto, Nei</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science &amp; education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>de Carvalho, Ítalo Nascimento</au><au>El-Hani, Charbel N.</au><au>Nunes-Neto, Nei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1258408</ericid><atitle>How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?</atitle><jtitle>Science &amp; education</jtitle><stitle>Sci &amp; Educ</stitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>513</spage><epage>547</epage><pages>513-547</pages><issn>0926-7220</issn><eissn>1573-1901</eissn><abstract>The excess of curriculum content is a well-known problem in high school biology. Some strategies to adjust the amount of content to the available classroom time have been proposed, but none has been widely accepted and applied. Furthermore, biology is frequently presented in high school not as an integrated science, but as a collection of unrelated sub-areas, say, zoology, botany, physiology, genetics, and evolution. In this paper, we advance a proposal on how to develop non-arbitrary, clear criteria for selecting conceptual content to be taught and learnt in order to make the biology high school curriculum more integrated and less loaded with content. We argue that we should adopt the idea of structuring concepts for seizing the prominent role some ideas play in biological thinking. We discuss how a hierarchical conceptual framework of biology can help us to identify key concepts as well as connections between these concepts that can allow students understand sub-areas of biology. We also advocate for establishing a balance between the concepts from functional and evolutionary biology, on the one hand, and concepts representing (i) systemic components, (ii) processes, and (iii) descriptive elements, on the other hand. Finally we exemplify how these criteria can be applied by providing a proposal for structuring concepts of biology as a whole and the theory of evolution in particular.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9</doi><tpages>35</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2308-3983</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3600-9168</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0926-7220
ispartof Science & education, 2020-06, Vol.29 (3), p.513-547
issn 0926-7220
1573-1901
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2418755042
source SpringerNature Journals; Education Source
subjects Biological evolution
Biology
Botany
Core curriculum
Criteria
Curricula
Curriculum Development
Education
Evolution
Genetics
History
Philosophy of Science
Science Education
Scientific Concepts
Secondary School Science
Secondary schools
Zoology
title How Should We Select Conceptual Content for Biology High School Curricula?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T12%3A49%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Should%20We%20Select%20Conceptual%20Content%20for%20Biology%20High%20School%20Curricula?&rft.jtitle=Science%20&%20education&rft.au=de%20Carvalho,%20%C3%8Dtalo%20Nascimento&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=513&rft.epage=547&rft.pages=513-547&rft.issn=0926-7220&rft.eissn=1573-1901&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11191-020-00115-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2418755042%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2418755042&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1258408&rfr_iscdi=true