Pro Bono Legal Work from a Comparative Perspective
The right to access to justice is one of the pillars of modern liberal democracies. On the one hand, it allows citizens to solve their conflicts by appealing to courts and to the administration. On the other, as argued in the theoretical papers gathered in Part I, it allows citizens to choose and re...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Indiana journal of global legal studies 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.131-188 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 188 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 131 |
| container_title | Indiana journal of global legal studies |
| container_volume | 27 |
| creator | Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla |
| description | The right to access to justice is one of the pillars of modern liberal democracies. On the one hand, it allows citizens to solve their conflicts by appealing to courts and to the administration. On the other, as argued in the theoretical papers gathered in Part I, it allows citizens to choose and realize their life projects and to be fully included in the political community. Modern liberal democracies have developed four institutions--public defenders' offices, court-appointed counsel, legal clinics, and pro bono work--to realize the State's and lawyers' obligations to securing the right to access to justice for all. Here, Maldonado focused on only one of these institutions: pro bono legal work. He pursues two intertwined aims: first, it describes and analyzes the conceptual architecture that supports pro bono work; second, using these theoretical tools, it describes and analyzes the pro bono discourse and practices developed in Argentina, Colombia, and Chile. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2416859993</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2416859993</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_24168599933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0NDUx1jUwNjNnAbINLAx0DcyNzDkYuIqLswwMDCwNDU04GYwCivIVnPLz8hV8UtMTcxTC84uyFdKK8nMVEhWc83MLEosSSzLLUhUCUouKC1KTQWweBta0xJziVF4ozc2g7OYa4uyhW1CUX1iaWlwSn5VfWpQHlIo3MjE0szC1tLQ0NiZOFQBnfjSd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2416859993</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pro Bono Legal Work from a Comparative Perspective</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla</creator><creatorcontrib>Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla</creatorcontrib><description>The right to access to justice is one of the pillars of modern liberal democracies. On the one hand, it allows citizens to solve their conflicts by appealing to courts and to the administration. On the other, as argued in the theoretical papers gathered in Part I, it allows citizens to choose and realize their life projects and to be fully included in the political community. Modern liberal democracies have developed four institutions--public defenders' offices, court-appointed counsel, legal clinics, and pro bono work--to realize the State's and lawyers' obligations to securing the right to access to justice for all. Here, Maldonado focused on only one of these institutions: pro bono legal work. He pursues two intertwined aims: first, it describes and analyzes the conceptual architecture that supports pro bono work; second, using these theoretical tools, it describes and analyzes the pro bono discourse and practices developed in Argentina, Colombia, and Chile.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1080-0727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1543-0367</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bloomington: Indiana University Press</publisher><subject>Access ; Attorneys ; Citizens ; Civil law ; Clinics ; Courts ; Democracy ; Justice ; Legal studies ; Obligations ; Political institutions ; Pro bono services ; Public interest ; Theory ; Traditions ; Transnationalism</subject><ispartof>Indiana journal of global legal studies, 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.131-188</ispartof><rights>Copyright Indiana University Press Winter 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,12825,27845</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla</creatorcontrib><title>Pro Bono Legal Work from a Comparative Perspective</title><title>Indiana journal of global legal studies</title><description>The right to access to justice is one of the pillars of modern liberal democracies. On the one hand, it allows citizens to solve their conflicts by appealing to courts and to the administration. On the other, as argued in the theoretical papers gathered in Part I, it allows citizens to choose and realize their life projects and to be fully included in the political community. Modern liberal democracies have developed four institutions--public defenders' offices, court-appointed counsel, legal clinics, and pro bono work--to realize the State's and lawyers' obligations to securing the right to access to justice for all. Here, Maldonado focused on only one of these institutions: pro bono legal work. He pursues two intertwined aims: first, it describes and analyzes the conceptual architecture that supports pro bono work; second, using these theoretical tools, it describes and analyzes the pro bono discourse and practices developed in Argentina, Colombia, and Chile.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Attorneys</subject><subject>Citizens</subject><subject>Civil law</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Courts</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Justice</subject><subject>Legal studies</subject><subject>Obligations</subject><subject>Political institutions</subject><subject>Pro bono services</subject><subject>Public interest</subject><subject>Theory</subject><subject>Traditions</subject><subject>Transnationalism</subject><issn>1080-0727</issn><issn>1543-0367</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0NDUx1jUwNjNnAbINLAx0DcyNzDkYuIqLswwMDCwNDU04GYwCivIVnPLz8hV8UtMTcxTC84uyFdKK8nMVEhWc83MLEosSSzLLUhUCUouKC1KTQWweBta0xJziVF4ozc2g7OYa4uyhW1CUX1iaWlwSn5VfWpQHlIo3MjE0szC1tLQ0NiZOFQBnfjSd</recordid><startdate>20200101</startdate><enddate>20200101</enddate><creator>Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla</creator><general>Indiana University Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200101</creationdate><title>Pro Bono Legal Work from a Comparative Perspective</title><author>Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_24168599933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Attorneys</topic><topic>Citizens</topic><topic>Civil law</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Courts</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Justice</topic><topic>Legal studies</topic><topic>Obligations</topic><topic>Political institutions</topic><topic>Pro bono services</topic><topic>Public interest</topic><topic>Theory</topic><topic>Traditions</topic><topic>Transnationalism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Indiana journal of global legal studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maldonado, Daniel Bonilla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pro Bono Legal Work from a Comparative Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Indiana journal of global legal studies</jtitle><date>2020-01-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>188</epage><pages>131-188</pages><issn>1080-0727</issn><eissn>1543-0367</eissn><abstract>The right to access to justice is one of the pillars of modern liberal democracies. On the one hand, it allows citizens to solve their conflicts by appealing to courts and to the administration. On the other, as argued in the theoretical papers gathered in Part I, it allows citizens to choose and realize their life projects and to be fully included in the political community. Modern liberal democracies have developed four institutions--public defenders' offices, court-appointed counsel, legal clinics, and pro bono work--to realize the State's and lawyers' obligations to securing the right to access to justice for all. Here, Maldonado focused on only one of these institutions: pro bono legal work. He pursues two intertwined aims: first, it describes and analyzes the conceptual architecture that supports pro bono work; second, using these theoretical tools, it describes and analyzes the pro bono discourse and practices developed in Argentina, Colombia, and Chile.</abstract><cop>Bloomington</cop><pub>Indiana University Press</pub></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1080-0727 |
| ispartof | Indiana journal of global legal studies, 2020-01, Vol.27 (1), p.131-188 |
| issn | 1080-0727 1543-0367 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2416859993 |
| source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy |
| subjects | Access Attorneys Citizens Civil law Clinics Courts Democracy Justice Legal studies Obligations Political institutions Pro bono services Public interest Theory Traditions Transnationalism |
| title | Pro Bono Legal Work from a Comparative Perspective |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T08%3A14%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pro%20Bono%20Legal%20Work%20from%20a%20Comparative%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Indiana%20journal%20of%20global%20legal%20studies&rft.au=Maldonado,%20Daniel%20Bonilla&rft.date=2020-01-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=188&rft.pages=131-188&rft.issn=1080-0727&rft.eissn=1543-0367&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2416859993%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2416859993&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |