Seabirds vary responses to supplemental food under dynamic natural prey availability and feeding aggregation composition

While foraging, a predator can feed solitarily or in a group. The net energy gain of joining a group is predicted to vary with prey patch quality, species-specific prey capture behavior, and the size and species composition of the predator group. In coastal Newfoundland, Canada, capelin (Mallotus vi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Auk 2020-01, Vol.137 (1), p.1-13
Hauptverfasser: Maynard, Laurie D, Carvalho, Paloma C, Davoren, Gail K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title The Auk
container_volume 137
creator Maynard, Laurie D
Carvalho, Paloma C
Davoren, Gail K
description While foraging, a predator can feed solitarily or in a group. The net energy gain of joining a group is predicted to vary with prey patch quality, species-specific prey capture behavior, and the size and species composition of the predator group. In coastal Newfoundland, Canada, capelin (Mallotus villosus), a key forage fish, migrates inshore to spawn during the summer, resulting in a dramatic shift in prey availability. During July–August 2015–2017, we examined the numerical and behavioral responses of procellarid (Great Shearwater [Ardenna gravis], Sooty Shearwater [A. grisea], Northern Fulmar [Fulmarus glacialis]), and gull species (Herring Gull [Larus argentatus], Great Black-backed Gull [L. marinus]) to fish offal under varying capelin availability as well as flock size and composition using an at-sea experiment on the northeast Newfoundland coast. The experiment consisted of providing offal every 30 s (10-min experimental period), along with 10-min control periods before and after. We recorded the species-specific number of birds on the water, the number of birds simultaneously attempting to capture offal, and the number of successful attempts (“foraging success”). The number of birds on the water was lower during high capelin availability for all species, except for Northern Fulmar. The number of conspecifics simultaneously attempting to capture offal increased with the number of conspecifics on the water, but plateaued at different numbers (4–17) for most species. The species-specific proportion of successful attempts (i.e. foraging success) varied with flock size and composition (i.e. number of conspecifics, heterospecifics, species). Foraging success of Herring Gulls and fulmars were moderately affected by flock size and composition, suggesting that they may be dominant competitors. Findings suggest that seabirds rely more heavily on supplemental food sources, such as fisheries discards and offal, when natural prey availability declines, potentially resulting in a higher risk of by-catch during fisheries activities as forage fish stocks decline.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/auk/ukz062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2416999481</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/auk/ukz062</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2416999481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b358t-f1dedf2214911fbce9bdfc1974278e873bcebb5a8af39bcd3eaafd90ca65e1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0FABBHWJpvdNjlK8QsKHux9ySaTJe02WZPdYv31pqznnmbemYcZeBC6peSJEsFmctjOhu0vmednaEIF41mRl8U5mhBCiowTxi_RVYybFEvCxQT9fIGsbdAR72U44ACx8y5CxL3Hcei6Fnbgetli473Gg9MQsD44ubMKO9kPIa26AAcs99K26VRr-xScxgZAW9dg2TQBGtlb77Dyu85He-yv0YWRbYSb_zpF69eX9fI9W32-fSyfV1nNSt5nhmrQJs9pISg1tQJRa6OoWBT5ggNfsDSq61JyaZiolWYgpdGCKDkvgSo2RXfj2S747wFiX238EFz6WOUFnQshCk4T9ThSKvgYA5iqC3aXhFSUVEexVRJbjWITfD_CfuhOcw8jV1vvHZxC_wDDm4wo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416999481</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seabirds vary responses to supplemental food under dynamic natural prey availability and feeding aggregation composition</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Maynard, Laurie D ; Carvalho, Paloma C ; Davoren, Gail K</creator><creatorcontrib>Maynard, Laurie D ; Carvalho, Paloma C ; Davoren, Gail K</creatorcontrib><description>While foraging, a predator can feed solitarily or in a group. The net energy gain of joining a group is predicted to vary with prey patch quality, species-specific prey capture behavior, and the size and species composition of the predator group. In coastal Newfoundland, Canada, capelin (Mallotus villosus), a key forage fish, migrates inshore to spawn during the summer, resulting in a dramatic shift in prey availability. During July–August 2015–2017, we examined the numerical and behavioral responses of procellarid (Great Shearwater [Ardenna gravis], Sooty Shearwater [A. grisea], Northern Fulmar [Fulmarus glacialis]), and gull species (Herring Gull [Larus argentatus], Great Black-backed Gull [L. marinus]) to fish offal under varying capelin availability as well as flock size and composition using an at-sea experiment on the northeast Newfoundland coast. The experiment consisted of providing offal every 30 s (10-min experimental period), along with 10-min control periods before and after. We recorded the species-specific number of birds on the water, the number of birds simultaneously attempting to capture offal, and the number of successful attempts (“foraging success”). The number of birds on the water was lower during high capelin availability for all species, except for Northern Fulmar. The number of conspecifics simultaneously attempting to capture offal increased with the number of conspecifics on the water, but plateaued at different numbers (4–17) for most species. The species-specific proportion of successful attempts (i.e. foraging success) varied with flock size and composition (i.e. number of conspecifics, heterospecifics, species). Foraging success of Herring Gulls and fulmars were moderately affected by flock size and composition, suggesting that they may be dominant competitors. Findings suggest that seabirds rely more heavily on supplemental food sources, such as fisheries discards and offal, when natural prey availability declines, potentially resulting in a higher risk of by-catch during fisheries activities as forage fish stocks decline.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/auk/ukz062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: University of California Press</publisher><subject>abats et rejets de pêche ; Aggregation ; Animal behavior ; Aquatic birds ; Ardenna gravis ; Availability ; Behavioural responses ; Birds ; Bycatch ; capelan ; Capelin ; Clupeoid fisheries ; Competitors ; Composition ; Conspecifics ; Discards ; Fish ; Fish offal ; Fish silage ; Fish stocks ; Fisheries ; fisheries discards and offal ; Food ; Food sources ; Foods ; Forage ; Forage fishes ; Foraging ; foraging success ; Fulmarus glacialis ; goéland ; Group size ; groupe d'alimentation mixte ; gull ; Larus argentatus ; Mallotus villosus ; Marine fishes ; mixed-species feeding assemblage ; optimal group size ; Predators ; Prey ; procellarid ; procellariidé ; RESEARCH ARTICLE ; Seabirds ; Species composition ; Success ; succès d'alimentation ; taille de groupe optimale</subject><ispartof>The Auk, 2020-01, Vol.137 (1), p.1-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright © American Ornithological Society 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><rights>Copyright © American Ornithological Society 2019. All rights reserved. For permissions, e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2019</rights><rights>Copyright American Ornithological Society Jan 2, 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b358t-f1dedf2214911fbce9bdfc1974278e873bcebb5a8af39bcd3eaafd90ca65e1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b358t-f1dedf2214911fbce9bdfc1974278e873bcebb5a8af39bcd3eaafd90ca65e1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maynard, Laurie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Paloma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davoren, Gail K</creatorcontrib><title>Seabirds vary responses to supplemental food under dynamic natural prey availability and feeding aggregation composition</title><title>The Auk</title><description>While foraging, a predator can feed solitarily or in a group. The net energy gain of joining a group is predicted to vary with prey patch quality, species-specific prey capture behavior, and the size and species composition of the predator group. In coastal Newfoundland, Canada, capelin (Mallotus villosus), a key forage fish, migrates inshore to spawn during the summer, resulting in a dramatic shift in prey availability. During July–August 2015–2017, we examined the numerical and behavioral responses of procellarid (Great Shearwater [Ardenna gravis], Sooty Shearwater [A. grisea], Northern Fulmar [Fulmarus glacialis]), and gull species (Herring Gull [Larus argentatus], Great Black-backed Gull [L. marinus]) to fish offal under varying capelin availability as well as flock size and composition using an at-sea experiment on the northeast Newfoundland coast. The experiment consisted of providing offal every 30 s (10-min experimental period), along with 10-min control periods before and after. We recorded the species-specific number of birds on the water, the number of birds simultaneously attempting to capture offal, and the number of successful attempts (“foraging success”). The number of birds on the water was lower during high capelin availability for all species, except for Northern Fulmar. The number of conspecifics simultaneously attempting to capture offal increased with the number of conspecifics on the water, but plateaued at different numbers (4–17) for most species. The species-specific proportion of successful attempts (i.e. foraging success) varied with flock size and composition (i.e. number of conspecifics, heterospecifics, species). Foraging success of Herring Gulls and fulmars were moderately affected by flock size and composition, suggesting that they may be dominant competitors. Findings suggest that seabirds rely more heavily on supplemental food sources, such as fisheries discards and offal, when natural prey availability declines, potentially resulting in a higher risk of by-catch during fisheries activities as forage fish stocks decline.</description><subject>abats et rejets de pêche</subject><subject>Aggregation</subject><subject>Animal behavior</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Ardenna gravis</subject><subject>Availability</subject><subject>Behavioural responses</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Bycatch</subject><subject>capelan</subject><subject>Capelin</subject><subject>Clupeoid fisheries</subject><subject>Competitors</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Conspecifics</subject><subject>Discards</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Fish offal</subject><subject>Fish silage</subject><subject>Fish stocks</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>fisheries discards and offal</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food sources</subject><subject>Foods</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Forage fishes</subject><subject>Foraging</subject><subject>foraging success</subject><subject>Fulmarus glacialis</subject><subject>goéland</subject><subject>Group size</subject><subject>groupe d'alimentation mixte</subject><subject>gull</subject><subject>Larus argentatus</subject><subject>Mallotus villosus</subject><subject>Marine fishes</subject><subject>mixed-species feeding assemblage</subject><subject>optimal group size</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Prey</subject><subject>procellarid</subject><subject>procellariidé</subject><subject>RESEARCH ARTICLE</subject><subject>Seabirds</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Success</subject><subject>succès d'alimentation</subject><subject>taille de groupe optimale</subject><issn>0004-8038</issn><issn>1938-4254</issn><issn>2732-4613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsXf0FABBHWJpvdNjlK8QsKHux9ySaTJe02WZPdYv31pqznnmbemYcZeBC6peSJEsFmctjOhu0vmednaEIF41mRl8U5mhBCiowTxi_RVYybFEvCxQT9fIGsbdAR72U44ACx8y5CxL3Hcei6Fnbgetli473Gg9MQsD44ubMKO9kPIa26AAcs99K26VRr-xScxgZAW9dg2TQBGtlb77Dyu85He-yv0YWRbYSb_zpF69eX9fI9W32-fSyfV1nNSt5nhmrQJs9pISg1tQJRa6OoWBT5ggNfsDSq61JyaZiolWYgpdGCKDkvgSo2RXfj2S747wFiX238EFz6WOUFnQshCk4T9ThSKvgYA5iqC3aXhFSUVEexVRJbjWITfD_CfuhOcw8jV1vvHZxC_wDDm4wo</recordid><startdate>20200107</startdate><enddate>20200107</enddate><creator>Maynard, Laurie D</creator><creator>Carvalho, Paloma C</creator><creator>Davoren, Gail K</creator><general>University of California Press</general><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200107</creationdate><title>Seabirds vary responses to supplemental food under dynamic natural prey availability and feeding aggregation composition</title><author>Maynard, Laurie D ; Carvalho, Paloma C ; Davoren, Gail K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b358t-f1dedf2214911fbce9bdfc1974278e873bcebb5a8af39bcd3eaafd90ca65e1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>abats et rejets de pêche</topic><topic>Aggregation</topic><topic>Animal behavior</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Ardenna gravis</topic><topic>Availability</topic><topic>Behavioural responses</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Bycatch</topic><topic>capelan</topic><topic>Capelin</topic><topic>Clupeoid fisheries</topic><topic>Competitors</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Conspecifics</topic><topic>Discards</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Fish offal</topic><topic>Fish silage</topic><topic>Fish stocks</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>fisheries discards and offal</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food sources</topic><topic>Foods</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Forage fishes</topic><topic>Foraging</topic><topic>foraging success</topic><topic>Fulmarus glacialis</topic><topic>goéland</topic><topic>Group size</topic><topic>groupe d'alimentation mixte</topic><topic>gull</topic><topic>Larus argentatus</topic><topic>Mallotus villosus</topic><topic>Marine fishes</topic><topic>mixed-species feeding assemblage</topic><topic>optimal group size</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Prey</topic><topic>procellarid</topic><topic>procellariidé</topic><topic>RESEARCH ARTICLE</topic><topic>Seabirds</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Success</topic><topic>succès d'alimentation</topic><topic>taille de groupe optimale</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maynard, Laurie D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carvalho, Paloma C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davoren, Gail K</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maynard, Laurie D</au><au>Carvalho, Paloma C</au><au>Davoren, Gail K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seabirds vary responses to supplemental food under dynamic natural prey availability and feeding aggregation composition</atitle><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle><date>2020-01-07</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>137</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>1-13</pages><issn>0004-8038</issn><eissn>1938-4254</eissn><eissn>2732-4613</eissn><abstract>While foraging, a predator can feed solitarily or in a group. The net energy gain of joining a group is predicted to vary with prey patch quality, species-specific prey capture behavior, and the size and species composition of the predator group. In coastal Newfoundland, Canada, capelin (Mallotus villosus), a key forage fish, migrates inshore to spawn during the summer, resulting in a dramatic shift in prey availability. During July–August 2015–2017, we examined the numerical and behavioral responses of procellarid (Great Shearwater [Ardenna gravis], Sooty Shearwater [A. grisea], Northern Fulmar [Fulmarus glacialis]), and gull species (Herring Gull [Larus argentatus], Great Black-backed Gull [L. marinus]) to fish offal under varying capelin availability as well as flock size and composition using an at-sea experiment on the northeast Newfoundland coast. The experiment consisted of providing offal every 30 s (10-min experimental period), along with 10-min control periods before and after. We recorded the species-specific number of birds on the water, the number of birds simultaneously attempting to capture offal, and the number of successful attempts (“foraging success”). The number of birds on the water was lower during high capelin availability for all species, except for Northern Fulmar. The number of conspecifics simultaneously attempting to capture offal increased with the number of conspecifics on the water, but plateaued at different numbers (4–17) for most species. The species-specific proportion of successful attempts (i.e. foraging success) varied with flock size and composition (i.e. number of conspecifics, heterospecifics, species). Foraging success of Herring Gulls and fulmars were moderately affected by flock size and composition, suggesting that they may be dominant competitors. Findings suggest that seabirds rely more heavily on supplemental food sources, such as fisheries discards and offal, when natural prey availability declines, potentially resulting in a higher risk of by-catch during fisheries activities as forage fish stocks decline.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>University of California Press</pub><doi>10.1093/auk/ukz062</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8038
ispartof The Auk, 2020-01, Vol.137 (1), p.1-13
issn 0004-8038
1938-4254
2732-4613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2416999481
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects abats et rejets de pêche
Aggregation
Animal behavior
Aquatic birds
Ardenna gravis
Availability
Behavioural responses
Birds
Bycatch
capelan
Capelin
Clupeoid fisheries
Competitors
Composition
Conspecifics
Discards
Fish
Fish offal
Fish silage
Fish stocks
Fisheries
fisheries discards and offal
Food
Food sources
Foods
Forage
Forage fishes
Foraging
foraging success
Fulmarus glacialis
goéland
Group size
groupe d'alimentation mixte
gull
Larus argentatus
Mallotus villosus
Marine fishes
mixed-species feeding assemblage
optimal group size
Predators
Prey
procellarid
procellariidé
RESEARCH ARTICLE
Seabirds
Species composition
Success
succès d'alimentation
taille de groupe optimale
title Seabirds vary responses to supplemental food under dynamic natural prey availability and feeding aggregation composition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T02%3A21%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seabirds%20vary%20responses%20to%20supplemental%20food%20under%20dynamic%20natural%20prey%20availability%20and%20feeding%20aggregation%20composition&rft.jtitle=The%20Auk&rft.au=Maynard,%20Laurie%20D&rft.date=2020-01-07&rft.volume=137&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=1-13&rft.issn=0004-8038&rft.eissn=1938-4254&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/auk/ukz062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2416999481%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416999481&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/auk/ukz062&rfr_iscdi=true